Generalized Model of Lockage Delay Based on Historic Data Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Smart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tradable Priority Permits Prof. Charles R. Plott Dr. Joseph P. Cook.
Advertisements

Navigation Economic Technologies Symposium 9-10 May 2003 Generic Characteristics of Corps Waterway Models.
INP-MAY 03 Inland Navigation Planning Current Practice May 9, 2003 Paul J. Hanley Economist, CELRD-CM-P
Vessel Sequencing In The Presence Of A Queue Center For Transportation Studies University Of Missouri, St. Louis June 15, 2005.
UMR Statistical Analysis Inland Navigation Appointment System Study Upper Mississippi River Locks Center For Transportation Studies University Of.
Design of Experiments Lecture I
Hadi Goudarzi and Massoud Pedram
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
1 Ports and Harbors – Transitions and Challenges Ms. Doris J. Bautch Commissioner, U.S. Section of PIANC U.S. Maritime Administration Presented at the.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Keith Hofseth 16-May-2006.
Maintenance Capacity Planning
1 BIS APPLICATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM Advance forecasting Forecasting by identifying patterns in the past data Chapter outline: 1.Extrapolation.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
Notes on Monte Carlo Simulation University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Introduction to Computer Based Models Bus Mr. Schrage Spring.
Stochastic Demand Uncertainty in price setting – Preferences – Competing technologies – Income – Prices of other goods – Weather Sometimes don’t produce.
Björn Landfeldt School of Information Technologies Investigating a theoretical model Bjorn Landfeldt University of Sydney.
*Sponsored in part by the DARPA IT-MANET Program, NSF OCE Opportunistic Scheduling with Reliability Guarantees in Cognitive Radio Networks Rahul.
Building and Running a FTIM n 1. Define the system of interest. Identify the DVs, IRVs, DRVs, and Objective. n 2. Develop an objective function of these.
Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach
7/3/2015© 2007 Raymond P. Jefferis III1 Queuing Systems.
Fall, 2012 EMBA 512 Demand Forecasting Boise State University 1 Demand Forecasting.
Estimating Risks Associated with Travel Demand Forecasts 14 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 2013 Thomas Adler, RSG Michael Doherty,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Case 1: Optimum inspection and maintenance rates (wind turbine is available during inspection) Case 2: Optimum inspection and maintenance rates (wind turbine.
Forecasting for Operations
Civil Protection and Disaster Management:
ISQA 407 Introduction to Global Supply & Logistics Management Winter 2012 Portland State University.
Huntington District Inland Navigation Mark Hammond Planning Center of Expertise for Inland Navigation Huntington District 25 March 2009.
1 Performance Evaluation of Computer Systems and Networks Introduction, Outlines, Class Policy Instructor: A. Ghasemi Many thanks to Dr. Behzad Akbari.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Demand Planning: Forecasting and Demand Management CHAPTER TWELVE McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Colombian Firm Energy Market: Discussion and Simulation Peter Cramton (joint with Steven Stoft and Jeffrey West) 9 August 2006.
Stracener_EMIS 7305/5305_Spr08_ Supply Chain Analysis Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7305/5305 Systems Reliability,
Forecasting to account for seasonality Regularly repeating movements that can be tied to recurring events (e.g. winter) in a time series that varies around.
DAVIS AQUILANO CHASE PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook F O U R T H E D I T I O N Forecasting © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 chapter 9.
What is Modeling?. Simplifying Complex Phenomena v We live in a complex world v Most of the scientific relationships we study are very complex v Understanding.
CHAPTER 5 DEMAND FORECASTING
Forecasting February 26, Laws of Forecasting Three Laws of Forecasting –Forecasts are always wrong! –Detailed forecasts are worse than aggregate.
Time series Decomposition Farideh Dehkordi-Vakil.
Time-Series Forecasting Overview Moving Averages Exponential Smoothing Seasonality.
WOOD 492 MODELLING FOR DECISION SUPPORT Lecture 24 Simulation.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Introduction to Uncertainty Simulation of Operations.
I2 U Intelligent Supply Chain Management Course Module Seven: Inventory Planning.
Math Programming Concept of Optimization (L.O. a ) Linear Programming Managerial Value of Information (L.O. d) Theory (L.O. b) Example Applications (L.O.
1 Hidra: History Based Dynamic Resource Allocation For Server Clusters Jayanth Gummaraju 1 and Yoshio Turner 2 1 Stanford University, CA, USA 2 Hewlett-Packard.
1 Courses and Research Yinhai Wang October 7, 2009.
Modeling SNS Availability Using BlockSim Geoffrey Milanovich Spallation Neutron Source.
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Systems-based Budgeting for Inland Navigation Operations and Maintenance Kenneth Ned Mitchell,
Delays  Deterministic Assumes “error free” type case Delay only when demand (known) exceeds capacity (known)  Stochastic Delay may occur any time Random.
U of Minnesota DIWANS'061 Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Forecasting Construction Cost Index Values Using Auto Regression Modeling Charles Nickel, P.E. Cost.
Forecasting is the art and science of predicting future events.
Distribution Requirements Planning. What is DRP? DRP provides the basis for integrating supply chain inventory information and physical distribution activities.
Building Valid, Credible & Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
Modeling the Optimization of a Toll Booth Plaza By Liam Connell, Erin Hoover and Zach Schutzman Figure 1. Plot of k values and outputs from Erlang’s Formula.
Demand Forecasting Fall, 2016 EMBA 512 Demand Forecasting
American Lighting Products
Inventory Fundamentals
Fall, 2017 EMBA 512 Demand Forecasting
Delays Deterministic Stochastic Assumes “error free” type case
Transportation & Supply Chain Costs: Answers to Questions
Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach
Sampling Distribution
Sampling Distribution
OUTLINE Questions? Quiz Discuss homework New Homework Start MRP.
Delays Deterministic Stochastic Assumes “error free” type case
Chapter 8 Supplement Forecasting.
Inventory Fundamentals
Presentation transcript:

Generalized Model of Lockage Delay Based on Historic Data Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Smart Rivers, 2011 New Orleans

2Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Optimal Investment in Projects and Maintenance Random Closure Probabilities Reliability Estimates Repair Plans and Costs Construction Plans Cargo Forecasts Lock Operations Towboat/Barge Operations Lock Risk Module Optimal Investment Module Waterway Supply and Demand Module Ohio River Navigation Investment Model (ORNIM) River Network Goal: Maximize net benefits from national investments in infrastructure Estimate waterway usage under future scenarios year time horizon Lock Transit time estimates determine delay costs and influence shipment levels.

3Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Transit Curves are a foundation of analysis. 1 (Processing_rate — Arrival_rate) Average_transit = Number of Vessels Or Total Tonnage Transit Time (hours) Systems approach requires curves for ALL locks in the system. Some locks are more critical for a given analysis. M/M/1 Queue

4Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Multiple Roads to Transit Curves Historic Lockage Data Lockage Component Distributions Time Period Averages Individual Lockage Estimates Simulation Results Fitted Transit Curves Simple Simulation Results Simple Simulation Results Lock Groups

5Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Multiple Roads to Transit Curves Historic Lockage Data Lockage Component Distributions Time Period Averages Individual Lockage Estimates Simulation Results Fitted Transit Curves Simple Simulation Results Simple Simulation Results Lock Groups

6Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data

7Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data

8Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data

9Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Multiple Roads to Transit Curves Historic Lockage Data Lockage Component Distributions Time Period Averages Individual Lockage Estimates Simulation Results Fitted Transit Curves Simple Simulation Results Simple Simulation Results Lock Groups

10Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data More than 40 thousand cuts over ten years

11Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Some Locks have much less traffic

12Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Multiple Roads to Transit Curves Historic Lockage Data Lockage Component Distributions Time Period Averages Individual Lockage Estimates Simulation Results Fitted Transit Curves Simple Simulation Results Simple Simulation Results Lock Groups

13Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Individual Estimations Each transit record becomes a data item Error checking on data Rolling average of arrival and processing rates Arrival rate = average arrival rate of last 20 tows Processing Rate = average of last 20 lockages Benefits Seasonality captured Variations in processing over time allowed Fitting to 1000s of points—Trade details for large numbers

14Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Transform and generalize the model 1 (Processing_rate — Arrival_rate) Average_transit = Log(Average_transit) = C+B*Log(Processing_rate — Arrival_rate) Log(Average_transit) = -Log(Processing_rate — Arrival_rate) D_Rate Linear Fit

15Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Checking the Fit Graphically

16Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Many Fit Well

17Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data But sometimes they don’t Construction & closures Changes to lock structures Very low traffic levels

18Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Some locks may be too complex for this approach

19Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Multiple Roads to Transit Curves Historic Lockage Data Lockage Component Distributions Time Period Averages Individual Lockage Estimates Simulation Results Fitted Transit Curves Simple Simulation Results Simple Simulation Results Lock Groups Size Up/Down ratio etc.

20Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Hilliard-Lock Delay Based on Historical Data Currently experimenting with ways to use the parameters. Direct Formula Assume “consistent” arrivals Assume average processing rate Guaranteed to be a “nice” curve – Increasing delay – Accelerating – Limited capacity Assume “consistent” arrivals Assume average processing rate Guaranteed to be a “nice” curve – Increasing delay – Accelerating – Limited capacity Simple Simulation Spreadsheet based simulation Arrival rate varies to match seasonality (with or without randomness) Quick model of changes to processing times or planned closures. Spreadsheet based simulation Arrival rate varies to match seasonality (with or without randomness) Quick model of changes to processing times or planned closures.