Preventing Severe Problem Behavior: Implementing a Behavior Education Program Within a School-Wide System of Behavior Support Susan Barrett www.pbismaryland.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
SWPBS Tier 2 Meets Tennessee’s RtI2 School-Based Teams
Information on BEP-RTI By: Ms. Amy Evans. Behavior Educational Program-Response to Intervention (BEP-RTI) Agreeing on and establishing school rules Teach.
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: What paraprofessionals have asked.
Using Data to Make Precision Statements Effective Schoolwide Discipline Implementers’ Forum Cathy Shwaery July 29, 2008.
MES Secondary Interventions
Wednesday, 9:15-10:30, Salon C. Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Barbara Mitchell, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier.
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant.
Positive Behavior Supports
Quick Sort Matrix 1 Check-In Check-Out Check & ConnectSocial Skills Group Organizational Skills Newcomers Club Adult Attention XXXXX Peer Attention XX.
March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Growing the Green: Focusing on Universal Interventions Joan Ledvina Parr PBIS Team Leaders and Coaches Meeting November 13, 2008.
Year 3 Day 2. Critical Elements PBIS TEAM Staff COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH DISCIPLINE DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS PLAN ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
PBIS Year 2, Day 4 Tier 2 Supports for Selected Students.
1 S200i Formalizing the Tier2/Secondary System Intervening Early through the Behavior Education Plan – A Research Based Example.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Check In/Check Out July 17, 2008 Susan Barrett
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
The Behavior Education Program: A Check-In, Check-Out Intervention Jennifer Wright Cottonwood Elementary June 12, 2008.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
© 2005 by The Guilford Press LICENSE TO REPRODUCE DOWNLOADABLE FILES These materials are intended for use only by qualified professionals. The Publisher.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
Check-In/Check-Out Staff Introduction. CICO (Check-In/Check-Out) Designed for Students with moderate problem behaviors Most appropriate when problem behaviors.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Secondary Behavior Interventions ABRI Terrance M. Scott, Ph.D.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
Students are identified and receive support ___________________. Check-in and check-out ___________________ with an adult at school. Regular feedback and.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Dr. Dana Morris Jessica Barrett Alcott Middle School.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Learning and Challenging Behaviors Learning and behavior problems result from interaction between the child and his or her environment and those in the.
Assessing the Impact of A Targeted Group Intervention The Middle Part of the Triangle What is BEP? BEP at Indian Head ES.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Establishing a BEP at Your School. School Readiness SW PBS in place SW PBS in place Administrative support Administrative support Faculty/staff buy-in.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
HIGH SCHOOL BEHAVIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM Amy Campbell.
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
Check In/Check Out A Tier 2 targeted system for providing behavioral support to groups of students at risk MCPS “Bone” Evidence Based Practices Training,
Wyoming Department of Education
What to Do When Check-in, Check-out Doesn’t Work: Next Steps
Module 5: Overview of CICO and other Tier II Interventions
Tier 2/3 Matching Support to Function of Behavior
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Presentation transcript:

Preventing Severe Problem Behavior: Implementing a Behavior Education Program Within a School-Wide System of Behavior Support Susan Barrett

Acknowledgements  Rob Horner, Leanne Hawken, Rob March  Fern Ridge Middle School  Clear Lake Elementary  Bohemia Elementary  Kennedy Middle School  Effective Behavior Support Team- University of Oregon This project was supported by Grant No. H324B000075, a Student Initiated Project, funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. Opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position of the U.S. Department of Education and such endorsements should not be inferred.

Overview  Behavioral Support Challenges in Schools  Overview & Essential Features of Targeted Interventions  Targeted Intervention Example: Behavior Education Program (BEP)  For Whom is the BEP Appropriate?  Using FBA procedures to Enhance BEP Effectiveness  School Readiness, Resources, & Team Process  Research Examining Effectiveness of BEP

Challenges  Doing more with less  Educating increasing numbers of students who are more different than similar from each other  Educating students with severe problem behavior

Response to Problem Behavior  Focus on prevention –Implement a continuum of behavior support  Work smarter, not harder  Teach, monitor and reward before punishment

Implementing a Continuum of Behavior Support  80-85% of students will be supported by preventative school-wide procedures & classroom management plans  15-20% of students will need more support  IDEA Increased focus on Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) & Behavior Support Planning (BSP) –Implement FBA-BSP with students with disabilities at-risk for change in placement

Functional Behavioral Assessment & Behavior Support Planning  FBA-BSP Research –Dramatic reductions in problem behavior and increases in prosocial behavior (e.g., Broussard & Northup 1997; Chandler, Dahlquist, Repp & Feltz, 1999; See Lane, Umbreit, & Beebe- Frankenberger, 1999 for review)  Full FBA-BSP –Includes interviews & observations –Time intensive  consultant time per student- (Schill, Kratochwill, & Elliott, 1998) –More than is needed for some students

Behavior Support Challenges  Resources (time & money) in schools are scarce  Match level of support to level of challenge  Need an efficient and effective intermediate level intervention system that targets students at-risk but not currently engaging in severe problem behavior

The Response: Targeted Interventions  “ Targets” groups of students (>10) who:  fail to respond to school-wide and classroom expectations  are not currently engaging in dangerous or extremely disruptive behavior  Efficient - Similar set of behavioral strategies are used across a group of students needing similar levels of support  Effective – Decreasing problem behavior in classroom, increasing academic engagement, & decreasing office discipline referrals ( Crone, Horner, & Hawken, in press; Hawken & Horner, in press; March & Horner, 2002)

Things to Consider First…  Establishment of a Universal System (School-Wide) Does Not Guarantee Individual Teachers are Implementing with High Integrity  Students Who Appear “At-Risk” May Benefit More When Teacher Improves Skills in Behavior Management Then Participate in Targeted Interventions

Is It Really Resistance For Intervention? Before Implementing a Secondary Intervention, You Must Ask: Is the Student Receiving an Adequate “DOSE” of the Universal Intervention?

Components often overlooked:  Positive Parent Contact  Random Reinforcement Strategies  Positive Public Posting  Continuous Behavioral Feedback for Students  Data on Positive Reinforcement  Other Enhancements…

Tracking the Positive  Analysis of number of positive behavior tickets to discipline tickets to insure maintenance of at least 4:1 ratio  Analysis of number of positive behavior tickets by group (e.g., at- risk & high risk groups)  Analysis of number of positive behavior tickets by teacher

Keep a Positive Ratio

Example of a Targeted Intervention Behavior Education Program Education Program(BEP)

Behavior Education Program (BEP) Features:  Students identified and receive support within a week  Check-in and check-out daily with an adult at school  Regular feedback and reinforcement from teachers  Family component  Daily performance data used to evaluate progress

Student Recommended for BEP BEP Implemented Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Feedback Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-in BEP Coordinator Summarizes Data For Decision Making Weekly BEP Meeting to Assess Student Progress Exit Program Revise Program

Daily Progress Report

BEP Process (cont.)  Weekly or Bi-weekly Principal Recognition –BEP coupon with graph attached  Data shared with all staff at least quarterly  9-Week graph sent to parents

Point Sheet Name: Date: Morning Work Reading Math Afternoon Keep my hands, feet, body and objects to myself Say nice things or no things to other people Follow adult directs the first time Goal met?

= 2 points = 1 point = 0 points POINT SHEET Name:__________________ Date:______________ Points received________________ Points possible________________ Daily goal reached? YES NO GOALSMorningReadingMathAfternoon Keep my hands, feet, body, and objects to myself. Say nice things or no things to other people. Follow adult directions the first time.

Critical Features of BEP  Intervention is continuously available  Rapid access to intervention (72 hr)  Very low effort by teachers  Positive System of Support –Students agree to participate  Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school  Flexible intervention based on assessment –Functional Assessment  Adequate resources allocated (admin, team) –weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week  Continuous monitoring for decision-making

Why does the BEP work?  Improved structure  Prompts throughout the day for correct behavior  System for linking student with at least one adult  Increase in contingent feedback  Feedback occurs more often and is tied to student behavior  Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be rewarded  Elevated reward for appropriate behavior  Adult and peer attention  Linking school and home support  Organized to morph into a self-management system

Designing Daily Progress Reports  Determine behavioral expectations –School-wide expectations –Academic vs. behavioral expectations  Expectations stated positively  Range of scores vs. dichotomous scoring –Rating scales should be age appropriate  Teacher friendly –circling versus writing & place for teacher initials –consistent expectations versus individual expectations  Data easy to summarize and determine if goal is met

KENNEDY CARD Name _____________________________________________________ Material s To Class Worked and Let Others Work Follow Directions the First Time TeacherParent 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, 2 1 No 2 1 No 2 1 No Assignments: Wow, = _____ Goal = 36

BEP Check-in/Check-Out Record Date:__________________BEP Coordinator:_________________ Check-In Check-Out Student Name PaperPencilNotebook BEP parent copy BEP Score Jason√√√√90 Leanne√√85 Juan√√√√60 Kiran√√100 Alexa√√√√95 Jacey√√√90

Tracking Student BEP Progress (number = % of total daily points) DateJasonLeanneJuanKiranAlexa 1/16/ /17/ /18/ /19/ /20/ /23/ /24/

Daily Data Used for Decision Making

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding BEP Implementation  What if the student does not check-in in the morning?  What if the student is not checking-out in the afternoon?  What if a student is consistently not checking in and/or checking out?  What if the student loses his/her BEP Card?  What if the student is consistently participating in the BEP and his/her behavior gets worse?

How is BEP Different Than Other “Behavior Card” Interventions  A Targeted Intervention Implemented Within a School-Wide System of Behavior Support –Behavior Cards typically classroom interventions  Implemented in all settings, throughout the school day  All teachers and staff are trained  Students identified proactively & receive support quickly  Team uses data for decision making to determine progress

What’s in a Name?  Behavior Education Program –Daily Progress Report  Kennedy Card Program –Kennedy Card  Hello, Update, & Goodbye (HUG program) –Hug Card  Check and Connect *Caution with Using “Behavior Card” or “Behavior Plan”

Activity: Designing Daily Progress Reports (DPR) for your school  Questions to think about: –What will the behavioral expectations be  Consistent with school-wide expectations? –Consistent across students or individualized? –Expectations positively stated? –Is the DPR teacher friendly? –Age appropriate and include a range of scores? –Data easy to summarize?

For Whom is the BEP Appropriate? APPROPRIATE – Low-level problem behavior (not severe) – 3-7 referrals – Behavior occurs across multiple locations – Examples talking outtalking out minor disruptionminor disruption work completionwork completionINAPPROPRIATE – Serious or violent behaviors/ infractions – Extreme chronic behavior (8-10+ referrals) – Require more individualized support Functional Assessment Wrap Around Services

How to identify students for BEP  Summarize Office Discipline Referral data –School-Wide Information System (SWIS) –Discipline Tracker  Develop a referral process –All staff trained on process –Differentiate behavior handled in classroom vs. office & Major vs. Minor rule infractions  BEP referral by teacher, staff, or parent

How to identify students for BEP  Other Data to Consider –Absences & Tardies –In school detentions (lunch-time or after school) –Time out / “Think Time”

Would Your School Benefit From Implementing a BEP?  How many students does your school have in the range of 3-7 referrals?  If > 7 students- BEP may be appropriate  If < 7 students- implement individualized interventions  The BEP should be able to reasonably maintain 7-20 students/year

Referrals per Student

Implementing BEP with Individual Students Effective School–Wide System in Place Student not responding to school-wide Expectations Implement Basic BEP Increased structure, check-in, checkout Frequent feedback Connection with key adult

Implement Basic BEP Is Is the Basic BEP Working? Continue with Basic BEP Transition to self- management Yes No Conduct Brief Functional Assessment What is the problem behavior? Where does the problem behavior occur/not occur? Why does the problem behavior keep happening?

Using Functional Behavioral Assessment Procedures to Enhance BEP Effectiveness  Functional Behavioral Assessment –A method of looking at environmental factors that predict, support, or explain problem behavior –In essence, examining setting events, antecedents, behaviors, and consequences and using this information to determine the function problem behavior serves (e.g., escape, adult or peer attention, etc.)

Why use FBA with the BEP?  FBA data support effective and efficient behavior support planning, a major goal of BEP (Carr et al., 1999; Didden et al., 1997)  FBA produces data on how BEP can: –Prevent problem behavior –Identify and teach alternative behaviors –Reward appropriate behaviors

Building on Efficiency: “Simple FBA”  Full FBAs: –Record review, interviews, observations –Specify problem behavior and contingencies within routines for purpose of individualized intervention design  Simple FBAs: –Interviews –Specify problem behavior, routines surrounding problem behavior, and function of behavior for purpose of selecting type of BEP

Matching BEP to Student Needs  Basic BEP : goals related to cooperative, respectful behavior; reinforced through daily positive adult contact (attention- related)  BEP + Academic Support : goals, prompts, and encouragement for organizational and routine-following behaviors or increase in academic support  Escape BEP : goals related to cooperative, respectful behavior: students reinforced through chance to earn a break from aversive activity or aversive social contact

Conduct Brief Functional Assessment Is the behavior maintained by escape from social interaction? Is the behavior related to lack of academic skills? Is the behavior severe, complex, intensive? Escape Motivated BEP Reduce adult interaction Use escape as a reinforcer BEP + Academic Support Increase Academic support Intensive, Individualized Behavior Support (e.g., Full FBA-BSP

Getting the BEP Started In Your School

Is My School Ready to Implement a BEP System? (see BEP Self Assessment Questionnaire)  School-wide system of behavior support in place  Staff buy-in for implementation of the BEP  Administrative support –Time & money allocated  No major changes in school climate –e.g. teacher strikes, administrative turnover, major changes in funding  BEP implementation a top priority

How Do You Build Student and Staff “buy-in” for the BEP?  Give BEP program a high profile in your school  Promote BEP as positive support not punishment  Collaboratively involve referring teachers in BEP process  Provide regular feedback to staff, students, and families

Training Teachers on BEP System In-service on the “spirit” of program –supportive, not punitive –immediate feedback on behavior (type of statements, what the ratings mean, examples of feedback) –follow-up forum to express concerns –individual coaching –boosters needed at least yearly

Training Students on BEP System  Meet with parents and students  Modeling and Practice  Accepting Feedback  Decision-Making –Goal

Personnel: BEP Coordinator  Take care of BEP requests for assistance  Lead morning check-in/ afternoon check- out  Enter BEP data on spreadsheet – daily  Organize and maintain records  Create graphs for BEP meetings  Gather supplemental information for BEP meetings  Prioritize BEP students for team meetings

Characteristics of an effective BEP coordinator  Flexibility within job responsibility (e.g., educational assistant, counselor, behavior health aide)  Positive and enthusiastic  Someone the students enjoy and trust  Organized and dependable  Works at school every day

Personnel: BEP Team  Attend weekly or bi-weekly meetings  Contribute to decision making for BEP students  Help conduct “Orientation to BEP” meetings  Gather supplemental information  Contribute to student/staff development workshops  Contribute to feedback sessions  Complete any assigned tasks from BEP meeting

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcome Target Group Staff Involved BEP Team Character Education Safety Committee School Spirit Committee Discipline Committee DARE Committee Attendance Committee Working Smarter- Not Harder

Evaluating BEP Progress: Sample Agenda Form BEP Team Meeting Agenda Date:____________Note taker:___________ Team Members Present:___________________________ List of Priority Students: 1) Discuss Priority Students 2)Discuss New Referrals 3) Identify Students to Receive Additional Reinforcer by Principal 4)Other BEP Issues or Students

Resources: Time and Money  8-10 hours per week for BEP coordinator  BEP forms on NCR paper  School supplies for BEP participants  Reinforcements for BEP participants

Research Articles Hawken, L. S. & Horner R. H., (2003) Implementing a Targeted Group Intervention Within a School-Wide System of Behavior Support. Journal of Behavioral Education March, R. E. & Horner, R. H. (2002) Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10,