ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I 2012-2013 Spring Term ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I 2012-2013 Spring Term INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demystifying Construction Lecture 10 : Course Recap & Assessment Exercise Created by Antony Wood, School of the Built Environment, University of Nottingham.
Advertisements

FEEDBACK! WHATS FEEDBACK? Did you know that..... Feedback you receive is not just confined to coursework and formal assessments. It will not always come.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Course Syllabus Development Abdullateef Haidar. Contents Introduction Introduction Some considerations Some considerations Components of course syllabus.
Professional Perspectives: Electronic Engineering Paul Spencer Dean of School, Electronic Engineering Kal Winston* Adviser, Study Skills Centre.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Exploring teaching and learning in first year architecture; bridging the gaps. Introduction to Architectural Design I Architecture BA (Hons) 1 st Year.
CS-550 Syllabus1 CS-550: Comparative Operating Systems Instructor: Dr. Marius D. Soneru Fall 2001.
CSc 2310 Principles of Programming (Java)
Prof. Dr. Ramdan Abdel Maksoud Pharos University Faculty of Engineering Architectural Department.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Grading Service-Learning Projects Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski Community Involvement Center Weber State University.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
We accept learning as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of the impact on learning.. - DuFour,
Consistency of Assessment
Developing an engaging and interactive online field Seminar Sarah Keiser, LCSW Field Coordinator and Assistant Professor of Practice And Kate M. Chaffin,
Achitecting an Active Classroom: An Integrative Approach Rocky K. C. Chang Department of Computing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Evaluating Discipline-based Goals and Educational Outcomes in Developmental Psychology Anne L. Law Department of Psychology Rider University.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
Course Portfolio: Making Pedagogy Visible Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Queensborough Community College, CUNY Spring 2008.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
COMPONENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE WRITING PROGRAM
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
September 9, Course overview Course description Course Website Required textbooks and readings Learning objectives Course components and assessment.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
CE0825 Object-Oriented Programming 2 © Allan C. Milne Abertay University v
Wimba Voice Critical to Successful Online Speech Language Pathology Assistant Courses Amy Heck, MA CCC-SLP Program Director Kari Watson, MA CCC-SLP Adjunct.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Mgt 20600: IT Management & Applications Introduction and Overview Tuesday August 30, 2005.
A Case Study in Evaluation & Assessment for a Virtual Learning Commons Mellon Library/Faculty Fellowship for Undergraduate Research Pat Davitt Maughan.
AE 321 Design Details (2) Prof.Dr. Tarek Saad Pharos University In Alexandria Faculty Of Engineering Architecture Department.
EVAL 6000: Foundations of Evaluation Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn & Carl D. Westine September 9, 2010.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Characteristics of Effective Learning Communities PowerUp Orientation.
CSc 2310 Principles of Programming (Java) Dr. Xiaolin Hu.
CSE 436 Software Engineering Workshop Course Overview Christopher Gill CSE 436 January 2007 Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
CST 229 Introduction to Grammars Dr. Sherry Yang Room 213 (503)
CLC reading program Nguyen Thi Thu Trang. In-class activities Assignment Assessment Add your text in here Reading program Objectives Contents.
Professional growth Objectives 1)Pilot program 2)Familiarize/re-familiarize ourselves with new Standards and Indicators 3)Consider the importance of data.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Module 6 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 6 Explain how teachers use standards-based curriculum to develop courses, supported by professional development.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
MYP: Humanities The Criteria.
ARC 234 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN III Spring Term ARC 234 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN III Spring Term INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT.
ARC 354 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN V Spring Term ARC 354 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN V Spring Term INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices Cynthia Daniel
ICS202 Data Structures King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals College of Computer Science & Engineering Information & Computer Science Department.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
DP, Language A Year 1. AIMS introduce students to a range of texts from different periods, styles, and genres. develop in students the ability to engage.
Staying Relevant A examination of an effective online course. Staying Relevant Learning Team A E-Learning/AET 541 September 29, 2014 Dr. Mary Poe (Elizabeth.
College of Education and Allied Studies Office of Semester Conversion Academic Programs and Graduate Studies February 4, :00 pm – 4:00 pm Oakland/Concord.
Reflections, Discussion Threads and Peer Review for Assessment in Online Learning Kristine Rabberman, Ph.D. Carol A. Muller, Ph.D.
Technical English for Engineering, ENGG 1305
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Increasing Student Learning Through Team Labs
How did WE work? Assessing Collaborative Projects in the Online or Hybrid Classroom
COURSE DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES This course provides an introduction to the basic concepts and principles of design. Through exercises it aims to develop.
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
Introduction to Behavioral Sciences
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Technical English for Engineering, ENGG 1305
CSE 310 Human-Computer Interaction
Technical English for Engineering, ENGG 1305
CSE 310 Human-Computer Interaction
Presentation transcript:

ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I Spring Term ARC 114 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN I Spring Term INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of ARCHITECTURE Assist.Prof. Dr. Mila Nikolic

Class Schedule: Wednesday, 12:00-13:45h Practical sessions: Wednesday, 08:00-11:45h

Course Description The Architectural Design I studio lays down the foundations for architectural design. Through lectures, small scale and experimental design projects, thinking of human inhabitation, space, and tectonics, as well as the relationship between plan, section and elevation, the course introduces principles and methods used at various stages of design analysis and synthesis processes. Site conditions are introduced to the design process; and the relation between interior and exterior are considered with regard to inhabitation.

This course seeks to: -Introduce students to the foundational vocabulary, syntax and application of the language of architecture. -Establish a momentum of studio culture while developing the basic concepts and activities for making architecture. -Define aspirational standards for craft and material sensibilities. -Create the ability to form clear architectural propositions and make qualitative assessments of design work. -Cultivate the spirit of inquiry and action. Course Objectives

1.Neufert, Ernst and Peter Neufert: Architect’s Data. John Wiley & Sons, 2012 (4thed.). ISBN: , 608 pg. Other relevant references will be provided during the semester in relation to specific topics. Textbooks

Studio is the major component of the course. It requires the student to fully engage in the design problem. Readings and research intended to enhance the material of the studio and contribute additional thoughts related to concepts explored. Design journal/sketch book is required for recording field research, exploration of precedents, class material, reading notes, etc. Reviews serving as markers of the individual and the collective studio progress and direction. Should any changes in the syllabus be required during the course of the semester, in-class announcements and/or electronic postings will be made to alert all participants. Learning Strategies

Specific: - Understanding and exploration of architectural fundamentals, from the concept to its translation into architectural form. - Solving small real life design problems. - Developing design solutions inspired by context and purpose. - Enhancing design methods and abilities Generic: - Verbal, Writing, Graphic Skills - Research & Critical Thinking Skills - Communication &Collaborative Skills Learning Outcomes

Grading Studio Operation and Structure The course will be taught by one faculty and administered by two teaching assistants. Students are responsible to and should digest feedback from the entire group of faculty, teaching assistants, and studio peers. Part of developing a critical understanding of architectural discourse is mastering the ability to engage a wide range of constructive critical feedback and use it to produce a position of your own and cultivate and develop your voice - in words, lines, and model making. Faculty will lead the lectures, general discussions and large group presentations of the studio. The teaching assistants will be responsible to specific pods of students and manage routine critiques, work submissions, attendance, and detail communication.

Grading Grade structure Class participation 20% Assignment 1 20% Assignment 2 30% Exam 30% Design Journal submitted and graded as a part of assignments

Detailed schedule, assignments and content according to the semestral brief. Brief Contents