THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 4. Engaging Students in Their Learning and Assessing That Learning November 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
WHO Antenatal Course Preparing the new WHO eProfessors.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Building Student-Centered Curricula: Problem-Based Learning and Cooperative Learning.
Assessing Student Learning
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
1 How LRW Faculty can Contribute to Their Law School’s Assessment Plan David Thomson (University of Denver) Sophie Sparrow (University of New Hampshire)
Active Learning Strategies Workshop Session 26 March 2013.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Continuous Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities for In-service Training Nizar Ibrahim 27/3/2011.
European Workshop on Microelectronics Education, May 12, 2010, Kjell JeppsonPage 1 Implementing Constructive Alignment in a CDIO-oriented Master’s Program.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
The Four-phase Lesson Plan
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
ASSESSMENT Formative, Summative, and Performance-Based
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Engaging Students in Productive Challenge December 9, 2013 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204.
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
Problem-Based Learning in Professional Education Doris R. Brodeur Massachusetts Institute of Technology AAHE - April 2004.
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
The Design and Implementation of a First Course in Computer Programming for Computing Majors, Non-Majors, and Industry Professionals within a Liberal Education.
Meaningful Mathematics
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Authentic Assessment Kellie Dimmette CI Pretest on Evaluation Part I 1.C & D 2.B & C 3.T 4.Valid, reliable 5.T 6.T 7.T 8.A & B 9.C 10.B.
“Developing Faculty Capabilities to Support Integrative Learning A Session Led by: L. Dee Fink, Ph.D. International Consultant in Higher Education AAC&U.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Facilitate Group Learning
THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 3. Designing and Integrating Design-Implement Experiences November 2007.
How to Write Lesson Plan Using the Cooperative Group Instructional Model.
“Teaching”…Chapter 11 Planning For Instruction
THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: Introduction November 2007.
CCRS Implementation Team SCIENCE Quarterly Meeting #
Delwyn L. Harnisch, University of Nebraska – Lincoln Leslie Lukin, Lincoln Public Schools.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
The Learner in the Center: Connecting Blended Learning with The Framework for Teaching Stacy Bryan Supervisor of Extended Learning.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Session Two March Sharing Experiences n In your team, share your experiences trying out the strategies shared in February in your own classroom.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Presentation transcript:

THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 4. Engaging Students in Their Learning and Assessing That Learning November 2007

CDIO AS THE CONTEXT THE CDIO SYLLABUS INTEGRATED CURRICULUM INTRO TO ENGINEERING DESIGN- IMPLEMENT EXPERIENCES WORKSPACES LEARNING FACULTY COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT PRO- GRAM EVALU- ATION WHYWHAT HOW WELL SESSION FOUR

SESSION FOUR OBJECTIVES Give examples of active and experiential learning methods Describe a variety of methods to assess learning Recognize the importance of aligning curriculum, teaching, learning, and assessment

RATIONALE FOR ENGAGING LEARNERS “The teacher’s fundamental task is to get students to engage in learning activities that are likely to result in their achieving the desired outcomes. Remember that what the student does is actually more important in determining what is learned than what the teacher does.” -- Thomas J. Shuell ( Courtesy of Queen’s University Belfast)

CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT

ACTIVE AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING ACTIVE LEARNING Engages students directly in thinking and problem solving activities Emphasis on engaging students in manipulating, applying, analyzing, and evaluating ideas Examples: Pair-and-Share Group discussions Debates Concept questions EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Active learning in which students take on roles that simulate professional engineering practice Examples: Design-implement experiences Problem-based learning Simulations Case studies

CONCRETE EXPERIENCE REFLECTIVE OBSERVATION ABSTRACT GENERALIZATION ACTIVE EXPERIMENTATION Tutorials, Activities, Labs, Simulations Lectures: Concepts, Models, Laws Design-Implement Projects, Field Work Journals, Portfolios, Lab Notes USING A VARIETY OF METHODS (Adapted from Kolb, 1984)

METHODS THAT ENGAGE LEARNERS Concept Questions Pre-Class Readings & Homework Case Studies and Simulations Cooperative Learning Learning Objectives Muddiest-Part- of-the-Lecture Cards Project-Based Learning Ticking Circle the teaching and learning methods used in your course or program.

CONCEPT QUESTIONS Focus on a single concept Are not solvable by relying solely on equations Reveal common difficulties with the concepts Have several plausible answers based on typical student misunderstandings

SAMPLE CONCEPT QUESTION To maximize endurance, an airplane must fly in a manner that 1. Minimizes drag 2. Maximizes drag 3. Maximizes the lift/drag ratio 4. Maximizes power available 5. Minimizes power required

SAMPLE CONCEPT QUESTION Social negotiation promotes learning because students 1.Have opportunities to evaluate their own understandings 2.Are placed in situations with students they wouldn’t otherwise meet 3.Learn the principles of workplace negotiations 4.I have no idea

TICKING Students are asked to prepare solutions to a set of problems. All students work on the same set of problems At the recitation or class session, students tick on a list the problems they are willing and prepared to present Students are chosen at random to present the problems on the board - one student per problem The student must demonstrate an honest effort to prepare the problem, and be able to lead a classroom discussion to a satisfactory solution. Should they fail in this, their ticks are cancelled (for that session) Ticking at least 75% of the problems is required, or rewarded with bonus points, or similar Note that the reward is given for the ticks. As the purpose is purely formative, the quality of presentations does not affect the grade

COMMENTS ABOUT TICKING WHAT STUDENTS SAY: “I now realize that in every course before this, I have only solved problems to get them done, without thinking really.” “This gave me motivation to prepare for class, because I did not want to stand up and say that I couldn’t do it.” This is the first time I have seen friends, who are generally weaker students, really “get it”. WHAT INSTRUCTORS SAY: “Suddenly, students don’t want to leave! They stay and work after class, discussing alternative solutions. During all my years as a teacher I have never seen anything like this.” “This raised the level of the whole course. The lectures, as well, have become interesting to students, now that they have the basis for understanding them.” (Courtesy of KTH-Royal Institute of Technology)

KEY PRINCIPLES Generating time on task Generating appropriate learning activities Providing prompt feedback Providing feedback that the students pay attention to Helping the students internalize criteria for quality It’s about improving what the student does. (based on Gibbs, 1999)

COOPERATIVE LEARNING (JIGSAW)  Divide the class into groups of three or four. These are students’ base groups.  Within each group, count out the number of concepts to be learned.  Students move to the group with all the same number, e.g., all the 1’s together.  In this new group, students discuss the assigned concept. They decide how they will teach this concept to their base groups. They can use sketches and examples to clarify the concept.  Students return to their base group and teach their concept to the whole base group.  When all groups have learned all the concepts, check for understanding. PROCEDURE

CHECKING FOR UNDERSTANDING What are some of the ways that I can check to see if you understand the concepts you learned in the Cooperative Learning Jigsaw activity? What is the role of the instructor with cooperative learning activities?

CHECKING FOR UNDERSTANDING What are some of the ways that I can check to see if you understand the concepts you learned in the Cooperative Learning Jigsaw activity? What is the role of the instructor with cooperative learning activities?

PROJECT-BASED LEARNING Student-centered and self-directed Organized around real- world problems Focused on authentic skills Collaborative With faculty as facilitators

BEST PRACTICE CDIO Standard 8 -- Active Learning Teaching and learning based on active and experiential learning methods CDIO Standard Learning Assessment Assessment of student learning in personal and interpersonal skills, and product, process, and system building skills, as well as in disciplinary knowledge

CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT

ASSESSMENT METHODS Performance Assessment Design Project Assessment Peer and Self- Assessment Reflective Journals and Portfolios Learning Objectives Circle the assessment methods that you use in your course or program. Informal Assessment Self-Report Instruments

INFORMAL ASSESSMENT What did you learn so far today? What did you learn about? What did you learn how to do? What do you have more confidence about, or change your opinion about? Without looking at your notes, write three or four things you learned.

NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE Procedure  When everyone has finished writing at least three responses, ask the first person for one response from his/her list.  Record the response so that everyone can see it. (Do not discuss; simply record.)  Go to the next person, ask for a different response.  A person who does not have any different responses to add to the common list simply passes.  Continue around the group until all different ideas have been named (nominal) and listed.  Summarize the responses.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Design Considerations Students prepare and present a performance of a valued activity, e.g., oral presentations and technical briefings, problem-solving, teamwork It is the process itself that is assessed Procedure Use rubrics that address specific criteria relevant to the process and scales with 3 to 5 levels of mastery CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW

DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT Design Considerations A project whose focus is on the development of a tangible product The product itself, the process, and quality of reasoning are all assessed Procedure Use rubrics that address specific criteria relevant to the product, process and quality of reasoning and scales with 3 to 5 levels of mastery

SAMPLE DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT Product Assessment – Built to specification – Time Team Collaboration Written Documentation Reflective Journal (Courtesy of Chalmers University of Technology) Formula Student Project

SAMPLE DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT Product Assessment – Built to specification – Course completion – Time – Number of trials Team Collaboration Articulation of robot logic LEGO Robotics (Courtesy of Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

ACTIVITY: MUDDIEST-PART-OF-THE-LECTURE CARD What is still “clear as mud” to you? What teaching, learning, and assessment methods can you introduce or improve in your courses?