ITEP-PNPI Spin Rotation Parameters Measurements and Their Influence on Partial Wave Analyses. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets, L.I. Koroleva,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Advertisements

Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
A. Švarc Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia INT-09-3 The Jefferson Laboratory Upgrade to 12 GeV (Friday, November 13, 2009) Continuum ambiguities.
The R-matrix method and 12 C(  ) 16 O Pierre Descouvemont Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium 1.Introduction 2.The R-matrix formulation:
Excitation of the Roper Resonance in Single- and Double-Pion Production in NN collisions Roper‘s resonance Roper‘s resonance a resonance without seeing.
NSTAR 2013 Workshop Peñiscola, Valencian Community (Spain), May 27-30, 2013 I.G. Alekseev a,*, V.A. Andreev b, I.G. Bordyuzhin a, Ye.A. Filimonov b, V.V.
MESON 2014 Workshop KRAKÓW, POLAND 29 th May - 3 rd June 2014 I.G. Alekseev a,*, V.A. Andreev b, I.G. Bordyuzhin a, Ye.A. Filimonov b, V.V. Golubev b,
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
 -Polarization in the Reaction   p  K 0   "EPECUR" Experiment Proposal. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets, M.M. Kats, L.I. Koroleva, V.V.
Dima Svirida (ITEP) Asymmetry Measurements in the Elastic Pion-Proton Scattering at 1.94 and 2.07 GeV/c. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets,
PNPI polarized target for pion-nucleon scattering measurements at intermediate energies A.V Aldushchenkov, A.G. Dernyatin, A.I. Kovalev, D.V. Novinsky,
High Precision Measurements of the Pion Proton Differential Cross Section. I,G. Alekseev, I.G. Bordyuzhin, D.A. Fedin, V.P. Kanavets, L.I. Koroleva, B.V.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Experiment “EPECURE”: first results.. 1 V.V.Sumachev Contents. 1. About the missing resonance problem. 2. Phenomenology. 3. Standard PWA restrictions for.
Dima Svirida, ITEP Asymmetry Measurements in the Elastic Pion-Proton Scattering in the Resonance Energy Range. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets,
The development of the designs and concepts of the target polarization measurement A.V Aldushchenkov, A.G. Dernyatin, A.I. Kovalev, D.V. Novinsky, I. Okunev,
ESFA/DESY LC Workshop 1 Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA.
Introduction 2. 2.Limitations involved in West and Yennie approach 3. 3.West and Yennie approach and experimental data 4. 4.Approaches based on.
1 1.Introduction 2.Limitations involved in West and Yennie approach 3.West and Yennie approach and experimental data 4.Approaches based on impact parameter.
1 Consequences for Future Multichannel Analyses of Electromagnetic Scattering Data if a Hadronic Beam Facility is not Built D. Mark Manley Kent State University.
I.G. Alekseev (ITEP) 1 EPECUR Search for narrow pion-proton states in s-channel at EPECUR: experiment status. I,G. Alekseev, I.G. Bordyuzhin, P.Ye. Budkovsky,
New Multichannel Partial-Wave Analysis Including ηN and KΛ Channels D. Mark Manley Kent State University IntroductionIntroduction Physics MotivationPhysics.
Chiral Symmetry Restoration and Deconfinement in QCD at Finite Temperature M. Loewe Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Montpellier, July 2012.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Breakup reaction for polarimetry of tensor polarized deuteron beams 1 A.P. Kobushkin Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics Metrologicheskaya str.
1 PANIC’08D.N. Svirida (ITEP) EPECUR Search for Cryptoexotic Non-strange Memeber of the Pentaquark Antidecuplet in the Elastic Pion-Proton Scattering and.
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
Dynamical coupled-channels analysis of meson production reactions at Hiroyuki Kamano (Excited Baryon Analysis Center, Jefferson Lab) in collaboration.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Víctor M. Castillo-Vallejo 1,2, Virendra Gupta 1, Julián Félix 2 1 Cinvestav-IPN, Unidad Mérida 2 Instituto de Física, Universidad de Guanajuato 2 Instituto.
Zhi-Yong Zhou Southeast university Zhangjiajie 周智勇 东南大学.
 -Polarization in the Reaction   p  K 0  in the Framework of "EPECUR" Experiment Proposal. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets, M.M. Kats,
SPIN 2012, Dubna, September 17-22, 2012 I.G. Alekseev a,*, V.A. Andreev b, I.G. Bordyuzhin a, D.A. Fedin a, Ye.A. Filimonov b, V.V. Golubev b, A.B. Gridnev.
Nstars: Open Questions Nstars: Open Questions L. Tiator, Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz  Introduction  Roper and S 11  the role of the D.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS * Gennady Aryassov,
L.D. Blokhintsev a, A.N. Safronov a, and A.A. Safronov b a Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia b Moscow State.
Exclusive ΦΦ in E690 G. Gutierrez FNAL-E690 Collaboration Small-X and Diffraction Physics Conference FERMILAB, Sep 2003.
Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID D. Drechsel, S. Kamalov, L. Tiator.
The completion of single-spin asymmetry measurements at the PROZA setup V. Mochalov (IHEP, Protvino) On behalf of the PROZA-SPASCHARM collaboration.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
The importance of inelastic channels in eliminating continuum ambiguities in pion-nucleon partial wave analyses The importance of inelastic channels in.
Multichannel Partial-Wave Analysis of Scattering Hongyu Zhang Tallahassee, FL October 12, 2005.
Fourier transform from r to k: Ã(k) =  A(r) e  i k r d 3 r Inverse FT from k to r: A(k) = (2  )  3  Ã(k) e +i k r d 3 k X-rays scatter off the charge.
The preliminary result from (K° s   ) spectra in reaction p+A at 10 GeV/c Contents Preview Method ( ,  + ) spectrum (K 0 s,   ) spectra Conclusion.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Non-Linear Effects in Strong EM Field Alexander Titov Bogoliubov Lab. of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna International.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Results for Asymmetry Measurement in the Elastic Pion-proton Scattering in the Region of Differential Cross Section Minimum. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky,
Lecture 2 - Feynman Diagrams & Experimental Measurements
Extending forward scattering Regge Theory to internediate energies José R. Peláez Departamento de Física Teórica II. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
PNPI & EPECUR.. New results on narrow structure in the pion nucleon elastic scattering from the EPECUR experimentn. I,G. Alekseev, I.G. Bordyuzhin,
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3. Free Particle: Energy, In Cartesian and spherical Coordinates. Wave function: (plane waves in Cartesian system) (spherical.
The Analysis of Elastic pp Scattering in the Forward Direction for PAX Experiment Energy Range. S.B. Nurushev, M.F. Runtso, Moscow Engineering Physics.
SPIN-04 Results for the Asymmetry Measurement in the Elastic Pion-Proton Scattering at 1.78 and 2.07 GeV/c. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets,
Polarization in charmless B VV decays
Jim Marie Advisor: Richard Jones University of Connecticut
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
The experimental investigation of the missing N
Data Interpretation of Baryon Resonances
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3.
Protvino-Moscow, Russia
Today’s topics; New AN and ANN results at s = 6.9 GeV
Study of excited baryons at BESII
Comprehensive study of S = -1 hyperon resonances via the coupled-channels analysis of K- p and K- d reactions Hiroyuki Kamano (KEK) YITP Workshop on.
Partial Wave Analysis results from JETSET the Jetset experiment
DUBNA-SPIN-05 -Polarization in the Reaction pK0  "EPECUR" Experiment  Proposal. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets, M.M. Kats, L.I.
Presentation transcript:

ITEP-PNPI Spin Rotation Parameters Measurements and Their Influence on Partial Wave Analyses. I.G. Alekseev, P.E. Budkovsky, V.P. Kanavets, L.I. Koroleva, B.V. Morozov, V.M. Nesterov, V.V. Ryltsov, D.N. Svirida, A.D. Sulimov, V.V. Zhurkin. Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, , Russia. Tel: 7(095) , Fax: 7(095) , Yu.A. Beloglazov, A.I. Kovalev, S.P. Kruglov, D.V. Novinsky, V.A. Shchedrov, V.V. Sumachev, V.Yu. Trautman. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Leningrad district, , Russia. N.A. Bazhanov, E.I. Bunyatova Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow district, , Russia. Dima Svirida (ITEP)

 Light baryon resonances in the latest PDG are based mainly on PWA’s KH80 and CMB80, both performed more than two decades ago. More recent analyses by VPI/GWU group did not reveal D 13 (1700), S 31 (1900), P 33 (1920), D 33 (1940) in the resonance cluster at  s =1.9 GeV/c 2  Latest A parameter measurement by ITEP-PNPI collaboration are in strong disagreement with either one of KH80 and CMB80 or both.  The method of the transverse amplitude zero trajectories was applied to analyze the situation.  The disagreements in most cases can be attributed to DISCREET AMBIGUITIES of Barellet type.  Such ambiguities lead to COMPLETE INTERMIXING OF PARTIAL WAVES, which is extremely dangerous when analyzing resonance clusters.  Correction to KH80 and CMB80 was introduced in a certain energy region, mainly affecting the resonance cluster at  s =1.9 GeV/c 2.  Fitting procedure was applied to the partial waves after correction to obtain resonance parameters. Preface Dima Svirida (ITEP)

Results agree well with FA02 and earlier versions of GWU-VPI solutions, and are in strong contradiction to both KH80 and CMB80. Spin rotation parameter A at 1.43 GeV/c Dima Svirida (ITEP)  CM

Situation in  + p is similar to 1.43 GeV/c, while in   p the data only suggests slight continuous change to all PWAs Spin rotation parameter A at 1.62 GeV/c Dima Svirida (ITEP)  CM

In  + p the disagreement with KH80 is only essential, while in   p the strong contradiction to CMB80 and SM90 is seen. Spin rotation parameter A at 1.00 GeV/c Dima Svirida (ITEP)  CM

 Transverse amplitudes f +, f  are the most suitable for the analysis  Simple relation to the Pauli g and h amplitudes from scattering matrix:  Expression for observables:   differential crossection, P  normal polarization, A, R  spin rotation parameters.  & P  ABSOLUTE VALUES of transverse amplitudes ONLY + A (or R)  RELATIVE PHASE of transverse amplitudes  Conclusion: older PWA do not correctly reconstruct the relative phase of the transverse amplitudes Transverse Amplitudes Dima Svirida (ITEP)

 Transverse amplitudes f + (  ), f  (  ) have finite number of complex zeroes, if Pauli amplitudes are represented as a finite sum of partial waves. Positions of these zeroes as functions of beam energy form trajectories in the complex plane of the angular variable w = e i . The unit circle is the physics region (at real  the module of w is 1).  Trajectories, close to the physics region determine the behaviour of the observables in corresponding kinematic ranges Transverse Amplitude Zeroes Dima Svirida (ITEP) P BEAM w-plane  CM f + f 

 A transformation of any zero of the form w i  1/w i * changes only the relative phase of the transverse amplitude, not changing the values of differential cossection and asymmetry while affecting A and R.  In the w-plane such transformation is equivalent to mirroring of a trajectory across the unit circle  crossing points are critical for branching of PWA solutions. Barellet Conjugation Dima Svirida (ITEP) KH80 Original KH80 reflected VPI/GWU  A correction is possible to a solution, provided the trajectory position relative to the unit circle is known from spin rotation parameter data.  Important property of the Barellet conjugation: ALL PARTIAL WAVES ARE LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF EACH OTHER a, b, c  coefficients and R, S matrices, built from w j values P, P  matrices, built from Legandre polynomial coefficients

In  + p such correction leads to the perfect agreement of CMB80 and KH80 with the A data and VPI/GWU solutions in a wide energy range PWA Correction Dima Svirida (ITEP)  CM

 In order to make estimates of the influence of such correction on the resonance pole parameters in the cluster near 1.9 GeV/c 2, the partial waves were fit with using the Breight-Wigner function with constatnt or linearly varying background M  resonance mass   full width R=  EL / 2   resonance circle radius on Argand plot   pole residue phase B  background parameters  Pole parameters for all 7  -isobars in the second resonance region were determined Resonance Parameter Fit Dima Svirida (ITEP)

 Elasticity of strong resonances grow, partial waves and resonance parameters become closer to those from VPI/GWU solutions.  Similar picture with ****F 35 (1905) ****F 37 (1950) Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

Though seen in many decay modes, the resonance is not strongly pronounced in the elastic channel. The elasticity decreases after correction. ****P 31 (1910) Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

The elasticity sufficiently decreases after correction, yet doesn’t become vanishing. Strange that VPI/GWU group doesn’t see it as in their solutions the resonant behavior is well pronounced and was successfully fit by our technique. ***P 33 (1920) Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

In all VPI/GWU solutions there is no resonant behaviour, yet in both ‘classic’ analyses the correction does not kill the resonance completely, though the elasticity becomes comparable with 0. ***S 31 (1900)  ** Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

The only evidence of *D 33 (1940) comes from the elastic channel in CMB80 analysis. After correction the behaviour of this partial wave becomes completely nonresonant. *D 33 (1940)  0 ? Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

Acknowledgements  Our thanks to Professor G.Hoehler for very interesting and fruitful discussion on partial wave analysis procedures and perspectives.  We are grateful to the ITEP accelerator team and cryogenic laboratory for creating excellent conditions for our experiments on measurements of polarization parameters.  This work was partially supported by the Russian Fund for Basic Research grant and Russian State Scientific Program "Fundamental Nuclear Physics".  GREAT THANKS to the organizers of this very interesting conference ! ! ! Dima Svirida (ITEP)

****F35(1905) Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80

***D 35 (1930) Dima Svirida (ITEP) CMB80KH80