1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FINAL FOCUS: COMBINATION OF PRE ISOLATOR AND ACTIVE STABILISATION K. Artoos, C. Collette, R. Leuxe, C.Eymin, P. Fernandez, S. Janssens * The research leading.
Advertisements

Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
Vibration issues for SuperKEKB M. Masuzawa, R. Sugahara and H. Yamaoka (KEK) Vibration issues for SuperKEKB (IWAA2010)
SIMPLIFIED MODELS OF ILD AND SID DETECTORS: SIMULATIONS AND SCALED TEST ULB: Christophe Collette, David Tschilumba, Lionel SLAC: Marco.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at
Chapter 13 Vibrations and Waves.  When x is positive, F is negative ;  When at equilibrium (x=0), F = 0 ;  When x is negative, F is positive ; Hooke’s.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Push Pull Considerations
1 ATF2 project: Investigation on the honeycomb table vibrations Benoit BOLZON 33rd ATF2 meeting, 24th January 2007 Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration.
ATF2 week meeting: Impact of cooling water on the final doublets vibrations Benoît BOLZON Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization 15/10/08.
Vibration measurements on the final doublets and the Shintake Monitor Benoît BOLZON7th ATF2 project meeting, 16/12/08.
Update of the ground motion generator of A. Seryi for ATF2 thanks to ground motion measurements in the ATF2 beam line 1 Benoît BOLZONATF2 software task.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
CLIC MDI Working Group QD0 external reference structure A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, H. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
Installation of FD in September A.Jeremie, B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With the help of KEK, SLAC, KNU and CERN colleagues For.
IN2P3 Les deux infinis G. Balik, B. Caron, L. Brunetti (LAViSta Team) LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry,
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR.
M.Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG September ‘09 ILD 1 Progress on Push-Pull IR Studies Marco Oriunno, SLAC A.Herve (ETH-Zurich), K.Simran (DESY) A.Seryi, T.Marckiewicz,
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
1. Civil Engineering works for Linear Colliders* : -Brief introduction on the overall machine layout (just for CLIC at this stage) -Experimental Area.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
QD0 stabilization L. Brunetti 1, N. Allemandou 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2, C. Hernandez 2, (LAViSta.
1 ILC Push-Pull : Platform Marco Oriunno, SLAC ILD Workshop, Paris May 24, 2011.
CLIC QD0 Stabilization J. Allibe 1, L. Brunetti 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2,C.Hernandez 2 1 : LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS,
European Organization for Nuclear Research International Linear Collider INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS ЛЦВС14 Vinča Institute of Nuclear.
CLIC MDI Working Group Vibration attenuation via passive pre- isolation of the FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
Guinyun Kim (KNU, Korea) International Linear Collider Workshop 2010 Beijing, China, March 2010 Summary of Machine Detector Interface.
SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.
July 5, 2007 C. HAUVILLER CLIC stabilization Beam line and final focus.
SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.
Update of a ground motion generator to study the stabilisation usefulness of ATF2 final focus quadrupoles 1 Benoît BOLZON B. Bolzon, A. Jeremie (LAPP)
QF1 vibration status A.Jeremie A.Jeremie, N.Geffroy, drawings by Araki-san.
CARE / ELAN / EUROTeV Feedback Loop on a large scale quadrupole prototype Laurent Brunetti* Jacques Lottin**
(Some) MDI Engineering Aspects A. Hervé / ETH-Zürich Together with ILC and CLIC MDI Groups IWLC2010 – 22 Oct
SLAC SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance Glen White SLAC March 27 th 2007.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
Vibrations studies for the nominal optics and the ultra-low beta optics Benoît BOLZON 1 B. Bolzon, A. Jeremie (LAPP) P. Bambade, Y. Renier (LAL) A. Seryi.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
1 KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Vibration analysis of the ILD QD0-support system Oct, 2 nd '09 KEK H. Yamaoka - Results of Vibration analysis - Coherency measurement.
(Some) MDI Engineering Aspects at ILC & CLIC A. Hervé / ETH-Zürich Together with ILC and CLIC MDI Groups CLIC Meeting-14 January 2011.
ATF2: final doublet support Andrea JEREMIE B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With constant interaction with colleagues from KEK, SLAC.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Keeping Nanometer Beams Colliding Vibration Stabilization of the Final Doublet Tom Himel SLAC NLC MAC review October.
Accelerator WG 5 summary Interaction region, ATF2 and MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Lau Gatignon, Andrei Seryi, Rogelio Tomas IWLC
QD0 Stabilisation L. Brunetti 1, J. Allibe 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2, A. Badel 2, R. Le Breton.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC, December 2011
Vibration issues at Linear Colliders:
Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization
ATF2: final doublet support
Development of models: FEM and Analytical
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Crab Cavity support system update
SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance
The Superattenuator upgrades and the SAFE Project
ILC Baseline BDS Collimation Depth Calculations
MACHINE DETECTOR INTERFACE WORKING GROUP STATUS
Guinyun Kim (KNU, Korea) International Linear Collider Workshop 2010
A.Jeremie, B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy
SiD IR Layout M. Breidenbach, P. Burrows, T. Markiewicz
CLIC Detector CERN Status + plans
A 12-min Introduction to The ILC Machine Detector Interface and SiD
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

2 Push pull Issues Support of the detector and QD0 – SiD favors a minimal L*. This means that the QD0’s are supported by the doors, and the beam-line breaks between QD0 and QF1 for push-pull. – There is ~1.5 m radial difference between SiD and ILD (different technology choices in the tracking region) – Beam height is 9 m from the floor, which increases to ~13 m with the adoption of a platform (platform thickness + motion system) by one or both detectors. – Studies are needed to understand the vibration performance and the cost implications of the push-pull approaches. M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

ILD SiD ILD and SiD differences Weight= 15 ktonnes Weight= 10 ktonnes ILD SiD 3 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Option 1, ILD and SiD moving on the floor Option 2, ILD on a platform, SiD moving on the floor Option 3, ILD and SiD on platforms 4 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

QD0 stability Requirements Most acute luminosity loss mechanism due to relative jitter of final focusing magnet elements : Ground Motion and Mechanical vibration sources ILC has Active Fast Feedback based on beam trajectory after collision Max. Integrated displacement:100÷200 nm > 5 Hz Lumi loss due to beam offset in SD0 (beamsize growth) and IP misalignment of beams G.White 98% G.White 96% 17 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Vibrations : Absolute, Relative and Coherent and motion Relative displacement spectrum Coherence : If P1=P2, then : Jo = 0 th Bessel function L= distance between points v = speed of sound in rock, ~3 km/s P1 P2 Ground Motion Model (A.Sery) 6 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

QF1 2 x L * FD M K C CfCf Kf Independent Supports (Cavern,Pillars Platform) Low Coherence 7 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

QF1 2 x L * FD M K C CfCf Kf Door Barrel Common Supports (Detector under mag.field) High Coherence 8 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

5 QD0 supported from the doors QD0 1.SLD Experience 2.QD0 push-pull with the detector 3.Low L* ~ 3.5 m M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

9 Random vibrations study X = Ground Motion PSD Frequency Response Function 2 Analytically FEA The Model requires the Ground Motion Spectrum P(f) and the Frequency Response Function H(f) of the structure M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Ground vibrations measurements are available for all the major accelerators sites Main features : Separation at ~few Hz between geology and human induced noise (pretty much the separation between the slow and fast luminosity feedback) Some site are more noisier than other because of Human activity Motion falls as 1/f 4 Ground motions Human activities Geology 1/f 4 Power Spectrum Density Integrated r.m.s. displacement 10 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct nm 50 nm 1 Hz

QD0 K foot K platform Mass of the door QD0 Floor Elasticity, not included SiD Vibration Model : 1 degree of freedom M,K,C oscillator 11 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

1 st Mode, 2.38 Hz 2 nd Mode, 5.15 Hz 3 rd Mode, 5.45 Hz 4 th Mode, 6.53 Hz 5 th Mode, Hz 6 th Mode, 13.7 Hz Vertical motion SiD Free Vibration Mode 12 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

fo = 5 Hz fo = 10 Hz PSD Integrated r.s.m. displacement Random vibration Studies : SiD O.K. on the floor, no platform 30 nm 20 nm 18 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Platform Studies m Iron re-bars (equivalent th. 35 mm) Concrete, 2130 mm Simplified ANSYS Model : SHELL91Layered Plate element CMS Platform during costruction 13 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Benchmark the FEA code: The CMS platform 1.The radiation cover shield of the PX56 shaft at the LHC Point 5 is has very close dimensions to the push-pull platform. 2.It is an ideal benchmark 14 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010 Platform Closed Platform half open

New Vibrations Measurements done at CERN last week, Analysis of the data in progress (CERN-EN Department) Absolute PSD spectra on various locations on the top of the platform, P1…P7, with the reference points PREF1, PREF2 Relative PSD spectra, P12, …. P17 (Coherence) (can be calculated from the previous measurements) Transfer functions on various locations on the top of the platform P with respect to the reference points Transfer Functions P1…P7 with reference to the ground vibration Reference geophones Platform geophones 15 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Alternative benchmarks available at SLAC EX-6 Shielding Block Mode 1 Mode 3 16 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010

Summary 1.Different dimensions between ILD and SiD have to be accommodated for a common push-pull solution 2.A platform with sub-trenches in the floor will increase these differences 2.Because of 1 & 2, there is concern about the ground vibration effects on SiD 3.Preliminary studies of the QD0s supported from the door, with SiD moving directly on the floor, shows results compatible with the vibration budget given in the requirements 4.The design of a platform which may mitigate the ground motions effects is under study 5.A FEA model of the platform is in progress and a benchmark is required to validate the model 3.Experimental vibration analysis are in progress at CERN on the CMS platform 19 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010