On behalf of NNbar Collaboration Yuri Kamyshkov University of Tennessee May 5, 2006 SUNY Stony Brook Search for neutron  antineutron transitions at DUSEL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Black Holes and Particle Species Gia Dvali CERN Theory Division and New York University.
Advertisements

Flavor Violation in SUSY SEESAW models 8th International Workshop on Tau-Lepton Physics Tau04 Junji Hisano (ICRR, U of Tokyo)
Properties and Decays of Heavy Flavor S-Wave Hadrons Rohit Dhir Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul Dated:11 th June, 2012.
The Standard Model and Beyond [Secs 17.1 Dunlap].
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Neutron-Antineutron Oscillation Search with Cold Neutrons ILL beam experiment Improved experiment with horizontal beam: (1)Reactor source, (2) pulsed source.
On behalf of NNbarX Collaboration Yuri Kamyshkov/ University of Tennessee 1 PAC Meeting  Fermilab  October 15, 2012.
Particle Physics and Cosmology
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Do Neutrons Oscillate ? Do Neutrons Oscillate ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland Beijing Colloqium, June, 2007.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Perspectives on Grand Unification in View of Neutrino Mass R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland.
Baryogenesis Confronts Experiments, Chicago, Nov. 7-9, 2007 R. Mohapatra University of Maryland K.S. Babu, R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2007)
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Unified TeV Scale Picture of Dark Matter and Baryogenesis R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland Neutrino Telescope 2007, Venice.
Hunting for New Particles & Forces. Example: Two particles produced Animations: QPJava-22.html u u d u d u.
The Ideas of Unified Theories of Physics Tareq Ahmed Mokhiemer PHYS441 Student.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation, Proton and Rare Lepton Decays PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation,
NNbar program: 3:30-5:30 R. N. Mohapatra: 3:30-4:00 (25+5) What physics from NNbar ? K. S. Babu: 4:00-4:25 (20+5) Origin of matter and NNbar R. Shrock:
R. Mohapatra K.S. Babu, R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (2007) K.S. Babu, Bhupal Dev, R. N. Mohapatra, in preparation. A New way to.
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
DUSEL Theory Workshop Ohio State University April 4-6, 2008 K.S. Babu Oklahoma State University K.S. Babu, R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2007)
Yuri Kamyshkov/ University of Tennessee DUSEL Theory Workshop, OSU April 4, 2008.
The Big Bang, the LHC and the Higgs Boson Dr Cormac O’ Raifeartaigh (WIT)
Electric Dipole Moment Goals and “New Physics” William J. Marciano 12/7/09 d p with e-cm sensitivity! Why is it important?
My Chapter 30 Lecture.
Yuri Kamyshkov/ University of Tennessee Mini-Workshop, WU St. Louis, February 11, 2011.
School of Arts & Sciences Dean’s Coffee Presentation SUNY Institute of Technology, February 4, 2005 High Energy Physics: An Overview of Objectives, Challenges.
Standard Model A Brief Description by Shahnoor Habib.
Particle Physics: Status and Perspectives Part 4: The Standard Model
Search for Randall-Sundrum Gravitons with 1 fb -1 of Data Amitabha Das.
Fisica Generale - Alan Giambattista, Betty McCarty Richardson Copyright © 2008 – The McGraw-Hill Companies s.r.l. 1 Chapter 30: Particle Physics Fundamental.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation R. N. Mohapatra University of.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
INVASIONS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS Compton Lectures Autumn 2001 Lecture 8 Dec
Introduction to Particle Physics How to compute the Universe?
Yuri Kamyshkov/ University of Tennessee Mini-Workshop, WU St. Louis, February 11, 2011.
TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.
Proton decay studies in Liquid Argon TPC Dorota Stefan Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos and Dark Matter January 2006, Cracow, Poland.
4-th SNOLAB Workshop, August 15-17, 2005 at Sudbury Yuri Kamyshkov Univ. of Tennessee TRIGA reactor.
Anthropology Series In the Beginning How did the Universe begin? Don’t know!
March 2005 Theme Group 2 What can N-N-bar Oscillation teach us about physics Beyond the standard model ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland NANO workshop,
Ohio State DUSEL Theory Workshop Stuart Raby Underground Detectors Investigating Grand Unification Brookhaven National Lab October 16, 2008.
Neutron-Antineutron Oscillations With Cold Neutron Beams
Yuri Kamyshkov University of Tennessee SLAC Experimental Seminar, Tuesday, May 17, 2005 Searches for Baryon Number Violation.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
1 Enhancement of in supersymmetric unified models Yukihiro Mimura (National Taiwan University) Talk at SUSY2015, Lake Tahoe.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Searching for New Matter with the D0 Experiment Todd Adams Department of Physics Florida State University September 19, 2004.
1 Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) “Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21 st Century”
Duality in Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism Michele Frigerio Service de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay Rencontres de Physique des Particules March.
Low scale gravity black holes at LHC Enikő Regős ( CERN )
Observable Neutron-antineutron oscillations K.S. Babu Oklahoma State University NANO Mini-Workshop Washington University, St. Louis February 11, 2011.
SYNTHESIS The Standard Model 1.Elementary particles 2.Strong nuclear force 3.Weak nuclear force 4.The Standard Model.
Standard Model - Standard Model prediction (postulated that neutrinos are massless, consistent with observation that individual lepton flavors seemed to.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
International Workshop “Search for Baryon and Lepton Number Violations”, LBLN Berkeley, September Yuri Kamyshkov / University of Tennessee.
1 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Owen Long U. C. Riverside March 1, 2014.
03/31/2006S. M. Lietti - UED Search at SPRACE 1 Universal Extra Dimensions Search at SPRACE S. M. Lietti DOSAR Workshop at U.T. Arlington.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
“Other” UCN Physics Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg TRIUMF Townhall Meeting Ultracold Neutron Working Group Aug Topics: 1. n-nbar oscillations.
1 Lecture-06 Baryogenesis Ping He ITP.CAS.CN
Neutrinos and the Evolution
Matter vs. Antimatter The Question of Symmetry
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Baryogenesis at Electroweak scale
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis
Neutrino Physics with SHiP
Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY
Presentation transcript:

on behalf of NNbar Collaboration Yuri Kamyshkov University of Tennessee May 5, 2006 SUNY Stony Brook Search for neutron  antineutron transitions at DUSEL N-Nbar proto-collaboration

Motivation  The origin of matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe (BAU) remains an unresolved problem  1967 A. Sakharov: 3 BAU conditions, including baryon number violation. The mechanism of B violation was undefined  1976 ’t Hooft: B and L are violated in SM; 1985 Kuzmin, Rubakov, Shaposhnikov: large effect in Early Universe (sphalerons) at the temperature scale >EW erasing (B+L). Need (B  L) violation above EW scale to explain BAU!  Leptogenesis: very high-temperature ~ GeV heavy-Majorana transition with  L=2 and  (B  L)  0, then converted to baryon asymmetry by sphalerons at EW energy scale. Beautiful idea but untestable directly  Proton decay modes conserving (B  L)  Proton decay modes conserving (B  L) e.g. p  e + +  0 can not generate BAU  PDK at GUT scale is not the mechanism of baryogenesis  Neutron  antineutron transition with  B=2 and  (B  L)  0 is possible testable mechanism of BAU

|  B|=2 ; |  (B  L)|=2 There are no laws of nature that would forbid the N  Nbartransitions There are no laws of nature that would forbid the N  Nbar transitions except the conservation of "baryon charge (number)": except the conservation of "baryon charge (number)": M. Gell-Mann and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 1387 M. Gell-Mann and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 1387 L. Okun, Weak Interaction of Elementary Particles, Moscow, 1963 L. Okun, Weak Interaction of Elementary Particles, Moscow, 1963 N  Nbar was first suggested as a possible mechanism for explanation N  Nbar was first suggested as a possible mechanism for explanation of Baryon Asymmetry of Universe by V. Kuzmin, 1970 of Baryon Asymmetry of Universe by V. Kuzmin, 1970 N  Nbar works within GUT + SUSY. First considered and developed within the framework of L-R symmetric Unification models N  Nbar works within GUT + SUSY. First considered and developed within the framework of L-R symmetric Unification models by R. Mohapatra and R. Marshak, 1979 … by R. Mohapatra and R. Marshak, 1979 … Several recent theory papers beyond SM related to N  Nbar Several recent theory papers beyond SM related to N  Nbar: K. Babu and R. Mohapatra, PLB 518 (2001) 269 S. Nussinov and R. Shrock, PRL 88 (2002) G. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, PLB 460 (1999) 47 H.Davoudiasl, et.al, PRL 93 (2004) B. Dutta, Y. Mimura, R. Mohapatra, PRL 96 (2006)

LHC nn Low QG models New n-nbar experiment Supersymmetric Seesaw for B  L, L  R Dvali & Gabadadze (1999) Mohapatra & Marshak (1980) Dutta-Mimura-Mohapatra (2005) Non-SUSY models Left-Right symmetric GUT SUSY GUT PDK Plank scale ILL/Grenoble experiment limit (1994)

Bound n: J. Chung et al., (Soudan II) Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) > 7.2  years  PDG 2004: Limits for both free reactor neutrons and neutrons bound inside nucleus Free n: M. Baldo-Ceolin et al.,  (ILL/Grenoble) Z. Phys C63 (1994) 409 with P = (t/  free ) 2 R is “nuclear suppression factor” Uncertainty of R from nuclear models is ~ factor of 2 models is ~ factor of 2 Search with free neutrons is square more efficient than with bound neutrons !

At ILL/Grenoble reactor in by Heidelberg-ILL-Padova-Pavia Collaboration M.Baldo-Ceolin M. et al., Z. Phys., C63 (1994) 409 Previous n-nbar search experiment with free neutrons

Detector of Heidelberg -ILL-Padova-Pavia 1991   No background! No candidates observed. Measured limit for a year of running: = 1 unit of sensitivity

How one can improve on such state-of-the-art experiment and achieve 3-4 orders of magnitude higher sensitivity? Two major improvements: 1.Focusing of neutrons: use of larger solid angle 2.Vertical layout: compensating Earth gravity (even with weaker neutron source) (even with weaker neutron source)

N-Nbar search experiment idea with vertical layout at DUSEL  Dedicated small-power research reactor with cold neutron moderator  V n  1000 m/s  Vertical shaft  1000 m deep with diameter  5 m  Large vacuum tube 10  5 Pa, focusing reflector; Earth magnetic field compensation system ~ nT  Detector (similar to ILL N-Nbar detector) at the bottom of the shaft (no new technologies)  No background: one event  discovery! Not to scale The possibility of a large increase in sensitivity of the experimental search for n  anti-n transition is a central motivation of our LOI 10  5 Pa

TRIGA Reactor picture courtesy of General Atomics Neutron source needed: small power 3.4 MW TRIGA reactor

Annular core TRIGA reactor (GA) for N-Nbar search experiment Economic solution for n-nbar: annular core TRIGA reactor 3.4 MW with convective cooling, vertical channel, and large cold LD 2 moderator (T n ~ 35K). Unperturbed thermal flux in the vertical channel ~ 2  n/cm 2 /s Courtesy of W. Whittemore (General Atomics) ~ 1 ft GA built ~ 70 TRIGA reactors 0.01  14 MW (th) 19 TRIGA reactors are presently operating in US (last commissioned in 1992) 25 TRIGA reactors operating abroad (last commissioned in 2005) some have annular core and vertical channel most steady, some can be pulsed up to 22 GW safe ~ 20% EU uranium-zirconium hydride fuel Cold neutrons

New ANL development enhancing n-nbar search sensitivity Very Cold Neutron Source with T n ~ 2.2K (IPNS/ANL R&D project by J.M. Carpenter et al., 2005) J.M. Carpenter et al., K Maxwellian

Soudan-II limit  ILL/Grenoble limit = 1 unit of sensitivity

TRIGA Cold Vertical Beam, 3 years Cold Beam TRIGA Very Cold Vertical Beam, 3 years

Possible impact of NNbar search at DUSEL If discovered: n  nbar will establish a new force of nature and a new phenomenon leading to the physics at the energy scale of > 10 5 GeV will provide an essential contribution to the understanding of BAU might be the first detected manifestation of extra dimensions and low QG scale new symmetry principles can be experimentally established:  (B  L)  0 If NOT discovered: within the reach of improved experimental sensitivity will set a new limit on the stability of matter exceeding sensitivity of X-large nucleon decay experiments wide class of SUSY-based models will be removed (K. Babu and R. Mohapatra, 2001) further experiments with free neutrons will allow high-sensitivity testing (L. Okun et al, 1984) (S. Lamoreaux et al, 1991)

Possible N-Nbar location at DUSEL/Henderson L~ 670m Ø ~ 10’ ? > 2026

Possible N-Nbar location at DUSEL/Henderson dia 6’  dia 20’ L ~ 580 m Avail.  2014

 Vertical shaft > 0.5 km deep, with dia  5 m to be instrumented  Construction access from the top and the bottom of the shaft  Location far from main underground labs  Reactor s are background for geo-neutrino studies...  Ownership of the reactor ?  Heat removal from 3.5 MW TRIGA reactor  Cryogen equipment for cold moderator  Many other things (to be discussed later) What is required for NNbar experiment at DUSEL?

Timeline of NNbar project development at Henderson/DUSEL  2007 Letter of Interest to DUSEL. Site non-specific/specific R&D  2008 Development of experiment proposal for NSF/DOE  2009 Proposal approval with funding agencies. CD0  2010 decision on vertical shaft enlargement  ~ 2 years of construction  ~ 3 years of running  TDR, reactor license, more R&D, reviews …

In the Supersymmetric Seesaw model describing the neutrino masses, leading N-Nbar operator was shown to have very weak power dependence on the seesaw scale i.e. 1/M 2 seesaw rather than 1/M 5 seesaw as in naive dimensional arguments. That makes N-Nbar observable within the reach of present experimental techniques. That also opens up the window for leptogenesis.

Proton decay is strongly suppressed in this model, but n-nbar should occur since n R has no gauge charges

For wide class of L-R and super-symmetric models predicted n-nbar upper limit is within a reach of new n-nbar search experiments! If not seen, n-nbar should restrict a wide class of SUSY models.

Quarks and leptons belong to different branes separated by an extra- dimension; proton decay is strongly suppressed, n-nbar is NOT since quarks and anti-quarks belong to the same brane.

Effective D = 7 operators can generate n-nbar transitions in such model.