LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Charles W. Anderson, Lindsey Mohan, Hui Jin, Jing Chen, Phil Piety, Hsin-Yuan Chen Karen Draney, Jinnie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Big Idea 18: Matter and Energy Transformations
Advertisements

Charles W. (Andy) Anderson June 16, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Lindsey Mohan and Andy Anderson (Michigan State University)
A Cross-cultural Study: Comparing Learning Progression for Carbon-Transforming Processes of American and Chinese Students 2010 NARST Presentation Written.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy Presentation at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA. Written.
Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley) Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University) Philip Piety (University of Michigan) Jinnie Choi (University.
Learning Progressions: A Discussion Ravit Golan Duncan Rutgers University Ravit Golan Duncan Rutgers University.
CONNECTIONS, CYCLES, FLOWS AND FEEDBACK LOOPS Environmental Systems.
Learning Progressions Immersion Activity Power point presented to teachers during professional development to help teachers learn about learning progressions.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Using empirical feedback to develop a learning progression in science Karen Draney University of California, Berkeley.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Questions for Interview Data 1.Which transcripts go together? Try to put together the 4 sets of 4 transcripts each that came from the same students. 2.What.
Understanding of Carbon Cycling: An Interview Study in the US and China 2009 NARST Presentation Written by : Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson (Michigan.
A comparison study on American and Chinese secondary students’ learning progression for carbon cycling in socio- ecological systems 2009 AERA Presentation.
Center for Curriculum Materials in Science AAAS, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan Presented at the Knowledge.
Energy Performances in the K-12 Curriculum Andy Anderson, Hui Jin MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
CONNECTIONS, CYCLES, FLOWS AND FEEDBACK LOOPS Environmental Systems.
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 31, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science.
How systems depend on CARBON and CHEMICAL ENERGY.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
Analyzing students’ learning performances in terms of practices for developing accounts Hui Jin, Jiwon Kim and Charles W. Anderson.
Energy Flow Through Ecosystems Food contains nutrients and energy needed for survival. Matter and Energy 3 3 When one organism is food for another organism,
This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning Progression for the Role of Carbon.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Charles W. Anderson, Beth Covitt, Kristin Gunckel, Lindsey Mohan, In-Young Cho, Hui Jin, Christopher.
Unit 2 Lesson 3 Energy and Matter in Ecosystems
Investigating Burning Ethanol. Steps in Investigation 1.Initial prediction and explanation 2.Observations: Measurements of changes in mass and CO 2 3.Learning.
The Effects of Teaching Materials and Teachers’ Approaches on Student Learning about Carbon- transforming Processes Li Zhan, Dante Cisterna, Jennifer Doherty,
Connections between students’ explanations and interpretations of arguments from evidence Allison L. Freed 1, Jenny M. Dauer 1,2, Jennifer H. Doherty 1,
Diagnostic Testing of Science Concepts K ESA/SER Joint Meeting Brook J. Wilke, Christopher D. Wilson & Charles W. (Andy) Anderson.
Charles W. (Andy) Anderson September 18, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
MSU Environmental Literacy Project Kristin L. Gunckel & Blakely K. Tsurusaki MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT UNDERSTANDING OF WATER IN THE ENVIRONMENT Beth Covitt & Kristin Gunckel Geological Society of America, North-Central.
Center for Curriculum Materials in Science AAAS, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan Organizers Andy Anderson, Michigan.
Plants Unit Activity 4.5b: Explaining How Plants Grow: Biosynthesis Environmental Literacy Project Michigan State University.
Activity 2.1 Zooming Into Plants, Animals, and Decomposers
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Animals Unit Activity 6.2a: Comparing Animals and Flames
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
MODERNIZING ECOLOGY CONTENT IN THE REQUIRED K-12 SCIENCE CURRICULUM:
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Activity 2.1 Zooming Into Plants, Animals, and Decomposers
Animals Unit Activity 6.2b: Functions of All Animals
Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
American and Chinese Secondary Students’ Written Accounts of Carbon Cycling in Socio-ecological Systems Jing Chen1, Charles, W. Anderson1, & Xinghua Jin2.
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
General Level Structure
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Plants Unit Activity 6.2a: Comparing Plants and Animals
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression
Systems and Scale Unit Activity 5.4: Other Examples of Combustion
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Long Term Ecological Research Math Science Partnership
Systems and Scale Unit Activity 3.5: Explaining Soda Water Fizzing
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Ecosystems Unit Activity 3.6: Explaining Patterns in Ecosystems
Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy
Driving question: How do cows move?
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
2009 AERA Annual Meeting, San Diego
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Activity 2.1 Zooming Into Plants, Animals, and Decomposers
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Presentation transcript:

LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Charles W. Anderson, Lindsey Mohan, Hui Jin, Jing Chen, Phil Piety, Hsin-Yuan Chen Karen Draney, Jinnie Choi, Yongsang Lee, Chris Wilson, Mark Wilson MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE LITERACY RESEARCH GROUP  Michigan State University  Working Groups: Carbon, Water, Biodiversity  Partners  Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network  Alan Berkowitz, Baltimore Ecosystem Study  Ali Whitmer, Santa Barbara Coastal  John Moore, Shortgrass Steppe  University of California, Berkeley  University of Michigan  Northwestern University  AAAS Project 2061 Environmental Literacy Research Group

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW  Environmental Science Literacy in K-12 Ed (Andy)  Learning Progressions  Upper Anchor Framework (scientific reasoning)  Tracing Matter: Examples of student responses and analyses (Lindsey, Chris)  Levels of the tracing matter progress variable and discussion of data (Hui)  What’s Next?  Comments & Questions Environmental Literacy Research Group

THE NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE LITERACY  Humans are fundamentally altering natural systems that sustain life on Earth  Citizens need to understand science to make informed decisions that maintain Earth’s life supporting systems  Citizens act in multiple roles that affect environmental systems: as learners, consumers, voters, workers, volunteers, and advocates Environmental Literacy Research Group

RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE LITERACY Environmental science literacy is the capacity to understand and participate in evidence- based decision-making about the effects of human actions in coupled human and natural environmental systems [LTER: socioecological systems]. (Anderson, et al., 2006) Environmental Literacy Research Group

LEARNING PROGRESSIONS Learning progressions describe knowledge and practices about topics that are responsive to children’s ways of reasoning, and reflect gradually more sophisticated ways of thinking. (Smith & Anderson, 2006) Environmental Literacy Research Group

Upper Anchor What high school students should know and be able to do Lower Anchor How children think and make sense of the world LEARNING PROGRESSIONS Environmental Literacy Research Group Transitions

PRACTICES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE LITERACY (HANDOUT TABLE 1) Engage in scientific inquiry to develop and evaluate scientific arguments from evidence Use scientific accounts of the material world as tools to predict and explain Use scientific reasoning in citizenship practices of environmental decision-making Environmental Literacy Research Group

Upper Anchor: Producing and Using Accounts

UPPER ANCHOR ACCOUNTS STRANDS, SYSTEMS, AND PROCESSES  Carbon: Environmental systems create, transform, move, and destroy organic carbon  Living systems at multiple scales  Engineered systems at multiple scales  Water: Environmental systems create and move fresh water  Atmospheric water, surface water, ground water, water in living systems, engineered water systems  Biodiversity: Environmental systems maintain complex structure and function at multiple scales  Homeostasis: maintaining structure and function  Response to environment  Change through natural and human selection Environmental Literacy Research Group

UPPER ANCHOR ACCOUNTS FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES  Structure of Systems  Atomic/molecular scale  Macroscopic scale  Large scale  Constraints on Processes  Tracing matter  Tracing energy  Tracing information  Change over time  Multiple causes and feedback loops  Evolution by natural selection Environmental Literacy Research Group

LOWER ANCHOR ACCOUNTS INFORMAL REASONING  Stories connected by metaphors  What stories do people tell about environmental systems and how do they connect them?  Alike and different  How do people name or identify systems, processes, materials, forms of energy, etc.  Which ones do they see as alike and different?  Egocentrism  How important are human uses and relationships to humans in accounts and ways of describing systems, processes, etc.? Environmental Literacy Research Group

? ? ? Elementary Middle High TRAJECTORIES Progression towards Environmental Literacy upper anchor: scientific reasoning lower anchor: informal reasoning

Carbon Cycling in Coupled Human and Natural Systems (Handout Table 2)

Tracing Matter (WTLOSS Worksheet) When a person loses weight, what happens to the mass of the fat? (a) The mass leaves the person's body as water and carbon dioxide (b) The mass is converted into energy (c) The mass is used up providing energy for the person's body function (d) The mass leaves the person's body as feces Environmental Literacy Research Group 4 students in 20 9 students in 20 5 students in 20 3 students in 20 Note: 1 student chose both C and D

Fat + O 2 Destruction of organic carbon - Metabolism Cellular respiration Carbon dioxide Water Correct Response

Explain your answer to the previous question. Why do you think this happens to the fat? Student Responses (WTLOSS Worksheet) TTS: “It leaves as water because all of it burns off and comes out the pours as water and carbon dioxide.” (TTS chose Answer A) BDG: “The fat is burned of then is used to provide energy.” (BDG chose Answer B)

Tracing Matter—Students’ responses Destruction of organic carbon - Metabolism TTS BDG The gray parts are what the student did not mention in his/her answer Fat + O 2 Burn off Carbon dioxide Water Destruction of organic carbon - Metabolism Fat + O 2 Burn off Energy

Tracing Matter (GRANJOHN Worksheet) Grandma Johnson Describe the path of a carbon atom from Grandma Johnson’s remains, to inside the leg muscle of a coyote. NOTE: The coyote does not dig up and consume any part of Grandma Johnson’s remains. ? Environmental Literacy Research Group

Inputs and Outputs – Tracing Carbon Grandma Johnson Creosote Bush Decomposers Rabbit Coyote C 6 H 12 O 6 CO 2 Generation of organic carbon - Photosynthesis Transfer of organic carbon - Food Chain Destruction of organic carbon - Cellular Respiration

CLS: “The carbon atom will leave Grandma Johnson's remains and travel through the soil in to the air. Then the coyote will breath it in as carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide will travel through the coyote to its leg muscle.” Student Responses (GRANJOHN Worksheet)

Tracing Carbon - CLS Grandma Johnson Creosote Bush Decomposers Rabbit Coyote CO 2

NLB: “Decomposers break down Grandma Johnson’s remains, leftover nutrients are absorbed into the rests of a creosote bush, a rabbit eats the fruit from the bush, the coyote catches and eats the rabbit.” Student Responses

Tracing Carbon - NLB Grandma Johnson Creosote Bush Decomposers Rabbit Coyote Nutrients ? ? ?

Tracing Matter Progress Variable (Handout Figure 1)

Tracing Matter Progress Variable (Handout Table 3) LevelHierarchy of SystemsMaterial Kind & Properties of Matter 7 Describes movements of matter through multiple processes at multiple scales Correctly characterizes reactants and products of processes in terms of how they affect organic carbon compounds 6 Traces elements or atoms through single life process, relating multiple scales Correctly identifies reactants and products of single life process 5 Describes movements of matters in simple chemical changes at atomic-molecular scale. (not just events) Correctly identifies reactants and products in simple chemical changes. 4 Describe matter movement at macroscopic scale. (not just events). Correctly identifies some reactants and products of simple chemical changes. Identifies solids, liquids, but not gases involved in chemical or physical changes. 3 Attention to hidden mechanism. Describes events as changes in materials. Attention to hidden mechanism, but cannot identify any material kinds. 2 Describes changes as events (at macroscopic scale) Identifies changes by using common sense of natural phenomena, but not as changes in materials 1 Egocentric/Naturalistic Reasoning: Respondents use human analogy to explain the changes in materials

Discussion of Student Responses Look at Excel workbook to discuss how we are mapping individual responses onto levels of the Tracing Matter progress variable

General Trends from Elementary to High School  From stories to model-based accounts –Shift from why to how--purposes to mechanisms –BUT lack knowledge of critical parts of systems  From macroscopic to hierarchy of systems –Increased awareness of atomic-molecular and large-scale systems –BUT little success in connecting accounts at different levels  Increasing awareness of constraints on processes –Increasing awareness of conservation laws –BUT rarely successful in constraint-based reasoning  Increasing awareness of “invisible” parts of systems –Increasing detail and complexity –BUT gases, decomposers, connections between human and natural systems remain “invisible”

WHAT’S NEXT?  Increase emphasis on inquiry and citizenship in addition to accounts  Refine assessments  Conduct teaching experiments to refine understanding of how students engage with and learn about environmental science  Use research to…  Inform development of curriculum materials  Inform development of new standards for formal K-12 science education Environmental Literacy Research Group

WHAT QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS MIGHT DRIVE TRANSITIONS?  Extending experience and reducing it to order  New experiences  Questions about quality of data  Moving the boundary between visible and invisible parts of systems  Questions about needs of organisms and why  Questions about mechanisms: How does this happen? Environmental Literacy Research Group

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS MORE INFORMATION QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? QUERIES? MORE INFORMATION Paper, tests and other materials are available on our website at… Environmental Literacy Research Group