Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOGICAL REASONING Study Unit 5 – eLearning RPK 214.
Advertisements

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
PHILOSOPHY 101 Maymester 2007 Day 2 Logic and Knowledge.
Deduction and Induction Elementary deduction, my dear Watson…
Lecture 2: Deduction, Induction, Validity, Soundness.
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Welcome to Dave Penner’s Presentation on Inductive Reasoning!
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Other Info on Making Arguments
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 6 Preparing to Evaluate Arguments.
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Deductive reasoning.
Is there any proof that the Bible is true?
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
Deductive Arguments.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 An introduction to Deductive arguments By David Kelsey.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning Starts with a general rule (a premise) which we know to be true. Then, from that rule, we make.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. F.O.A. (Bellwork) Mr. Ezzell is a man. Men like to watch football. Therefore, …. You fill in the blank. Mrs. Ezzell.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
What is Reasoning  Logical reasoning is the process of drawing conclusions from premises using rules of inference.  These inference rules are results.
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE Or OBSTACLE TO IT?
Deductive reasoning.
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
What makes a Good Argument?
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Deductive and Inductive
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Introduction to Prolog
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Argumentation.
Presentation transcript:

Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments Jason Chang Critical Thinking

Lecture Outline Two types of reasoning Deductive arguments Inductive arguments Common misconceptions Determining whether deductive or inductive

Two Types of Reasoning Reasoning Using information, evidence, or claims(s) to arrive at further information, evidence, or claim(s)

Two Types of Reasoning (P1) John’s fingerprints are on the murder weapon. (P2) John’s DNA was found at the murder scene. (P3) The murder victim owed John money. Therefore, John probably committed the murder.

Two Types of Reasoning (P1) Triangle OAH is a right triangle (P2) O = 3 (P3) A = 4 (P4) A2 + B2 = C2 Therefore, H = 5 O = 3 A = 4

Two Types of Reasoning Necessary reasoning Probabilistic reasoning (P1) Triangle OAH is a right triangle (P2) O = 3 (P3) A = 4 (P4) A2 + B2 = C2 Therefore, H = 5 (P1) John’s fingerprints are on the murder weapon. (P2) John’s DNA was found at the murder scene. (P3) The murder victim owed John money. Therefore, John probably committed the murder. Necessary reasoning Probabilistic reasoning

Two Types of Reasoning Necessary reasoning Deductive reasoning Probabilistic reasoning Inductive reasoning

Deductive Arguments Premises Deductive argument Conclusion An argument in which it is thought that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises

Deductive Arguments (P1) All men are mortal. (P2) Socrates is a man. Therefore, (C) Socrates is mortal.

Deductive Arguments (P1) Either John or Sally committed the murder. (P2) We know that Sally did not commit the murder. Therefore, (C) John committed the murder.

Deductive Arguments (P1) A = B (P2) B = C Therefore, (C) A = C

Inductive Arguments Premises Inductive argument Conclusion An argument in which it is thought that the conclusion probably follows from the premises

Inductive Arguments (P1) She stayed up all night partying. (P2) She drank heavily and had a hangover in the morning. (P3) She did not eat breakfast. Therefore, (C) She probably will not ace the test.

Inductive Arguments (P1) It did not snow in San Jose on July 4 in 2014. (P2) It did not snow in San Jose on July 4 in 2013. (P3) In fact, for the past 100 years, it did not snow in San Jose on July 4. Therefore, (C) Next July 4, it will probably not snow in San Jose.

Years it did not snow in San Jose on July 4 Inductive Arguments (P3) In fact, for the past ??? years, it did not snow in San Jose on July 4. Therefore, (C) Next July 4, it will probably not snow in San Jose. Certainty Confidence that it will not snow next July 4 Years it did not snow in San Jose on July 4

Common misconceptions

Common misconceptions Deductive and inductive arguments must have true premises FALSE!

Common misconceptions (P1) All women are rich. (P2) Socrates is a woman. Therefore, (C) Socrates is rich.

Common misconceptions (P1) In my life, all the dogs I have witnessed are red. Therefore, (C) All dogs are red.

Common misconceptions Deductive and inductive must have “good” reasoning FALSE!

Common misconceptions (P1) Triangle OAH is a right triangle (P2) O = 3 (P3) A = 4 (P4) A2 + B2 = C2 Therefore, H = 5 (P1) Triangle OAH is a right triangle (P2) O = 3 (P3) A = 4 (P4) A2 + B2 = C2 Therefore, H = 7

Common misconceptions (P1) In my life, I have known only one person from New Zealand. (P2) She was not intelligent. Therefore, (C) All New Zealanders lack intelligence.

Determining whether deductive or inductive

Determining whether deductive or inductive Method #1: Indicator words Deductive indicators “Necessarily” “Must” “Certainly” “Absolutely” Inductive indicators “Probably” “Likely” “Plausible” “Reasonable to conclude”

Determining whether deductive or inductive Method #2: Type of reasoning Sometimes it is useful simply to observe the strength the conclusion is thought to follow from the premises.

Determining whether deductive or inductive (P1) All men are mortal. (P2) Socrates is a man. Therefore, (C) Socrates is mortal. DEDUCTIVE (P1) Some fruits are green objects. (P2) Some fruits are green apples. Therefore, (C) Some fruits are green apples. ???

Determining whether deductive or inductive Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between: An inductive argument A deductive argument with bad reasoning (P1) Some fruits are green. (P2) Some fruits are green apples. Therefore, (C) Some fruits are green apples.

Determining whether deductive or inductive Method #3: Argument form Notice the argument form This is the easiest and fastest way to determine whether an argument is deductive or inductive

Determining whether deductive or inductive Common deductive argument forms Argument from mathematics (except from statistics) Argument from definition Syllogism (categorical, hypothetical, disjunctive) Modus ponens and modus tollens Scientific argument that applies general law

Determining whether deductive or inductive Common inductive argument forms Prediction Generalization Causal inference Argument from analogy Argument from authority Scientific argument of observation to general law