1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jim Rahn LL Teach, Inc.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 7 Overview.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Test Item Analysis Science Grade 6 Josh Doty John Sevier Middle School Kingsport, TN Grade Level: 6 Content Area: Earth Science Source: 2007 Tennessee.
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Brought to you people who may not have taught in a long time…..
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
Introduction “Singapore math” is the term used to refer to the mathematics curriculum used in Singapore. For over 15 years, Singapore has consistently.
What Mathematics Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics?
History & Vision.  The new standards are rigorous, research- based, and designed to prepare every student for success in college and the workforce. 
1/∞ CRESST/UCLA Towards Individualized Instruction Using Technology Gregory K. W. K. Chung Annual CRESST Conference Los Angeles, CA – January 22, 2007.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
C R E S S T / U C L A Improving the Validity of Measures by Focusing on Learning Eva L. Baker CRESST National Conference: Research Goes to School Los Angeles,
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing David Niemi August 10,
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Every Student Prepared for the Future EXPLORE, PLAN, The ACT Test Specifications.
CURRENT STATE OF ALGEBRA PREPARATION 1. 7 TH GRADE CURRICULUM TOPICS Major Emphasis Ratio and Proportional Relationships— Includes analyzing proportional.
Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Where we try to make sense of numbers.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
Middle School Liaison Meeting
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
BF PTA Mtg Math An Overview to Guide Parents about the Common Core, Math Expressions, and your student’s math experiences.
Some Implications of Expertise Research for Educational Assessment Robert J. Mislevy University of Maryland National Center for Research on Evaluation,
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
Forum - 1 Assessments for Learning: A Briefing on Performance-Based Assessments Eva L. Baker Director National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,
CERA 87 th Annual Conference- Effective Teaching & Learning: Evaluating Instructional Practices Rancho Mirage, CA – December 4, 2008 Noelle C. Griffin,
UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Online Assessment within.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
ONR/NSF Technology Assessment of Web-Based Learning, v3 © Regents of the University of California 6 February 2003 ONR/NSF Technology Assessment of Web-Based.
CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.
Unwrapping the Standards. The power standards are the fence posts. They provide the curricular focus and teachers need to dig deeper to assure student.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core Standards Implementation ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Understand the Change Be the Change How to Change.
Teaching to the “Big Ideas”: Moving beyond the standards Terry P. Vendlinski UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for.
California Educational Research Association Disneyland Hotel – Anaheim, CA December 1, 2011 Terry Vendlinski Julia Phelan Improving Middle School Math.
Patty Stephens, M.Ed, NBCT 7-12 Math Instructional Specialist, Northshore School District Jeanne Flahiff, M.A., NBCT 7-9 ELA teacher & instructional coach,
Slide 1, Moving From Challenge To Action: Accountability Supporting Student Learning Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information.
Mathematics Instruction In the Age of Common Core State Standards.
Learning Target Cycles Chris Coombes
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Curriculum Focal Points PK-8— A Quest for Coherence Released September 12, 2006.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
BHS Freshman Math Night Agenda: 1.Introductions 2. 9 th Grade Math Courses 3.Math Pathways/Student testimonials 4.IMP Information 5.Resources 6.Breakout.
Changes in Mathematics Dixon-Smith Middle School Parent Information Session Kimberly McGehee, Math Coach.
Program Description Comprehensive middle school mathematics curriculum primarily used in grades 6-8. Development of the curriculum was funded in part by.
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Mrs. Ranayhossaini Mathematics Principles of Pre-Algebra Pre-Algebra
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Computational Reasoning in High School Science and Math
Welcome to the 6th Grade Enterprise Team.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures
Claim 2: Problem Solving
Presentation transcript:

1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) CRESST Conference Los Angeles, CA September 9, 2005

2 The mile wide, inch deep curriculum  How wide and deep should it be?  1 inch wide and 1 mile deep?  1/2 mile wide and 2 inches deep?

3 Example of Instruction e πi + 1 = 0

4 Assessment e πi + 1 =

5 Answer e πi + 1 = 0

6 What would you have to know in order for this to be meaningful and useful? e πi + 1 = 0  What do the symbols mean?  What is this equation about?  What can you do with it?  What’s important about it?  How does it connect to other topics in mathematics?

7 Our approach Analyze and map the domain based on previous research and knowledge elicitation  Identify central principles  Used to build schemas  Enable inferences, complex problem solving, and learning  Provide a foundation for advanced learning Use models to build assessments at right level of cognitive demand

8 Research on the Structure of Knowledge --Chi, Glaser, & Rees, 1983

9 Eliciting the Structure of Knowledge Experts (scientists, mathematicians, historians, writers) identify organizing concepts and principles (“big ideas”) Determine related ideas and skills: facts, problems, situations, etc. Map all ideas and skills

10 Structure of Algebra I Knowledge: Central Principles  1 Number  2 Expressions, Equations, Inequalities  3 Functions  4 Problem Solving  5 Reasoning  6 Sets

11 Ideas About Functions  A function is a mapping between inputs and outputs such that each input is mapped to one and only one output.  Many events in the physical world can be modeled as functions.  Many functions can be represented by algebraic equations or graphs.  The equation of a linear function can be written in the form f(x) = mx + b.  The graph of a linear function is a line.

12 Map of Algebra I Knowledge

13 Task Components for Assessing Complex Learning Text or other representation of information requiring domain knowledge (concepts, principles, and factual knowledge) Respond with complex performance E.g., explanation, problem solving, knowledge map Scoring based on expert performance

14 Examples of Models in Action  Assessments of history and math understanding tested with hundreds of students  Scaling up with ,000 students per year in the district’s 2nd largest district  IERI: online tools to build assessments (Assessment Design and Delivery System or ADDS)  New CRESST: assessments of mathematics understanding in grades 6-8, including worked examples

15 Study of Fifth Grade Students’ Understanding of Fraction Representations  500 students randomly assigned to instruction on: Fractions as parts of wholes Fractions as rational numbers  After instruction, students given  Students performed better with the types of representations and meanings they had been taught.  Students who understood the representations performed better on measures of complex problem solving.

16 Fractions

17 Fractions

18 Equivalent Fractions

19 Equivalent Fractions

20 Fractions

21 ADDS Designer: Select Information Source

22 Screenshot from an Animation

23 Two Screenshots From an Animation 1 2

24 Screenshot from a Simulation

25 Results from Studies of Teachers Using ADDS  Series of experimental studies  In one study, 33 middle school science teachers randomly assigned to ADDS and non-ADDS groups  ADDS teachers were more likely to focus on central ideas and developed more cognitively complex assessments.  In another experimental study with 17 teachers, ADDS enhanced the ability of teachers to develop comparable assessments on the same topic.

26 What have we learned (in the effort to “make evidence based practice a reality”)?  Complex, research-based assessments:  Can be instructionally sensitive, valid measures of challenging state standards, predictive of performance on state tests  Can provide info to guide and improve instruction,  Can be reliably scored.

27 What have we learned?  Deep understanding is rare or non-existent, but understanding and use of big ideas can be improved in a relatively short time.  Information on student understanding and complex performance is a powerful tool for change and can be used to help focus and propel capacity building efforts.