TEST SETUP FOR HF PMT AT IOWA LAB CMS HCAL Meeting FNAL, November 16-18 Y. Onel U. of Iowa W. Anderson Iowa State U. D. Winn Fairfield U.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-of-Flight at CDF Matthew Jones August 19, 2004.
Advertisements

Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Update on Electronics Activities Jim Pilcher University of Chicago 20-Jan-2006.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
P. Karchin – PMTs for Scintillator Based Muon Systempage 11/7/2004 January 7, 2004 American Linear Collider Physics Group 2004 Workshop Stanford Linear.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
WBS 2.5 HF PMT SYSTEM Y. Onel University of Iowa US CMS DOE/NSF Review May8-10, 2001.
Scintillation Detectors
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
1 Light Collection  Once light is produced in a scintillator it must collected, transported, and coupled to some device that can convert it into an electrical.
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
Catania VLVnT09 Athens, Greece 1/14 Catania Performances of four super bialkali large area photomultipliers with respect to.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
1 Performance of multi-anode PMT employing an ultra bi-alkali photo-cathode and rugged dynodes Takahiro Toizumi Tokyo Institute of Technology S. Inagwa.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Anatoli Konoplyannikov Design and integration of HV, LED monitoring and calibration system for HCAL Overview of the subsystems design High voltage.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
July 29, 2004 American Linear Collider Physics Group Victoria Linear Collider Workshop Muon Detector MAPMT Tests - Calibration R&D Scintillator Based Muon.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
U. Akgun, HCAL Fall Meeting, 11/11/2004, Fermilab, IL HF PMT ISSUES By Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Simonetta Gentile, LCWS10, March 2010, Beijing,China. G-APD Photon detection efficiency Simonetta Gentile 1 F.Meddi 1 E.Kuznetsova 2 [1]Università.
On behalf of joint ITEP / IHEP team: A. Arefiev, N. Filimonov, T. Kvaratskheliya, I. Machikhiliyan, P. Shatalov, T. Zakoryuchkina, A. Zhokhov, S. Zvyagintsev.
Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments By W.R. Leo Chapter Eight:
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
Status of the PMT light detection system Gian Luca Raselli 20-AUG-2015 ICARUS executive meeting.
R. Pani Department of Experimental Medicine and Pathology University of Rome La Sapienza-Italy. Flat Panel PMT: advances in position sensitive photodetection.
Catania 11 ICATPP october, 2009 Como 1/12 Catania Comparative measurements of the performances of four super bialkali large.
28 June 2007G. Pauletta: ALCPG Tests of IRST SiPMs G. Pauletta Univ. & I.N.F.N. Udine Outline 1.IRST SiPMs : baseline characteristics 2.first application.
Production PMT Testing and Work on Site with Prototype Tank University of California, Los Angles Department of Physics and Astronomy
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
Cold PM test at Indiana final measurements, September 9 – 24, 2007 PM under test: Hamamatsu R7725 serial # ZK3692 (tube with Pt underlayer) Hans-Otto Meyer.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
SiPM for CBM Michael Danilov ITEP(Moscow) Muon Detector and/or Preshower CBM Meeting ITEP
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Photo-detection EDIT EDIT 2011Single photon counting measurements with an HPD – T. GysSlide 1 Single photon counting measurements with a hybrid photon.
CMS HF PMT SYSTEM By Y. ONEL U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA CMS HCAL at Fermilab Feb 6-8, 2003.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
CMS HF PMT SYSTEM By Y. ONEL U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA HF-RBX PRR CERN Apr 3-4, 2003.
PMT Tests for HF Upgrade Ugur Akgun. HF PMT Proposed Tests On Every PMT: – Rise Time – Negative Pulse Width – Transit Time – Transit Time spread – Single.
Basic Measurement of the Hamamatsu 10 inch PMT at –40 degree –40 degree Hiroko Miyamoto Dept. of Physics CHIBA University The Uniformity measurement of.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
Iowa PMT Test Station Ugur Akgun 1. HF PMT Proposed Tests On Every PMT: – Rise Time – Negative Pulse Width – Transit Time – Transit Time spread – Single.
CMS HF PMT SYSTEM By Y. ONEL U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA CMS Meeting, CERN, Dec 1-8,2001.
Characterization of Hamamatsu R12199 PMTs Oleg Kalekin KM3NeT Meeting CPPM, Marseille
The photomultiplier tubes selection for KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors (EDs) hou chao IHEP The 2nd workshop of air shower detection at high altitudes.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
KM2A PMT testing platform FENG Cunfeng, LI Chaoju, SUN Yansheng Shandong University THE 2 nd WORKSHOP OF AIR SHOWER DETECTION AT HIGH ALTITUDES IHEP, Beijing,
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
CMS HF PMT SYSTEM By Y. ONEL U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA HF-RBX PRR CERN Apr 3-4, 2003.
PreShower Characterisations
Scintillation Detectors
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
BESIII EMC electronics
Development of hybrid photomultiplier for Hyper-Kamiokande
md-NUV PET project meeting
Photomultiplier (PMT) Tubes
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

TEST SETUP FOR HF PMT AT IOWA LAB CMS HCAL Meeting FNAL, November Y. Onel U. of Iowa W. Anderson Iowa State U. D. Winn Fairfield U.

Hardware and Software Tools for Test and Calibration of HF PMT Light-tight Test Box Laser Bench PC Storage Cupboards Electronics Racks Scope UI CMS HF Test Lab 6 m 5 m The hardware system for the quality control of HF PMT at delivery will be installed at UI CMS lab. Test Station Components: 1 - Light sources: LASER, LED, Radioactive sources + Scintillators 2 - Light-tight Test Box 3 - Readout Electronics 4 - Data Acquisition, Analysis and Storage PC - controlled System

Tasks of the Test System: HF PMT Quality Control, Calibration and Monitoring System should address the following items: label and catalogue each PMT at delivery and storage (StorageIN); mechanical assembly with HV power supply and base; installation in Test Box : individually or in groups (6 - 9); measure: (a) - gain vs HV [G-HV] (b) - pulse shape [PS] (c) - single photoelectron response [SPR]; (d) - noise and dark current [N/DC]; (e) - photocathode uniformity [PCU]; (f) - linearity of response [LR]; (g) - pulse rate dependence [PRD]; (h) - quantum efficiency vs wave-length [QE-WL]; (i) - timing response and intrinsic delay [TR-D].

Procedures for measurements The following sequence of measurements will be performed for each PMT: 1 - PMT's installed in Test-Box are let to stabilize at standard HV; 2 - Check of normal operating conditions [source + scint.]; 3 - Noise and dark current measurements vs. HV; 4 - Gain vs. HV [laser]; 5 - Single photoelectron level; 6 - Linearity for p.e.; 7 - Rate dependence for Mz [LED]; 8 - Photocathode uniformity; 9 - Quantum efficiency ( nm) [dye laser]; 10 - Pulse shape measurements at nominal HV. According to specifications of the PMT (manufacturer's data sheet and preliminary measurements on a test sample) and requirements of HF application (Nphe/GeV, dynamic range, etc.) the test setup working conditions will be adjusted in a range of light yield and sensitivity appropriate for the standard test procedure. Three light sources will be used for the specific measurements: - laser - LED - Rad. sources + radiator

(a) Gain vs HV [G-HV] The signal charge QA at the PMT anode for a pulse of Nph photons of w. l. hitting the photocathode of quantum efficiency  is: QA = G(V)  Nph qe where G(V) is the PMT gain,  Nph = Nphe is the number of photoelectrons (charge qe) at the cathode. For fixed illumination ( = const.), the relation = A Vk determines k. At any voltage V, and fixed illumination ( = const.), A is related to / qe  QA2/, where is estimated as = (1+  ) ( /  QA ) 2 [  0 for pure Poisson photoelectron distribution,  0.25 taking into account first dynode collection efficiency and SER];  QA is the RMS spread (0.85 HWHM) of the anode charge QA distribution (see SER measurement). Measurements of gain vs HV can be performed with laser, LED, or source + radiator. The HV supply settings are stepped through the useful HV range for the PMT via computer control and pulse amplitude distribution measured with ADC.

(a) Gain vs. HV [G-HV]

(b) Pulse Shape [PS] The pulse shape (characterized by rise-time TR and FWHM of anode signals) is measured on a digital scope with PMT illuminated with a radiator and  -source. The digitized pulse shape is recorded.

(c) Single Photoelectron Response [SPR] The light yield is set to a low level, in such a way that there is no count in the majority of cases; for instance, with 80% missing counts, according to Poisson statistics, approximately 90% of the residual counts in these conditions, should correspond to single phe.

(d) Noise and Dark Current [N/DC] Dark current is measured at various HV settings with a picoamperometer, recorded with the PMT in stable temperature conditions and after a period ( 1/2 hour) in dark. Noise spectrum is obtained in same situations by measuring ADC pedestal spectrum, and subtracting the electronic noise contribution.

(e) Photocathode Uniformity [PCU] The uniformity of response for the photocathode is measured by having an illuminating spot (typ. 1mm diam.) spanning the photocathode surface (via a fiber moved with a scanning table) and recording pulse amplitude at each position.

(f) Linearity of Response [LR] The light yield on the photocathode is varied over a wide range and PMT response measured as a function of light intensity; various methods can be used to provide different light levels: calibrated filters, diaphragms, etc.; the variation of light yield is monitored with linear (photodiode) devices; the effective steps in illumination can be checked and adjusted at low light levels, using wide dynamic range ADC (or proper attenuation/amplification).

(g) Pulse Rate Dependence [PRD] The pulse rate dependence is measured with (a group of) LED (of equalized yield) mixed in a light manifold; over a certain range of pulse rates, the frequency of LED can be varied individually without change of the light pulse amplitude or duration; for higher frequencies few LED, feeding a light mixer, can be pulsed together, with short relative delays, thus producing a high frequency (defined by the delay) pulse train. Alternatively one LED can be pulsed for long times with an average light yield reproducing the amount of photons of a high frequency burst, and short pulses from another LED are analyzed as a function of the average current load produced by the first LED.

(h) Quantum Efficiency vs. Wavelength [QE-WL] The response of PMT is measured with definite WL of light (of known intensity).

(i) Timing Response and Intrinsic Delay [TR-D] The PMT is illuminated with radiator/scintillator excited with rad. source; the time response of the PMT and its transit time are measured with respect to a calibrated counter viewing the same light source.

Measurements will be performed at stable (controlled) temperature. For each delivery batch, sample measurements will be performed for temperature and magnetic field dependence. The data for each PMT will be stored in appropriate archive files on disk and copied to permanent storage media. For each PMT an entry will be printed and logged to a general PMT directory and test logbooks.

The PMT's, conforming to acceptance criteria, will be sorted in classes and stored (Storage OUT), ready for installation. Those not conforming will be returned to the manufacturer. All measurement procedures will be automated and computer-controlled, to minimize individual biases and interventions; daily test shifts will be supervised by an expert, who will also review the archived data of the day and certify their validity.

Electronics The electronic system for the Test Setup includes: 1 - Pulsers for the Laser, LED and calibration pulses; 2 - Digital control circuits for - HV and LV power supplies, - Laser parameters and settings, - Stepping motors for moving parts in Test Box, - Probes for temperature, etc., in Test Box - Safety circuits on door, sliding mechanics, etc. 3 - Trigger logic for DAQ, monitors and gates 4- ADC and TDC for amplitude and timing measurements 5- Digital Oscilloscope for measuring and recording pulse shapes Electronics block diagram TDC PC DAQ Electronics Data Storage PMT's, Monitors, etc. Digital Scope Pulsers & Controls Test BoxLASER, LED, Trigger Logic

Test Box The Test Box assembly consists of: 1 - PMT holder support with position remote control; 2 - Optical Manifold (O. M.) providing fiber coupling to individual PMT's and receiving light from: a - laser system with variable wavelength (dye), b - LED system pulsed at high frequencies, c - Radioactive sources + scintillators; 3 - Monitoring and control devices.

The Test Box is a light-tight and temperature- stabilized chamber [60 (H) x 60 (W) x 120 (L) cm3] containing precision remotely-controlled slides, supporting the PMT's holder and the assembly for O. M. and fibers coupling to the PMT's; it provides a number of sealed cable inlets and outlets for PMT signals, HV and LV and control signals as well as for fibers from the Laser system.

DAQ System and Measurement Strategy The following sequence of measurements will be performed for each PMT: 1 - PMT's installed in Test-Box are let to stabilize at standard HV; 2 - Check of normal operating conditions [source + scint.]; 3 - Noise and dark current measurements vs. HV; 4 - Gain vs. HV [laser]; 5 - Single photoelectron level; 6 - Linearity for p.e.; 7 - Rate dependence for MHz [LED]; 8 - Photocathode uniformity; 9 - Quantum efficiency ( nm) [dye laser, source + scint.]; 10 - Pulse shape measurements at nominal HV.

Quality Assurance At the manufacturer testing/preselection as they arrive beam/calibration tests during the installation period we will eventually have two test stations for testing PMT can be replaced any PMT will function within 20% of any other PMT

Data Acquiaition System (DAQ) We have VAx3200 (with backplane) which is a functional DAQ system with CAMAC We have also purchased the interface cards and software for the mobile DAQ [which is LabView based] We have U. of Iowa matching funds to purchase the components of the fixed PMT test station

Manpower and expert team to install the test system UI U. Akgun A. Ayan P. Bruecken J.P. Merlo M. Miller Y. Onel I. Schmidt A. Tauke R. Vogel post-doc (to be named) ISU W. Anderson Fairfield U P. Winn International Team E. GulmezTurkey A. Penzo Italy M. ZeyrekTurkey

Test Team Post-doc (supervisor) M. Acar (graduate student) P. Bruecken (Quarknet lead teacher) A. Kocbay (graduate student) Bettendorf H.S. seniors (2) UI undergraduate (2)

Tests required of the vendor on each tube 1.Determine the cathode luminous sensitivity with a tungsten filament lamp with a color temperature of 2856K. 2.Determine the cathode blue sensitivity with a 2856K tungsten light filtered through a Corning CS5-58 filter ground to half stock thickness. 2a.Alternatively the vendor may measure and report the quantum efficiency of the tube at 420nm. 3.Determine the voltage at which a current gain of 5x105 is reached. 4.Measure the dark current at a current gain of 5x105.

Additional tests Our institution/university is interested in having additional selection tests performed at the vendor’s site. The vendor is invited to submit a proposal for PMTs with the following additional measurement made at the vendor’s site. The vendor shall determine the pulse height resolution at a gain of 5x104 using the following method or some other method agreed on between the University and vendor. The PMT pulse height resolution shall deviate less then 30% from the ideal resolution (defined as sigma/mean equal to 1/sqrt(t) where Npe is the average number of photoelectrons produced by the photocathode for a given light pulse intensity) at a current gain of 5x104. The vendor and University shall agree on an appropriate test to determine that this resolution specification is met.