Detection of UHE Shower Cores by ANITA By Amir Javaid University Of Delaware.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGASA Results Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration at 3 rd Int. Workshop on UHECR, Univ. Leeds.
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
RICE bounds on UHE Neutrino fluxes in the GZK Regime plus bounds on new physics Data from 2000 through 2004 confront models of the world (PRELIMINARY)
JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Air Shower Simulations for ANITA K. Belov UCLA. Goals Approach Estimate the energy of the UHECRs detected by ANITA using MC simulations Use well known.
Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
Anita Simulation on the Mainland Amy Connolly April 9 th, 2005.
Kay Graf University of Erlangen for the ANTARES Collaboration 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, August 23 – 29, 2007 Acoustic.
Radio detection of UHE neutrinos E. Zas, USC Leeds July 23 rd 2004.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
IMPACT OF WATER OPTICAL PROPERTIES ON RECONSTRUCTION: HINTS FROM THE OB DATA. A PRELIMINARY STUDY ANTARES Collaboration Meeting CERN, February 07 th -10.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
Tampa APS Meeting April 2004 P. Gorham 1 UH ANITA monte carlo Peter Gorham University of Hawaii A N I T A.
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna NASA funding started 2003 for first launch in 2006 Phase A approval for SMEX ToO mission 600 km radius, 1.1 million.
Characterization of Orbiting Wide-angle Light-collectors (OWL) By: Rasha Usama Abbasi.
Tuning in to UHE Neutrinos in Antarctica – The ANITA Experiment J. T. Link P. Miočinović Univ. of Hawaii – Manoa Neutrino 2004, Paris, France ANITA-LITE.
Jonathan Perkin ARENA May 05 Acoustic Cosmic Ray Neutrino Experiment FUTURE PROSPECTS simulation…
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
July 10, 2007 Detection of Askaryan radio pulses produced by cores of air showers. Suruj Seunarine, Amir Javaid, David Seckel, Philip Wahrlich, John Clem.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
Studies of the Energy Resolution of the ANITA Experiment Amy Connolly University of California, Los Angeles CALOR06 June 6 th, 2006.
Simulation Issues for Radio Detection in Ice and Salt Amy Connolly UCLA May 18 th, 2005.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Contributions of the University of Bucharest to the study of high energy cosmic rays in the framework of the KASCADE-Grande experiment Octavian Sima Faculty.
ARIANNA - A New Concept for Neutrino Detection Steve Barwick, UC IrvineMadison, Aug ARIANNA Institutions: UCI, UCLA,
Simulations of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers Tim Huege & Heino Falcke ARENA-Workshop Zeuthen,
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
E.Plagnol - TA/TALE feb Acceptance and Counting Rates of EUSO ë Detecting UHECR from space ë The EUSO detector : Who does what. ë Some characteristics.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Bartol Flux Calculation presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Detection of UHE Shower Cores by ANITA By Amir Javaid University Of Delaware.
Feasibility of acoustic neutrino detection in ice: First results from the South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS) Justin Vandenbroucke (UC Berkeley) for.
RICE: ICRC 2001, Aug 13, Recent Results from RICE Analysis of August 2000 Data See also: HE228: Ice Properties (contribution) HE241: Shower Simulation.
Studies of Askaryan Effect, 1 of 18 Status and Outlook of Experimental Studies of Askaryan RF Radiation Predrag Miocinovic (U. Hawaii) David Saltzberg.
Current Physics Results Gordon Thomson Rutgers University.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
Olivier Deligny for the Pierre Auger Collaboration IPN Orsay – CNRS/IN2P3 TAUP 2007, Sendai Limit to the diffuse flux of UHE ν at EeV energies from the.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany for AGASA collaboration.
June 19, 2009 Simulation of Askaryan Detectors and Events (SADE) David Seckel, Pat Stengel, Shahid Hussain D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware.
June 18-20, 2009 Detection of Askaryan radio pulses produced by cores of air showers. Suruj Seunarine, David Seckel, Pat Stengel, Amir Javaid, Shahid Hussain.
Lingling Ma IHEP China Measurement of Cosmic rays with LHAASO at 10PeV~100PeV 4th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Institute of High Energy.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
L.L.Ma for LHAASO collaboration Beijing China
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Event Rates vs Cross Sections
Validation Plots from the Mainland ANITA Simulation
MC Simulation and optimization of KM2A
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory
NuTel Video Conference 6/13/2003 M.A. Huang
ANITA simulations P. Gorham 5/12/2019 P. Gorham.
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

Detection of UHE Shower Cores by ANITA By Amir Javaid University Of Delaware

Topics Detection of Shower cores by ANITA Brief look at the shower Cores Rough estimates for event rate & shower core analysis summary Summary of UD Monte Carlo Simulator for Shower core detection by ANITA Present status of UD Monte Carlo Future Plans for a Monte Carlo simulator Some preliminary results from Monte Carlo Simulator test runs Search for a better Model for Antarctic topography

Detection of Shower cores by ANITA schematic

Detection of Shower cores by ANITA Energy in the Shower cores above 100PeV~10% (Corsika Shower Simulations) Shower cores will produce Askaryan pulse. Pulses may be strong enough to be detected by ANITA payload Askaryan pulses moving downwards and reflecting back from the bed rock are the most favorable for detection Regions with thin ice and high elevation are most suitable for shower core detection by ANITA. Ice thickness 1km Approximately 8% of the area in Antarctica satisfies the above conditions.

Detection of Shower cores by ANITA (contd..) Ice thickness Histogram (Bedmap) Suitable area~8% Histogram Area suitable for Shower core detection ~8%

Brief look at the shower Cores To analyze the properties of the shower cores a library of Corsika shower runs has been generated Present energy span of this library is from 10PeV -1EeV The detector elevation is set at the South Pole and zenith angle is chosen to be zero Showers are produce in South Pole magnetic field Flat detector and curved atmosphere model is used.

Brief look at the shower Cores (Corsika Simulation runs) 1 EeV primary proton shower footprint at South Pole for 10m 2 area

Brief Look at the shower Cores (contd..) 1 EeV primary proton shower footprint at South Pole for 1m 2 area

Brief Look at the shower Cores (contd..) 1 EeV primary proton shower footprint at South Pole for 10cm 2 area

Brief look at the shower cores (contd..) 150 PeV~15% of Total Shower

Rough estimates for event rate above eV for ANITA Air Showers For one steradian around the vertical axis the Event Rate estimated for ANITA payload horizon ~ 1.5×10 16 cm 2 from the measured cosmic ray flux data is ~1400 events per day[1]. Neutrinos For 2 π steradian the Event Rate estimated for ANITA horizon from the Waxman Bahcall flux model is~237 interactions per day[1]. [1] ftp://ftp.bartol.udel.edu/anita/amir/EventRate_analysis_V1.4.pdf

Present Status of UD Monte Carlo Simulator UD MC is in testing Stage. It is based on the SADE0.1 MC by Shahid Hussain modified to fit the ANITA event Geometry. For testing purpose AVZ parameterized Askaryan pulses are used. It uses Bedmap for ice thickness, bedrock elevation and surface elevation. Interpolation is used to fill the gaps in Bedmap data. For testing purpose Snell’s law with constant refractive of ice for ray tracing is used.

Present Status of UD Monte Carlo Simulator (contd..) More sophisticated ray tracing techniques do exist in UD MC. It assumes that the ice and bedrock surfaces are flat. Perfect reflection from bedrock and perfect transmission from ice/air surface. Point detector model with orientation. Constant attenuation model for testing purpose. More realistic attenuation models are also built in UD MC.

Future Plans for UD Monte Carlo simulator Development of parameterization of Askaryan pulses from shower cores. Use of Fresnel reflection and transmission. Better model of surface roughness for bedrock and ice/air surface. Realistic Detector and triggering model. Effective area calculation

Preliminary Results (UD MC) Test Run geometry Detector position Latitude= deg Longitude=-90 o deg, Altitude= m Event position & Energy Latitude=-78 deg, Longitude=-90 deg, depth=198.3m Energy=100PeV, Cherenkov Angle=55.85 deg Test runs Red Arrows show various shower axes used to test the code X parallel depth Altitude R bn X perp Shower axes Event Vertex

Test Run Results (contd..)

Search for a better Model for Antarctic topography For modeling of the surface and bedrock roughness much high resolution Antarctic topographical models are needed. One option is the Radarsat Antarctic Mapping (RAMP) Project Digital Elevation Model Version 2 available from The National Snow and Ice Data Center. RAMP 1 km, 400 m, and 200 m DEM data are provided in ARC/INFO and binary grid formats, and the 1 km and 400 m DEMs are also available in ASCII format.

Search for a better Model for Antarctic topography (contd..)

Radarsat Surface elevation 400mRes Bedmap Surface elevation 5km Res

Summary Detailed analysis of shower cores Askaryan Pulse parameterization is in progress Development of UD Monte Carlo is moving towards more robustness Feasibility check of the Radarsat RAMP model for the use in Monte Carlo. These files are large (~2.5 GB), which mean more cpu cycles are required. Plan of ANITA -1 flight data analysis for shower core events.