GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Outline. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber. Support stands. Alignment.
Light, Reflection, & Mirrors
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Hyperbola Directrix e>1 O: center F1, F2: foci V1, V2: vertices
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Example (4.1): A rectangular beam has the dimensions shown in Figure 4.12.a and is loaded with a 40 ton concentrated.
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov,
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Jim Stewart (JLAB) Internal Magnet Review May 2009.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
1 Configuration Development for HIF Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole Array HIF Final Focus Meeting July 2, 2002 Tom Brown Chang Jun Phil Heitzenroeder.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Preassembly of second bottom yokes and poleshoes. a) Install special support. b) Place the second bottom.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
TAGGER MAGNET DESIGN Presented by Tim Whitlatch Hall D Tagger Magnet Design Review July 10,
Jim Stewart Tagger Magnet Design Review July 2009.
Magnet rotated by 5.9 degree Distance from entrance point to magnet right bottom corner m.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Outline (HIBP) diagnostics in the MST-RFP Relationship of equilibrium potential measurements with plasma parameters Simulation with a finite-sized beam.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 8 - Magnetism.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Prajwal T. Mohan Murthy Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT νDM Group Spin-Light Polarimeter for the Electron Ion Collider EIC Users Meeting 2014 Jun 2014.
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
Admin: mid-term 2 grades and solutions posted. Scripts back at the end Average = 84% (up from 72%). Excellent work! Assignment 10 posted. Due on Monday.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
23 July 2012D. Sober1 Some thoughts on Hall D tagger magnet field mapping D. Sober Catholic University of America GlueX Beam/Tagger biweekly meeting 23.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Hcal Geometry and Assembly CLIC Meeting - LAPP December 2008, 15th.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
SC dipole magnet for CBM E.A.Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov JINR, Dubna CBM Collaboration.
Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
General Physics II, Additional Questions, By/ T.A. Eleyan 1 Additional Questions Lec. 15,16.
1 COMPTON POLARIMETER PRELIMINARY MAGNET DESIGN 06/03/08 Christopher Vidal, Senior Mechanical Designer Ernie Ihloff, P.E., Engineering Group Leader EE.
Jürgen Florenkowski GSI, Darmstadt Agenda Annual Report Meeting EU construction ( CNI ) contract "DIRAC-PHASE-1" for the FAIR project September 26, 2006.
Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
GlueX Collaboration Meeting. Jefferson Lab. September 9 – 11, Review of Tagger System.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
More Examples of Biot-Savart & Ampère’s Law. Recall: Biot-Savart Law: Ampere’s Law:
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
More Examples of Magnetic Flux Biot-Savart Law Ampère’s Law.
CEA DSM Irfu WP 7.4 : Insert design and construction M. Devaux J-M Rey, M. Durante, P. Tixador, C. Pes 18/09/2012HFM collaboration meeting WP 7 - Milano.
Chapter 27 Magnetism Force on an Electric Current in a Magnetic Field; Definition of B Example 27-2: Measuring a magnetic field. A rectangular loop.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
Panda Forward Dipole Magnet design status International Workshop on Antiproton Physics and Technology at FAIR November 2015 Budker Institute of Nuclear.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Dipole magnets A dipole magnet gives a constant B-field.
The Medium and High resolution mass separators for SPES facility
Physics II Magnetostatics.
A 3D design model of the apparatus for the Laser Wakefield Acceleration of electrons at ELI-NP S. Balascuta1 , R. Dinca1 1) “Horia Hulubei” National.
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Literacy Research Memory Skills Stretch Area
Chapter 32Light: Reflection and Refraction
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
KICKER STATUS G-2 meeting March 5, 2014
Chapter 29 Examples Examples 1, 6, 7.
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
Presentation transcript:

GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i) Complete Tagger. (ii) Vacuum Chamber Tests.

S oftware used : Opera 3D, version What we have calculated: 2 D, 3 D magnetic field distributions. The Effective field boundary along the magnet edge. Electron trajectories calculated by using Opera 3D, post processor. Optical properties using a grouping of 9 electrons trajectories. Part 1 3 D Tosca analysis

2 D magnetic field histogram calculated by TOSCA. magnetic field along a line perpendicular to the magnet output edge.

Electron trajectories have been calculated using Opera 3 D post processor. By using the calculated electron trajectories, beam spot size, and focal plane position have been determined.

Calculated electron trajectories Beam trajectories calculated from TOSCA in the mid plane for 1 GeV and 9 GeV. Those trajectories having the same direction focus on position 1, and those trajectories having the same starting position focus on position 2. ( electrons travelling in the direction shown by the top arrow ). Electron trajectory bundles according to their directions at the object position. (1 GeV)(9 GeV)

Other interesting results The intersections of the beam trajectories with the plane through the focusing point and perpendicular to the beam ((a):1 GeV, (b): 9 GeV), the dotted lines show the beam spot profile. (We have used a rectangular object shape. So, ideally we expect to obtain a rectangular image at the focal plane.) (a)(b)

Preliminary drawings of the two identical magnet tagger system are shown. The magnet dimension used here are the same as used in the Tosca analysis. The drawings include the two magnets, a vacuum chamber. Assembly procedure are proposed. Part 2 Preliminary drawings

The two identical magnets tagger Magnet 1 Magnet 2 Vacuum chamber The vacuum force is around 70 tons, so the vacuum chamber needs external support

The electron entrance angle :5.9 degrees Main beam exit angle: 6.6 degrees Main beam bending angle 13.4 degrees The angle between the photon exit beam and the focal plane: 9.94 degrees 1 1 1

Length: 3.11 m. Width: 1.09 m. Height:1.41m. Weight: ~38 Tonns for one magnet. Conductor area: 84 cm 2. Current: 154 A. Magnetic field: 1.5 T. Pole gap: 2 cm 1 Vertical section through one of the dipole magnets showing pole profile and coil geometry

Vacuum chamber 1 1

Vertical section showing how vacuum O-ring compression is determined * O-ring seal Vacuum chamber

Vertical section showing how coils are supported against magnetic forces (0.5 ton)

Vertical section showing how weight of coils are supported (each coil ~0.4 ton)

The brackets and spacers used in the tagger system

Part 3. (i) Proposed Assembly procedure for complete tagger

Part 3. (ii) Proposed Assembly procedure for vacuum chamber testing

Conclusions 1.Optical properties meet design specification 2.Sufficient details is provided so that a realistic cost estimate of the tagger magnets and vacuum chamber can be obtained from potential manufactures.