Research Needs on SCC of Pipelines Raymond R. Fessler Stress-Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Workshop DOT/RSPA Houston, TX December 2, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IND 205 Auditing a Contractors Property Management System TLO #9 Auditing a Contractors Property Management System.
Advertisements

Research Methodology Chapter 1.
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Comparison of Major Contract Types
2013 Northwest Hydro Operators Forum 1 Risk-Informed Decision Making – FERC Perspective David Lord, P.E., D2SI Dam Safety Risk team – Portland, Or Natural.
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
Government Industry R&D Forum March 2005 Pipeline Design & Construction Near Term Focus Future Gaps & Opportunities.
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
Materials and Joining March 2005 R&D Forum David Horsley TransCanada Pipelines Limited.
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
© ChevronTexaco 2004 Accelerating the Deployment of Technology to Business Opportunities Kevin Kimber – ChevronTexaco David Matheson - SmartOrg Value-Based.
1 The Role of the Revised IEEE Standard Dictionary of Measures of the Software Aspects of Dependability in Software Acquisition Dr. Norman F. Schneidewind.
OPS Stress Corrosion Cracking Workshop OPS Research and Development Projects James Merritt R&D Program Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety
Dynamic Service Composition with QoS Assurance Feb , 2009 Jing Dong UTD Farokh Bastani UTD I-Ling Yen UTD.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
Software Measurement: Uncertainty and Causal Modeling Koosha Golmohammadi
Overview of Key Rule Features
Model Building and Simulation Chapter 43 Research Methodologies.
What is the Most Effective Way to Produce Food Safety? INFORMS Seminar Series Isenberg School of Management October 29, 2004 Julie A. Caswell
PIPELINE ENGINEERING COURSES DISTANCE LEARNING 12 WEEKS DR. ESAM AM AL-MATOUQ.
Integrated Pest Management
Stress Corrosion Cracking Overview & Introduction David Johnson December 2, 2003.
RAM Modelling in the Project Design Phase Friday 30 th April, 2010 Paul Websdane Reliability Modelling for Business Decisions Asset Management Council.
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
Innovation Leadership Training Goals and Metrics February 5, 2009 All materials © NetCentrics 2008 unless otherwise noted.
Terence Milne South African Road Pavement Forum 13 & 14 November 2002 Conference Report Back: ICAP – 22 AUGUST 2002 COPENHAGEN AFRICON.
ILIA View: In-Line Inspection State-of-the-Art For SCC Presented by: Scott Thetford Manager- Government Relations GE-PII OPS Workshop on SCC December 2,
COB 300C Product and Service Design. Reasons for Product or Service Design Be competitive Increase business growth & profits Avoid downsizing with development.
Development of a Research Roadmap Related to Safe and Reliable Transportation of Ethanol in Pipelines Prepared for Pipeline Research Council International,
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 12: (IS) Project Management.
Industry & Research: Issues, needs and conclusions from the US IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes & Uncertainty Workshop at HR Wallingford,
Distribution Integrity Management – What To Expect John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association Western Regional Gas Conference.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
Application of SRA for Pipeline Design Operation & Maintenance Andrew Francis Advantica Technologies ASRANeT, 2 nd Annual Colloquium, 9 th July 2001.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Fitness For Service and Management of Pre-Regulation Pipe Chad Zamarin Chief Operating Officer NiSource Midstream.
OPS - SCC Workshop R&D Past and Present December 2, 2003 Jerry Rau - Panhandle Energy.
ICDA of Gas Transmission, Gathering & Storage Systems GOAL: Develop a protocol for Validation of dry gas ICDA method: –Identify data needs –Develop procedures.
Managing Stress Corrosion Cracking Williams Gas Pipeline Transco – Ron Scrivner Northwest Pipeline – Dave Katz.
Product and Service Design
Preparing for the Hydrogen Economy by Using the Existing Natural Gas System as a Catalyst // Project Contract No.: SES6/CT/2004/ NATURALHY is an.
INGAA Direct Assessment Industry Workgroups Drew Hevle El Paso Corporation.
1 Commercial Uses of Eyetracking Alan Woolrych School of Computing and Technology University of Sunderland UK.
Overview of the “Recommended LRFD Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges” Ian M. Friedland, P.E. Bridge Technology Engineer Federal Highway.
METAL LOSS IN-LINE INSPECTION SURVEYS LIMITS AND INACCURACIES.
1 In-line Inspection Results Evaluation and Data Integration Olympic Pipe Line Company Ferndale to Renton 16” Project OPS IMP Workshop Houston, TX August.
Enbridge SCC Management Program SCC Workshop Houston - December 2, 2003 Walter Kresic Enbridge Pipelines Inc. SCC Workshop Houston - December 2, 2003 Walter.
Development of a Research Roadmap Related to Safe and Reliable Transportation of Ethanol in Pipelines Gap Analysis - Phase 1 Prepared for Pipeline Research.
Project management Topic 5 Risk. What is risk? An uncertain outcome – either from a positive opportunity or negative threat Risk management is about:
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
MICHAEL BAKER Jr., Inc. Stress Corrosion Cracking SCC Workshop December 2, 2003 Engineering & Energy.
SCC Management 16” Camas to Eugene 26” Sumas to Washougal.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Equipment Life Optimization Program (ELOP) Doug Hilleman February 10, 2011.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
7 Motivation Concepts.
Stress Corrosion Cracking Technical Workshop Office of Pipeline Safety Research and Special Programs Administration SCC Workshop December 2, 2003 Houston,
Wind Composite Services Group/WindCom
Sampling.
Potential Risk Concerning the Use of Hydrogen Peroxide
Comparison of Major Contract Types
Updating the failure probability of miter
Dr. Morgan C. Wang Department of Statistics
Ballot Idea#: 2817 Identifying Coating Faults and Their Severity through Electrolyte Resistivity Measurements Eric Pozniak (PureHM Edmonton Canada) PRCI.
ARIES Pathways Program
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Presentation transcript:

Research Needs on SCC of Pipelines Raymond R. Fessler Stress-Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Workshop DOT/RSPA Houston, TX December 2, 2003

Status of SCC Remains an industry-wide concern SCC is being managed –Probability of failures is low Much lower than would be expected if it were not being managed Probably never will be zero –Integrity of P/L can be assured Cost of SCC management is very high

SCC Gap Analysis What opportunities are there to decrease the probability of SCC failures and reduce the cost of SCC management? What research is needed to take advantages of those opportunities?

STRUCTURE FOR SCC GAP ANALYSIS 1.1. Assess Risk Locate Treat 1.2. Locate SCC and treat 1.3. Change operating practices 1. Existing pipeline Initiation Threshold Growth 2.1. Select resistant steel 2.2. Select effective coating 2.3. Design operating conditions 2. New (future) pipeline Manage high-pH and near-neutral-pH SCC

Criteria for Recommending Research Understanding is not high Probability of success is reasonable Potential benefits far exceed cost of research

Incentives for Additional R&D Improve effectiveness and reduce costs of –Hydrostatic retesting –ILI –Direct Assessment Make future pipelines more resistant to SCC

Objectives for Future R&D Optimize hydrotesting and ILI intervals –Justify on basis of crack growth rate –Extend intervals by reducing crack growth rate through operating practices –Prioritize areas –Optimize procedures Develop ILI for gas pipelines

Objectives for Future R&D (cont.) Validate Direct Assessment for SCC Develop direct-examination sizing techniques Develop simple-to-use ECA methods Validate new repair methods for SCC Develop resistant steels

R&D Approaches Optimize inspection intervals –Improve crack-growth models –Improve site-selection models ILI –Develop technologies –Develop commercial tools Direct Assessment –Field Validation Sizing techniques –Develop & qualify commercial tools ECA methods –Develop simple tool (RSTRENG for SCC) Resistant steels –Evaluate current steels –Understand relationships between composition, structure, properties, & performance

Crack-Growth Models

Several crack-growth models –Leis (Battelle) probabilistic model for high-pH SCC –Rainbow P/L Model for near-neutral-pH SCC –Beaver’s/Lambert’s superposition model All are based on simplified assumptions about growth rate of single crack Some consider interactions between cracks Each has benefits and limitations At least two should be examined and developed more fully

Site-Selection Models

Difficult to evaluate effectiveness –Limited data –Few “control experiments” –Proprietary algorithms –Continual refinements Phenomenological rather than scientific

Site-Selection Models (continued) Mixed industry experience –Geographically specific –More reliable with tape than asphalt –Interdependent factors (e.g., coating type and soil resistivity) Opportunities –Develop scientific basis –High pH vs. near-neutral-pH –Improved soils module Accelerating & Inhibiting factors –Incorporate operating history & coating –Combine industry data

In-Line Inspection (ILI)

No satisfactory commercially available tool for gas pipelines –Liquid-coupled UT too cumbersome and expensive –Elastic wave has inadequate discrimination –EMAT remains to be demonstrated Too early to judge other technologies, but probably long shots –Circumferential MFL –Rotating magnetic-field probe –Gas-coupled UT

In-Line Inspection (continued) Role of PRCI –Support field validations –Develop/encourage/test new technologies Role of vendors: Develop commercial tools Role of DOT Protection of proprietary ideas Assurance of adequate market

SCC Direct Assessment (Covered in other presentations)

SCC Direct-Examination Sizing Techniques (Covered in other presentations)

Resistant Steels

Resistant Steels: R&D Approaches & Issues Empirical approach –Test current and new steels Fundamental approach –Relate SCC susceptibility to micro-plastic behavior, microstructure, composition, processing Issues –Large effort required –Proper coatings and surface preparation provide significant benefit

Speculative Budget Projections

Summary of Opportunities for Gov’t/Industry Cooperation Optimize testing/inspection intervals –Crack-growth models –Site-selection models ILI for SCC –Practical technologies for gas lines Direct-examination sizing and ECA of SCC Resistant-steel development