Interdisciplinary Studies of Ethical and Societal Implications of Nanotechnology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sociology and Climate Change Psychology is how individual things make a difference Sociology is how social things make a difference.
Advertisements

1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
What are the issues important for domestic order? 4.
Deborah Rockstroh PATT27: A Play on Sustainability Christchurch, NZ: Dec 2-6, 2013.
Audiences for Science Thinking Analytically About Audiences Susanna Priest, Ph.D. Editor, Science Communication Visiting Scholar, University of Washington.
PP 7.1 THE ROLE OF BASIN PLANNERS. The Roles of Basin planners Basin planners have three main roles:  Bringing together knowledge  Identifying stakeholders;
UIA Associations Round Table – Europe 2014 Dublin, November 2014 Achieving impact and finding the funds Dr Dragana Avramov PSPC, Brussels 14/11/2014www.avramov.org1.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Dr. Mairead Seymour, Dr. Ann Marie Halpenny, Cathy Kelleher School of Languages, Law and Social Sciences, DIT.
KNOWLEDGE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE CHALLENGE OF MULTIPLE EPISTEMOLOGIES Gilberto Gallopín and David Manuel-Navarrete Symposium: Knowledge Systems.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Ethics & Professional Issues in Information Systems Development.
Sustainable Development as the Global Framework
APPROACHES TO HEALTH PROMOTION
Cape Town, 27. August 2009 Page 1 Science and ethics of climate scientists Hans von Storch Institute of Coastal Research, GKSS Research Center Geesthacht.
Creating the relationship between good science and informed policy John C. Tracy, Director Idaho Water Resources Research Institute University of Idaho.
M EET T HE A T THE Introduction Please hang on a while to learn more about the Dutch National Research Group, what it stands for, what its objectives.
I wouldn’t start from here: Some lessons from the real world of wildlife conservation Felicity EdwardsThe CSE Group Michael Gibeau Parks Canada.
FUTUREtec Gesellschaft für angewandte Informatik GmbH Bridging the gap between research and industry, Prague © Copyright FUTUREtec GmbH.
How to design and organize a public deliberation project Gy Larsen Ida-Elisabeth Andersen The Danish Board of Technology.
Teaching as inquiry: Well intentioned, but fundamentally flawed Leon Benade School of Education Auckland University of Technology.
APPROACHES TO HEALTH PROMOTION. Approaches to Health Promotion 1. Medical 2. Behaviour change 3. Educational 4. Empowerment 5. Social change.
What is risk communication? Risk communication is defined by exchange or sharing of information about risk between risk manager and interested parties.
Overview Science, Technology, Enterprise and Innovation Social issues related to Science and Technology (S&T) Communication of high.
BULLYING IN SCHOOL BASED SETTINGS National Crime Prevention Centre What Have We Learned? March 23, 2006.
Prepared by Dr. Hazem Abu-Orf Urban Planning of Arabic Cities Urban Planning, its theory & Development.
DIRECTORY OF EXISTING PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS IN THE EU (Guy Van Gyes, Tom Vandenbrande, Ellen Schryvers) Budapest, June 12 & 13, 2003.
The Organisational Politics of Taxonomies ISKO July 2015 Joy Siller Taline Babikian CORPORATE TAXONOMY People Management - Learning & Development - Performance.
Tore Tennøe Director, The Norwegian Board of Technology Dublin 8 May 2012 How Different European Countries are Managing the Interface between Science,
Learning to participate in the scientific debate Adriana Valente*, Luciana Libutti*, Michela Mayer°, Alba L’Astorina^ The methodology and results of the.
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Professor Philip Lowe Newcastle University Director of UK Research Councils’ Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Researching Environment - Society Relations.
1.  Policy Cycle  Government actors - incentives  Interest Groups  Interests  Resources  Strategies 2.
Socio-cultural and ethical aspects Anne G. Ekeland Berlin,
THINK TANKS AS CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FORUMS Ruurik Holm (Left Forum, Finland)
9. EAFM START UP B Essential EAFM Date Place 9. EAFM Startup B: Engage Stakeholders Version 1.
Intercultural Dialogue and the European Higher Education Area The People’s Friendship University Sochi, May 2010.
Climate Generation Day 3 Practical Stakeholder and community engagement.
Climate Projections: From Useful to Usability Richard B. Rood, Maria Carmen Lemos, Donald E. Anderson Richard B. Rood
“Participation is a Goal, not just a Means, in NFPs.” Margaret A. Shannon, Ph.D. COST Action E-19 Vienna, September 15, 2003.
Participatory Development. Participatory Development-PD Participatory Development seeks to engage local populations in development projects or programs.
Becoming a Learning Community Module 1 School Division Superintendents Leadership Program July 20-24, 2015.
Making Responsible Decisions
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Advocating for public health at EU level Anne Hoel and Lara Garrido-Herrero European Public Health Alliance Moscow, 28th November 2006.
1 The Workbook Process The Workbook starts by building an understanding of the context of the school and the Prevent agenda. It then focuses on 4 aspects.
The influence of SEA: the psychology and sociology of political decision making IAIA’05 – Prague 2005 Marc Van Dyck, Resource Analysis.
Introduction to Science Fiction and its History. Science Fiction (Sci-fi) is a modern genre that is fueled by the issues of the contemporary world. Sci-fi.
Chapter 2 Perspectives On Human Communication Human Communication in Society 3 rd Edition.
Question motivating workshop: What are the existing and future challenges in coordinating and managing multiple uses of the Chukchi and Beaufort Sea and.
Developed by Aspire - North Business Partnering Programme Delivered by.
3-MINUTE READ THE PREVENT DUTY. What is it and what does it mean for me? This 3-Minute Read summarises the DfE’s document: ‘The Prevent duty: Departmental.
Introducing Ethical Capability Focus on F-6. Objectives  an overview of the Ethical Capability curriculum  introduction of an ethical issue planning.
Minding the Gap How engineering can contribute to a liberal education.
What Is Ethics? Ethics is the branch of philosophy that focuses on moral principles and codes of conduct (Wood, 2010, p.27). Ethics is the study of the.
Testing methods for the co-production of target knowledge Tobias Buser, Network for Transdisciplinary Research td-net, Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.
Engineering Economics Chapter 1 Engineering Decision Making Copyright © 2013 Pearson Canada Inc
European Research 2002, Workshop on Uncertainty, Brussels, November 2002 Extended Peer Reviews in Science for Sustainability 1 Extended Peer Reviews Joachim.
Stuart Hall ENCODING/DECODING MODEL OF COMMUNICATION.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Integration into the decision making process Session.
Seven challenges to environmental policy
AWARE Evaluation Results and Conclusions
Learning to participate in the scientific debate
What does science communication mean to you?
KEY PRINCIPLES OF THINKING SYSTEMICALLY
The Moroccan Observatory on Drugs
Session 2 Challenges and benefits of teaching controversial issues
Exploring the Added value of Climate Adaptation
Profesionalism and Managerial Skill
FIT4RRI Focus Group Meeting to discuss objectives related to embedding of RRI in monitoring system research. Mary Jane Monaghan Joseph Spencer.
Presentation transcript:

Interdisciplinary Studies of Ethical and Societal Implications of Nanotechnology

“…social sciences should (must) be placed in the heart of the discussion of nanotech development and not at the periphery as a second level ‘input’ of nanotechnology and nanoscience research and development” Quote from Fabrice Jotterand (Rice university), at The NanoEthics 2005 meeting of the University of South Carolina (USC)Columbia, SC. United States. March 2-5, 2005

The Goal of the Project To develop an interdisciplinary platform for discussion between Nanoscientists and scientists within Social sciences And to combine scientific imagination with critical search for sources of uncertainty and ignorance within and on the border of nanoscience.

Nanotechnology One of the unexplored frontiers of science We expect our body of knowledge to be improved

Nanotechnology Implies that the assumptions we use today will may be incomplete or wrong Various scientists may have experience skills or other tacit knowledge that indicate where the uncertainties may be But this is hard to bring into the decision-making processes

Some aspects of uncertainty How is the scientists perception of their own knowledge, and the uncertainties in nanotechnology? In the presence of uncertainty ideology & values will play a role; what are the dimensions in the debate? On the background of this I want to investigate alternative approaches to present decision-making tools.

Aspect 1: Knowledge and Uncertainties Map the present knowledge and the perceived uncertainties The scientists’ perception of the quality of their own knowledge New knowledge and insights may emerge as a result of the interdisciplinary discussions

Knowledge and uncertainties Two way learning process between the scientists The aim is not to create consensus, but to make explicit the differences in perception of uncertainty and knowledge.

Aspect 2: the discourse Long term prediction of science and technology and its implication is profoundly inexact. Our experiences are scarce The questions are in part normative We can not avoid let our decisions be influenced of beliefs about the general working of the world

The discourse Literature study (policy documents, NGOs and stakeholders, scientific work, media and the public) What are the dimensions of the debate?

The discourse What do they disagree about (really)? Can expect to find perceptions such as: Techno optimism/pessimism, the importance of types of values, beliefs of predictability, focus on political agenda, perception of the future, reductionism/anti- reductionism etc

Aspect 3: Practical decision-making PP makes it possible to make decisions based on uncertainty. Damage has to be identified and perceived as likely from a scientific point of view

Aspect 3: Practical decision-making No good in complex situations and radical uncertainty Some fear that PP will not be able to protect us against an development of our society that we do not want, or from harm. Now that we are aware of uncertainty, we need to recognise our responsibility also when the real consequences are unknown How do we do this?

Workshop/participation - challenges Practical arrangement of workshop –time consuming to the ones involved – how make people participate? How to reach all the ones that want to participate? How to avoid groups from feeling left out? What about extreme positions?

Workshop/participation - challenges What if nobody want to be involved – what if there is no engagement or interest? Technically difficult How to avoid people fall into locked positions in discussions? How to create ownership to the outcome of workshop/participation?