Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) Orientation Module © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
The Ugly Truth… Most school principals think they are “effective instructional leaders” but few really are.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
PA-ETEP Overview for Teachers. Table of Contents  Registration Registration  Portal Navigation Portal Navigation  Notifications Notifications.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Educator Effectiveness
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Georgia Department of Education
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Jeffrey Freund

Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics

Jeff Freund: Education and Work History 5 Years Master’s of Education in Middle School Math, Curriculum and Instruction Science and Social Studies

Jeff Freund: Education and Work History 6 Years Principal Certification Middle School and Supervisor of Curriculum Elementary Math, and Instruction Certification Science and Social Studies

What I Bring to the District Loyalty 11 years of Experience in Education Middle School and Elementary School Experience Suburban and Inner-City Experience The Ability to Deal with Difficult Students Knowledge of Fair and Consistent Discipline Ability to Lead and Manage Knowledge of Data Analysis, Curriculum and Current Educational Initiatives

Vision for the District Journey to Increasing STEAM Administrator that is Transparent Growth and Achievement Oriented United Community Partnership Active Behavior Plan Research Based, Data Driven, and Standards Aligned Student Focused

EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION MODEL Act 82 of 2012 Goal: To develop educator effectiveness models that will reform the way we evaluate school professionals as well as the critical components of training and professional growth.

Supervision VS Evaluation

Rating Tool Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished With distinguished being viewed as a place that we visit Sets numerical values for the ratings from 0 to 3

Standards of Use for Teacher Observation and Practice: The 4 Domains Off Stage Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 4: Professional Accountability On Stage Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction 50% of a Teacher’s Evaluation

Based on classroom observations, practice models, evidence or documented artifacts.

Standards of use for Multiple Measures of Student Performance Building Level Data 15% Teacher Specific Data 15% Elective Data 20% 50% of a Teacher’s Evaluation

Building Level Data 15%

Teacher Specific Data 15% 5% 10%

Elective Data 20% Student Learning Objectives PDE’s Definition: A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards. Developed Locally Goal Statement with Targeted Content Standards Performance Measures: Assessment Tool Performance Indicators: Expected Level of Achievement

Benefits More effective teacher evaluation Based on Multiple Measures of performance Consistent language Ensures that students have an effective teacher in their classrooms and effective leadership in every building. Better Evaluation leads to more effective teaching. Gives more feedback

What Does This Mean For Us? 98.2% of Teachers were Satisfactory

How Do We Get Everyone to Improve? Determine Strengths and Weaknesses Establish Dialogue with Teachers Use Danielson’s Guiding Questions Professional Development Plan with Teachers Reflective Input All Teachers will have an Individual Plan of Improvement

Electronic Teacher Evaluation Portal Formal Observations – Questionnaires for pre- and post-observation, classroom observation evidence collection, fully interactive Rubrics, and dynamic structuring to include Unannounced observations Student Learning Objectives (SLO) – Goal setting, focus areas, progress tracking, feedback and rating performance Non-Teaching Professional (NTPE) Observations – Evaluate and track over 16 NTPE roles, from school nurse to directors Walk-through and Anecdotal Notes – Short records for unscheduled, classroom sit-ins and miscellaneous professional activities, administrative notes, and accomplishments ACT 82 Rating (Summative Data) Forms – Complete periodic, semi- annual, and annual summative rating forms for teachers, NPEs, and principals. Reference the year’s supervision records, rate your professional, and the form assist with the calculation your final rating.

Thank you for your time and attention.