Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student-centered learning: principles, benefits, challenges, levels of implementation Pusa Nastase, CEU, Budapest Matyas Szabo, CEU, Budapest PASCL Training.
Advertisements

SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses SWOT Opportunities Threats.
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.
STRATEGIC PLANNING – Preparing for the future Module 1 of the SWITCH Training kit.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
Do it pro bono. Competitor/Collaborator Analysis Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Competitor/Collaborator.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
Assessment on the implementation of the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development Dr Nicola Cantore Overseas Development Institute,
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
『华东师范大学』 课程名称: 软件开发实践 Software Development Practice 课程类型: 实践课 第二讲: 项目管理 Lect_02: Manage the Project 主讲 : 软件学院 周勇 副 教授 日期 :
Page 1 FICCI MSME Workshop /10/2015 Making BDS Market Work For MSEs Amit Kumar, GIZ Private Sector Development.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Reflection and roadmap: CFR assessment and roadmap development.
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Visioning: Towards a new initiative on Earth system research for global sustainability research Prof. Deliang CHEN, ICSU Executive Director.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Climate policy mapping and analysis. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F +49.
Exercise: Accreditation of a National Implementing Entity.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Stakeholders and institutions. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
International climate finance governance: role play.
Strategic Knowledge Management DoE-to have Nodal Departments for Climate Change Each Vulnerable sector to have a Nodal officer Establish working groups.
Name Project Management Symposium June 8 – 9, 2015 Slide 1 Susan Hostetter, Reed Livergood, Amy Squires, and James Treat 2015 Project Management Symposium.
Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
O Identify the impacts and dependencies of business operations on biodiversity in agricultural landscapes o Assess and prioritise the risks and opportunities.
Standards and Competencies for Cancer Chemotherapy Nursing Practice in Canada: CANO/ACIO AN INTRODUCTION.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
Module IV.3 NAP Implementation Trainer: [Name]
Feedback on the marine Natura 2000 biogeographical seminar
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Module VI.2 Transfer of knowledge into daily work Trainer: [Name]
Preparing Tables and Figures: Some Basics
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
GE-McKinsey 9-Box Matrix
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
Four-step approach (2) Identify adaptation options
Integrated River Basin Management
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
SMP Slovakia: Main recommendations
Guidance on Non-energy extractive industries & Natura 2000
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013

Credits and conditions of use 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. - The Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Jamie Call, Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management3

Learning objectives Participants have the knowledge and are able to explain that the management of knowledge and (non)-knowledge is a crucial task providing the basis for developing a learning and adaptable institution. Furthermore they are able to draw the line to an array of topics related to knowledge and (non)-knowledge management like meta-information, relevance of unknowns and proactive knowledge management to scan for future risks. 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management4

? Outline What is knowledge and non-knowledge? Why do we assess (non)-knowledge? How do we manage (non)-knowledge? Practical Tips 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management5

? What is knowledge and non-knowledge? In the context of MARISCO, knowledge is the abundance of information available or knowable about the management area → Including details on how information was generated: Who ga- thered it? What were their methods? When was it collected? etc. Non-knowledge is everything that conservation site managers could, should or would wish to know about the area but do not or cannot know Especially relevant form of non-knowledge is that of unforeseen potential risks or threats → Including knowledge relevant stakeholders do not have or refuse to acquire 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management6

? Why do we assess (non)- knowledge? Assessment of knowledge and non-knowledge = crucial task providing basis for developing a learning and adaptable institution During implementation of strategic portfolio, regularly mapping non-knowledge can help to finesse the strategic model and improve the structure of research portfolios 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management7 Did we meet our goals? No? Why not? Did we miss something? What did we miss?       

? How do we manage (non)- knowledge? 1. Collect available information from members of managing entity, relevant stakeholders and scientific literature 2. Develop adequate infrastructure from which knowledge can be easily accessed, stored, used, adapted and further developed → Maintain meta-information (details on how information was gathered) 3. Identify problems which arise due to lack of knowledge and address them through educational strategies 4. Integrate ‘horizon-scanning’ into monitoring strategy Constantly search for and classify potential/real future risks 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management8

? 2. Highly recommended that the organizations employ someone to take care of (non)-knowledge management 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management9 How do we manage (non)- knowledge? 1. Manage non- knowledge by asking what is unknown about the managed system and why it is unknown Try to categorize this non-knowledge:

? Practical Tips 27. Knowledge and non-knowledge management10