Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Backwards Design for Standards-based Education
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Information from Van de Walle (2004) And Wiggins and McTighe (2005)Jamar Pickreign, Ph.D Planning a Problem-Based Lesson John Van de Walle, offers.
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
UbD and the OCG in HPE Stage I: Desired Results Part I of 3.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Course Project Unit Planning Using Wikispace Project Progress: Stage I, Stage II, Stage III.
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
46th Annual MPESA Fall Conference
Parkway School District Day 2 Evidence of Understanding And Teaching for Understanding Understanding by Design THINK DIALOGUE COLLABORATE TEACH Authentic.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
MI/MIS PDU April 2013 Agenda: 4:30-5:00 Deep Dive in LEAP Indicator I.8 5:00-5:15, Networking, Feedback on AT and Special Olympics 5:30 – 6:30 Stage 2.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
The big ideas of UbD UbD big idea Why important? If not… ‘Backward’
Understanding by Design
York Public Schools Curriculum Design September 1, 2010 Toby Boss ESU 6.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Using Understanding by Design
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Stage 3: Learning Activities and Performance Tasks Thursday, August 4th, 2010.
Understanding Backwards Design – U. S. History Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Ashley Blakely Anne-Eliese Raya Shanda Carpenter.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Welcome to EDUC 461! Integrated Methods I: Processes Mercer University McDonough RAC.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
Understanding Backwards Design - Civics Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
HOW IS “WHERETO” LIKE AMERICAN IDOL? All rights reserved. This PowerPoint is intended for use in face- to-face presentation for Parkway School District,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
Understanding by Design UMS Opening Day Why UbD?
Understanding by Design Stage 3 Based on the work of: Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins Copyright (C) 1998 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
3 Stages of Backward Design
Understanding by Design
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins

WooHoo! Elementary School First coordinated look at curriculum mapping Pre-K to Grade 5 Half a year of work on Mathematics instruction, including mapped math units Pre- K to Grade 5 on Atlas Half a year of work on Reading instruction, including mapped reading units Pre-K to Grade 5 on Atlas Elementary Team Leaders 75% of whom attended the AERO curriculum mapping workshop Elementary School First coordinated look at curriculum mapping Pre-K to Grade 5 Half a year of work on Mathematics instruction, including mapped math units Pre- K to Grade 5 on Atlas Half a year of work on Reading instruction, including mapped reading units Pre-K to Grade 5 on Atlas Elementary Team Leaders 75% of whom attended the AERO curriculum mapping workshop

Yeah! Middle and High School First opportunity to review existing unit plans with the aid of Atlas Department specific goals met ranging from the completion of one whole unit on Atlas to the completion of all content and skills in all course maps Subject Area Leaders 50% of whom attended an AERO curriculum workshop Middle and High School First opportunity to review existing unit plans with the aid of Atlas Department specific goals met ranging from the completion of one whole unit on Atlas to the completion of all content and skills in all course maps Subject Area Leaders 50% of whom attended an AERO curriculum workshop

Wow! School-wide A different perspective on the importance of curriculum mapping From form-filling, checklist-ticking curriculum work to individual and team ownership of curriculum mapping A recognition of the benefits of having a systematic approach to mapping the curriculum with Atlas School-wide A different perspective on the importance of curriculum mapping From form-filling, checklist-ticking curriculum work to individual and team ownership of curriculum mapping A recognition of the benefits of having a systematic approach to mapping the curriculum with Atlas

What is UbD? A tool to help “identify the overarching ideas and essential questions that provide important throughlines in the curriculum” A three-stage approach to curriculum mapping by which units are planned with the “end in mind” A tool to help “identify the overarching ideas and essential questions that provide important throughlines in the curriculum” A three-stage approach to curriculum mapping by which units are planned with the “end in mind”

The 3 Stage Plan Stage 1 – Desired Results Stage 2 – Evidence Stage 3 – The Learning Plan Stage 1 – Desired Results Stage 2 – Evidence Stage 3 – The Learning Plan

Stage 1 - Desired Results Established goals Enduring understandings Essential questions Content and skills Established goals Enduring understandings Essential questions Content and skills

Stage 1 To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… The targeted understandings enduring, based on transferable, big ideas at the heart of the discipline and in need of uncoverage?

Stage 1 To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… The targeted understandings framed by questions that spark meaningful connections, provoke genuine inquiry and deep thought, and encourage transfer?

Stage 1 To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… The essential questions provocative, arguable, and likely to generate inquiry around the central ideas?

Stage 1 To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… Appropriate goals (e.g. content standards, benchmarks, curriculum objectives) identified?

Stage 1 To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… To what extent does the design focus on the big ideas of targeted content? Consider: Are… Valid and unit-relevant knowledge and skills identified?

Stage 2 – Evidence (assessment) Performance tasks and rubrics Other evidence Self-assessment Performance tasks and rubrics Other evidence Self-assessment

Stage 2 To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… Students asked to exhibit their understanding through authentic performance tasks?

Stage 2 To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… Appropriate criterion-based scoring tools used to evaluate student products and performances?

Stage 2 To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… A variety of appropriate assessment formats used to provide additional evidence of learning?

Stage 2 To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… The assessments used as feedback for students and teachers, as well as for evaluation?

Stage 2 To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable and sufficient measures of the desired results? Consider: Are… Students encouraged to self-assess?

Stage 3 – The Learning Plan WHERETOWHERETO WHERETOWHERETO

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… Know where they’re going (the learning goals), why the material is important (reason for learning the content), and what is required of them (unit goal, performance requirements and evaluative criteria)? W

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… Be hooked – engaged in digging into the big ideas (e.g. through inquiry, research, problem solving, and experimentation)? H

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… Have adequate opportunities to explore and experience big ideas and receive instruction to equip them for the required performances? E

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… Have sufficient opportunities to rethink, rehearse, revise and refine their work based upon timely feedback? R

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Will the students… Have an opportunity to evaluate their work, reflect on their learning and set goals? E

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Is the learning plan… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Is the learning plan… Tailored and flexible to address the interests and learning styles of all students? T

Stage 3 To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Is the learning plan… To what extent is the learning plan effective and engaging? Consider: Is the learning plan… Organized and sequenced to maximize engagement and effectiveness? O

At the end of Stage 3… Overall Design Review Peer review Self reflection Team analysis Indicators of success Overall Design Review Peer review Self reflection Team analysis Indicators of success

Overall Design To what extent is the entire unit coherent, with the elements of all three stages aligned?

Timeframe Completion of Stage 1 – by the end of Work and progress on Stage 2 – start in 08-09, continue in Work and progress on Stage 3 – start in (?), continue through Overall design review – start in (?), continue until  ! Completion of Stage 1 – by the end of Work and progress on Stage 2 – start in 08-09, continue in Work and progress on Stage 3 – start in (?), continue through Overall design review – start in (?), continue until  !

Immediate Benefits Already more alignment from Pre-K to grade 12 More structured curricular guidelines in place for new teachers More conversations between subject areas about interdisciplinary work Deliberate reflection of practice resulting in more thoughtful decisions about instruction Already more alignment from Pre-K to grade 12 More structured curricular guidelines in place for new teachers More conversations between subject areas about interdisciplinary work Deliberate reflection of practice resulting in more thoughtful decisions about instruction

Long(er)-term Benefits Curriculum aligned to content-standards, which translates into a guaranteed curriculum for our students, Pre-K to 12 Ability to analyze the types of assessments given across grades and make decisions based on that data Ability to look for overlapping content and skills to more deliberately make connections between content areas or to cut content Curriculum aligned to content-standards, which translates into a guaranteed curriculum for our students, Pre-K to 12 Ability to analyze the types of assessments given across grades and make decisions based on that data Ability to look for overlapping content and skills to more deliberately make connections between content areas or to cut content

Next Steps Staff development provided by in- house trainers and external consultants In sections and in teams, work on our curriculum mapping process in stages Set toll-gates and checkpoints based on team and sectional goals Staff development provided by in- house trainers and external consultants In sections and in teams, work on our curriculum mapping process in stages Set toll-gates and checkpoints based on team and sectional goals

Q/A Are there any clarifying questions?