1 Garth Conrad VP Quality Medtronic Advanced Analytics to Improve Medical Device Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IHE-PCD 2006 Survey Final Results 171 Responses 68 Vendors 103 User Community Survey by HIMSS Analytics Report Compiled by Ray Zambuto.
Advertisements

ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Lean Hospital Materials Processes and Throughput Costs in an Increasingly Tightened Economic Market.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
(TITLE SLIDE) GetConnected 2015 Poster Template *This template serves to provide recommendations only. The presenter is ultimately responsible for organizing.
Identifying and Selecting Projects
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Sustainability Community R&D Committee 11/2009 page 1 R&D Project Charter: Real Estate Sustainability Framework Workplace and Real Estate Portfolio Sustainability.
| LUMIS International GmbH | Successful conduct of clinical trials to prove biosimilarity through defining a best fit outsourcing strategy Heike Schoen,
EU Vigilance New Manufacturer Incident Report Form Piloting arrangements.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
Group Members: Anum Baig Hassaan Khalid Gauhar M. Bhatti.
Towards an Integrity Standard in the Pharmaceutical Industry IACC Conference, May 27, 2003 Seoul, Korea Dr. Jillian Clare Cohen Assistant Professor, Leslie.
Clinical Care Pathways (CCCP): Magic or Maze? Norah Bostock Operations Manager: Governance.
Vision of how informatics enables a transformed health system Joyce Sensmeier MS, RN-BC, CPHIMS, FHIMSS, FAAN Vice President, Informatics, HIMSS President,
NHS Highland Quality and Patient Safety Framework
Making the most of your survey results Caroline Powell.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
E QUUS software Delivering transparent data to Senior Management: Data Analytics & Dashboard Reporting Alan Bell, VP Technology Solutions.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Teams and the Learning Healthcare System King C. Li, MD, FRCP(C), MBA Senior Associate Dean, Clinical and Translational Research Isadore Meschan Distinguished.
Margaret Chrymko Erie VAMC October VHA Handbook ASHP Outcomes, Goals, Objectives RESIDENCY PROJECT.
OPERATING ROOM DASHBOARD Virginia Chard, RN, BSN, CNOR
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Proposal CCITI NY 01/27/2014.
Chapter 6 CRISIS MANAGEMENT. Introduction - Crisis: ◦is a situation that specifically involves a pharmaceutical product, medical device or activity with.
Jeffrey S. Barrett, PhD, FCP, Dimple Patel, MS, Bhuvana Jayaraman, BS, Mahesh Narayan, MS, Athena Zuppa, MD, FCP Laboratory for Applied PK/PD, Division.
Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Continuing Medical Education Michael D. Jibson, MD, PhD and Jennifer Seibert, MD University of Michigan.
Marcos Esterman, Associate Professor Industrial and Systems Engineering Department Rochester Institute of Technology Multidisciplinary.
AIDS Community Health Center Treatment Adherence Program CHC Quality Learning Network AIDS Institute April 12, 2007 Roberto Corales, D.O. Danita Djeloski,
Health Management Information Systems
Quality of care, part 4: MI Kim A Eagle MD Albion Walter Hewlett Professor of Internal Medicine Chief, Clinical Cardiology Co-Director, Heart Care Program.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
The Value Driven Approach
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Industry Prospective Robin Bostic, Thoratec VP Health Policy and Health Economics INTERMACS Industry Sub-Committee Representative Our Future.
Physicians and Health Information Exchange (HIE) The Value of HIE to a Physician’s Practice and Consumers.
MDIC 1 George Serafin Deloitte & Touche LLP MDIC Open Forum Quality System Maturity Model Update.
MDIC/Xavier University Device Product Quality Metrics October 8,
The Third Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress 1 How to Implement a Private Payer Reimbursement Strategy Barbara Grenell.
David A. Gerber, MD Professor and Chief Division of Abdominal Transplantation Department of Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
1 Suzanne Fiorino, MDIC CfQ Program Manager MDIC Case for Quality Open Forum October 8, 2015.
Advanced Analytics for Medical Device Quality
(c) Adaptive Processes Consulting Be with the Best!
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
MDIC/Xavier University Device Product Quality Metrics December 8, 2015.
Emerging SACHRP Issues K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of.
The Role of New Markets Advisors in Healthcare Case Study in Medical Devices.
Virtual Hearing of the Health IT Policy Committee Clinical, Technical, Organizational and Financial Barriers to Interoperability Task Force Friday, August.
Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Vanessa Jacoby, MD, MAS Associate Professor Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9c: Quality Indicators.
D Monnery, R Ellis, S Hammersley Leighton Hospital, Crewe.
People centred, low carbon catering A new procurement approach Gaynor Whyles FCP Programme Manager and EcoQUIP Co-ordinator Department for Business, Innovation.
Methodological Issues in Implantable Medical Device(IMDs) Studies Abdallah ABOUIHIA Senior Statistician, Medtronic.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DOMAIN TASK FORCE Rebecca Jackson, MD Co-Lead.
Advanced Healthcare Technology Management Workshop Mombasa, Kenya — 9-12 August 2006 Quality Management & HT Baset Khalaf Tshwane University of Technology.
Topic #1: EOP2A Meetings Please comment on the goals of the proposed EOP2A meeting and the impact that such meetings could have on optimizing dose selection.
Change Management A process for process change by Cory R. Peters Exelon PowerLabs.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
Comprehensive, Collaborative System of Crisis and Emergency Care
Patient Involvement in the HTA Decision Making Process
FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Summary of Public Notification of Emerging Postmarket Medical Device Signals (“Emerging Signals”) Effective: December.
Nicholas D Hartman, M. D. , M. P. H. 1, Kim L. Askew, M. D. 1, David E
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
Team Charter Project Name: Executive Sponsor: Project Purpose:
Members Meeting Leadership Consortium for a Value & Science-Driven Health System March 21, 2019 Vision  Research  Evidence  Effectiveness  Trials.
Presentation transcript:

1 Garth Conrad VP Quality Medtronic Advanced Analytics to Improve Medical Device Quality

2 Objective: To develop and pilot a process that will provide information to customers to use when making decisions about which medical device has the highest quality and thus greatest value to the patient. The outcome of these decisions is to improve access to quality medical devices, leading to improved patient outcomes. Potential barriers: No standards for quality of data or method of collection (measures and metrics) Manufacturers not willing or able to provide data No standard for analytics that provide most useful information Customer not knowledgeable of how to access or use information Improved Patient Outcomes Product Data Advanced Analytics Better Information Informed Decisions

3 Who is the customer?

4 Hypotheses and Research Questions Assumption: Stakeholders use data to make decisions to improve patient access to high quality devices. HypothesisResearch Questions 1.If stakeholders had access to unbiased and relevant information about product quality then they would make better informed decisions.  What information should stakeholders use to determine product quality?  What information do stakeholders use today? 2.If stakeholders consistently applied KPIs and analytical methods to measure product quality then they would make better informed decisions.  What KPIs and analytical methods should stakeholders use?  What KPIs and analytical methods do they use today? 3.If there were a secure process or operating model to enable and encourage individual companies to be fully transparency about product quality, they would share this information.  What information about product quality do manufacturer’s share today?  What is the gap between what is shared today versus what information stakeholders need?  What are the challenges to closing the gap (what would it take for companies to disclose this information)? 4.If stakeholders had unbiased and relevant information from companies and applied consistent KPIs and analytical methods, they would make better informed decisions  How would a stakeholder’s historic decision been different if they applied the proposed data and analytics?

5 Voice of Customer What information do VAC/VAPs use to make a decisions about Quality of Product? (1) MAUDE (2) Field Corrective Actions (3) Service experience Need information (characteristics & facts) not data. Specific to decision being made. Mechanism for manufacturer interaction (e.g. what fixes put in place) What assistance is needed? 1.Standardization of how to gather information 2.Quality of information available is critical 3.Could use assistance in identifying what is important (critical to quality) about the technology “Trust = self service model”

6 Prior work - AHRMM Survey Association for Healthcare Resource & Materials Management (AHRMM) received 165 responses to the survey. More than 80% of the responders indicated that the following criteria were “extremely important” or “very important” when making purchasing decisions about all medical devices. −Improved patient outcomes −Cost per unit −Demonstrated ability to supply −Improved operational efficiency −Durability of device −Clinicians ease of use (interface, programming, etc.) −Adverse Events −Recalls −Comparative Benchmarking of similar devices 104 Hospitals identified one or more of the following data sources as data routinely considered before making a medical device purchase Number responses% of responses Clinical trial data FDA Medical Device Adverse Event Reports (MDR) ECRI reports Comparative benchmark reports MD Buyline Patient/consumer reports290.28

7 Project timeline and milestones

8 Team Members Joanna Engelke Boston Scientific Steering Committee Sponsor Project Manager Project Leader Rahmat Muhammad Deloitte & Touche LLP Garth Conrad Medtronic - Spinal Ann Ferriter FDA Mike Schiller AHRMM Danqing Yu Deloitte & Touche LLP Rachael Marshall Deloitte & Touche LLP Jacqueline Berretta J&J - ASP Jeff Kaser J&J - Depuy Nathan Soderborg Exponent Melissa Lalomia Stryker Daniel Matlis Axendia George Serafin Deloitte & Touche LLP

9 Questions?