PlusDelta Panelist -- dynamic, great, like the variety of speakers, good delivery, experienced, related to audience Focus on “what is known, not what is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Advertisements

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
Teacher Evaluation Model
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
1 Duschl, R & Osborne, J ”Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education” in Studies in Science Education, 38, Ingeborg.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
PlusDelta Panelist – engaging, knowledgeable, clear, informative, accurate, passionate; shifting presenters kept the day moving The King video was good.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
RIDE Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting December 6, 2010.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
PlusDelta Panel – nice mix, experience, well- organized, liked the variety, “highly effective”, Good overview, great activities, engaging, Needed a break.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
PlusDelta Panel - team approach, highly engaging, interesting, interaction, Good overview of APPR, great activities, good pacing & clarification of CCLS.
PlusDelta Panelist -- charismatic, interesting, engaging, inspirational to hear educators w/such broad and varied backgrounds, like the variety of speakers.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research: Principal Characteristics Time Out: §3012-d Planning Forest or the Trees? Making a “To-Do”
Annual Professional Performance Review and YOU! Is the road to hell paved with good intentions?
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
APPR Update School Year.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Local District G Open Court Reading 2nd Grade Assessment Results
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PlusDelta Panelist -- dynamic, great, like the variety of speakers, good delivery, experienced, related to audience Focus on “what is known, not what is up in the air” APPR, good review of new information, valuable, clear, APPR %-what are the rules we play by? Good information on APPRNeed more on APPR and rubrics Good group discussion, table talk, sharing with other districts, collaboration, A little more hands on work, more table talk, more interaction among groups, more role play Video lessons were effectiveIt is important to model practice Liked the humor More concrete information Help build consistency among administrators More information on data portion

2 ExemplarGrade Level Content AreaStandardsTime Straw Man Outline for an Intense Engagement 7Addition and subtraction of rational numbers 7.NS.1, 7.NS.3 15 days Monk’s Words We Live By MSAmerican History - Constitution RI , 5, & 6; W , 4 & 9) 2 days Gettysburg Address HSAmerican History – Civil War RI ; RI , SL ; and L days The Making of a Scientist MSELARI & 8; W.5.2, 4 & 9; SL.5.1; L days

1. Teaching Standards 2. Evidence-based observation techniques grounded in research 3. Application & use of student growth percentile model & VA model (30-2.2) 4. Application & use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubric(s) 5. Application & use of any assessment tools 6. Application & use of State approved locally selected measures 7. Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System 8. Methodology of how scores are generated/composite scores 9. Considerations for evaluating ELLs & SWDs 3

LevelState Assessments Local Measures Other 60 PtsOverall Composite Score Ineffective0-2 Score range locally determined 0-64 Developing Effective Highly Effective Number ranges to be negotiated according to the Appeal.