AfRE Framework of Policies and Procedures for University Research Ethics Committees Overview Prof Margaret Rees AfRE Chair 29 July 2015 Association for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
One Voice Wales Councillor Training Programme Module 3: The Council as an employer.
Advertisements

Introducing Research Ethics & the UREC Professor Chris Newman, UREC Chair.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
B-BBEE VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK.  The BEE Verification process evolved since the release of the B- BBEE strategy in 2003  The dti was requested to provide.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Running Your Club Corporate Governance Presentation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
PROF. CHRISTINE MILLIGAN SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND MEDICINE LANCASTER UNIVERSITY Ethics and Ethical Practice in Research.
Introduction to the planning system for elected members
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Information Security Compliance System Owner Training Richard Gadsden Information Security Office Office of the CIO – Information Services Sharon Knowles.
Tuesday 13 th October MIREC Documents Procedures MIREC-1 - Terms of Reference & Procedure for MIREC Review of Research Projects Involving Human.
ISSUES AND ETHICAL PRACTICES 1. Questions on Issues 1.Are these actually issues? 2.In what ways are they issues for members of your group? 3.What causes.
John Oates Andrew Rawnsley Birgit Whitman. Plan The background to the Framework The structure of the Framework How the Framework might be implemented.
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
The Drivers of Audit Quality Culture within firm Skills and qualities of partners and staff Audit Quality External factors Reliability and usefulness of.
Ethics Corlia van Vuuren January Background Two distinct areas of ethical conduct for health care professionals: Professional behaviour/professional.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Roadmap For An Effective Compliance And Ethics Program The Top Ten Things the Board Must Know [Name of Presenter] [Title] [Date]
Ethics and Clinical Ethics Committee ETHICS. Ethical Dilemma OCCURS IN SITUATIONS WHERE A CHOICE MUST BE MADE BETWEEN TWO OR MORE RELEVANT, BUT CONTRADICTORY.
Issues in Supervision and Consultation Deborah Smith, PhD Michelle March, PhD Corey, 8e, © 2011, Brooks/ Cole – Cengage Learning.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Aline Giordano & Sean Wellington Southampton Solent University.
Carole Wells Kutztown University Andrea Chapdelaine Albright College Ana Ruiz Judy Warchal Alvernia University 11 th Annual International Association for.
AfRE Standard Operating Procedures for University Research Ethics Committees Overview Prof Margaret Rees AfRE Chair 8 September 2015 Association for Research.
The Pay Agreement – An overview. The agreement is set out in the Framework document. The Framework also refers to national guidance which also makes up.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
Lecture 6: More on Ethics. Respect for Dignity of Persons Respecting the rights of individuals Respecting the rights of individuals Non-discriminatory.
AfRE self assessment Birgit Whitman, University of Bristol, July 2015.
Conflicts of Interest in Research Ethics Committee Review Dr. Vichai Chokevivat M.D,MPH Chairman, Forum for Ethical Review Committees in the Asia Pacific.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Corey, 8e, ©2011, Brooks/ Cole – Cengage Learning Chapter 9 Issues in Supervision and Consultation.
ISO :2015 Documentation kit for Accreditation of Certifying Body - by Global Manager Group
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
HOW TO DEVELOP THE BOARD COVENANT SCANPO Wednesday Webinar.
F8: Audit and Assurance. 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Audit Framework and Regulation Section B: Internal audit Section.
Our Club: SUPPORTS Kids Is SAFE for Kids Is FUN for Kids.
Improving Process and Outcomes of Ethics Review at Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University Anusra Thaprom, MBA Chawapornpan Chanprasit, PhD Suthisa Lamchang,
Research ethics.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Good Corporate Governance and Ethics Presented by Ricardo Blas.
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester Ethics in non-medical research Karen Schafheutle PhD Research Practice and Governance.
Framework for Risk Assessment Management and Evaluation - FRAME
Evidence in the research ethics application process
IMS Implementation Project
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
Advocacy Policy Walsingham Support believes that the people we support should be able to express their views as clearly and honestly as they wish to. Some.
Agenda What is Corporate Governance?
Accountability: an EU perspective
Good Clinical Practice
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
Child & Youth Risk Management Strategy 2014/2015 Induction
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Main Features of an Ethics Framework for the Public Sector
Ethics and Clinical Ethics Committee
Mr Mirco Barbero European Commission, IAS.C1
M&E Report: Department of Communications
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
A COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING LANGLEY HALL PRIMARY ACADEMY 14 JULY 2017 Clive Haines & Rebecca Walker.
Ethics & Laws.
DMCS Data Ethics Framework principles
Presentation transcript:

AfRE Framework of Policies and Procedures for University Research Ethics Committees Overview Prof Margaret Rees AfRE Chair 29 July 2015 Association for Research Ethics

Key content Principles of research ethics Principles of governance arrangements Implementing the principles in the ethical review process Model Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Self assessment tool Association for Research Ethics

Basic principles of ethical research Autonomy. The participant must normally be as aware as possible of what the research is for and be free to take part in it without coercion or penalty for not taking part, and also free to withdraw at any time without giving a reason and without a threat of any adverse effect. Beneficence. The research must be worthwhile in itself and have beneficial effects that outweigh any risks; it follows that the methodology must be sound so that best results will be yielded. Non-maleficence. Any possible harm must be avoided or at least mitigated by robust precautions. Confidentiality. Personal data must remain unknown to all but the research team (unless the participant agrees otherwise or in cases where there is an overriding public interest, or where participants wish their voices to be heard and identified). Integrity. The researcher must be open about any actual or potential conflicts of interest, and conduct their research in a way that meets recognised standards of research integrity. Association for Research Ethics

Principles of governance arrangements Independence Competence Facilitation Openness Association for Research Ethics

Governance within the framework: key features Independence and integrity of committee decisions Clear committee structure Appeals procedures defined Misconduct procedures for researchers who act against the requirements of the REC in place Clear job descriptions for REC administrators Association for Research Ethics

Implementing the principles in the ethical review process Policy document with approach to ethics review, terms of reference of the committee and job descriptions for committee members Training and development of committee members Standard operating procedures Other procedures and guidelines eg conduct of meeting, dealing with complaints Association for Research Ethics

Model standard operating procedures should include Role of a REC Constitution of a REC Arrangements for dealing with applications, amendments and appeals Fat tracking ethics review and devolved review Monitoring procedures Association for Research Ethics

Conclusion AfRE promotes excellence in the ethics of research in humans through training and education The full framework is trustees/ framework-complete-2.pdf trustees/ framework-complete-2.pdf Association for Research Ethics