REPORT ON THE L A K E T A H O E B E N C H M A R K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sales Comparison Approach Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting Group
Advertisements

INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH TO VALUE  A BASIC INVESTMENT PREMISE IS: THE HIGHER THE EARNINGS, THE HIGHER THE VALUE.  THE PRINCIPLE OF ANTICIPATION.
Case Study 250,000 square foot suburban office building
Corrections System Master Plan PRELIMINARY CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 CARTER GOBLE LEE In association with CH2M HILL.
Gross Income Multiplier The Income Approach for single family and small (two to four unit) residential properties Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting.
SENIORS HOUSING PANEL. Overview of Presentation  Industry overview and trends  Types of Senior Facilities  Valuation issues  Industry overview and.
“Old Approach to Needs Analysis” The standard practice in Oregon has been to extrapolate forward the past 5 or more years in housing production as the.
1 05/03/14 Presented to: CCCMAC Presented to: CCCMAC Research Valuation and Advisory Services Presented by: Cameron McAlpine, BA, AACI.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G. Miller and David M. Geltner Chapter 12 Value Theory, Highest and Best use Analysis, and the Cost.
SDHC City Linkage Fee Stakeholders Meeting November 19,
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
The Student Handbook to T HE A PPRAISAL OF R EAL E STATE 1 Chapter 16 Land and Site Valuation.
Market Analysis for Shopping Centers Demand, Supply and Equilibrium Analysis Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting Group
Chapter 23 Commercial Brokerage and Leasing
Chapter 3 Development Appraisal and Risk Property Development (6 th Edition) Publisher: Routledge Authors: Professor.
Permit Implementation Regulations (AB 1497) Package Update Key Issues 1. Significant Change and Modified Permit Process 2. Public Noticing and Hearing.
Valuation of Income Properties: Appraisal and the Market for Capital
Fundamentals of Real Estate Lecture 14 Spring, 2003 Copyright © Joseph A. Petry
The Student Handbook to T HE A PPRAISAL OF R EAL E STATE 1 Chapter 20 The Income Capitalization Approach.
An overview of prepared for A D V I S O R Y G R O U P World Services Group, Inc. May, 2004 U.S. Economy & Commercial Real Estate Investment Market.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
City of Newport Beach “Quickie” Tidelands Fee Hikes September 17, 2010 A Study in Poor Process Inequity & Abandonded Commitments.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
Chapter 12: Sales Comparison Approach. The Sales Comparison Approach is Useful When:  An active market exists  Comparable sale are highly similar to.
Life Cycle Cost Model Update Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee January 4, 2007 Stephanie Hoffman and Keenan Konopaski.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
March 27, 2008 CPUC MPR Workshop: Recommended Changes to MPR Gas Methodology and Inputs Union of Concerned Scientists Clyde Murley, UCS Consultant.
NMA Report to City Council June 16, 2015 Presented to Newport Beach City Council 1.
Real Estate Investment Chapter 12 Comparison Screening © 2011 Cengage Learning.
Conclusion with State Lands PRC Sunnyside Lane Tahoe City 20 February 2015 Prepared by Greg Price (415)
Community Meeting May 31, Agenda: 7:00 – 8:00 Topics to include: An overview of the “foundation funding” system of the past several years. (Mr.
Analyzing and Adjusting Comparable Sales Basic Real Estate Appraisal: Principle & Procedure – 9 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning Chapter 9.
Chapter 13: Site Valuation. Approaches to Site Valuation  Direct sales comparison approach  Extraction method  Development approach  Capitalization.
ALACHUA COUNTY COMMISSION QUARTERLY RETREAT ENERGY RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTATION THE ALACHUA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS December 12, 2008.
Fiscal Year 2013 Department of Administrative Services General Services Division Rates and Fees.
Discussions with State Lands 2280 Sunnyside Lane Tahoe City 2 December 2013 Prepared by Greg Price (415)
Residential Refrigerator UES Measure Update Regional Technical Forum April 16, 2013.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Calendar Item 100. Current Continuation of Rent Process 1) Prior to 5-year anniversary, staff performs a rent review. Proposed.
Proposed Regulations for the Commercial Herring Fishery Proposed Regulations for the Commercial Herring Fishery Presented by The Department.
Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004.
Sacramento Housing Market Forecast Appraisal Institute 1 © 2015 The Gregory Group February 5, 2016.
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
Alice Baker Memorial Library Report to Town and Village Board March 2, 2016.
Huntington Beach Oil Field A Proposed Royalty Modification for California Resources Corporation's (CRC) Offshore Leases, PRCs 91, 163, E-392, 425, & 426.
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO LEASING REGULATIONS Calendar Item 5.
Summary and analysis of information disclosed by 29 electricity distributors 12 December 2013.
ITEM 6.B ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AT CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
City of Kodiak Harbor Rates. Harbor Rate Study Recommendations from Northern Economics – Option 1 ▫ 18.5% increase and increase based on Producer Price.
2017 Reappraisal Reappraisal is required at least every 8 years per N.C.G.S. § Last reappraisal was conducted for Reappraisal includes both.
City of San Mateo 2016 Reach Code
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
REPORT ON THE MEDICAL CANNABIS REGULATION AND SAFETY ACT AND THE ADULT USE OF MARIJUANA ACT AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS February 28, 2017.
Environmental Quality Board
Topic 1 Tangible Non-current Assets
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Real Estate Appraisal _______________________________________.
LAKE TAHOE BENCHMARKS CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
2017 FEE REVIEW WORKSHOP SENATE BILL NO. 512, CHAPTER 366, 79TH SESSION 2017, REQUIRES THE STATE LAND REGISTRAR TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN FEES BY REGULATION.
City Council Meeting August 27, 2018
Affordable Housing Fees Study
Update of recommendations for harmonisation for the HBS round of 2005
Introduction Last comprehensive review was undertaken in 2012/2013
EASTERN placer COUNTY NEXUS-BASED AFFORDABLE/Workforce HOUSING FEE
Presentation transcript:

REPORT ON THE L A K E T A H O E B E N C H M A R K

Lake Tahoe Los Angeles Eureka Sacramento Owens Lake San Francisco

Lake Tahoe Benchmark Been in use since Last updated in Currently used for more than 70 leases. Will be used for 600 previously rent-free Recreational Pier Leases as they come up for renewal and conversion to rent-paying leases pursuant to PRC

Overview January 29, 2012 – Commission Meeting February 13 - Staff invites Stakeholders to meeting to seek input. February 29 – Stakeholder Meeting. March 29 – Commission Meeting. Update to Commissioners postponed due to lack of input. April 5 th – Reminder to Stakeholders for input. April 30 – Another reminder to Stakeholders. As of May 24 – Total of 5 comments received.

Lake Tahoe Benchmark Methodology The Benchmarks for docks and buoys are based on a market survey of commercial marinas. The current (2007) Benchmark for docks is $0.804 per square foot. The current Benchmark for buoys is $340 per buoy, Benchmark for docks is not based on a simple formula that is easy for the public to understand. Benchmark for buoys is based on the rate of increase in the market, as surveyed, since the last Benchmark date.

Stakeholder Input 1.Curtis Sproul (attorney) – Comments related to swim areas, not Benchmark methodology per se. 2.Kevin Agan (consultant) – Recommended a methodology tied to the cost to install the docks and buoys, and not on the value of the Public land. 3.William Threlfall (property owner) – Comments related to enforcement and having a non- operational category for buoys. No comments on methodology.

Stakeholder Input (Con’t.) 4.Greg Price ( property owner) – Recommended tying annual rent for buoys to 5% of market rate. Recommended establishing a Benchmark based on 5% of the seasonal market rate for a 25’ slip and then applying it to the number of “safe berth locations” on the dock (catwalks, boathouses, etc.). Proposal does not appear to include rent for footprint of actual dock structure. 5.Tahoe Lakefront Owners’ Association – Criticize current methodology. Propose use of either a Flat Rate Method or a Revised and Discount Benchmark. Both methods employ the criticized CSLC benchmark rate. Haven’t had sufficient time to analyze.

Alternatives 1.Update and continue to use current methodology. 2.Base buoy rent on current dock rate (variation of #1). 3.Base rent for docks and buoys on 9% of appraised land value per CCR ( Title 2, Division 3, Chapter 1, §2003 ). 4.a) Buoy rent based on direct comparison to buoy rates in marinas. 4.b) Dock rent based on per SF rate derived from direct comparison of buoys (variation of 4a). 5.Paired sales analysis.

Alternatives Alternative Docks (Per SF)Buoys (Per Buoy) ---Current benchmark $0.804$340 1Update current benchmark methodology for docks and buoys $0.79$377 2Keep current Benchmark methodology for docks, but apply dock rental rate to buoy areas. Same as No. 1$1,550 3Rent for docks & buoys based on 9% of appraised land value. Preliminary value estimate of $50/SF. $4.50$8,831 4aBuoy rent based on direct comparison. Rents would range from $1,163 (El Dorado Co.) to $3,932 (Placer Co.), or be based on overall average of $2,701 per buoy. ---$2,701 (overall) 4bDock rent based on buoy rent (from No. 4a). Would range from $0.59 (El Dorado Co.) to $2.00 (Placer Co.), or be based on overall average of $1.38. $1.38 (overall)--- 5Use paired sales analysis to isolate value of submerged land. Consultant

Sample Rent Under the Alternatives County LocationPlacer Dock1,150 Sq. Ft. Use Area2,887 Sq. Ft. No. of Buoys (25-ft swing area)2 Buoy Area (based on 25-ft. swing area) Sq. Ft. Sample No.Alternative DocksBuoysRent ---Current benchmark $0.804$340$2,765 1Update current benchmark methodology for docks and buoys $0.79$377$2,803 2Keep current Benchmark methodology for docks, but apply dock rental rate to buoy areas. Same as No. 1$1,550$5,150 3Rent for docks & buoys based on 9% of appraised land value. Preliminary value estimate of $50/SF. $4.50$8,831$29,333 4aBuoy rent based on direct comparison. Rent shown is for Placer Co. ---$3,932$7,864 4bDock rent based on buoy rent (from No. 4a). Rent shown is for Placer Co. $ $5,187 Total 4a & 4b $13,051 5Use paired sales analysis to isolate value of submerged land. ConsultantN/A

Staff Recommendations - Docks MethodRate / RentProsCons 1The 2012 Lake Tahoe Benchmark $0.79/SFBased on the principle of substitution, i.e., rent for a slip in a marina. Not simple or easy for the public to understand. Basis is slips that are rented on a seasonal basis, but the benchmark rent is extrapolated to annual basis to reflect that the facilities occupy State lands year round. Some have questioned the applicability of commercial rates to private recreational use. 2Pier rent extracted from the Direct Comparison Method for buoys $1.38/SF (overall); $0.59/SF (El Dorado Co.); $2.00/LF (Placer Co.) Simple & easy to understand. Based on market data. Consistent with buoy methodology. Not apples to apples (i.e., buoys to piers). Does not adequately reflect the owner's investment in the pier. Reflects seasonal usage only, not year-round occupancy by the dock. 39% of appraised value of the leased land per the California Code of Regulations. Will vary.Reflective of specific property location and physical characteristics. Rate is set by Code. Does not provide efficiencies or consistencies for Commission staff. Based on preliminary information, will most likely result in significantly higher annual rents.

Staff Recommendations - Buoys MethodRate / RentProsCons 1The 2012 Lake Tahoe Benchmark $377 per buoyBased on average rate of change from last Benchmark rate. Different methodology for buoys than recreational piers. 2Direct Comparison Method $2,700 per buoy (overall); $1,160 per buoy (El Dorado Co.); $3,900 per buoy (Placer Co.) Simple & easy to understand. Based on direct comparison of market data. Rents would be significantly higher than under the current methodology. 3Apply recreational pier rate (per SF) from the 2012 Benchmark to buoys $1,550 per buoy ($0.79/SF) Methodology and per SF rate consistent with piers. Overall methodology is not simple or easy for the public to understand. Basis is slips that are rented on seasonal basis, but this benchmark rent is extrapolated to annual basis. Some have questioned the applicability of commercial rates to private recreational use.