Presidential Summit Commitment to Civic Engagement October 3, 2006 Research Park III Symposium Room.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

A comprehensive plan complied by Ms. Concetta DAlessio, Mr. Thomas Gelok, & Ms. Meghan Kilfeather of the University at Buffalo. DAlessio, Gelok, Kilfeather.
Building a Culture of Collaboration Through Civic Engagement and Service Learning Initiatives Debby Scire Executive Director Campus Compact for New Hampshire.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Higher Education Conference. Higher Education Conference on Enrollment Management February 20, 2007 Rose State College Service-learning Shows Promise.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
1 Natalie S. Grant, Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, and Rhonda K. Lewis, Professor of Psychology Service-Learning Faculty Fellows.
CITLA’s Annual Winter Workshop Using Service-Learning to Enhance the Student Experience Rhode Island Campus Compact & Norwalk Community College.
Ford Community Corps Partnerships (FCCP) at UDM. For more than 60 years, the Ford Motor Company Fund and Community Service has worked to build vibrant.
Introduction to Service Learning. What is Service-Learning? Many definitions: “A form of experiential education in which students engage in activities.
1 Role of Provosts in promoting Civic & Community Engagement Academic Council 30 November 2006 Season Eckardt Administrative Director, CSU Office of Community.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Effective Methods for Assessing the Impact of Service-Learning on Students, Institutions, and Communities ANDREW FURC0 University of Minnesota February.
A REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR SERVICE-LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION.
SERVICE, ENGAGEMENT, AND ACCREDITATION Presidential Summit Commitment to Civic Engagement October 3, 2006 Oklahoma City, OK Dr. Steven Crow Executive Director,
Moving from “Just a Project” to “Sustainability” Kathleen M. Beauman Director, Business Education Partnerships Anne Arundel Community College CCTI Summit.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
Learn and Serve Higher Education Grant. What is the purpose of Learn and Serve America? Learn and Serve America supports service- learning programs in.
1 Engaged Campus – Institutional Level and Department Level presented to Engaged Department Summit CSU Chico – May 5, 2006 Season Eckardt, Administrative.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Service-Learning Coordinator AmeriCorps*VISTA Member Truman State University.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
1 Presentation Ivy Tech Community College Terre Haute, IN Jackie McCracken April 21, 2007.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
Service Learning: An Introduction. What is Service Learning? Service Learning combines community service with classroom instruction, focusing on critical.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Welcome to LC W University Parkway. Our Staff Director Summer Valente Academic Service- Learning Director Jonathan Westover Program Coordinator.
Welcome to LC W University Parkway. Who is who? Director Alexis Palmer Academic Service- Learning Director Jonathan Westover Program Coordinator.
Grants as Planning Stepping Stones: Strategic Initiatives for Engagement with India at Winston-Salem State University UNC India Summit UNC General Administration.
Moving from “Just a Project” to “Sustainability” Dr. Andrew L. Meyer Vice President for Learning Anne Arundel Community College CCTI Summit 2006.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
Institutionalizing Service- Learning at Ohio State Ola Ahlqvist & Harmony Cox The Service-Learning Initiative.
Building and Maintaining Partnerships for Community Engagement Victor Rubin Vice President for Research, PolicyLink Engaged Institutions Cluster Meeting.
Service Learning and Civic Engagement: Changing the Way We Educate Students.
2012 Hired Highway Safety Services to assist in the management of SMSA Opened the SMSA Business Office Created a new Web Page Distributed the SMSA Newsletter.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
How to Build a Network. Overview: Recruiting and Mobilizing Community Organizations Together, the Steering Committee and the Community Action Team: Identify.
Capacity development: Research rooted in community partner voice September 24, 2012 Patrick M. Green, Ed.D. Director, Center for Experiential Learning.
URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE PARTNERSHIPS, PARENTS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT October 27, 2011 Presented By Ramona Reyes, Vice President, Columbus.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Rx for Success: Sustainable Partnership Models Douglas M. Simmons, DDS, MPH October 25, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
In existence since 1981, the Commission for Women identifies areas of concern to women employees and students of Penn State, and suggests changes in existing.
The Scholarship of Engagement: Faculty Grant Dollars to Support Your Engaged Teaching, Research, and Service J.R Jamison, M.A. Associate Director Indiana.
Public Affairs 1 Incorporating an Annual, University-wide Public Affairs Theme Across Both Academic and Co-Curricular Activities.
Institutionalizing Service-Learning Canadian Association of Community Service-Learning Jeffrey Howard June 21, 2007 Jeffrey Howard June 21, 2007.
Institutionalization: Service Learning at the University of Central Oklahoma Josh Krawczyk Director, Volunteer and Service Learning Center (VSLC) April.
Nurturing a Commitment to Lifelong Service Jefrey Walls Clemson University Youth Development Leadership Program College of Health, Education, and Human.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
ANDREW FURCO UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 2, 2009 Building the Civically Engaged University through Service-Learning.
Faculty and Staff Community Engagement Award get money to do good things.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Ivy Tech Community College Student Life Ivy Tech Community College Student Life June 29, 2011.
1 Searching for Common Ground: International & USA University Partnerships for Faculty Development FACILITATORS: Denise Drane, Northwestern University.
1 Overview of the Montefiore Emergency Preparedness Coalition Presentation to the New York City Healthcare Coalition Leadership Council February 18, 2016.
Service-Learning and Student Organizations April 25, 2011 Presenter: Barbara Jacoby, Ph.D. 1.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
Let Quality Guide Quality Evaluation Recent Trends Implemented in the Middle East.
Improving, Expanding, and Institutionalizing Civic Learning and Community Engagement Dr. Curt Brungardt Dr. Jill Arensdorf Mr. Brett Bruner Dr. Christie.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Service Learning: What is it and how can it enhance student learning? Kim Buch Psychology.
Civic Engagement and Volunteerism in the Union Linda Corriveau Plymouth State University © linda corriveau, 2011.
Credit Suisse Americas Corporate Citizenship Lalita Advani, Director of Community Engagement.
Service-Learning: A pedagogy and scholarship of civic engagement Marie Watkins, Ph. D. Faculty Assembly August 24, 2011.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
University Career Services Committee
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Service-Learning and Student Success
Service Learning: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Presidential Summit Commitment to Civic Engagement October 3, 2006 Research Park III Symposium Room

Oklahoma Campus Compact Mission Oklahoma Campus Compact (OkCC) supports the civic purpose of higher education that includes developing students as citizens. OkCC will assist member institutions in their efforts to develop citizenship skills by promoting and advancing methodologies including service-learning (SL), volunteerism, community service, and political engagement.

Civic Engagement Methodologies Academic Service-Learning: a teaching methodology that connects learning in the classroom to meeting community needs; Volunteerism: direct service to recipient and the primary beneficiary is the recipient; Community Service: is the engagement in activities where services provided and received are mutually beneficial to both the community and the student. May be connected to coursework, but credit is not awarded (also called co-curricular). Political Participation: Individual and collective actions designed to address issues of public concern; Internships: similarities exist between internships and service-learning, but distinctions exist in the purpose, method, structure, and duration.

THE ENGAGED CAMPUS Positive student, community, and institutional outcomes Student Civic Engagement Institutional Civic Engagement Copyright, Minnesota Campus Compact, 2004 The Home of Engagement

Packet Materials Presidential Summit Agenda Featured Speaker Bios Participant List Oklahoma Campus Compact One-Pager Ms. Gina Wekke PowerPoint Dr. Barbara Holland PowerPoint Dr. Steve Crow PowerPoint Criterion 5 – Engagement and Service Higher Learning Commission Crosscutting Themes Dr. Debra Stuart PowerPoint Overview of the Literature Linking Service- Learning and Retention

Self-Assessment on the Institutionalization of Service-Learning Survey conducted early 2006 Twenty-three Oklahoma Campus Compact member institutions responded The survey involves institutional self- assessment in five dimensions Philosophy and Mission Faculty Involvement Student Support Community Involvement Institutional Support

Average Assessment for Dimension I “Average Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the dimension. Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization Philosophy and Mission of Service-Learning

Average Assessment for Dimension II Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization “Average Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the dimension. Faculty Support and Involvement in Service-Learning

Average Assessment for Dimension III Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization “Average Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the dimension. Student Support for and Involvement in Service-Learning

Average Assessment for Dimension IV Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization “Average Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the dimension. Community Participation and Partnerships

Average Assessment for Dimension V Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization “Average Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the dimension. Institutional Support for Service-Learning

Average Overall Assessment for Service-Learning in 2006 Stage 1=Critical Mass building Stage 2=Quality Building Stage 3=Sustained Institutionalization “Average Overall Assessment” is the average of all stage levels (1-3) reported within the 5 dimensions.

Dim I: Philosophy and Mission of Service-Learning Definition of Service-LearningStrategic Planning Alignment with Institutional Mission Alignment with Educational Reform Efforts Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3

Faculty Knowledge and Awareness Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3 Faculty Leadership Faculty Incentives and Rewards Dim II: Faculty Support and Involvement in Service-Learning

Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3 Student Awareness Dim III: Student Support for and Involvement in Service-Learning Student Opportunities Student Leadership Student Incentives & Rewards

Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3 Dim IV: Community Participation and Partnerships Community Partner Awareness Mutual Understanding Community Partner Voice & Leadership

Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3 V: Institutional Support for Service-Learning Coordinating Entity Policy-Making Entity StaffingFunding

V: Institutional Support for Service-Learning Administrative SupportDepartmental Support Evaluation & Assessment Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3

Dim I: Changes In Philosophy and Mission of Service-Learning: Progressed Regressed Definition of Service-Learning Strategic Planning Alignment with Institutional Mission Alignment with Educational Reform Efforts Regressed Progressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed Regressed Unchanged Progressed Regressed Unchanged

Definition Strategic Planning Alignment w/ Institutional Mission Alignment w/ Educational Reform Efforts Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Changes In Philosophy and Mission of Service-Learning:

Dim II: Changes In Faculty Support and Involvement in Service-Learning: Faculty Leadership Faculty Incentives and Rewards Regressed Progressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed Regressed Unchanged Faculty Knowledge and Awareness

Changes In Faculty Support and Involvement in Service-Learning: Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Faculty Knowledge And Awareness Faculty Leadership Faculty Incentives And Rewards

Dim III: Changes In Student Support for and Involvement in Service-Learning: Student Awareness Student Opportunities Student Leadership Student Incentives and Rewards Regressed Progressed Unchanged RegressedProgressed Regressed Unchanged Progressed Regressed Unchanged

Changes In Student Support for and Involvement in Service-Learning: Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Student Leadership Student Incentives & Rewards Student Awareness Student Opportunities

Dim IV: Changes In Student Community Participation and Partnerships: Community Partner AwarenessMutual Understanding Community Partner Voice and Leadership Regressed Progressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed Regressed Unchanged

Changes In Community Participation and Partnerships: Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Community Partner Voice & Leadership Community Partner Awareness Mutual Understanding

Dim V: Changes In Institutional Support For Service-Learning: Coordinating Entity Policy-Making Entity Staffing Funding Regressed Progressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed Regressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed

Dim V: Changes In Institutional Support For Service-Learning: Administrative SupportDepartmental Support Evaluation & Assessment Regressed Progressed Unchanged Regressed Progressed Regressed Unchanged

Changes In Institutional Support for Service-Learning: Administrative Support Departmental Support StaffingFundingPolicy-Making Entity Coordinating Entity Evaluation & Assessment

Self-Assessment on the Institutionalization of Service-Learning Of the 15 institutions who reported having no standing service-learning committee only 7 have plans to establish one on campus. 83% of reporting institutions have mission statements that include student citizenship or civic engagement.

Services Needed by Institutions from Oklahoma Campus Compact 74% need training 70% need resources The area of least need (44%) is help in building collaborative networks among campuses, state agencies, and community organizations. Nearly 1/3 of the 23 reporting institutions need services in all areas 61% need conferences 65% need sub-grants 57% need information and research

Oklahoma Campus Compact (OkCC) OkCC’s purpose is to serve our members: We can help with technical training for faculty, students, administrators, and others related to civic engagement methodologies Provide access to national models Sponsor conferences, workshops, etc. Serve as a clearinghouse of information and resources Student programming Offer incentives, grants, and programming to help institutions move in whatever direction is appropriate Campus Visits and more….

Contact Ms. Gina M. Wekke, Executive Director Oklahoma Campus Compact Post Office Box Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (405)