Systems Engineering at The University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Susan Ferreira, Assistant Professor and SERC Director March 10, 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Systems Engineering Research Center UARC Dr. Dinesh Verma Executive Director January 13,
Advertisements

Project L.O.F.T. Report May 2007 through October 2007 Creating a design to meet stakeholder desires and dissolve our current set of interacting problems.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Phase 6: Implementing Sumber Kepustakaan : gunston.gmu.edu/ecommerce/mba731/doc/BP R_all_Part_I.ppt 1 Plan IT implementation Plan organization implementation.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
APPLICATION OF A RISK-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR EVALUATING AVIATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION TO A CONTROLLED-FLIGHT-INTO-TERRAIN ACCIDENT by Denise.
Page 0 Optimization Uncertainty Decision Analysis Systems Economics Masters of Engineering With Concentration in Systems Engineering A 30 hour graduate.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
Towards COSYSMO 2.0: Update on Reuse Jared Fortune, USC Ricardo Valerdi, MIT USC ARR 2009 Los Angeles, CA.
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Enterprise Architecture
INCOSE 1 st reactions. One other area that struck me has the sheer number of levels of proficiency—in ours we are going with 5 and the first one is limited.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
The University of Texas, Arlington Dept. of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems Engineering Master of Science, Systems Engineering Systems Engineering.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Industrial Engineering Roles In Industry
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
1 ISA&D7‏/8‏/ ISA&D7‏/8‏/2013 Systems Development Life Cycle Phases and Activities in the SDLC Variations of the SDLC models.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Sigma Lean Execution Plan for Black Belts
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Candidate Collaborative Projects for Net-Centric Application Michael F. Siok, PE Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Government Procurement Simulation (GPSim) Overview.
Software Engineering - I
Project Management Planning Minder Chen, Ph.D. CSU Channel Islands
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Mysoltani.ir سایت فیلم روشهای مشارکتی Technology Foresight Foresight is about preparing for the future. It is about deploying resources in the best.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
A Prescriptive Adaptive Test Framework (PATFrame) for Unmanned and Autonomous Systems: A Collaboration Between MIT, USC, UT Arlington and Softstar Systems.
27/3/2008 1/16 A FRAMEWORK FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT (FRERE) Dr. Li Jiang School of Computer Science The.
1 V&V Needs for NextGen of 2025 and Beyond A JPDO Perspective Maureen Keegan JPDO Integration Manager October 13, 2010.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Operations Research The OR Process. What is OR? It is a Process It assists Decision Makers It has a set of Tools It is applicable in many Situations.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Click to edit Master title style What is Business Analysis Body of Knowledge?
STEM at the Academics and Career Center A report of the ACI STEM Task Group to the School Board February 14, 2008 Arlington Public Schools.
UTA/ARRI. Enterprise Engineering for The Agile Enterprise Don Liles The University of Texas at Arlington.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Building a BA Center of Excellence Gain Momentum...Produce Results!
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Enabling Building Efficiency: The NYC Urban Technology Innovation Center TIMOTHY CROSS, COLUMBIA ENGINEERING IEEE INNOVATION DAY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
SILICE SinnoLAB Model- Social Start-up Generator 1.2
Presentation transcript:

Systems Engineering at The University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Susan Ferreira, Assistant Professor and SERC Director March 10,

Systems Engineering My Background 17+ years Defense and Aerospace industry employment –Systems engineering for complex software intensive systems –Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems & Solutions, General Dynamics, Northrop Corporation Multiple systems engineering roles over the development cycle 2

Systems Engineering Agenda UTA Systems Engineering Program Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) PATFrame Activities & Support 3

Systems Engineering The University of Texas at Arlington Main campus in Arlington, Riverbend Campus in east Fort Worth, Fort Worth Center (Santa Fe Station) in Downtown Fort Worth 100 buildings on 420 acres A new engineering research building under construction 78 BS, 74 MS, and 33 PhD Programs 5700 Degrees awarded in ,000 students 1320 Faculty Founded in

Systems Engineering UTA SE Program Background Systems Engineering identified as the most critical human resource need in engineering by Aerospace and other DFW industry Partnered with industry to develop a research and education capability focused on the methods, tools, technologies for Systems Engineering UTA has established Systems Engineering as a strategic initiative 5

Systems Engineering Systems Engineering Program Master of Science in Systems Engineering Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) Ph.D. in IE with a Dissertation Focus in Systems Engineering 6

Systems Engineering MSSE Education Objectives A practical experience- based program Provides students with the fundamental and applied management and technical knowledge to support the development of large scale complex systems Immediate relevant value for students when returning to or entering industry 7

Systems Engineering Master of Science Features Systems Engineering I Tailored for busy working professionals with evening or distance classes Instructors with significant industry experience in Systems Engineering and Program Management ensures business perspective Cohort-based core classes provides practical team focused experience Systems Engineering II Systems Engineering III Intro to Systems Engr. Cohort-based 8

Systems Engineering Local Companies/Government Represented by SE Students/Alumni Accenture Bell Helicopter Federal Aviation Administration Georgia Tech Research Institute L-3 Communications Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Lockheed Martin Missiles & Fire Control Mary Kay Cosmetics Motorola Perot Systems Raytheon Systems Siemens U.S. Army Vought Aircraft Systems 9

Systems Engineering Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) The SERC is an Official University Center of The University of Texas at Arlington The SERC Seeks to Address Key Challenges with Innovative Approaches 10

Systems Engineering SERC Vision & Purpose Premier industry, government, and academic institution collaborator, fostering mutually beneficial and ongoing relationships with our partners while working jointly to solve critical problems and initiate new areas of ground breaking research in systems engineering Solve complex, interdisciplinary, “never before seen”, and defined/unsolved problems Identify and develop research areas of interest with industry and government agency partners Address international and national level system engineering problems 11

Systems Engineering 12 Systems Engineering Testbed UTA SERC Research Agenda Mission: Optimize Systems Engineering for Complex Systems Architecture SE Process Simulators Variability Reduction Applied to SE Complex Software Intensive SE Lean Principles Applied to SE Requirements Engineering SE Understanding & Analysis SE Process Improvement Focus Areas Systems of Systems Decision Support Tools Defense & Aerospace Health Care Energy Environment Domain Areas

Systems Engineering SERC Projects A Prescriptive and Adaptive Testing Framework (PATFrame) for Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems The Development of a Systems Engineering Simulator (TSGC) Systems Engineering Testbed: Systems Engineering Learning and Research Re- invented Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP) Exam Preparation Course 13

Systems Engineering SE Simulator Research Direction Focus: Develop various simulators that can be used to better understand process dynamics of systems engineering and evaluate project, program, and enterprise factors and options Utilize systems dynamics modeling –Value of system dynamics modeling Ability to deal with non-linear processes Illustrate feedback loops 14

Systems Engineering SE Simulator Research Direction SE Simulator benefits –provide experiential learning & training –accelerate development of systems engineers –evaluate “what-if” scenarios in a no risk/no impact manner –test ideas about a project or system prior to implementation –study & predict project performance 15

Systems Engineering SE Simulator Research Direction Leverage software engineering simulator research Precedent set in developing software engineering project related simulators that explore & help understand system dynamics –Effects of multiple software development risks –Effects of requirements volatility –Effects of schedule pressure –...on cost, schedule, quality …and other key indicators Analogous work can be done for systems engineering 16

Systems Engineering SE Simulator Research Direction Simulator scope: Process, Phase, Project (R&D project, Systems Development project), Program (multi-project), Enterprise level (multi-program) –Phase focused: Requirements Engineering, Integration & Test, Transition to Operation, Logistics, etc. Life: concept definition through disposal, development, etc. Level: System, System of Systems (SoS) Key Project Issues/Risks: requirements volatility, excessive schedule pressure, low morale/team commitment, inadequate staffing & resource timing, etc. 17

Systems Engineering TSGC Systems Engineering (SE) Simulator Objective: Develop causal models and architecture for a systems engineering process simulator tailored for NASA processes Provides a tool that can help others understand complex systems engineering project system dynamics Focused on key project risks –E.g. Requirements volatility 18

Systems Engineering Example Research Questions What Systems Engineering Factors are Affected by Requirements Volatility? How can These Factors and the Uncertainty Associated to These Factors be Modeled? What is the Project Management Impact of Requirements Volatility? Do Certain Process Factors or the Use of Specific Requirements Engineering Techniques Mitigate the Risk of Requirements Volatility (RV)? 19

Systems Engineering Original Causal Model 20

Systems Engineering SE RV Causal Model 21

Systems Engineering Systems Engineering Testbed A unique, nationally recognized laboratory resource for Systems Engineering research and for the development and deployment of Systems Engineering methods and tools -Unique Systems Engineering simulation environment -Unprecedented access to SE tools for various phases of a project lifecycle -Resource for training mid-career and new systems engineers -Multi-use reconfigurable, dynamic resource and research environment 22

Systems Engineering CSEP Exam Preparation Course Objective: Prepares systems engineering professionals to take the INCOSE CSEP exam and includes a comprehensive coverage of the INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook 23

Systems Engineering UTA PATFrame Activities & Support Unmanned and autonomous (UA) system of systems (SoS) test and evaluation (T&E) ontology model Causal models DoDAF extensions 24

Systems Engineering UAS SoS T&E Ontology Model Provides a common foundation of understanding for UA SoS test and evaluation Describes (1) objects, (2) relationships between objects, (3) use of objects inside and outside domain boundary, and (4) rules which govern the entities existence and behavior Used in support and development of other PATFrame deliverables 25

Systems Engineering UAS SoS T&E Ontology Model What are the key “things” in the test domain? (system(s) under test, test process, test products, test infrastructure [including test equipment, simulators, stimulators, test sensors, …], test personnel, etc)? What are the associated attributes? When are these things created? How are these things related? 26

Systems Engineering System Test and Evaluation Process (Draft)

Systems Engineering March 11 Ontology Workshop Questions What key “things” are we missing? How does your process map to the draft T&E process? What is missing? What is the same? Which organizations are responsible for each subprocess? What triggers the test process to occur? What are the inputs? Outputs? Who are your subject matter experts? Can we contact them? 28

Systems Engineering Causal Models Causal models –used to illustrate the combination of factors and associated relationships between the factors (including nonlinear relationships) –lead to development of systems dynamics models 29

Systems Engineering DoDAF Extensions Develop recommendations to augment DoDAF for test and evaluation 30

Systems Engineering Project Related UTA Research Centers / Laboratories –Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) –Center on Stochastic Modeling, Optimization, & Statistics (COSMOS) –Autonomous Vehicles Laboratory –Enterprise Engineering Group –Human Factors Laboratory –... Many others... 31

Systems Engineering Thank You! Dr. Susan Ferreira

Systems Engineering Backup Slides Additional information about SE program and SERC 33

Systems Engineering UAS SoS T&E Ontology Model Major Tasks 1.Conduct a literature review –Identify current and projected T&E policies, standards, procedures, processes and other related information 2.Conduct a survey of key subject matter experts 3.Analyze literature review and survey –Findings will include an initial identification of ontology inputs 4.Develop ontological views and document the ontology model views 5.Validate the ontology 6.Document final ontology in a report and present the results 34

Systems Engineering Causal Model Major Tasks 1.Conduct literature review –Identify challenges (or problems) and risks inherent in T&E (UAS SoS). –Generate a prioritized list of challenges and risks based on potential criticality and commonality of problems, challenges and risks seen in the literature review and findings from MIT’s prioritized set of challenges identified for Task #1. 2.Develop an initial set of causal maps for a selected set of challenges and/or risks –The causal maps will identify the factors and relationships between the factors believed to be related to the challenges and/or risks 3.Validate the causal models 4.Document final causal models in a report and present the results 35

Systems Engineering DoDAF Extensions Major Tasks 1.Conduct a literature review –Identify the current or proposed use of DoDAF in the T&E community. This will be used as a basis to assist in evaluating prospective DoDAF related recommendations 2.Conduct a survey to evaluate the use of DoDAF in the UAS T&E community –Effort will identify the extent of use, types of DoDAF views used, and (if used) the current processes used to generate T&E specific views 3.Develop recommendations to generate UAS T&E SoS views and how the views may be created using the framework for dynamic adaption 4.Validate the DoDAF results 5.Document DoDAF activity results in a report and present the results 36