Channel Coordination and Quantity Discounts Z. Kevin Weng Presented by Jing Zhou.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry Authors: C. Corbett, C. S. Tang Presenter: T.J. Hu.
Advertisements

Yang Cai Oct 01, An overview of today’s class Myerson’s Auction Recap Challenge of Multi-Dimensional Settings Unit-Demand Pricing.
PAUL.S.CALEM DANIEL.F.SPULBER.   This paper examines two part pricing by a multiproduct monopoly and a differentiated oligopoly.  Two part pricing.
Seminar in Auctions and Mechanism Design Based on J. Hartline’s book: Approximation in Economic Design Presented by: Miki Dimenshtein & Noga Levy.
Dr. A. K. Dey1 Inventory Management, Supply Contracts and Risk Pooling Dr. A. K. Dey.
Chapter 13: Learning Objectives
Pablo Serra Universidad de Chile Forward Contracts, Auctions and Efficiency in Electricity Markets.
Lecture 5 Decision Analysis Chapter 14.
Chapter 13 Inventory Management
Chapter 13 Inventory Management McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter 14 Advanced Pricing Techniques
March 25, 2006Teck Ho Overview of Experiment 2 Markets, A and B Each Market lasts for 6 rounds Each group plays 3 times in Market A and 3 times in Market.
CHAPTER 9 Basic Oligopoly Models Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Supply chain  Supply chain is a two or more parties linked by a flow of goods, information, and funds This section builds heavily on excellent review.
Who Wants to be an Economist? Part II Disclaimer: questions in the exam will not have this kind of multiple choice format. The type of exercises in the.
Competitive Analysis of Incentive Compatible On-Line Auctions Ron Lavi and Noam Nisan SISL/IST, Cal-Tech Hebrew University.
INDR 343 Problem Session
Anonymizing Web Services Through a Club Mechanism With Economic Incentives Mamata Jenamani Leszek Lilien Bharat Bhargava Department of Computer Sciences.
Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics, 9e Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice.
Static Games of Incomplete Information.. Mechanism design Typically a 3-step game of incomplete info Step 1: Principal designs mechanism/contract Step.
MNG221- Management Science –
Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination.
Contracts for Make-to-Stock/Make-to-Order Supply Chains
Chapter 14: Advanced Pricing Techniques McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Operations Management
Five Sources Of Monopoly
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e Global Edition 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education. 1-1 Copyright.
Backup Contracts under Supply Risks and Stochastic Demand Jing Hou.
Perfect Competition. Production and Profit Optimal output rule for price taking firms ▫Price equals marginal cost at the price-taking firm’s optimal quantity.
Monopoly with Incomplete Information Eric Maskin and John Riley The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Summer, 1984), pp Presented by:
Auction Seminar Optimal Mechanism Presentation by: Alon Resler Supervised by: Amos Fiat.
Monopoly.
Review Demand curve, consumer surplus Price elasticity of demand.
1 Inventory Control with Stochastic Demand. 2  Week 1Introduction to Production Planning and Inventory Control  Week 2Inventory Control – Deterministic.
1 Chapter 8 Practice Quiz Tutorial Monopoly ©2004 South-Western.
Channel Coordination and Quantity Discounts Z. Kevin Weng Management Science, Volume 41, Issue 9 (September, 1995), Prepared by: Çağrı LATİFOĞLU.
Perfect Competition Chapter 9 ECO 2023 Fall 2007.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Chopra and Meindl Supply Chain Management, 5e 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Supply Contracts with Total Minimum Commitments Multi-Product Case Zeynep YILDIZ.
Competition, bargaining power and pricing in two-sided markets Kimmo Soramäki Helsinki University of Technology / ECB Wilko Bolt De Nederlandsche Bank.
1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Operations Management Session 23: Newsvendor Model.
WIN WIN SITUATIONS IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Logistics Systems 2005 Spring Jaekyung Yang, Ph.D. Dept. of Industrial and Information Systems Eng. Chonbuk.
Inventory Models in SC Environment By Debadyuti Das.
Pasternack1 Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities B. A. Pasternack Presenter: Gökhan METAN.
EE 685 presentation Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence By Steven Low and David Lapsley.
© 2010 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Chapter 7 Incentive Mechanism Principle-Agent Problem Production with Teams Competition.
Chapter 14 Equilibrium and Efficiency McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
15-1 Economics: Theory Through Applications This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
Advanced Pricing Techniques
A Supplier’s Optimal Quantity Discount Policy Under Asymmetric Information Charles J. Corbett Xavier de Groote Presented by Jing Zhou.
11-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Role of Cycle.
Contents Introduction Economies of scale to exploit fixed costs
11-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Role of Cycle.
14-1 Learning Objectives  Explain why uniform pricing does not generate maximum possible total revenue and how price discrimination can generate more.
© 2007 Pearson Education 10-1 Chapter 11 Managing Economies of Scale in the Supply Chain: Cycle Inventory Supply Chain Management.
Oligopoly Overheads. Market Structure Market structure refers to all characteristics of a market that influence the behavior of buyers and sellers, when.
Five Sources Of Monopoly
PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE MARKET - FIRM’S SUPPLY
IE 8580 Module 2: Transportation in the Supply Chain
Advanced Pricing Techniques
Chapter 14: Advanced Pricing Techniques
Managing Short-Term Assets
Perfectly Competitive Supply: The Cost Side of The Market
© 2007 Thomson South-Western
Chapter 14 Sourcing Decisions in a Supply Chain
Chapter Seventeen: Markets Without Power.
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Chapter 14 Sourcing Decisions in a Supply Chain
Perfectly Competitive Markets
Operations Management
Presentation transcript:

Channel Coordination and Quantity Discounts Z. Kevin Weng Presented by Jing Zhou

Introduction D(x) SupplierBuyer x p Q c mQ C S (Q) Operating Cost: C b (Q) Channel x, Q Can be coordinated through the mechanisms of quantity discounts and franchise fees

The Role of Quantity Discounts in Channel Coordination Economic literature Marketing literature Production management literature Quantity Discounts Price discrimination Effect on the profit Demand decreases in price Operating cost is fixed Effect on the operating costs Demand is fixed Operating cost is a function of order quantities Quantity discounts are effective and necessary mechanisms to achieve channel coordination

Assumptions  The buyer uses EOQ model as her inventory policies  The supplier offers the buyer or a group of homogeneous buyers an identical quantity discount policy  The supplier has complete knowledge of the buyer’s demands, holding costs and ordering costs  The demand decreases in selling price

The Model D(x) SupplierBuyer x Channel p Q c mQ xD(x) Revenue: pD(x) S S D(x)/Q+h S Q/2 Ordering & Holding Cost: S b D(x)/Q+h b Q/2 Purchasing Cost: cD(x) pD(x) xD(x) S J D(x)/Q+h J Q/2 cD(x) h J =h S +h b S J =S S +S b

The Model (Con’t) G S (p) = (p-c)D(x) - [S S D(x)/Q + h S Q/2] Supplier’s profit: G b (x,Q) = (x-p)D(x) - [S b D(x)/Q + h b Q/2] Buyer’s profit: G J (x,Q) = (x-c)D(x) - [S J D(x)/Q + h J Q/2] Channel’s profit:

Scenario 1 (Decentralization) G b (x,Q) = (x-p)D(x) - [S b D(x)/Q + h b Q/2] The buyer’s problem: 1. Given x, the buyer’s optimal order size is the resulting ordering and holding cost is 2. With Q b (x), the buyer’s profit function is 3. For any p charged by the supplier, let denote the buyer’s optimal selling price that maximizes her profit the corresponding order quantity is

Scenario 1 (Decentralization) G S (p) = (p-c)D(x) - [S S D(x)/Q + h S Q/2] The supplier’s problem: 1. With the buyer’s selling price, and the order quantity, the supplier’s profit function is  Let denote the supplier’s unit selling price that maximizes, let which is a lower bound on the supplier’s profit 3. Accordingly, is the buyer’s minimum profit and is the system’s profit without coordination

Lemma 4.1 Buyer’s EOQ order quantitySupplier’s EOQ order quantity Supplier’s operating cost: The buyer’s EOQ order quantity also maximizes the supplier’s profit only if

Scenario 2 (Cooperation) 1. Given x, the joint operating cost is minimized by the joint EOQ order quantity the resulting joint ordering and holding cost is 2. With, the joint profit function is G J (x,Q) = G S (p) + G b (x,Q) = (x-c)D(x) - [S J D(x)/Q + h J Q/2] Joint profit:

Lemma 4.2 Joint EOQ order quantityBuyer’s EOQ order quantity With joint EOQ order quantity, the joint profit will be at least the system’s profit without joint coordination Given, Profit:

Profit Impact of Joint Policy 1. The supplier can charge a p such that the resulting profit is higher than his minimum profit, i.e. Given a joint policy, if Then both the supplier and the buyer would accept the joint policy and 2. This p leads the buyer’s profit is higher than her minimum profit, i.e.

Profit Impact of Joint Policy (Con’t) With and, we have where 1. The joint profit increases if the joint unit selling price x satisfies 2. If x is chosen such that g(x) > 0, then g(x) represents the increased unit profit due to the joint EOQ order quantity 3. also leads to an increase in the demand rate from to The increased profit as a result of joint coordination

Dividing the Profits  If the buyer’s unit purchase price then the buyer’s profit increases by and the supplier’s profit increases by  Suppose x* maximizes the increased total profit g(x)D(x) and both parties agree to employ the optimal joint policy

Implementation of the Optimal Joint Policy  A control mechanism that make both parties choose the decision policies that maximize their individual profits as well as the joint profit simultaneously  To maximize the joint profit, both conditions should be met: a) the buyer chooses the selling price as x* b) the buyer chooses order quantity as a) a quantity discount policy with an average unit purchase price p J will induce the buyer to order b) but a quantity discount policy is not sufficient to induce the buyer to choose the optimal unit selling price x*

Implementation of the Optimal Joint Policy (Con’t) Given a QD policy with order quantity and the average unit purchase price P J, the buyer’s profit function is, let 2. There exists a unit purchase price, such that the buyer’s optimal unit selling price 3. If the buyer make a fixed payment to the supplier, then the buyer’s profit function is Identical when x = x* 1.

Quantity discounts and franchise fees  Quantity discounts and franchise fees can coordinate the channel  The role of quantity discounts is to ensure that the joint order quantity selected by both parties minimizes the joint operating costs  The role of franchise fees is to enforce the joint profit maximization for both parties

Equivalence of AQD and IQD  As long as the average unit discount rate and the order size are the same for either types of quantity discount schemes, the increased benefits due to quantity discounts are identical The selection of the type of quantity discount has no effect on achieving channel coordination

Discussion  Contribution  Generalize the two streams of research on the roles of quantity discounts in channel coordination  Investigate the role and limitation of quantity discounts in channel coordination Quantity discounts alone are not sufficient to guarantee joint profit maximization AQD policy and IQD policy perform identically in benefiting both the supplier and the buyer

Discussion (Con’t)  Limitation  Should discuss the partial concavity property when sequentially solving a two- variable maximization problem  The author used some results without necessary proofs. These results may depend on the demand distribution.

Thank you!