Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.C. Aschenauer1. Requirements from Physics on IR E.C. Aschenauer 2 Summarized at: Hadron Beam:
Advertisements

R. De Vita, INFN – Genova Workshop sulle prospettive di fisica adronica a Jefferson Lab Genova, 27 Febbraio 2008 Hall A Upgrade New Multi Purpose Spectrometer(s)
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Space-time description of hadronization in DIS Taisiya Mineeva Jefferson Lab University of CT NNPS, 26 June 2008.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Roberto Francisco Pérez Benito On behalf the HERMES Collaboration European Graduate School Lecture Week on Hadron Physics Jyväskylä, Aug 25-29, 2008 HERMES.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: D(e,e   p RTPC )X D(e,e   p RTPC p CLAS )X N(e,e   )XD(e,e   p CLAS )X E = 5.3GeV Simulation Procedure.
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
1 Ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions Timoshenko S., Emelyanov V. Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (State University) (for the STAR Collaboration)
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
POETIC 2012 Indiana University R. D. McKeown 12 GeV CEBAF.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
1  Calorimetry  W-Scintillator & W-Si  compact and high resolution  Crystal calorimeters PbW & BGO BNL, Indiana University, Penn State Univ., UCLA,
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
DVCS with Positron Beams at the JLab 12 GeV Upgrade
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in JLAB Hall A
Photon 2003Falk Meissner, LBNL Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration Photon 2003 April 2003 Coherent Electromagnetic.
MEIC Detector Rolf Ent MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
The Quark Structure of the Nucleon Inti Lehmann & Ralf Kaiser University of Glasgow Cosener’s House Meeting 23/05/2007 Nucleon Structure Generalised Parton.
Ultra-peripheral Collisions at RHIC Spencer Klein, LBNL for the STAR collaboration Ultra-peripheral Collisions: What and Why Interference in Vector Meson.
Chapter 29:Nuclear Physics
Detector & Interaction Region Concepts for DES and SIDIS Pawel Nadel-Turonski Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA EICC meeting, January 10–12, 2010, Stony.
F.-H. Heinsius (Universität Freiburg) on behalf of the COMPASS collaboration Gluon polarization measurements at DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso,
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
“Backward” Particle Detection for 12 GeV in Hall C Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University, ISRAEL Hall C Meeting, January 18-19, 2008 Jefferson Lab, Newport.
Overview of IR Design V.S. Morozov 1, P. Brindza 1, A. Camsonne 1, Ya.S. Derbenev 1, R. Ent 1, D. Gaskell 1, F. Lin 1, P. Nadel-Turonski 1, M. Ungaro 1,
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions at Medium and Low Energies [contents] 1. Neutrino and weak interaction 2. Cross section for ν-A and e-A reactions 3. EMC effect.
Current eRHIC IR Design  Important features  10 mrad crossing angle Needs to be integrated into the current STAR and upgrades Important for luminosity.
Particle Physics Particle Physics Chris Parkes April/May 2003  Hydrogen atom Quantum numbers Electron intrinsic spin  Other atoms More electrons! Pauli.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad m 3.67 mrad 60 m m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e GeV p.
Unpolarized Physics Program HERA-3 Workshop, MPI, 17-Dec-2002 A. Caldwell Physics Topics: eP, eD, eA Detector Requirements Accelerator Requirements Sources:
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
The First Transverse Single Spin Measurement in High Energy Polarized Proton-Nucleus Collision at the PHENIX experiment at RHIC RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Some thoughts to stimulate Discussion E.C. Stony Brook, January
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
Search for direct evidence of tensor interaction in nuclei = high momentum component in nuclei = TERASHIMA Satoru 寺嶋 知 Depart. of Nuclear Science and Technology,
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
From RHIC to eRHIC E.Kistenev XIX International Baldin Seminar, Dubna, 2008.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Interaction Region and Detector
MEIC Interaction Region & Tagging
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Large Booster and Collider Ring
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
Plans for nucleon structure studies at PANDA
Forward (ion-SIDE) Tagging: Motivations, ConCepT, Performance
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
Search for f-N Bound State in Jefferson Lab Hall-B
Update on JLEIC Interaction Region Design
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Geometry Tagging for Heavy Ions at JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University 2 nd Electron Ion Collider Workshop March 15-17, 2004 Jefferson Lab

Forward Tagging Electron-Ion collider offers unique opportunities for tagging particles emitted in the forward direction at very low momentum transfer:  Target Fragmentation in DIS  Recoil proton or nucleus in exclusive DVCS and Deep Virtual meson production  Spectator tagging in Quasi-Free reactions N(e,e’)X: D(e,e’p)X, D(e,e’n)X  Zero degree electron scattering for tagging of Quasi- Real photons.

ELIC Baseline Design 5 GeV/c (electron)  50 GeV/c proton  Luminosity L = /cm 2 /s Nuclear beams A Z,  Magnetic rigidity K = A P / (Ze) = 50 GV/c  N=Z nuclei, P A = (A/2) P = (25 GeV/c) A  Luminosity L A = L A 2 /Z 4 Crab crossing at 100 mrad Longitudinal & Transverse momentum spread      = 3·10 -4  Longitudinal acceptance  P = 0.3%  Transverse Beam Stay Clear??

Singles rates dominated by Bremsstrahlung e Z  e Z   Ion beam Radiation Length : X 0 ( A Z Z+ ) = [A/Z 2 ] 7·10 25 /cm 2  Tagging rate (e,e’x) Coincidence rates dominated by quasi-real photon true coincidences Tagging spectrometer (extended ‘C’ magnet) for first dipole on one IP  0.5 < k  / E e < 0.95 (photon)  0.05 < E e ’ < 0.50 (scattered electron) Zero degree electron scattering

Hadron Beam tagging DVCS:ep  ep   Form 3D image of proton as a function of quark wavelength  Size = [1fm] ln(1/x) = 5 fm at x=0.01  ELIC, x > 0.01 for Q 2 > 5GeV 2 Proton recoil  P’ = P(1-x), resolve shift xP from beam momentum P  P , resolve 0.2GeV/ln(1/x) = 40 MeV/c at x=0.01 P  / P > = 3  at IP  x>3E-3 separated (=0) in first 100m  Require 2cm radius aperture in all elements  Require 2 x 10cm drift space before and after each dipole.  Pperp? Emmitance = 0.3mr = 15 MeV/c  Can we detect at 3 sigma = 45 Mev/c??

Phase Space Densities (Wigner Distributions) of Quarks inside the Proton, for Short, Medium, and Long wavelength quarks. Scale is 1 fm  r.m.s. charge radius of proton. Wavelength  h/(Mx) Surfaces of constant density Courtesy, X. Ji, UMd

DVCS: Recoil proton tagging in lattice Ring acceptance x < Tag protons with x >  Trackers (Si…), 2 cm I.d., 4 cm. O.d. just after and just before each dipole in first few dipoles of ring. Resolve (1-x)P and P .  Compact detectors, with 1m drift space.  Roman Pot Design (reinsertion after fill)?  Lattice apertures should accommodate larger acceptance.  Expanded magnet aperture for detectors inside magnets.

N* decay veto Resolve e p  e p  from e p  e N*   e N    has long. momentum (m/M)P = P/7   has typical transverse momentum m  = 7m/P = 20 mr   0 2 photon opening angle = 7m/P = 20 mr  Fine grained calorimetry in front of FF Quad.  Recoil neutron  = 7m/(6P) = 0.3 mr  ZDC  Recoil proton P+ = (6/7) P 133 mrad bend in Crab crossing dipole.

Neutron Detection Detect neutrons at zero degrees  Nuclear beam momentum AP/Z = 50 GeV  P = 25 GeV per nucleon  Aperture  = 200 MeV/ P = 200 MeV/25 GeV = 8mrad Aperture = 2.4 cm at final focus quad (3m). = Hadron Calorimeters (20 cm length) before final focus  Roman Pot design needed between crab crossing dipole and final focus quad Aperture 2 cm at 6 m  angle>3 mrad  3 cm at 10m ZDC

Deuterium Quasi-Free Deuteron  Magnetic rigidity K = 50 GeV=AP/Z  P = 25 GeV/nucleon Spectator proton  K’ = 25 GeV  Lattice transport should allow detection of these protons. Deuteron bends 100 mr in crab crossing dipole. Proton will bend 200 mr!!  Need a C-magnet tagging spectrometer design or tracking detectors inside magnet.  Point-to-point focus with post-IP quadrupole

Nuclear Quasi-Free Beam rigidity = K = AP/Z A Z(e,e’ A-1 Z)X, [quasi-free on neutron]  Magnetic Rigidity of daughter K(A-1)/A<K A Z(e,e’ A-1 [Z-1])X  Magnetic Rigidity of daughter  K Z (A-1)/[(Z-1)A] > K Tracking needed at both large and small radius in first dipoles

Nuclear Decay fragments Quark fragmentation, measure nuclear temperature: Evaporation neutrons near 0-deg Evaporation protons at rigidity P <AP/Z

Conclusions First few elements in lattice should be designed with thought to detection of forward fragments Compact detectors near 0deg can enhance physics program.