Three restrictions on judicial discretion: Mandatory minimum sentences “Three strikes” Sentencing guidelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Punishment and Sentencing
Advertisements

Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Residential Community Supervision Programs
EMERGENCE IN 1980S/GOALS PROGRAMS BOOT CAMPS Intermediate Sanctions.
May 15, Where are We Now? An estimated 5.1% of all persons in the U.S. will be confined in a State or Federal.
Modern Correctional Philosophy
13 Prison and Jails.
Mainstream and Crosscurrents, Second Edition Chapter 13 Corrections in the Community.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Corrections
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
Sentencing and Punishment
Corrections Carrying out the sentence of the decreed by the judicial system History of Corrections Community Corrections Intermediate Sanctions Institutional.
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing
Corrections n Carrying out the sentence of the decreed by the judicial system –History of Corrections –Community Corrections –Intermediate Sanctions –Institutional.
BY TANYA MARIA GOLASH-BOZA Chapter Eleven: Racism and the Criminal Justice System.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Community Corrections Research Papers Due At Beginning Of Class Probation, Parole And Intermediate Sanctions.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
The use of Deadly Force Tennessee v. Garner (1985) “Fleeing Felon” Trend of police killings (and killings of police) have been downward Most department.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
History Probation 101.  Middle Ages (1200s-1800s)  Benefit of the Clergy  Sanctuary  Judicial Reprieve  Common Theme/Purpose?
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
The Correction of Offenders generally divided into 2 broad categories:
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions Alternatives to incarceration Operated by probation/parole agencies No need to create new bureaucracies More punitive.
Community Corrections Chapter 11 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
Chapter 5 The Criminal Justice System. Components of the Criminal Justice system The criminal justice system is far more than law enforcement officers.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
CANADA’S PRISON SYSTEM. Entering Prison Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Corrections: Wassup with that?. What is Corrections? Agencies and programs that carry out the sentence of the court  Institutional Corrections = prisons/jails.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
Chapter 13 Prisons and Jails
SENTENCING Overview/Review The “PSI” and “Risk Assessment” Sentencing Disparity Sentencing Guidelines Who Dictates Time Served?
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Probation History Probation 101. Early Precursors Middle Ages (1200s-1800s) Middle Ages (1200s-1800s) Benefit of the Clergy Benefit of the Clergy Sanctuary.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Criminal Justice Unit 4.  Read  Should euthanasia (aka assisted suicide) be legal?
Modern Correctional Philosophy. Performance Objectives Refer to POST performance objectives Refer to POST performance objectives.
Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more jails, more sentences, throw people in.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Unit III Flashcards Chapters 5 and 6.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
CE-Notes
Three restrictions on judicial discretion:
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Chapter Ten Incarceration
The Correctional Context
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Sentencing.
Presentation transcript:

Three restrictions on judicial discretion: Mandatory minimum sentences “Three strikes” Sentencing guidelines

Sentencing Guidelines n Typical Guideline –Criminal History Score X Offense Severity –Each combination = specific range of sentences n Do they work? –They do reduce sentencing disparity –BUT, do they simply shift discretion to the prosecutors and the legislature?

Corrections n Carrying out the sentence of the decreed by the judicial system –History of Corrections –Community Corrections –Intermediate Sanctions –Institutional Corrections

The Middle Ages to the 17th Century n The Middle Ages –Feudal period: blood feuds--> wergild –Later Middle ages (Henry VIII, Elizabeth I) Increase in corporal and capital punishment Bizarre and extravagant tortures n 17th Century –Poor laws and “houses of correction” –Transportation (for profit), galley slaves

Colonial America (1600s-1750s) n Punishment was public n Punishment was corporal or capital n Prison-like institutions existed, but were not used as “punishment”

COPORAL PUNISHMENTS

The Rise of the Penitentiary ( ) n William Penn –Revised criminal code in Pennsylvania to forbid torture and mutilation; ordered new “houses of correction” n Walnut Street Prison (1790) –Other states (New Jersey, New York) followed

Walnut Street Jail and Eastern Penitentiary

Pennsylvania vs. Auburn System n Pennsylvania –Western Penitentiary, Eastern Penitentiary –Silent System n New York –Auburn Prison –Congregate System n Only difference? –Isolation of inmates during the day

Corrections in the 1800s n Auburn System wins debate –Easier to perform labor; the only way to perform factory labor –But, prison brutal, corporal punishment prevalent n Prison building boom (1850s) n Prison Industry –Contract system, convict-lease, state account

The Progressive Era n We’ve already talked about the progressives –1920s –Attacked many social ills (working conditions, poverty….) –In Criminal Justice Argued that rehabilitation (not punishment, penance) should be the goal of corrections Platform of indeterminate sentences, probation, parole.

Corrections from 1970 to present n Faith in rehabilitation crushed –Liberals = justice model; Conservatives = punish n 1970s = deterrence n 1980s-present = deterrence/incapacitation –Return to determinate sentencing –3 strikes legislation –Chain gangs, “strip-down” prisons

Pennsylvania vs. Auburn System n Pennsylvania –Western Penitentiary, Eastern Penitentiary –Silent System n New York –Auburn Prison –Congregate System n Only difference? –Isolation of inmates during the day

Corrections in the 1800s n Auburn System wins debate –Easier to perform labor; the only way to perform factory labor –But, prison brutal, corporal punishment prevalent n Prison building boom (1850s) n Prison Industry –Contract system, convict-lease, state account

The Progressive Era n We’ve already talked about the progressives –1920s –Attacked many social ills (working conditions, poverty….) –In Criminal Justice Argued that rehabilitation (not punishment, penance) should be the goal of corrections Platform of indeterminate sentences, probation, parole.

Corrections from 1970 to present n Faith in rehabilitation crushed –Liberals = justice model; Conservatives = punish n 1970s = deterrence n 1980s-present=deterrence/incapacitation –Return to determinate sentencing –3 strikes legislation –Chain gangs, “strip-down” prisons

Conscience and Convenience n Why were the first prison built? –“Penitentiaries” –“Correctional Facilities” n Why do we still build prisons if we no longer believe in rehabilitation? –Incapacitation as the “default” goal of prisons….or “convenience”

The Corrections Continuum n Probation n Intermediate Sanctions n Jails n Prisons

Probation n Father of Probation is John Augustus n Formally adopted in progressive era n Suspend sentence, in return, offender abides by “conditions of probation” –Conditions set and enforced by judicial system –Offenders who “fail” may have probation revoked, and original sentence imposed

Functions of Probation Departments n Pre-sentence Investigation (PSI) –Interview offender, case history, tied to rehabilitation –Includes recommendation for sentence n Supervision of Offenders –Counseling, meet with offenders –Help with job, broker community resources –Supervise (house visits, drug testing)

Use of Probation n Almost 2/3 of the total corrections population is on probation –Roughly 3.5 million offenders are on probation –Average Caseload = 113 n Goal has shifted –Rehabilitation to supervision/zero tolerance

Parole n Parole as release from prison –Discretionary release –Parole board = appointed by governor –Rehabilitation and intermediate sentences n Parole as supervision –Similar to probation supervision –Early release a privilege, therefore must follow conditions of release

Abolish Parole? n Typically, states move to abolish “discretionary parole release” n When this is done, “post release supervision” is still part of the process

How “effective” are probation and parole supervision? n Cost savings –Probation and parole are much less expensive than prison n Recidivism –Large differences in “recidivism” across jurisdictions –As high as 65% (California felons), as low as 25% (Huntsville, TX) –Depends upon “risk” of clients

Intermediate Sanctions Probation Prison Death ISP EM Boot Camp

WHY do these critters exist? n Prison crowding in 1980s n Probation viewed as failure n Need for “continuum” of sanctions

What is the goal of these critters? n Divert offenders from prison (save money) n Reduce recidivism (through deterrence) n Provide an option to judges that fits between prison and probation

Intensive Probation or Parole Supervision (IPS) n Idea is to “soup up” traditional supervision –Reduce Caseloads (15 to 40 offenders) –Daily contact with offender –Routine drug testing –Curfews, home and employment visits

Do ISP’s work? n Do ISP’s divert from prison? –NO, judges are reluctant to send “prison-bound” offenders to ISP (Net Widening) n Do ISP’s reduce recidivism? –NO, when compared to similar group of offenders, they actually do worse (fishbowl effect) –Similar to “California Caseload Experiments” of the 1970s

Shock Incarceration (boot camps) n Short, intense incarceration to “shock” the offender into his/her senses –military drill and discipline, physical exercise, hard physical labor –typically reserved for young, non-violent, first-time offenders –short time-span, typically 6 months

Do boot camps work? n Reduce Recidivism? –NO, boot camp graduates have similar recidivism rates as offenders who receive different sanctions n Divert Offenders? –Possible, but not likely –Depends upon where in the system they are diverted

Home Confinement and Electronic Monitoring n Home confinement is an old practice n Electronic Monitoring is used to enforce home confinement –Technology emerged in the 1980s –Most are bracelets that work like invisible dog fences –Tell probation/parole officers whether or not a person has broken curfew

Residential Community Corrections n Traditional “Half-way house” –Used to reintegrate prison inmates into society n Now –Traditional functions –Sanction for probation violators –Day reporting centers –Split sentences (probation + RCC time)

How do RCC’s Work? n Typically, they are house-like structures (not prison-like) –Inmates (clients) are usually free to leave during the day (job, classes) –Return at night –Most RCC’s are privately run

Evidence for Cost Savings and Diversion n In order to divert and save $, demonstrate that the offender would’ve went to prison if not for the intermediate sanction –Most programs demonstrate “net widening” –Exception--if correctional personnel make decision.

Evidence for Recidivism n None of these sanctions have demonstrated recidivism reductions. –Why not? All of them are based on the principle of specific deterrence. Example of boot camp--why would this reduce recidivism? –Exception: some incorporate intervention programs grounded in good theory

Evidence for Providing a “Continuum” n This is the sole “Victory” for intermediate sanctions –Offenders report that ISP is more painful than traditional probation, and some suggest it is worse than prison –Is this enough to justify intermediate sanctions?

Why are these Critters thriving? n Provide Continuum n Politically Powerful –Boot camp residents with shaved heads, saluting…. –Public wants “harsh” punishments –Myth of effectiveness

Institutional Corrections Go to jail, go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200

JAILS n County Level Institutions –Usually run by Sheriff and deputies n House inmates (less than 1 year) and pre-trial detainees n Conditions notoriously poor –Little programming, no medical facilities –Violence, shifting population, suicide rates high

Prisons n Hold individuals sentence to at least 1 year n Operated by the executive branch –Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) 98 Facilities 126,000 inmates Most inmates (60%) are serving time for drug offense Prisons ranked on a 1 to 6 scale (1 = FCI in Colorado)

State Prisons n Over 500 prisons, and 1.2 million offenders n Governor typically appoints warden n Organization –Maximum (razor wire, guard towers…) –Medium (similar to max, but less serious offenders) –Minimum (typically campus style)

Since the late 1970s, the total number of inmates in custody has increased dramatically

The incarceration rate has kept pace

Why the dramatic increase? n Change in public opinion, and political emphasis –Three strikes laws, “truth in sentencing” –Drug Policies n Increase in felony convictions n Factors that do not clearly influence incarceration –Crime rates –Economy

Profile of Prison and Jail Inmates n Racial Profile –35% White, 44% Black, 11%, Hispanic –11% of black males in 20s and 30s n Most (98%) are male n Most are poor, with less than a high school education n Most (60%) have been in prison before

The Pains of Imprisonment n Gresham Sykes –Material possessions –Heterosexual relationships –Security –Autonomy n Deprivation model vs. Importation model n Does old “inmate code” still exist? NO

The Inmate Economy n A black market exists in almost all prisons –Sex, drugs, alcohol, food, better living conditions… –What is the currency of the prison economy? CIGARETTES n Why not “stamp out” the prison economy? –Guards are pragmatic (worry about the big stuff) –Some guards are part of the economy

Prison Gangs n Similar to the “outside,” gangs are divided along racial lines n Roughly 6% of inmates identify with a gang n Gangs control economy, rackets… –Primary concern is gang violence, and the possibility of riots

Women’s Issues n Typically single prison per state –Get less resources –More difficult to visit n Pregnancy, motherhood –Where do children go if mothers are locked up?

Does Rehabilitation Work? n Martinson (1975) “nothing works” –He later recanted his position, and argued that dome things do “work,” but nobody listened n Don Andrews (Canadian Psychologist) –Much “rehabilitation” is “correctional quackery” –What works? Cognitive/Behavioral based programs Intensive intervention with follow-ups