FINNISH FOOD SAFETY INDICATORS Leena Räsänen

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

AIR OPERATOR SURVEILLANCE. OBJECTIVES Determine compliance with regulatory requirements - safe practices Detecting changes in operational environment.

Advertisements

1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.

Dr. Richard Raymond Under Secretary for Food Safety USDA Office of Food Safety Tuesday, November 15 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection.

Appendix H: Risk training slides (sample). What is Risk? “ Risk is the effect of uncertainty on objectives ” AS/NZS ISO31000:2009.

EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS.

Regulators’ Compliance Code Zoë Dayan Secondee Ministry of Economy, Lithuania.

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.

ALERT: The Basics Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

0 0 Water Sector and Regulation in ALBANIA WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY Avni DERVISHI Chairman of Albanian WRA November 25,2013, Florence.

EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.

Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.

Analysis of the DMR 2013/14 Annual Report 15 October 2014.

Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities The activities and responsibilities of the Regulatory Body GSR Part 1.

1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service Winston Felton, D.V.M. Dearborn Circuit Supervisor Madison District.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.

Limits of Inspections and Enforcement, Tools and Approaches to Promote Private Sector Compliance and Improve Safety and Outcomes Donald Macrae, WBG Consultant.

Annual Report Executive Summaries Food and Veterinary Office Unit F1-Country profiles, Coordination of Follow-up.

Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

Key changes and transition process

1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.

DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency

OFFICIAL CONTROL OF FOOD LABELLING AND FOOD QUALITY CONTROL Dr. Pirjo-Liisa Penttilä Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland.

Market Surveillance Authorities intervention actions How the measures (corrective/repressive) are taken by the competent market surveillance authority.

The Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration: Moving Forward Together Christopher Braden, MD Director, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental.

1 1 BRANCH: CORPORATE AFFAIRS 1. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES To provide financial and strategic support services that enhance service delivery by the.

Managing Contamination Through Chain to Improve Public Health Outcomes Birds, Bacteria & Baselines.

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.

Importance of traceability in Food and Feed Production – Responciples of FBO and CA By Regulation 178/2002 Art. 19 Zagreb, Croatia Jaana Elo.

State regulation of the SMEs in the Russian food market as an element of ensuring food security of the country. Ekaterina Silanteva PhD student School.

Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.

Optimal Food Safety Sampling Under a Budget Constraint Mark Powell U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis.

1 Judi Lee/Janice Attrill, MPI J MPI Update for NZFMA – Mar 2014 Salmonella Strategy & Animal Feeds Review.

SAPS ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY OVERVIEW TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE – 13 SEPTEMBER 2011.

Sub-group "Indicators" Grange November, 2012.

Monitoring for the Elimination of Iodine Deficiency -Introduction of the framework- Moldova – April Arnold Timmer UNICEF Regional Office.

Kari Dommarsnes Seniorinspektør Mattilsynet Infectious microorganisms in fresh, imported vegetables Kari Dommarsnes Seniorinspektør Mattilsynet (The Norwegian.

Bank Audit. Internal Audit Internal audit is an independent, objective assurance activity and can give valuable insight in providing assurance that major.

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.

Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 HACCP Impacts on Contamination Levels in Meat and Poultry Products: FSIS Perspective Delila R. Parham, DVM Office of.

U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Public Health Based Slaughter Inspection: Rationale and Process August 7,

1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.

Indicators in Malaria Program Phases By Bayo S Fatunmbi [Technical Officer, Monitoring & Evaluation] ERAR-GMS, WHO Cambodia & Dr. Michael Lynch Epidemiologist.

Indicators in Malaria Program Phases By Bayo S Fatunmbi [Technical Officer, Monitoring & Evaluation] ERAR-GMS, WHO Cambodia.

Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Economic Development Department on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Ahmed Moolla October.

Data Needed to Measure HACCP Impacts on Public Health Jack Guzewich, R.S., M.P.H. Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 May 6, 2002.

Organising of the Official Food Control in Finland Jorma Hirn Director General National Food Agency.

Bjørn Bauer Manager of PlanMiljø Danish Inspection Guidelines IMPEL Management Reference Book AC IMPEL Project – Training and institutional analyses Support.

Experiences with Controlling Listeria monocytogenes in Ready- to-Eat Food Processes W. Payton Pruett, Jr., Ph.D. ConAgra Refrigerated Foods USDA Listeria.

SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.

Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.

Outcomes of the FMC review Vania Tomeva, PIFC consultant July 2013, Tbilisi 1.

FOOD FOR GROUPS: Food Safety Awareness Campaign Ellie Chan and Karina O’Loughlan.

Work shop on Procurement Key-performance indicators with selected implementing entities Public procurement and property administration agency August 2016.

MICROBIAL FOOD SAFETY A FOOD SYSTEMS APPROACH

Quality of Education - Teachers' Professional Training and Development

Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of

The American Public Health Association’s 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition November 7, 2007.

Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.

2018/19 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FOR MISA

the Public Procurement Audit Practical Guide

2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS PREPARATORY WORKS

National Cancer Center

Customized interventions to increase compliance with hygiene rules

Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year.

Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Solly Jiyana.

Zsuzsa Sötét Monitoring and Evaluation Departement

Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.

Presentation transcript:

FINNISH FOOD SAFETY INDICATORS Leena Räsänen

Food safety organisation

Implementation of the plans Monitoring the effects of implementation - Use of resources - Implementation of the control plans - Sector based MANCP-reports Corrective actions Changes needed Annual control plans Continuous improvement – long and short term PDCA’s Annual planning Strategic planning State budget, national strategies, Changes in operational environment Impact indicators Effectiveness and efficiency indicators of CA’s

Finnish food safety rating system Oiva (Finnish “Smiley”) “Oiva” meaning “excellent” The publicity of the food control results became possible in 2011 by the change of the national food law (23/2006) Oiva is coordinated by “the Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira” and carried out by municipal food control authorities –At first a pilot project “Oiva”, now expanding

OIVA evaluation grades Food safety level is indicated by four smiley grades; excellent, good, to be corrected and poor A BCD

The objectives of OIVA –Increase the transparency of the activities of food business operators and authorities Consumers are able to vote with their feet –Harmonize food control Standardize the inspections Promote the risk-based approach Improve the effectiveness of controls –Encourage the business operators to improve food safety

Indicators for impact Goal: High level of food safety is maintained –Objective1: Food-borne illnesses remain at acceptable level IND1 Number of human foodborne cases Target, incidences/ inhabitants Campylobacter13,4 Salmonella6,0 Yersinia10,0 Listeria1,3 EHEC0,6

Indicators for effectiveness Goal: High level of food safety is maintained –Objective 1: The Oiva inspections improve compliance of FBO’s IND2 Trends in Oiva inspections (smiley) Target: YearCoverage of Oiva inspections% of FBOs achieving two of the best grades (A or B) %85 % %85 % %88 % %90 %

Indicators for effectiveness Goal: High level of food safety is maintained –Objective1: the proportion of FBO’s with C or D in Oiva, which get A or B in follow-up inspection IND3 % of FBO’s which have improved their performance in Oiva inspections Target (% of FBO’s improving their performance in next inspection) FBO’s which have got grade C100 % (gets grade A or B in next inspection) FBO’s which have got grade D100 % (gets grade A or B in next inspection)

Indicators for effectiveness Goal: High level of food safety is maintained –Objective1: Compliance of FBO’s with labelling requirements IND4 % of FBO’s compliant with labelling requirements Target: Percentage of inspections on labelling in compliance 85 %

Indicators for efficiency and quality Objective1: Official controls are efficient and risk based –Objective2: Variation of results in Oiva inspections among municipal CA’s are acceptable level IND5 % of A, B, C ja D grades of Oiva inspections of municipal CA’s Target: Will be decided later when the results of two or three years are available

Indicators for efficiency and quality Objective1: Official controls are efficient and risk based –Objective2: CA’s carry out risk based control plan IND6 Implementation level of risk based control plans, % TargetTarget Indicator value 2012 % of risk based control plans fully implemented by municipal CA’s 90 % % % % % 57 %

Indicators for efficiency and quality Objective1: Official controls are efficient and risk based –Objective2: Coverage of inspections in accordance with recommended risk based frequency IND7 Coverage of inspections, % Final targetTarget Indicator value 2012 Total41 % FBO’s whose recommended inspection frequency is less than 1/year Coverage more than 70 % Will be decided later when results of 2013 are available FBO’s whose recommended inspection frequency is 1/year or more Coverage is 100 % Will be decided later when results of 2013 are available

Indicators for efficiency and quality Objective1: Official controls are efficient and risk based –Objective2: Inspectors carry out more inspections Later also economic efficiency (€/inspection) will be measured IND8 Efficiency of inspections, inspections/fte TargetTarget Indicator value

Efficiency of inspections carried out by municipal CA’s (2012) Inspections/fte Municipal CA’s in random order

Costs of inspection, €/inspection (2012) Municipal CA’s in random order €

Indicators for efficiency and quality Objective1: Official controls are efficient and risk based –Objective2 Municipal CA’s notify suspected food-borne epidemics IND9 Notifications of suspected food-borne epidemics, number/ inhabitants Target Will be decided later when results are available from two or more years

Notifications of suspected food-borne epidemics/ inhabitants (2012) Municipal CA’s

Backround ”information” (no special objectives) Residue control –Number of samples –Number of analyses –Number of non-compliant samples, cases or lots Number of RASSF-notifications made by Finland Number of withdrawals or recalls Number of official samples (taken by municipal CA’s)