Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ 3.2.1. Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Game Theory
Advertisements

Introduction to Game Theory
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
3. Basic Topics in Game Theory. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1 What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the.
© 2009 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Game theory The study of multiperson decisions Four types of games Static games.
Introduction to Game theory Presented by: George Fortetsanakis.
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
Operations Research Assistant Professor Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh 2 nd Semester ITGD4207 University of Palestine.
1 Chapter 14 – Game Theory 14.1 Nash Equilibrium 14.2 Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma 14.3 Sequential-Move Games and Strategic Moves.
1 Game Theory. By the end of this section, you should be able to…. ► In a simultaneous game played only once, find and define:  the Nash equilibrium.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
OLIGOPOLY A market structure in which there are few firms, each of which is large relative to the total industry. Key idea: Decision of firms are interdependent.
Game Theory. “If you don’t think the math matters, then you don’t know the right math.” Chris Ferguson 2002 World Series of Poker Champion.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Games What is ‘Game Theory’? There are several tools and techniques used by applied modelers to generate testable hypotheses Modeling techniques widely.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 4 Applications in Industrial Organization.
Economics 202: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory 1.HW #6 on website. Due Thursday. 2.No new reading for Thursday, should be done with Ch 8, up to page.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
GAME THEORY.
Chapter 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Game Theory.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- The Lockhorns Cartoon
Basics on Game Theory For Industrial Economics (According to Shy’s Plan)
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Review Midterm3/19 3/12.
6.1 Consider a simultaneous game in which player A chooses one of two actions (Up or Down), and B chooses one of two actions (Left or Right). The game.
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
QR 38, 2/22/07 Strategic form: dominant strategies I.Strategic form II.Finding Nash equilibria III.Strategic form games in IR.
Game Theory.
Game Theory Statistics 802. Lecture Agenda Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for.
Social Choice Session 7 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics 11 Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics All men can see the.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Nash equilibrium Nash equilibrium is defined in terms of strategies, not payoffs Every player is best responding simultaneously (everyone optimizes) This.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. GAME THEORY, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS.
Dynamic Games & The Extensive Form
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Chapters 29, 30 Game Theory A good time to talk about game theory since we have actually seen some types of equilibria last time. Game theory is concerned.
3.1.4 Types of Games. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1. What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the Game:
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Game theory 2 Lukáš Lehotský
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Statistics Overview of games 2 player games representations 2 player zero-sum games Render/Stair/Hanna text CD QM for Windows software Modeling.
Topics to be Discussed Gaming and Strategic Decisions
Games of pure conflict two-person constant sum games.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 3 Why and How is Nash Equilibrium Reached?
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 8 Games in Extensive-Form.
Econ 805 Advanced Micro Theory 1 Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 1 A Quick Review of Game Theory and, in particular, Bayesian Games.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 2.1.Dynamic Games of Complete and Perfect Information Lecture
Advanced Subjects in GT Outline of the tutorials Static Games of Complete Information Introduction to games Normal-form (strategic-form) representation.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection.
Chapter 12 Game Theory Presented by Nahakpam PhD Student 1Game Theory.
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Simultaneous Move Games: Discrete Strategies
Combining Sequential and Simultaneous Moves
Chapter 6 Game Theory (Module 4) 1.
Strategic Decision Making in Oligopoly Markets
Choices Involving Strategy
Chapter 29 Game Theory Key Concept: Nash equilibrium and Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium (SPNE)
Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009
Lecture Game Theory.
Introduction to Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1. What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the Game: Example Examples of Game Situations Types of Games 3.2. Solution Concepts Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ There are, basically, four different types of games All games in a given category are represented and solved alike Reminder

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Solution Concepts A solution of a game is called an Equilibrium of the game Reminder

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of Complete Information All the players choose their strategies simultaneously. This does not mean “at the same time” but “without knowing the choice of others” Because of this simultaneity they can be represented by means of a table (payoff matrix) They are “one-shot games”, that is, they are played only once All the players have all the information regarding who are the other players, what are the own strategies and the strategies of the others, what are the own payoffs and the payoffs of the others, and what are the rules of the game Reminder

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Solution concepts for this type of games Equilibrium in Dominant Strategies When there is an “always winning” strategy Equilibrium by elimination of Dominated Strategies When there are “worse than” strategies Nash Equilibrium Works in any case In pure strategies (players do not randomize) In mixed strategies (players do randomize)

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Reminder An equilibrium of the game is a choice of strategies by all the players that is stable, in the sense that Given what the other players are doing, nobody has any reason to change his or her own strategy

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Advertise Not advertise Reynolds (player 1) Philip Morris (player 2) 50, 50 Advertise Not advertise 20, 60 30, 3060, 20 Example: Game with “always winning” strategy (Dominant Strategy) Prediction of Game Theory: Both have a clear best strategy Advertise no matter what

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ (in thousands of dollars) $2$4$5 Bar 1 $210, 1014, 1214, 15 $4 12, 1420, 2028, 15 $5 15, 1415, 2825, 25 Bar 2 Prediction of Game Theory: There is no “always winning” strategy Example: Game with “worse than” strategies (Dominated Strategies)

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ (in thousands of dollars) $2$4$5 Bar 1 $210, 1014, 1214, 15 $4 12, 1420, 2028, 15 $5 15, 1415, 2825, 25 Bar 2 Prediction of Game Theory: But there is a clearly bad strategy: $2 is always worse than $4

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ (in thousands of dollars) $2$4$5 Bar 1 $210, 1014, 1214, 15 $4 12, 1420, 2028, 15 $5 15, 1415, 2825, 25 Bar 2 Prediction of Game Theory: If $2 is removed from the game (it will never be used) then the game is more clear

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ (in thousands of dollars) $4$5 Bar 1 $4 20, 2028, 15 $5 15, 2825, 25 Bar 2 Prediction of Game Theory: Now $4 is clearly the best strategy no matter what my competitor does

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ (in thousands of dollars) $4$5 Bar 1 $4 20, 2028, 15 $5 15, 2825, 25 Bar 2 Prediction of Game Theory: NOTICE: The “coincidence” of red circles is (again) the stable outcome

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Mary RightLeft Paul Right 0, 0 -50, -50 Left -50, -500, 0 There are 2 equilibrium: (coincidence of red circles) Both players driving on the right Both players driving on the left (but players do not randomize!) Example: Game with no “always winning strategy with no “worse than” strategies (Nash Equilibrium) Prediction of Game Theory: There is no “always winning” nor “worse than” strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 Prediction of Game Theory: There is no “always winning” nor “worse than” strategies Example: Game with no “always winning strategy with no “worse than” strategies (Nash Equilibrium)

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 Prediction of Game Theory: There is no “coincidence” of red circles Example: Game with no “always winning strategy with no “worse than” strategies (Nash Equilibrium) Players do randomize to play this game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Equilibrium in Dominant Strategies A player has a Dominant Strategy if, regardless the strategy chosen by the other players, that strategy is always a best response (it has all red circles) If every player has a Dominant Strategy, then the predicted outcome of the game is the one that corresponds to the players choosing that strategy If some players have a Dominant Strategy and others don't, the predicted outcome is that players with dominant strategies will use them whereas players with no dominant strategies will choose a best response to them

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Advertise Not advertise Reynolds (player 1) Philip Morris (player 2) 50, 50 Advertise Not advertise 20, 60 30, 3060, 20 Example: Advertise Not advertise Reynolds (player 1) Philip Morris (player 2) 50, 80 Advertise Not advertise 20, 60 30, 3060, 20 Example:

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Equilibrium by elimination of Dominated Strategies A player has a Dominated Strategy if, regardless the strategy chosen by the other players, that strategy is always worse than some other strategy (it has NO red circles) If a player has a Dominated Strategy, the corresponding row or column can be removed from the table After the removal of one dominated strategy it might happen that other strategies are also dominated. The process of elimination of dominated strategies continues until there are no more dominated strategies for any player

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies Notice that (B,Z) is the only outcome with coincidence of red circles There are no strategies with “all red circles” That is, there are no Dominant Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies But there are strategies with NO red circles That is, there are Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies But there are strategies with NO red circles That is, there are Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 D 1,6-3,0-1,41,1-1,4 E 0,01,4-3,1-2,3-1,-1 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies We can eliminate the dominated strategies !

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies We can eliminate the dominated strategies !

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies Now there are strategies with NO red circles for Player 2

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies Now there are strategies with NO red circles for Player 2

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example VWXYZ A 4,-13,0-3,1-1,4-2,0 B -1,12,22,3-1,02,5 C 2,1-1,-10,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies We can eliminate, again, the Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XYZ A -3,1-1,4-2,0 B 2,3-1,02,5 C 0,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies We can eliminate, again, the Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XYZ A -3,1-1,4-2,0 B 2,3-1,02,5 C 0,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies Now we find new Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XYZ A -3,1-1,4-2,0 B 2,3-1,02,5 C 0,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies Now we find new Dominated Strategies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XYZ B 2,3-1,02,5 C 0,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XYZ B 2,3-1,02,5 C 0,44,-10,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XZ B 2,32,5 C 0,40,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XZ B 2,32,5 C 0,40,2 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XZ B 2,32,5 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example XZ B 2,32,5 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example Z B 2,5 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The process of elimination of Dominated Strategies continues

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example Z B 2,5 Player 2 Player 1 Look for the best replies The final (predicted) outcome of the game is Player 1 chooses B and gets a payoff of 2 Player 2 choose Z and gets a payoff of 5 (Notice that this was the only outcome with “coincidence” of red circles)

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The order of elimination of Dominated Strategies does not affect the final outcome of the process Sometimes the process of elimination continues until a unique outcome survives, sometimes it stops earlier If some outcome of the game has a “coincidence of red circles”, then it will survive the process of elimination

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Nash Equilibrium after John F. Nash Jr. (1928-) There are (many) games in which the two previous solution concepts can not be used. That is, there (many) games with no Dominant Strategies nor Dominated Strategies. The ideal would be to have a solution concept that can be used in any game and that always works. That is the “Nash Equilibrium”

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Nash Equilibrium A Nash Equilibrium is a combination of strategies by the players with the special feature that: All players are playing a best reply to what the other players are doing Notice that, since all the players are playing a “best reply”, nobody will want to change his choice of an strategy !!! Is in this sense that a Nash Equilibrium is stable

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ

Nash Equilibrium In practical terms A Nash Equilibrium is where the best replies of the players coincide That is, a Nash Equilibrium is where the red circles coincide (in the Table representation of the game)

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example: The Battle of the Sexes Pat and Chris want to go out together after work They work on different places and before going to work they couldn't find any agreement on where to go The options were go to the Opera of go to the Football They both would like to go to a place together, but Pat prefers the Opera whereas Chris likes the Football better Thus, the situation is that after work (5 pm) each must decide where to go without knowing the choice of the other

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The environment of the game Players:Pat and Chris Strategies:Opera or Football Payoffs:In this case we must “define” the payoffs in such a way that represent the game described (see the Table in the next slide) The Rules of the Game Timing of movesSimultaneous Nature of conflict and interactionCoordination Information conditionsSymmetric

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 Look for the best replies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 Look for the best replies

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 There are two Nash Equlibria

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 Pat and Chris going both to the Opera is stable

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 Pat and Chris going both to the Football is stable

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 Any other outcome is unstable

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ The game represented Football Opera Pat Chris 3, 1 Football Opera 0, 0 1, 3 -1, -1 This game calls for coordination

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Example: The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 Look for the best replies Example: The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 There are not “always good” nor “always bad” strategies. Example: The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 And there is no coincidence of red circles. !! There is no stable outcome ! Example: The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ RockPaperScissors Player 1 Rock0, 0-1, +1+1, -1 Paper +1, -10, 0-1, +1 Scissors -1, +1+1, -10, 0 Player 2 In this games, players choose their strategy “at random” This will be the equilibrium Example: The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Nash Equilibria are stable outcomes of the game The concept of Nash Equilibrium does not tell how that outcome is reached In case of more than one Nash Equilibria, we do not know which one will be the one chosen by the players (Advanced Game Theory has more solution concepts to “select” among several Nash Equilibria) An Equilibrium in Dominant Strategies is also a Nash Equilibrium A Nash Equilibrium survives the process of elimination of Dominated Strategies A Nash Equilibrium is a one-for-all solution A Nash Equilibrium always exists, in any game

Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Summary If you have a Dominant Strategy use it, and expect your opponent to use it as well If you have Dominated Strategies do not use any of them, and expect you opponent not to use them as well (eliminate them from the analysis of the game) If there are neither Dominant Strategies nor Dominated Strategies, look for Nash Equilibria and play accordingly. Expect your opponent to play according to the Nash Equilibrium as well If there are multiple Nash Equilibria, further analysis is required