Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar Climatology of Tornadoes in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Jason Davis Matthew Parker North Carolina State University.
Advertisements

Synoptic/Meso-scale Comparison of Recent Historic Tornado Events Marc Kavinsky Senior Forecaster – Milwaukee/Sullivan WFO NWA 31 st Annual Meeting
mesovortex apex of bow echo Bow Echo: radar-observed features mid-level overhang weak echo notch bookend vortex.
Bow Echoes: A Review of Conceptual Models WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO: GEORGE BRYAN, NOLAN ATKINS,STAN TRIER Matthew Dux NWS-Pleasant Hill/Kansas City March.
Prof. Paul Sirvatka ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Spotter Training and.
SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Severe Weather Radar Features. Weak Echo Region (WER) Region of low radar reflectivities on inflow side of storm o Near the surface High reflectivities.
The Impact of Gravity Wave/Undular Bore Dissipation on the June 22, 2003 Deshler and Aurora Nebraska Tornadic Supercells AARON W. JOHNSON NOAA/NWS Weather.
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
1.27 SEVERE CONVECTION ENVIRONMENT IN SOUTHEASTERN ROMANIA Aurora Stan-Sion and Cornel Soci National Meteorological Administration, 97 sos. Bucuresti-Ploiesti.
Mike Evans / NWS Binghamton, NY. Outline Large-scale pattern / meso-analysis Radar data High resolution model output Summary.
Article By: Charles Doswell III Donald V Baker Charles A Liles Presentation By: Jason Tiffany Recognition of Negative Mesoscale Factors for Severe-Weather.
A Study on Convective Modes Associated with Tornadoes in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania Timothy W. Humphrey 1 Michael Evans 2 1 Department.
Kari Murray.  This article is extending on a 10-year climatological study done by Rose et al.  Rose et al. found that tornadoes most commonly occur.
S. Hunter Coleman*, Michael Cammarata, Anthony Petrolito NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Columbia, SC * A Significant Hail.
The Father’s Day 2002 Severe Weather Outbreak across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
SNOWIN’ TO BEAT THE BAND Using Satellite and Local Analysis and Prediction System Output to Diagnose the Rapid Development of a Mesoscale Snow Band Eleanor.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
Synoptic, Thermodynamic, Shear Setting May 7, 2002 Tornadic Thunderstorm in Southwestern Kansas Michele Blazek May 15, 2005.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Supercell Thunderstorms.
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
© Craig Setzer and Al Pietrycha Supercell (mesocyclone) tornadoes: Supercell tornado environments Developed by Jon Davies – Private Meteorologist – Wichita,
Use of TAMDAR Data in a Convective Weather Event Saturday, May 21, 2005.
1 Supercell Thunderstorms Adapted from Materials by Dr. Frank Gallagher III and Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Part.
Comparison of the 29−30 June 2012 and 11 July 2011 Derechos: Impact of the Appalachians Matthew S. Wunsch and Ross A. Lazear Department.
George D. Phillips NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, Kansas.
AN OVERVIEW OF TORNADOGENESIS AND VORTEX STRUCTURE by Ernest M. Agee Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana.
Overview of Storm and Vortex Morphology During the ‘Intensifying Stage’ of Mesoscale Convective System Evolution. Ron W. Przybylinski and Gary K. Schmocker.
HOLLY, COLORADO TORNADO 28 MARCH 2007 Bill Eckrich DayWeather, Inc. Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Reanalysis of Southern New England Tornadoes To Improve Warning Verification Daniel Brook, Lyndon State College* Joseph DelliCarpini, NOAA/NWS Taunton,
SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY LABORATORY The Dallas and Fort Worth Storms of May 5, 1995 Storms of May 5, 1995 BY: Brent Crisp, Phil Grigsby, Thomas Jones, Devon.
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA.
Mark Conder, Todd Lindley, and Gary Skwira – NOAA/National Weather Service, Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION  A complex storm system brought a.
Using Ensemble Probability Forecasts And High Resolution Models To Identify Severe Weather Threats Josh Korotky NOAA/NWS, Pittsburgh, PA and Richard H.
March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II.
The 1925 Tri-State Tornado What If It Happened Today? Pat Spoden NOAA/NWS WFO Paducah, Kentucky John Hart NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Meteo 3: Chapter 14 Spawning severe weather Synoptically-forced storms Read Chapter 14.
Quasi-Linear Convective System Tornado Warnings
A Multiscale Analysis of the November 2004 Southeast United States Tornado Outbreak Alicia C. Wasula.
Title card A Look at Environments Associated with Nighttime Supercell Tornadoes in the Central Plains Meteorologist Jon Davies Private © Dick McGowan &
Jennifer Belge And Mike Baker ESC 452 4/20/06
Tornado Warning Skill as a Function of Environment National Weather Service Sub-Regional Workshop Binghamton, New York September 23, 2015 Yvette Richardson.
A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.
2. Basic Characteristics and Forecast The 500-hPa pattern for this event featured a deep low centered over Idaho. A composite analysis of past tornado.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
The Over Forecast Advisory Event on St. Patricks Day Weekend 2013 NOAA’s National Weather Service Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer Fred.
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
Houze et al. (BAMS, 1989). Johnson and Hamilton (1988)
The April 9 th Tornado Outbreak Across the Four-State Region By Nick Fillo & Ismari Ramos WFO Shreveport, LA 4 th Regional Severe Storms/Radar and Hydrology.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Mesovortices within the 8 May 2009 Bow Echo over the Central United States: Analyses of the Characteristics and Evolution Based on Doppler Radar Observations.
Balanced or Slightly Shear Dominant Regions of the QLCS Line Normal 0-3 km Bulk Shear ≥ 30 Knots Surge or Bow in the Line 1 1.Define the Updraft Downdraft.
Conducted by: Robert Frye & Jason Schaumann NWS Springfield, MO
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Mobile - Pensacola
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Background and Definitions
The November 26, 2014 banded snowfall case in southern NY
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
Differences Between High Shear / Low CAPE Environments in the Northeast US Favoring Straight-Line Damaging Winds vs Tornadoes Michael E. Main, Ross A.
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D data Ron W. Przybylinski and James E. Sieveking NOAA/ National Weather Service St. Louis MO Nolan T. Atkins Lyndon State College Lyndonville VT Severe Storm Workshop Winter 2007, Saint Louis University

It is 10 March 1986 and you are the warning forecaster. You need to issue warnings from the conventional WSR-74C at WFO IND (125 nm range). What type of warnings would you Issue based on the conventional reflectivity data? Any particular locations?

2 April 2006 Outline Storm Damage Assessment Synoptic / Mesoscale Environment Radar Analysis - Early Stages - Northeast of St. Louis - St. Louis Area and immediate southwest Illinois (metro east) Summary

Some Findings: 9 tornadoes occurred within the WFO LSX CWA (with many of these tornadoes occurring along the leading edge of the squall line). Tornadic damage ranged from F0 to F2 intensity F2 damage intensity occurred in Fairview Heights and east of the O’Fallon Illinois area. The longest tornadic damage track occurred over Montgomery County Illinois (20 miles long). 2 fatalities (one in St. Louis County and the other in Fairview Heights Illinois) and 20 injuries occurred with this event.

East-Central Missouri – Southwest Illinois Damage Map

Most of our damaging wind reports with organized convective lines occur between 4:00 PM – 8:00 PM

Most of our squall line (non-supercell) tornadoes also occur between 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM CDT.

Visible Satellite and Surface Analysis for 1900 UTC

Sounding Analysis from KSGF at 1800 UTC CAPE = 2056 J/kg BRN = km Bulk Shear 27 m s -1 (54 kts) 0-3 km Bulk Shear 16 m s -1 (32 kts) 0-3 km SR Helicity 215 m 2 s -2

What was the degree of instability on this day? From SPC mesoanalysis At 1900 UTC (2:00 PM) MLCAPE / MLCIN analysis showed the greatest instability was located over central Missouri J/kg. At 2100 UTC (4:00 PM) Axis of highest instability extended from southeast Iowa through east central Missouri 1500 – 2000 J/kg.

Along warm or near stationary frontal boundaries we frequently observe strong thermal gradients which supports potential for near surface and low-level rotation. From Markowski et al. 1998

0-1 km Storm-relative helicity (SRH) for 2:00 PM CDT from SPC. Axis of highest values are aligned with the warm frontal boundary from northeast Missouri through south- central Illinois. Units m2 s km Storm-relative helicity (SRH) (deeper layer) for 2:00 PM CDT. Axis of highest values are similar to 0-1 km SRH from northeast Missouri through south- central Illinois.

0-1 km Storm-relative helicity (SRH) for 4:00 PM CDT. Magnitudes of SRH increased from 2:00 PM CDT. Again the axis strongest values were aligned along the warm frontal boundary – west central through south-central Illinois. 0-3 km Storm-relative helicity (SRH) (deeper layer) for 4:00 PM CDT. Similar to the 0-1 km SRH image the axis of highest magnitudes were aligned along the warm frontal boundary.

Radar Composite including mesovortices 1 through 10 and tornado tracks (shown in red). Except for MV 1 and MV 7 the tornadic mesovortex tracks in the 2 April case revealed longer paths compared to the 10 June 2003 St. Louis bow echo case during BAMEX. 3:30 PM4:30 PM5:30 PM

On this day, I was traveling southbound on I 55 heading towards STL. With the approaching line of storms I stopped and positioned myself just northeast of Staunton Illinois.

Viewing southwest towards the town of Staunton IL. No Shelf Cloud Yet!!!

Approaching Shelf Cloud from the southwest. Viewing southwest towards the town of Staunton IL.

Viewing south – Shelf cloud overhead. Any possible rotation with the shelf cloud? Winds estimated 50 to 60 mph with hail (dime size) at this time. I- 55 is just to the left.

A Wall Cloud along the leading edge of the large bow echo near Springfield Illinois (April 2, 2006).

Mesovortices #2, 3, 4 and 5 over southwest Illinois; 55 km NNE of KLSX over Macoupin County IL. Light blue contours represent tornadic damage path. Light blue and black contour signifies path of mesovortex.

Rotational Velocity trace of Mesovortex #2

KLSX planview reflectivity and cross-section at 2226 UTC (Images from WDSS-II). Multicell evolution noted along the leading edge at this time. KLSX plan view base velocity and cross-section at 2226 UTC. Mesoscale RIJ appears to be descending to near the surface at this time.

REFLECTIVITY CROSS SECTION

VELOCITY CROSS SECTION DESCENDING REAR INFLOW JET (RIJ) Mesoscale RIJ originated near 4.0 km (white – light gray area greater than 70 kts) then descends to near the surface as to line approaches western St. Charles and St. Louis counties.

Mesovortices #5, 6, and 7 over Metro East Fairview Heights and O’Fallon Illinois are located along the path of MV #6 (Light blue region).

Rotational Velocity trace of Mesovortex #6

Rotational Velocity trace of Mesovortex #7

Summary 2 April 2006 Tornadic QLCS was one of the most challenging severe weather episodes in recent history. Widespread wind damage occurred over parts of east-central Missouri, while much of the higher intensity damage over southwest Illinois occurred along the paths of the mesovortices (circulations). Tornadic damage ranged from F0 – F2 intensity. Two fatalities and 20 injuries occurred.

Summary Continued Tornado touchdown occurred at or just after the initial identification of the mesovortex. (Thus very limited lead time for warnings in this case). Rapid convective line motion combined very small mesovortex core diameters and weak to moderate intensity rotational velocities lead to the complexity of the April 2 nd tornadic case. Of the 38 cases studied over the Mid-Mississippi Valley Region, this case could be placed near the far left end of the spectrum of cases.