Validation for PythiaVPhoton10 Jiahang Zhong (Academia Sinica)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low-p T Multijet Cross Sections John Krane Iowa State University MC Workshop Oct , Fermilab Part I: Data vs MC, interpreted as physics Part II:
Advertisements

Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Event Generation with HERWIG Nick Brook University of Bristol Introduction Multiple Interactions in HERWIG Parameter Tuning B-production.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
Direct photon production in RHIC and LHC energies Xiao-Mei Li, Shou-Ping Li, Shou-Yang Hu, Ben-Hao Sa China Institute of Atomic Energy Dai-Mei Zhou, Zhi-Guang.
Quark Compositeness Study and Progress Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh C. Choudhary & Debajyoti Choudhury Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
1 Introduction to Dijet Resonance Search Exercise John Paul Chou, Eva Halkiadakis, Robert Harris, Kalanand Mishra and Jason St. John CMS Data Analysis.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting ( )‏
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Study of Direct Photon Pair Production in Hadronic Collisions at √s=14 TeV (Preliminary Results) Sushil Singh Chauhan Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Single Top Search ~ New Kinematics Fitter and ttbar bkg~ K Nakamura.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Spin transfer coefficient K LL’ in  photoproduction at HERMES D. Veretennikov On behalf of the HERMES collaboration DIS08, London.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
Mitchell Naisbit University of Manchester A study of the decay using the BaBar detector Mitchell Naisbit – Elba.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Recent multiplicity studies at ZEUS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinHadron Structure 2004, Sept. 1st University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of the.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Responsibles: Jon Butterworth (UCL), Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Daniela Rebuzzi (Pavia, INFN) ATLAS MC Validation Meeting, 24 May 2011 HERWIG validation.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
Jet-jet angular distributions and search for quark substructure in p-p collisions at 1.96 TeV Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration XIX.
1 Review BDT developments Migrate to version 12, AOD BDT for W , Z  AS group.
Madgraph + pythia ISR/FSR MI. pp -> bb pT(b)=50GeV NO OPAL - ppHad Jets PFOs N jets (all jets consiered) N PFOs in the two leading jets Theta DR pT Delta.
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Energy Dependence of the UE
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Generator Study of Tevatron collider
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
VBF H(->bb)+photon
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
HERA-LHC Workshop, DESY, 22th March 2005
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Study of Top properties at LHC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Validation for PythiaVPhoton10 Jiahang Zhong (Academia Sinica)

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong2 Motivation  W/Zinclusive (5104/5105/5144/5145) were chosen as background samples, in which Pt>25GeV Photons are rare. (110/500,000)  Have more phase space for cuts.  In Pythia, VPhoton processes are singular in the limit Pt->0, hence Pt should not be too small.

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong3 Z  Cross Section Table (Electron) unit [pb] Baur’s Generator PYTHIA Zinclusive PYTHIA ZGamma25 PYTHIA ZGamma10 Electron Channel s(FSR) [PT(g) > 5GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(FSR) [PT(g) > 10GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(FSR) [PT(g) > 15GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(FSR) [PT(g) > 25GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(ISR) [PT(g) > 5GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(ISR) [PT(g) > 10GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(ISR) [PT(g) > 15GeV & Mee > 40 GeV] s(ISR) [PT(g) > 25GeV & Mee > 40 GeV]

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong4 Z  Plots (Electron) Normalized from 25~200 GeVNormalized from 10~200 GeV FSR ISR

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong5 W  Cross Section Table (Electron) unit [pb] Baur’s Generator (W + g) Baur’s Generator (W - g) PYTHIA Winclusive (W + g) PYTHIA Winclusive (W - g) PYTHIA WGamma25 (W + g) PYTHIA WGamma25 (W - g) PYTHIA WGamma10 (W + g) PYTHIA WGamma10 (W - g) Electron Channel s(FSR) PT(g)>5GeV s(FSR) PT(g)>10GeV s(FSR) PT(g)>15GeV s(FSR) PT(g)>25GeV s(ISR) PT(g)>5GeV s(ISR) PT(g)>10GeV s(ISR) PT(g)>15GeV s(ISR) PT(g)>25GeV

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong6 W  Plots (Electron) Normalized from 25~200 GeVNormalized from 10~200 GeV ISR FSR

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong7 Control Tags for a new sample  In pythia, adjust PYSUBS-CKIN3 from 25 to 10. CKIN3: Pt lower limit in the rest frame of hard interaction.  In GeneratorFilter, adjust PhotonFilter.Ptcut from to PhotonFilter.Ptcut: (GenStat==1&&Pt>25GeV) photon in pythia output  In additional, PhotonFilter requests Photon Eta<2.7.  All 3 leptonic decay channels are turned on.

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong8 Cross Section Comparison applied selection cuts  Two cuts are used to select Pt>25GeV events from VPhoton10 samples.  #1 Lab frame Pt Cut (as Generator Filter)  Require Type==22 & GenStat==1 & Pt>25GeV  With-filter samples only  #2 W+Gamma Rest frame Pt cut (as CKIN3)  KOriVNt==4 & GenStat==3  Boost 2 particles to their CM frame  After boost, require Pt>25GeV  For samples with filter, both cuts are used For samples without filter, only cut #2 are applied

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong9 Cross Section Comparison WGamma  Both Filtered and Non- Filter samples are tested.  Non-100% selection for WPhoton25 samples indicates problem with CKIN3 definition  Similar discrepancy observed among the comparison between 10GeV/25GeV/40GeV no-filter samples with cut on 40GeV  Zgamma has same discrepancy WPhoton25WPhoton10 With Filter Cut #1 & #2 No Filter Cut #2 With Filter Cut #1 & #2 No Filter Cut #2 σ(total) 7.41pb11.5pb32.8pb52.3pb Cut efficiency 96.5%91.0%27.7%28.3% σ(output) 7.2pb10.5pb9.1pb14.7pb

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong10 Cross Section Comparison CKIN3 comparison  Log histogram for CKIN3 value (Photon Pt in rest frame) Tails below cuts imply distortion of original kinematics.  WPhoton25 histogram is normalized to WPhoton10’s scale Visible different slopes responsible for cross- section shift

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong11 Meaning of CKIN3 discussion in MC hyper news (1)  Inspiring discussion in the MC generators HN, still undergoing…  First suggestions to play with MSTP 61 & 91 tags. Correction as underlying events, rather than switch for our ISR hard process  MSTP 61: ISR switch. Default=2 as on. Switch to 0 as off. Correction as underlying events, rather than switch for our ISR hard process Gaussian distribution with peak around ~400MeV  MSTP 91: Primordial Kt distribution of parton in protons. Default=1 as Gaussian dist. Switch to 0 as no Kt correction. Gaussian distribution with peak around ~400MeV  These MSTP parameters are corrections happened after “hard process”. While CKIN3 is cut in the “hard process”

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong12 Meaning of CKIN3 discussion in MC hyper news (cont. 2)  Cross section not changed by these corrections.  The tail was eliminated mainly by switching off ISR  Less significant effect from Kt dist.  Even output file size will be reduced by stop ISR. MSTP61=0 & MSTP91=0 MSTP61=d & MSTP91=d MSTP61=0 & MSTP91=d MSTP61=d & MSTP91=0

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong13 Meaning of CKIN3 discussion in MC hyper news (cont. 3)  The four momentum of incoming and outgoing particles are not conserved.  KEndVNt==4 as incoming particles, 1 & 2  KOriVNt==4 as outgoing particles, 3 & 4  Boost particle 3&4 (Z+gamma) to the 1+2 (incoming quarks) rest frame.  Plot entries over ln[Pt(Z+gamma)]  A peak around 6, namely ~400MeV  Broad distribution up to hundreds GeV.

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong14 Meaning of CKIN3 discussion in MC hyper news (cont. 4)  In the rest frame of incoming quarks and gluons, Pt of W+gamma has a distribution, rather than flat zero if four momentum are conserved  The peak is at ~400MeV, which is around the peak of Kt distribution correction.  Indicates inconsistency of data documentation between incoming and outgoing particles, in different stages (before or after Kt dist. correction)  There was similar report earlier in generator HN.  This may be the reason of CKIN3 shift. Athena Generator group will investigate into it.

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong15 Further discussion ISR in hard/soft process  In our attempt, we turned off the ISR switch. And the cross- section didn’t have noticeable deviation.  Though in physics, this ISR as correction is the same Feynman diagram as our ISR process (t-channel of VPhoton), in Pythia they are two different conceptions.  Maybe it’s more exact to turn off the ISR switch for our ISR hard process  Is there some potential trouble by comparing the hard process ISR in VPhoton and the soft ISR correction in V- inclusive samples?

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong16 Validation in Version 13  No support in version12 for new sample validation anymore.  Need version 13, which use latest Pythia version  Test run with transformation is successful in a local installation  Joboption to convert EVNT into CBNT has failed. Need to find a solution

DTY bi-weekly meeting, J. Zhong17 Conclusion  Lower Pt cut can give more phase space for study.  Comparison of the cross-section reveals discrepancy with cross- section, and further questions that we omitted before.  Pythia_i need to be investigated, especially data documentation needs some check.  Need more understanding of how generator works, rather than use everything as a black box.