ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
XTCAV X-Band Transverse Deflecting Cavity Project Overview Patrick Krejcik Yuantao Ding, Joe Frisch.
PAL/POSTECH 제 2 회 한국 국제선형충돌가속기 워크숍 Waveguide System for Linear Collider Woon-Ha Hwang Linac Division Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2005,12,28.
Roger Ruber, Volker Ziemann, Gergana Hamberg Uppsala University
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
DESIGN OF A HIGH POWER TEST STAND FOR ESS SPOKE CAVITIES
European Spallation Source RF Systems Dave McGinnis RF Group Leader ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP-1 Meeting 9-December-2011.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University ESS TAC4 16 Feb
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
SLAC ILC High Level RF Ray Larsen LLRF Workshop, FNAL, January 17, 2005 Rev. 1.
High Power RF Systems, Control and Distribution in the HINS Alfred Moretti, Brian Chase, Chris Jensen and Peter Prieto Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee.
Klystron Modulator for Proton Driver
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer – Accelerator Division
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
RF Development for ESS Roger Ruber and Volker Ziemann Uppsala Universitet 4 Dec Dec-20091RR+VZ: ESS RF Development.
W. 3rd SPL collaboration Meeting November 12, 20091/23 Wolfgang Hofle SPL LLRF simulations Feasibility and constraints for operation with more.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
1 SPL Collaboration Meeting dec 08 - WG1 Introduction First SPL Collaboration Meeting Working Group 1 High Power RF Distribution System Introduction.
13 th April 2007FFAG 07 Carl Beard EMMA RF System Carl Beard, Emma Wooldridge, Peter McIntosh, Peter Corlett, Andy Moss, James Rogers, Joe Orrett ASTeC,
Proton Driver Main Linac Parameter Optimization G. W. Foster Proton Driver General Meeting Jan 19, 2005.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction. ESS RF system From the wall plug to the coupler Controlled over EPICS Connected to the global Machine Protection System.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop. June 2014 I. Syratchev X-band high RF power testing activity at CERN I.Syratchev.
Modeling SNS Availability Using BlockSim Geoffrey Milanovich Spallation Neutron Source.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
Ingot Niobium Workshop RF Sources Andrew Kimber 4 th December 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is managed by Jefferson Science Associates,
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
F DOE Annual Program Review High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D in the Meson Detector Building Bob Webber & Giorgio Apollinari September 26, 2007.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities ESS/SPL Collaboration Meeting Lund, 29 June 2010 Roger Ruber (Uppsala University) for the ESS.
Stefan Wilke, DESY MHF-e 1 12th ESLS RF Meeting 1 st October, 2008 at DIAMOND Overview and Status of Assembling and Commissioning the RF-System at PETRA.
FREIA: HIGH POWER TEST STAND Rutambhara Yogi & FREIA Group ESS RF Group Unit Leader for Spoke Power and RF Distribution FREIA Group Unit Leader, Uppsala.
650 MHz Solid State RF Power development at RRCAT
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
ESS Cooling System - Interface with RFQ 1 John Jurns Cooling System Engineer.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
ESS Linac Upgrade Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division May 27, 2014.
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
RF cell Anders Sunesson RF group leader
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Overview and System Design for ESS LLRF Systems
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
SPL Collaboration Meeting PAC2009
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
Session Ic “Energy efficiency/recovery/optimization”
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
CLIC Klystron based. Updates 2017.
CEPC RF Power Sources System
RF Pulse Shaping.
RF systems introduction
Linac LLP Outline LINAC Long Lead Procurements
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Presentation transcript:

ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012

Outline Overview of the ESS RF system System behaviour System layout Modulator workshop Risk & reliability

SYSTEM OVERVIEW

RF System Overview NB: Lattice updates will have altered this. Superconducting linac

RF System Main Components The RF system for the ESS linac is defined as the system that: – converts AC line power to RF power at either 352 or 704 MHz – supplies this power to the cavity couplers Main components – Modulator Converts conventional AC power into pulse power ESS requires 90 modulators – RF Power Amplifiers Converts the modulator’s pulsed power to RF at 352 or 704 MHz Typically klystrons – Require ~180 klystrons – 1 MW peak power per klystron (40 kW average) – RF Distribution Transports the RF from power amplifiers to cavity coupler couplers Typically waveguides with other components (circulators, directional couplers, etc…) – Low Level RF Control Regulates RF amplitude to 0.5% and phase to 0.5 degrees Requires both feedback and adaptive feed-forward algorithms

General Requirements

System Requirements

Example Specifications

BEHAVIOUR

Large-scale system response Required saturated klystron power assuming 25% overhead + 5% losses. Drives the scale of the klystron/modulator systems, cooling requirements, etc. Required saturated klystron power assuming 25% overhead + 5% losses. Drives the scale of the klystron/modulator systems, cooling requirements, etc. Steady-state reflected power (i.e. during beam- time) is governed by the R/Q drop at the ends of each section. Drives requirements of the circulators, loads, etc. Steady-state reflected power (i.e. during beam- time) is governed by the R/Q drop at the ends of each section. Drives requirements of the circulators, loads, etc. Single coupler design (i.e. Q L ) for each section, but each cavity detuned to minimise the reflected power.

Temporal response Total reflected energy per pulse under nominal conditions. Dictates the load requirements.

Efficiency of the overall RF system

LAYOUT

Gallery/Linac integration: Chute Concept

Gallery/Linac integration: Stub Concept

Benefits: 1.Fewer (larger) penetrations. 2.Wide penetrations allow 90 degree bend. 3.No line of sight from tunnel to gallery. 4.Freedom to alter cryomodule positions

MODULATOR WORKSHOP

“Intense” Discussions Presentations by invited experts CERN, DESY, FNAL, LANL, RRCAT, SLAC, SNS Attendance included manufacturers – No presentations, but strong participation in discussions Draft strategy emerged from the meeting ESS will write the technical specifications » Does *not* impose a topology Call for tender for production of multiple prototypes Limited call for tender for series production » Possibility for multiple vendors to be successful

RISK & RELIABILITY

95% availability MTBF & MTTR of klystrons is likely to dominate the machine availability

Transformer R ti = RF Source 1 Modulator R mi = Klystron R ki = Circulator/load R ci = LLRF R mi = Klystron R ki = Circulator/load R ci = LLRF R mi = RF Source RBD RF Source 3RF Source 2RF Source 4 Power dist RBD