Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ 2008-2009 Annual Performance Reports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
Advertisements

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South Regional Resource Center, RRCP Document developed by members of the Systems.
TIP Webinar Targeted Improvement Planning. ILCD EDN Guidance Document First document to review in preparation for your TIP development. The questions.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Local Contributing Factor Tool for SPP/APR Compliance Indicators C-1, C-7, C-8, C-9/B-15, B-11 and B-12: Collecting and Using Valid and Reliable Data to.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
Road blocks & remedies for linking & using data Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Part C to part B 619 Mary Peters, DaSy, ECTA Center Debbie Cate, ECTA Center.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Early Intervention Services in Natural Environments Indicators C-1, C-2 and C-7 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Child Outcomes Measurement and Data Quality Abby Winer Schachner & Kathleen Hebbeler International Society on Early Intervention Conference Stockholm,
1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Part C Data Managers — Review, Resources, and Relationship Building
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Kathy Whaley & Debbie Cate (NECTAC) December 14, 2010, 4:00 PM EST 1

Webinar Focus National Trend Data for APR Indicators C-8 & B-12 Continuing Challenges Improvement activities Contributing to Improved Performance Implications for Practice –Policy Makers –Administrators –Front Line Staff 2

Part C Transition Indicator The analysis of data across Indicators C-8 and B-12 provides a national perspective on early childhood transition from Part C to Part B for the following requirements:  C8a - IFSPs with transition steps and services  C8b - Notification to LEA, if child is potentially eligible for Part B  C8c - Transition conference for potentially eligible children 3

Part B Indicator B12 - Children referred by Part C prior to age three, who are found eligible for Part B and have an IEP developed and implemented by age 3 4

Performance does not necessarily provide measures of the quality of transitions, but the extent to which specific requirements of IDEA are being met. These analyses yield data on practices that are necessary but may not sufficient to ensure quality States have worked diligently to improve transition! 5

National Trend Data

7 Transition Indicator Trend Data (C8 & B12)

8 C8a - Change from Baseline to FFY Actual Performance

9 C8b - Change from Baseline to FFY Actual Performance

10 C8c - Change from Baseline to FFY Actual Performance

11 B12 – Change from Baseline to FFY Actual Performance

12 Indicator B12 - Early Childhood Transition by Child Count

Trends in Capacity to Collect and Use Data Increasing use of state data systems by Part C & Part B Part C continuing to use monitoring mechanisms for reporting C8a Variation in process, practices and category descriptions Few states using unique child identifiers Improved ability to match specific child data from C to B Improvements in migrating sets of data from C to B 13

Challenges to Meeting Timelines and Requirements of Early Childhood Transition

Challenges Influencing Practices Maintaining adequate numbers of qualified personnel Scheduling and completing evaluations Increasing numbers of children referred & transitioned Conducting transition conferences & IEP meetings for children with summer birthdays 15

Challenges Influencing Practices Late referrals to both 619 and Part C programs Addressing family circumstances & parent refusals Sharing child specific data across programs Maintaining local expertise due to turnover State funding issues 16

Collaboration & Coordination Challenges Delays may be caused by: Differences in procedures Developing relationships and maintaining effective communication Changes/shortages in personnel Almost all the steps along the transition timeline require effective communication and coordination. 17

Comprehensive and Targeted Improvement Activities

Improvement Activities In addition to improvements in data capacity, improvement activities were categorized as improvements to: Policies and Procedures Training and technical assistance Monitoring and data verification Interagency Collaboration and Coordination 19

Collaborative Improvement Activities Collaborative activities between Part C & 619: Child identifiers that follow the child Mechanisms to share data elements Coordinated policy clarification Joint program evaluation Collaborative training 20

Part C - Explanation of Progress Strategies specific to C-8 sub-indicators: C8a – Clarifying requirements for documentation Modifying the IFSP to include sections designed to address outcomes, steps and services More states seem to be moving to statewide forms (17) 21

Part C – Explanation of Progress C8b – Improvements in data systems, data management and interagency communication C8c – strategies for local collaboration, data system alerts and local MOUs 22

Part B – Explanation of Progress The most frequently cited Part B improvement activities reflected themes: Joint clarification of policies and procedures The ability to collect needed data elements. Collaborative Training, TA and other coordinated activities. 23

Themes - High Performing States Embrace the mission: Promote young children’s successful transitions through collaborative support of families by both Part C and Part B. Develop joint or coordinated policies and procedures to ensure the best possible transitions. Include quality measures about transition in on-going and joint monitoring activities. Continue to coordinate transition efforts between Part C & B in the ability to gather, report and analyze data. Together, use transition data to guide and improve transition processes and procedures. 24

Implications for Policy Makers Knowledge and awareness of issues and context for front line staff and families Deliberate, systematic anticipation of intended and unintended consequences Capacity of policies and procedures to create improvements Decisions influenced by program evaluation and family feedback Use of evidence-based practices when known 25

Implications for Administrators Knowledge of rules and policies Promoting relationships with key partners Designation of staff to be responsible for transition Administrative support for interagency coordination Ongoing training and orientation processes Local agreements Mechanism for input and feedback from families 26

Implications for Front Line Staff Key source of accurate and consistent information for families Willingness to learn about other program’s rules and policies Ability to access information and resources Ability to develop relationships and partnerships Support families while implementing requirements 27

Full Reports Available On-line Part C State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report 2009 Indicator Analysis FFY part-c_sppapr_10.pdf (this link is available from the webinar series page) 28

Full Reports Available On-line Part B State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report 2009 Indicator Analysis FFY part-b_sppapr_10.pdf (this link is available from the webinar series page) 29

ectransitionta.asp OSEP SPP/APR Calendar ( these links are available from the webinar series page) 30 Transition Resources National Early Childhood Transition Initiative

transition.asp National Early Childhood Transition Center (NECTC) (these links are available from the webinar series page) 31 Transition Resources NECTAC Transition Topic Page

Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Thank you for participating. Presentations from this series and their related resources are made available on the NECTAC website at: 32