Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS
Advertisements

Hydrologic Modeling on Lower Colorado Basin Ki-Weon Seo
Hydrologic Analysis Dr. Bedient CEVE 101 Fall 2013.
Generating Flow Frequencies – Updating NOAA Atlas Precipitation Frequency for California by: John High, Hydrologist Sacramento District Sacramento District.
Introduction to Surface Water Hydrology and Watersheds Lecture 1 Philip B. Bedient Rice University November, 2000.
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Transforming the Runoff
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Hydrologic Theory One of the principal objectives in hydrology is to transform rainfall that has fallen over a watershed area into flows to be expected.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.
Synthetic Unit Hydrographs
Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Using CRWR-PrePro Francisco Olivera, PhD Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
El Vado Dam Hydrologic Evaluation Joseph Wright, P.E. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Services Center Flood Hydrology and Meteorology Group.
Summary of Topics - HEC-HMS
Regional Characteristics of Unit Hydrographs and Storm Hyetographs Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E.
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL entity] Company Confidential Hydrologic Evaluation of the Little Thompson River Phase 2: Little Thompson.
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
Introduction to HEC-HMS
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
Project Our group collaborated with students at the University of Zacatecas (UAZ) to accomplish the following: 1- Create an accurate hydrologic model which.
James River in Richmond, Virginia looking upriver from the Robert E. Lee bridge. Belle Isle is on the right, November What is happening in this.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
Frequency Analysis and Data Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Time of Concentration and Lag Time in WMS Ryan Murdock CE 394K.2.
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
WinTR-20 SensitivityFebruary WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan CESI/RBF RR/KM FEMA CTP HYDROLOGY.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 9: Rational Equation Method Introduction to HEC-HMS.
Synthetic UH Definition: Synthetic Hydrograph is a plot of flow versus time and generated based on a minimal use of streamflow data. Example: A pending.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-Runoff – I
Module 3: HEC-HMS Elementary Model Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI August 2015 Module 3 1.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
The Effect of Urbanization to the surface-water runoff The comparison between the urbanized and undeveloped zones.
CE 374 K – Hydrology Second Quiz Review Daene C. McKinney.
HEC-HMS Simulation Developing a Unit Hydrograph
Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.
The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.
Rainfall and Runoff Reading: Haested Section 2.4 Computing Hydrographs.
Multiple Rain Gages and Weighting in HEC-HMS
Module 10: Average Rainfall Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI August 2015 Module 10 1.
HYDROGRAPH is a graph showing the rate of flow (discharge) versus time past a specific point in a river, or other channel or conduit carrying flow. It.
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
Water supply Flood prediction and forecasting. Water quality
Guidance on Homework Report Tc and R for each watershed
Update to the 1992 Dry Creek Watershed Flood Control Plan
Hydrologic Simulation Models
GIS in Water Resources Presentation By: Zac Sharp
Dry Canyon Study Design Hydrographs
Hydrology.
Forest Fire Rehabilitation
Hydrograph Computation
Dr. Phil Bedient Rice University
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph
Flooding in Flathead County and Kalispell, MT
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Example Determine the 1- hr unit hydrograph for a watershed using the precipitation pattern and runoff hydrograph below. The abstractions have a constant.
Presentation transcript:

Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

Reno/Truckee Meadows Flood Control Project Long Valley Creek Watershed

Truckee Meadows 1997

Long Valley Creek Model Methodology Feasibility study Feasibility study Available data: one USGS peak flow gage and a nearby rain gage. Available data: one USGS peak flow gage and a nearby rain gage. Gage: limited period of record Gage: limited period of record Correlated 2-day precipitation Correlated 2-day precipitation to peak flow to extend record to peak flow to extend record Rainfall-Runoff Model Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters physically based Parameters physically based Gathered from maps, GIS, Gathered from maps, GIS, soil surveys, previous studies soil surveys, previous studies Model (loss rates) calibrated Model (loss rates) calibrated to frequency curve to frequency curve

HEC-1 vs HEC-HMS

Rainfall-Runoff Modeling 1. Characterize Watershed 2. Develop Precipitation 3. Account for Losses 4. Transform to Runoff Hydrograph 5. Route Hydrographs through the Watershed 6. Combine Hydrographs The Process

Basin Characterization GEO-HMS GEO-HMS 11 Subbasins 11 Subbasins Geometry: Geometry: Centroid Centroid Centroidal Flow Path Centroidal Flow Path Longest Flow Path Longest Flow Path Slope Slope Basin Area Basin Area Long Valley Creek, NV

Design Storms NOAA 14 precipitation frequency data NOAA 14 precipitation frequency data 5- through 500-year events (7 Frequencies) 5- through 500-year events (7 Frequencies) Storm centering to maximize peak runoff Storm centering to maximize peak runoff Areal Reduction Factors Areal Reduction Factors Pattern Hyetograph -- Reno January 1963 Storm Pattern Hyetograph -- Reno January 1963 Storm Balanced to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 hour depths Balanced to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 hour depths

NOAA 14

Depth Area Reduction Factors 12-Hour DARF = 0.01*( *Area 0.46 )

Peak 1 Hour Peak 3 Hour Peak 6 Hour

Loss Rates Initial and Constant Initial and Constant Initial Initial Initial losses set to 0 Initial losses set to 0 Constant Constant NRCS Soil Survey Data NRCS Soil Survey Data Long Valley Creek > 75% D Type Soils Long Valley Creek > 75% D Type Soils Calibrated to Freq. Curve Calibrated to Freq. Curve Percent Impervious Percent Impervious 5% 5%

Used LA Unit Hydrograph Procedure with S-graph from Truckee Meadows Used LA Unit Hydrograph Procedure with S-graph from Truckee Meadows Computed lag from basin geometry Computed lag from basin geometry User Generated Unit Hydrographs L = Length of Longest Stream Course Lca = Centroidal Stream Length S = Slope (ΔElevation/L) n = Basin “n” – watershed roughness factor Lag = 24n{[(L x Lca)/(S^.5)]^.38}

Routing & Combining Muskingum Routing Routing Time (K) Stream Velocity Muskingum X Varies from 0 to 0.5 Slope, Roughness K < 1 hour X = 0.35

Calibration Loss rates adjusted for each event to match frequency curve Loss rates adjusted for each event to match frequency curve Larger event = lower loss rates Larger event = lower loss rates EventConstant Loss Rate 10 year year year year year0.04

End Results Hydrographs Hydrographs Floodplain Floodplain Results—Final Hydrographs