12/18/2000 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T 732-420-4962

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ENUM Overview – July The ENUM Objective Mapping PSTN addresses into the IP world ENUM allow any IP device to establish whether an E.164 telephone.

Advertisements

Implications of ENUM Geoff Huston Office of the CTO September 2002.

Tekelecs opinion on Change orders NANC 400 and NANC 401 ENUM.

International Telecommunication Union ENUM Issues and Solutions Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau International Telecommunication.

2001_03_28 SG A contribution– 1 Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A Ad Hoc Meeting on ENUM March 28th & 29th, 2001 ENUM CONTRIBUTION TITLE: ENUM.

1 IETF- ENUM ITU-T Workshop for International Regulators 17 January 2001 – ITU HQ Geneva Richard Shockey IETF ENUM Work Group Co-Chair Senior Technical.

SG-A Ad Hoc - ENUM Jordyn A. Buchanan Register.com February 12, 2001.

2/12/2001 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T

Support and Transparent Process for ENUM Designated Zone implementations for the USA Before the Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A AdHoc Meeting.

ENUM Administration Issues

ENUM - The UK experience so far Tony Holmes BT Chairman of UK ENUM Group NICC Open Forum 2003.

Carrier/Infrastructure ENUM Requirements draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01.

© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM An Evolution Path for Numbering and Interconnection Future Of Numbering Symposium November.

ENUM Trial Implementation and results ENUM Workshop ETSI HQ Sophia Antipolis, France February 2004.

Working Group ENUM, Seminar Bratislava 16th of March 2005 Proposal on ENUM Trial in the Slovak Republic Vladimir Murin Research Institute Posts and Telecommunications,

International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,

UK ENUM Jay Daley, Nominet UK. ENUM explained Nominet and ENUM.

ENUM Chris Wong Converging Services Branch International Training Program 7 September 2006.

August 13-14, 2002 Washington, DC Gary Richenaker Chair ENUM Forum

Understanding ENUM & Current Status Network Planning August 21, 2001

ENUM Primer November 4, 2004 Tom McGarry - NeuStar

ENUM ITU-T Status Update An SAIC Company Prepared For: ACA Industry Workshop March, 2003 Telcordia Contact: Gary Richenaker

1 IETF – ENUM US Government Briefing Richard Shockey IETF ENUM Work Group Chair Senior Technical Industry Liaison NeuStar, Inc Vermont Avenue N.W.

Draft-pfautz-lind-enum-carrier- 00.txt IETF 60 4 August 2004 Steven D. Lind.

December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)

ENUM? “ Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM or Enum, from TElephone NUmber Mapping) is a suite of protocols to unify the telephone numbering system E.164 with.

Naming & Addressing ENUM, EPC, WINC overview JaeYoung Choi

PSTN – User ENUM – „Infrastructure ENUM“ An ETSI View Richard Stastny IETF60 San Diego.

RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.

VoIP and ENUM The Austrian Trial IETF #57 Vienna July 2003 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG/TELEKOM AUSTRIA, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna enum:

ENUM Update for voipeer BOF Richard Shockey ENUM co-chair IETF 63 Paris.

International Telecommunication Union Global ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union.

Industry Canada 1 Bob Leafloor Colman Ho Peter Chau Industry Canada January 2003 (ENUM) T E lephone NU mber M apping.

Japan Registry Service Copyright © 2004 JPRS A Glance at ENUM AP* Retreat Feb. 22, 2004 Hiro HOTTA.

Slide 1 Nicklas Beijar - TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability Nicklas Beijar

Bernard Turcotte President Canadian Internet Registration Authority Canada’s ccTLD ENUM CSCN Forum March 11, 2004.

ENUM Services and their Provisioning Submitted by VeriSign, Inc and Telcordia Technologies, Inc Available at

©Stephen Kingham SIP Peering SIP Workshop APAN Taipei Taiwan 23rd Aug 2005 By Stephen Kingham

© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM VoIP, Portability, and the Evolution of Addressing LNPA & Future of Numbering Working.

ENUM- --- S.,L. Chou 1 工業技術研究院電腦與通訊工業研究所 Industrial Technology Research Institute Computer & Communications Research Laboratories 11/21/00 ENUM --- A.

1 ENUM’s Role in VoIP IP Telephony Conference & Expo Miami February 12, 2004 Sheri Jenkinson VeriSign Communication Services Product Manager - ENUM

International Telecommunication Union ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union ICANN.

IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224

Registries and Registrars Dr Bruce Tonkin Chief Technology Officer Melbourne IT Ltd 3 March 03.

Status on Xiaodong(Sheldon) Lee, CNNIC , Seoul, IETF59.

ENUM Presentation to Large Business User Panel 26 September 2001 Justin Moore.

International Telecommunication Union ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Organizational Perspectives Swedish Administration Workshop on ENUM Stockholm,

Slide 1 Nicklas Beijar - TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability TRIP, ENUM and Number Portability Nicklas Beijar

International Telecommunication Union ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Interests? ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM Geneva, February 8, 2002 Robert Shaw.

Patrik Fältström. ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM. Feb 8, 2002, Geneva Explanation of ENUM (RFC 2916) Patrik Fältström Area Director, Applications Area,

Post & Telecommunication Institue Tr.1 The vision of PTIT about E-GOV Hà Nội, 07/2008.

Page 1IETF 63 ENUM WG IETF 63 – ENUM WG IANA Registration for an Enumservice Containing Number Portability and PSTN Signaling Information 5 August 2005.

1 February 8th, 2002 ITU ENUM Tutorial Stanislas Bourgain Autorité de régulation des télécommunications Unité Internet Service Interconnexion et Nouvelles.

Enumservice VOID draft-stastny-enum-void-00 Richard Stastny Lawrence Conroy IETF60 San Diego.

ENUM The Status of UK Implementation Tony Holmes BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing Chairman UK ENUM Group ITU February 2002.

International Telecommunication Union ITU Perspective on ENUM Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor ICANN Rio de Janeiro, Brazil March 25,

Update on ITU-T ENUM Activities Steven D. Lind AT&T SG-A ENUM - Ad Hoc February 12, 2001.

International Telecommunication Union ENUM Organizational Perspectives Richard Hill, for Houlin Zhao Director Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.

ENUM Administrative Process Reference Model James Yu, NeuStar, Inc. December 14, 2000.

1 Introduction to ENUM Technical and operational aspects Marco Bernardi NeuStar, Inc

ENUM Tutorial ENUM Forum June 3, 2003 Steven D. Lind, AT&T GEN0075R0.

ENF/ERO ENUM Convergence Workshop Tony Holmes Chairman ETSI SPAN11 NAR BTexact Technologies Numbering Addressing & Routeing 9-10 January 2002 Standards.

Carrier/Infrastructure ENUM Requirements draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01.

Xiaodong(Sheldon) Lee, CNNIC , Seoul, IETF59

KR ENUM Trial Status Update

Using NPAC as the ENUM Registry

IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory

SIR Basics – 1 Shared Registration System (SRS)

ENUM: Convergence of Technology and Interests?

Implementation of ENUM on telecommunication networks

Presentation transcript:

12/18/2000 ENUM Administration Penn Pfautz AT&T

12/18/2000 ENUM Administration Mixes domain registration and telephone number administration –Rights to ENUM domain tied to corresponding number assignment in the PSTN –Rights to number in ENUM lost when service on number is disconnected –Generally, telephone service provider is only party that knows about number assignments & disconnects –Design issue for industry & regulators: How to balance need for TSP involvement with burden on TSP and a competitive environment?

12/18/2000 e164.arpa (RIPE-NCC) nsnanp_enum.com (1.e164.arpa) 4.6.e164.arpa Sweden... $ORIGIN e164.arpa IN NS e164.att.net IN NS joes-enum.com e164.att.net $ORIGIN e164.arpa. IN NAPTR "u" "sip+E2U" IN NAPTR "u" "mailto+E2U" IN NAPTR "u" "tel+E2U" "!^.*$!tel: !". $ORIGIN e164.arpa. 1 IN NS nsnanp_enum.com 4.6 IN NS sweden_enum.com. Tier 1 – Registry- defined by ITU member state Tier 2 – Service Registrar ENUM Hierarchy sip.att.com Tier 3 – Application Service Provider

12/18/2000 e164.arpa.arpa TLD since infrastructure RIPE NCC will host Essentially populated with identities of name servers for country codes ITU indicates to RIPE authority for each country code

12/18/2000 Tier 1 (Registry) Entries point to Service Registrar for a number Provider(s) determined by national authorities –NANP-wide or per NANP nation? Because of number portability, Tier 1 name server must point to Service Registrar on an individual number basis; numbers can’t simply be delegated to the carrier to which their Central Office code or thousands block was initially assigned

12/18/2000 Tier 2 (Service Registrar) Hosts NAPTR (service) records for a telephone number All records for a given number must be in one name server Major issue is who can be Service Registrar –Two “strawman” models presented to IETF Any properly accredited domain name registrar (model I) Telephone service provider (model II)

12/18/2000 Reference Model I (General) T1E T2E End User TSP ASP A B C F G E D New T2E H Legend ASP Application Service Provider TIE Tier 1 Entity (Registry) T2E Tier 2 Entity (Registrar) TSP Telephony Service Provider ** End User can be the end user itself or an agent authorized to represent the end user. ** TSP can offer application services also. The “TSP” entity performs functions specific to the TSP.

12/18/2000 Reference Model I – Pros & Cons Pros: EU determines T2E, EU has more control EU can be T2E (e.g., universities and enterprises) for his/her own TN(s) Enable competitive T2E service offering Cons: More complicated interactions among involved entities More efforts at T2E to manage the NAPTR RRs

12/18/2000 Reference Model II (T2E=TSP) T1E T2E/TSP End User Legend ASP Application Service Provider TIE Tier 1 Entity (Registry) T2E Tier 2 Entity (Registrar) TSP Telephony Service Provider ASP A’ C’ New T2E/TSP E’ B’ D’ ** End User can be the end user itself or an agent authorized to represent the end user. ** TSP can offer application services also. The “TSP” entity performs functions specific to the TSP.

12/18/2000 Reference Model II – Pros & Cons Pros: Fewer interfaces to deal with Easier to verify EU’s identity and ownership of the TN More incentives for TSPs to get involved in enum process (e.g., verify EU’s ownership of a TN and inform T1E about TN service disconnect) Cons: Only TSPs can be T2E, non-competitive if there is only one TSP in a serving market Non-TSPs cannot be T2E –(except through delegation from TSP) EUs cannot be T2E for their own TNs EUs cannot get enum service if none of TSPs in the serving market offers enum service

12/18/2000 Telephony Service Specific Records Are there services for which the TSP should have right to put records in ENUM? How can TSP control records in Tier 2 of end user choice? How might these records be distinguished? Alternative is to treat TSP like any other application service provider Ability of TSP to populate ENUM for customer will facilitate penetration

12/18/2000 Major Issues Entity to be Service Registrar Authentication of rights to number –Number assignment –User identity Disconnect notification –Who informs Registry? Telephony service specific records

12/18/2000 References Patrik Faltstrom, “E.164 Number and DNS” RFC draft-pfautz-na-enum-01.txt draft-pfautz-yu-enum-adm-00.txt draft-ranalli-peek-walter-enum-t1roles- 00.txt