The 3 Stages of Peering. Interviews with 200 ISP Peering Coordinators revealed… 3 General Phases of Peering: 1) Identification of Potential Peer – the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMHS/SWIM Seminar Chiang Mai, Thailand 5-6 March 2012
Advertisements

Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
The IX Playbook Observations from an IX Operative.
Copyright 2007 CENIC and PNWGP TransitRail: Nationwide Commodity Peering Program February 12, 2007 Minneapolis, MN.
Advanced Topics of WAN Compiled from Previous ISQS 6341 Project November 2003.
Part II: Inter-domain Routing Policies. March 8, What is routing policy? ISP1 ISP4ISP3 Cust1Cust2 ISP2 traffic Connectivity DOES NOT imply reachability!
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Workshop: A Practical Guide to Interconnect, Transit & Peering.
Peering vs Transit Economics : The Peering Simulation Game August :00-13:00 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi
A Business Case for Peering in 2010 William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR.
Scaling the Internet Core William B. Norton Co-founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. William B. Norton Co-founder.
1 Customer Network Operations Center. 2 Agenda Overview Benefits Value Additional Services Questions Monitoring Options.
Copyright © 2015 John, Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved FitzGerald ● Dennis ● Durcikova Prepared by Taylor M. Wells: College of Business Administration,
1 CS 4396 Computer Networks Lab The Internet. 2 A Definition On October 24, 1995, the FNC unanimously passed a resolution defining the term Internet.
Peering policies and BGP configuration
April, 2001Korea Telecom1 IP Pricing and Interconnection in Korea by Inho Chung Korea Telecom (The views in this slide do not necessarily represent the.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
BCNET Security Policies Jens Haeusser Information Security Officer, UBC and Chair, Security Working Group, BCNET Internet2 Joint Techs Vancouver, BC July.
Scaling IXPs Scalable Infrastructure Workshop. Objectives  To explain scaling options within the IXP  To introduce the Internet Routing Registry at.
Internet Peering in the UK Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange 13th May 1998.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
Content Peering William B. Norton Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison Content Peering Forum September 18, 2002 © Equinix 2002.
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Page 1 Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) Bill Tschudi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Director of Business Development NANOG 16 - Eugene, Oregon24-May-99 © Equinix, Inc
Future of Africa’s iGDP Protect. Connect. Grow.. Is Africa still a significant market? Africa is the 2nd largest continent, in both size and population.
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
TASIM Trans Eurasian Super Information Highway Summary Presentation October 2010.
Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004.
The Peering Simulation Game William B. Norton August 2010 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi African Peering and Interconnection Forum:
Peering Policies - When to Peer, When not to Peer Quilt Peering Workshop October 2006 St Louis, Missouri.
NWEN 402 – Peering & Exchange T With material from Geoff Huston, Andy Linton & Valerie Schaeffer.
Peering & Internet eXchange Points AfNOG 2001 Meeting 12 th May, Miklin Hotel Accra – Ghana.
Policies for Peering and Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 8.
CS551: ISP Peering Norton01 Christos Papadopoulos (
25/07/2003BGP Table Manners 1 Interdomain Routing Politics for the Masses Dave Aaldering.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon.
November 1999 London Internet Exchange Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman JPIX Meeting, July 2000.
Internet Architecture: A High-level Overview AFIX Technical Workshop Session 1.
TACIS Project: R8.01/98 – TRANSLATION, EDITING AND DIFFUSION OF DOCUMENTS (Result Dissemination) Improvement of the fission product retention system at.
The Chicken and the Egg The Network Externality Effect for Internet-based Services.
Scotland Internet Exchange The LINX UK-wide Peering Initiative John Souter CEO, LINX Scotland (Edinburgh) Peering Event March 2013.
Why SingTel Won’t Peer William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. Asia Pacific Peering Forum Singapore, Oct. 5, 2006 Slide Set.
1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o n - W a r s a w 2002 Sixth Framework Programme Instruments.
Peering Strategies for Operators Building critical mass of peers.
Benefits and Value of an IXP The IXP Value Proposition.
Peering and Interconnection Economics Introduction to Internet Transit and Peering.
Policy Guide for Developing Nations Wishing to Encourage the Formation of a Domestic Internet Industry Version 0.2 January, 2002 Bill Woodcock Packet Clearing.
Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Conference, 11 May Operational Co-ordination in the RIPE Region presented by: Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
Introduction to Information Networks COMT 625 Hans Kruse.
STC IPv6 Services Overview
Copyright 2007 CENIC and PNWGP
A Business Case for Peering
Peering Information: Some Data Points
AMHS/SWIM Seminar Chiang Mai, Thailand 5-6 March 2012
Copyright 2007 CENIC and PNWGP
NANOG Panel Discussion: Are “Transit Exchanges” and “Peering Exchanges” Self-Differentiating? Toronto June, 2002.
Internet Interconnection
Peering Information: Some Data Points
Malama Chileshe Energy Economist COMESA Secretariat
Taesang Choi CJK Testbed Collaboration for NGN Taesang Choi
The Big 6 Research Model Step 2: Information Seeking Strategies
Computer Networking A computer network, often simply referred to as a network, is a collection of computers and devices connected by communications channels.
The Internet Introductory material.
Internet Exchange.
UNFCCC Needs-based Finance (NBF) Project
SwiNOG May 2013 Ian Cleary – Director Internet Services EMEA
Presentation transcript:

The 3 Stages of Peering

Interviews with 200 ISP Peering Coordinators revealed… 3 General Phases of Peering: 1) Identification of Potential Peer – the who 2) Initial Contact and Qualification – the why 3) Implementation Discussions – the how

I. Phase 1: Identification of Peer: Traffic Engineering Data Collection and Analysis Motivations: Reduce load on expensive Transit service Traffic src/dest Measure or Intuit Usage-based Billing 2 nd Goal: Lower latency Result  Top 10 list (see next page) Part of larger business deal Seek interconnection Transit $$ Transit $$ ISP A ISP B Transit ISP

Sample Top 10 Destination List

Phase 1: Identification of Potential Peer

II. Phase 2: Contact & Qualification, Initial Peering Discussion How to make contact with potential peer ISP? 1. person or 2.Exchange point participant list 3.Tech-c/admin-c from DNS/ASN registries 4.Engineering Forums NANOG, IETF, RIPE, etc. 5.Trade shows: speakers and booth staff 6.Target ISP sales force 7.Target ISP NOC

II. Phase 2: Contact & Qualification, Initial Peering Discussion Once contact is made… 1.Sometimes Mutual NDA 2.Exchange BiLateral Peering Agreement (BLPA) 3.Traffic Data justification shared One basis: Peering iff PeeringCost < TransitSavings? 4.Requirements Exchange (e.g. Must be at n Public Peering Points, xMbps, private peering migration strategy, etc.) Either Party may walk away….. If still interested, implementation discussion…

Phase 2: Contact and Qualification

III. Phase 3: Implementation Discussions How to interconnect? Direct Circuit-based Interconnection VS. Exchange-Based Interconnection

Cost Comparison at n=5 costDCfn()=(n-1)*C/2 $2,500 n=5 costDC=(4)*$2500/2 costDC=$5,000/mo costExchfn()=BDC+(n-1)*x/2+Racks $5,000 n=5, 1 costExch=$5,000+(4)(250/2)+$1000 costExch=$6,500/mo More expensive to use Exchange-Based Interconnection Strategy at n=5. N>5?

Exchange-based vs. Direct Circuit Interconnection Direct Circuits Model MUX Big Pipes Model Dark Fiber Model

9 Exchange Selection Criteria 1.Telecommunications Access Issues 2.Deployment Issues (getting in & up) 3.ISP Current Presences (there yet?) 4.Operations Issues (restrictions?) 5.Business Issues (neutrality/alignment) 6.Cost Issues ($$) 7.Credibility Issue (backing,attraction)  8.Exchange Population (side effect) 9.Existing vs. Emerging Exchange?

Value of the Internet Exchange V Exchange N Participants Cost Of Coming In (Circuits+ Routers+ StaffTime) V Capacity The Exchange Startup Hump First Carrier(s) First ISP(s) First CP(s) Critical Mass Point (V exchange =Cost Exchange ) Large Facility Scaling