Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil Rights in the Courts
Advertisements

■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford Background Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master (a doctor) from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois (free state)
Chapter 5 Civil Rights Legal basis for civil rights Enforcing the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment Critical Supreme Court ruling in the battle.
14 th amendment All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
6 – CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. SWEATT V. PAINTER BACKGROUND In 1946, Heman Marion Sweatt, a black man, applied for admission to the University.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Equal Protection ◦ Supreme Court’s Standards  Race and Ethnicity (inherently suspect/strict/difficult to meet)*
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
30.4 The Movement Continues. Civil Rights movement in trouble: SCLC workers were determined to continue King’s work so they went ahead with the Poor People’s.
BY: WILL CLAYTON & GRIFFIN SMITH.  Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder ’ s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
Copyright, 2000 © Prentice Hall Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
Labor Force: Includes all people who are at least 16 years old and are working or actively looking for work. In the U.S. two thirds of all people 16 years.
O UR E NDURING C ONSTITUTION Chapter 7. E SSENTIAL Q UESTIONS Did the Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect freedoms for all people? How have court.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Objective 30D Understand the application and significance of the equal protection clause of the 14 th amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Objective 30d Understand the application and significance of the Equal Protection clause of the 14 th Amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Regents of The University of California v. Bakke By Alicia M.
California vs. Bakke Anessa,Tierra and Keanna. Facts Covered under the 14 th amendment Bakke, a white medical school applicant,was turned and his spot.
Unit 3 Objectives 30d 30e 30f. 14 th Amendment No state shall make or enforce any law that shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens.
Goal 5.06A “The Civil Rights Struggle” I: Struggle for Rights A: Discrimination= unfair treatment based on prejudice against a certain group. B: Civil.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Learning Target 3: Civil Rights Cases.
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
Chapter 28 Our Enduring Constitution
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
Equal Rights: Struggling Toward Fairness
GOOD AFTERNOON, 8TH PERIOD! PLEASE PICK UP A SHEET FROM THE TABLE
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Gov Review Video #48: Important Civil Rights To Know
Group Six Will Mason Tracy Epton Maile Kobayashi Susan Redick
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Lecture 41 Discrimination V
Bakke v. Board of Regents of California
New Approaches to Civil Rights Ch. 21 Sec. 4 Pgs
Civil Rights.
New Approaches to Civil Rights
Affirmative Action.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Civil Rights for Women and LGBTQ
Bakke v. The board of regents in california
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? CPUSH Agenda for Unit 14.4:  Important.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Ch. 21—Equality Under the Law
Bryan Dee Graham Fuller Adam Nims Andrea Stoddard Greg Baumer
The Civil Rights Struggle
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Ap u.s. government & politics
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Topic 6 – Role of the people
Presentation transcript:

Block 2 Carl Turner

Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978

Plan to equalize the educational, employment, and contracting opportunities for minorities and women with opportunities given to their white and male counterpart.

The Medical school reserved 16 out of 100 seat for the minorities, including African Americans, Asian, and Native Americans. The rigid admission quota was administered by a special school committee. Allan Bakke, a white applicant, was twice denied admissions to the medical school even though his GPA and MCAT Scores was ‘’ significantly higher’’ than the minorities applicants who was recently admitted

Bakke sued the University in a state court because the medical school’s violated Title VI of the Civil Rights of 1964 and the 14 th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Then he took the case to the Supreme Court because it involved the Constitution.

The medical school violated Title VI of The Civil Rights of 1964 and the Equal protection clause.

That it was Constitutional and they were helping the minorities group.

None

Was a 5-4 decision, ruled that the uiv of California plan was unconstitutional, because it use a quota Justice Lewis Powell Jr. announced the Court’s Judgment

That the use of race as criterion in admission decision in higher education was constitutional because a number is necessary to insure that minority applicants will increase.

Public and private universities have crafted affirmative action programs consistent with Bakke’s requirments