1. 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Just War: Along side Pacifism and Realism, Just War theory represents one of the three main moral responses to the issue of war. Just War theory has developed.
Just War Theory.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
Today’s lesson we will be looking at: Responses to aggression You will be able to:  State two responses to aggression which involve the use of force.
War and Violence. Violence as a Process Definitive of the “State” Distinction between “jus ad bellum” – justice of war and “jus in bello” – justice in.
The Ethics of War Spring Main normative questions When, if ever, is resort to war justified? What can we permissibly do in war? Who are responsible.
Just War Augustine’s Contributions and Modern Expressions of the Theory.
1 I I Is Pre-Emptive War Wrong?. 2 Phillips’ Central Claim On the principle that just war requires both justice in going to war (jus ad bellum) and justice.
PacifismJust WarCrusade. Matthew 5:21-22… “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject.
Lesson Objectives To know about weapons of mass destruction
17th March Just War Aims: To look at the conditions of a just war and to explore the idea that some wars may be justified.
Journal 5: Just War? MLA Format 350 Words or More.
Objective To use media clips and biblical quotes to understand Christian attitudes to war.
Law of Land Warfare Agenda What is the law of war What is the law of war Purpose of the law of war Purpose of the law of war Who are Noncombatants Who.
20 th Century American History. War: A Definition  Noun  A conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation;
The Privatisation of War The Law of Armed Conflict and Private Military Firms Dr Regina Rauxloh School of Law, University of Surrey, UK Surrey International.
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Chapter 11 The Challenge of Peace: Christian Resolution of Conflict 11.1.
Christians and War: Three Viewpoints Holy War – A crusade of Good against Evil Just (justifiable) War – Limited war that is tragic but necessary for the.
Just War Theory Unit #7: The Cold War Essential Question: Was the Cold War a just war?
War in Jewish Tradition. Sure there are lots of wars in the Bible- but what does Judaism teach about War? Some caveats- From 70 C.E. ( actually 6 C.E.
Making choices Rules of war - walking debate. 2 Slide 5 > Look at each image scenario in turn and decide whether you think it is acceptable/unacceptable.
Government S-1740 International Law Summer 2006
Today’s Checklist Take up Darfur Now Peace and violence continued Just War Theory Introduction.
MSL 401, Lesson 6a : The Law of Land Warfare The Law of Land Warfare.
JIHAD Jihad – striving comes from a word which means effort. In particular it is any effort made by someone out of love for Allah.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Week Five Seminar Terrorism HU245 Ethics. New Business! Discussion Thread: Capital Punishment One thread this week.
Situating International Humanitarian Law (IHL) ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
Just War Theory Jus ad bellum Right to engage in war When? Where? For what reason? To what end? Jus in bello Right conduct in war How? Who? With what means?
Dr. Steve Hays BKHS Leadership and Ethics Spring 2014.
International Section | Leadership & Management Division | College of Management and Technology 31. Just War Theory SLP(E) Course.
1 Applied Ethics Section 6 Ethics of War. 2 Is Ethics Applicable to Warfare? Some reject the applicability of ethics to wars, citing the adage ‘All’s.
Violence and Religion. Assessing the sources Are they reputable? (where published?) How do they engage Islamic teaching? Can you perceive whether the.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Just War When is war the answer?.
I will know about the 3 parts of the Just War Theory – Jus ad bellum, Jus in bello, Just post bellum Hmk: Evaluate Just War Theory.
The Bigger Picture What instrument did Cain use to kill Abel? The Real Issue: Personal Responsibility!
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
Theological Issues WAR & PEACE Trinity International University © John Stevenson, 2009.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory. Just War Theory Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation Jus in bello:
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to define what a ‘Just War’ and ‘Holy War’ are and list two criteria for a Just War MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain.
Christian Beliefs about Just War,. To be a just war the war must meet certain criteria; 1.LAST RESORT A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All.
LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT. HISTORY AND OVERVIEW BACKGROUND n Definition (JCS Pub 1-02): u The part of international law that regulates the conduct of armed.
1 Do We Need to Rewrite Military Ethics? Ethics and Robotic Systems in Military Operations Msgr. Dr. Werner FREISTETTER Episcopal Vicar.
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
Law of Armed Conflict.
List some good reasons for a country to go to war.
THE JUST WAR THEORY.
Key Principles: A few preliminaries
War and Peace.
Quiz: Thursday, March 15 Discuss the prevailing arguments for and against Capital Punishment. Include in your discussion the traditional teachings of the.
Nuclear weapons and Just War
Who needs rules? Discuss
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
On your whiteboard: How much can you remember about war and peace?
Political Violence and Terrorism
LO: Analyse the JWT and explain your own view on war
War and Violence Can war be just?.
Just War.
UNIT FOUR| DEFENSE & SECURITY
JUST WAR.
Key words on Peace and Justice
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
JUST WAR.
Just War Principles 1. Last Resort
Presentation transcript:

1

2

3

4 John Adams Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore (WWI) Billy Graham Dr. Richard Land (War in Iraq)

5 Roots in philosophy and religion Seeks to deal with the moral and ethical arguments for war Began as how to limit war; has evolved to how to prevent war Augustine and Thomas Aquinas are the early shapers of Just War Theory as we know it

6 I am my brother’s keeper – Genesis 4:8-12 Love and care of neighbor – Matthew 22:39; Luke 10:25-37 Rules of restraint in war – Deuteronomy 20:10-20 Doctrine of love/charity – 1 Corinthians 13 The Roman Catholic Catechism

7 Answers the questions, “When is it just to go to war?” “When is war morally acceptable?” Just Cause – There must be a right reason for going to war: self-defense, eminent attack, protecting the innocent, restoring human rights, restoring international peace and security. (Revenge, punishment, expansion, colonialism are not accepted as “just” reasons for war.)

8 Lawful Authority – War must be declared by those with responsibility for public peace and security, not private groups or individuals. Comparative Justice – Besides being just, the cause must be weighty enough to warrant the extreme step of engaging in war with all its uncertainties and evils. Right Intentions – Our motives must be pure. Our aim must be to create a better, more just and lasting peace than there would have been if we did not go to war.

9 Reasonable Chance of Success – There must be a reasonable chance of success. If the result of war is only increased death and suffering without making things materially better, then it is not humane or moral to engage in warfare. Proportionality – The damage inflicted and the costs incurred by war must be proportionate to the good expected by taking up arms. Last Resort – We must not resort to arms if and until absolutely every other option for a peaceful resolution has been exhausted.

10 Answers the question, “How can war be conducted in a moral manner?” Principle of Distinction – War should be directed towards combatants and not towards innocent non-combatants. This requires discriminating between targets chosen and limiting the destruction of targets.

11 Principle of Proportionality and Military Necessity – Only the force required to defeat the enemy should be exercised or, at the least, not to be defeated by the enemy. Restraint should be the norm. The lives of innocents AND the lives of soldiers should not be wasted unnecessarily. Principle of Humanity and Military Honour – Human beings have intrinsic value and are not to be treated impersonally or inhumanely on the field of battle. This requires the fair treatment of prisoners of war.

12 Principle of Malum In Se (evil in itself) – Soldiers may not use weapons or methods of warfare that are evil in themselves – rape, torture, forcing soldiers to fight against their own side, using weapons of mass destruction.

13 Answers the question, “What are the responsibilities of the victor and vanquished when the war is over?” A Just Settlement – The war begins with a disagreement and it ends when agreement is reached. A just war requires a just settlement. The terms of the agreement must be measured, reasonable and public.

14 Just Military Occupation – The victor has the responsibility to create order out of chaos and to prevent further chaos. The victor is the temporary trustee for a specified period of time. (The responsibilities of occupying armies are laid out in the Hague Conventions.) Limited Right to Change Status – The victor cannot change the map or partition of a country; it cannot engage in population transfers. Any changes to sovereignty must be validated by the international community (i.e., United Nations).

15 Questions? Discussion? What have we learned today?