Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS 3313-001, Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faster-Than-Light Paradoxes in Special Relativity
Advertisements

Special Relativistic Paradoxes PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation
INST 240 Revolutions Lecture 9 Directions in Spacetime, Twin Paradox & Vectors.
Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity Postulate –The laws of physics are the same in every inertial reference frame The Speed of Light Postulate.
Theory of Special Relativity
Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Einstein’s.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 39 Relativity. PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou2 Outline The principle of Galilean relativity Galilean space-time transformation equations.
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
The laws of physics are the same in any inertial (non- accelerating) frame of reference Galileo & Einstein would both agree (at terrestrial speeds.) F=ma.
LECTURE # 4 DOPPLER –SPACETIME DIAGRAMS PHYS 420-SPRING 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Homework #3 L-8 (25 points) L-16 (25 points) 4-1 (20 points) Extra credit problem (30 points): Show that Lorentz transformations of 4-vectors are similar.
Special Relativity & General Relativity
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
Time Dilation, Length Contraction and Doppler
Lecture 14 Space-time diagrams (cont) ASTR 340 Fall 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Module 5Relativity of Velocity and Acceleration1 Module 5 Relativity of Velocity and Acceleration The velocity transforms follow directly from the Lorentz.
Further Logistical Consequences of Einstein’s Postulates
The Death of High Mass Stars. Quiz #8 On the H-R diagram, a high mass star that is evolving off the main sequence will become redder in color and have.
Special Theory of Relativity
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
Phy107 Fall From last time… Galilean Relativity –Laws of mechanics identical in all inertial ref. frames Einstein’s Relativity –All laws of physics.
The Special Theory of Relativity. Galilean-Newtonian Relativity Definition of an inertial reference frame: One in which Newton’s first law is valid Earth.
Special Relativity.
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4. Lorentz transformation 5. Consequences.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition The Twin Paradox Space-time.
1 1.Einstein’s special relativity 2.Events and space-time in Relativity 3. Proper time and the invariant interval 4.Lorentz transformation Einstein’s special.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Education Physics Deparment UNS
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Physics Lecture 2 1/26/ Andrew Brandt Monday January 26, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Special Relativity 2.Galilean Transformations 3.Time.
The Theory of Special Relativity. Learning Objectives  Einstein’s two postulates in his theory of special relativity: The principle of relativity. (Same.
Wed., Sept. 12, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Spacetime Diagram&
My Chapter 26 Lecture.
Physics 102: Lecture 28, Slide 1 Special Relativity Physics 102: Lecture 28 Make sure your grade book entries are correct Bring ID to Final EXAM!!!! Today’s.
Module 10Energy1 Module 10 Energy We start this module by looking at another collision in our two inertial frames. Last time we considered a perfectly.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions will be on CULearn by 5pm today. Next weeks.
Wed., Sept. 5, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #3 Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Galilean Transformation.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
Time Dilation. Relative Time  Special relativity predicts that events seen as simultaneous by one observer are not simultaneous to an observer in motion.
Special Relativity /- 5 The End of physics: Black Body Radiation -> Quantum mechanics Velocity of light With Respect to ether Maxwell’s Equations…
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Galilean Transformation Do we need Ether? Michelson-Morley Experiment Einstein’s.
X’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive.
1 Review: Special Relativity – Chapter 1 Postulates of relativity: 1. All physical laws are the same in all inertial reference frames 2. The speed of light.
Lecture 5: PHYS344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
By: Jennifer Doran. What was Known in 1900 Newton’s laws of motion Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism.
PHYS344 Lecture 6 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
Special Relativity (Math)  Reference from Tipler chapter 39-1 to 39-3  Newtonian relativity  Einstein’s postulates  Lorentz transformation  Time dilation.
PHYS 342: More info The TA is Meng-Lin Wu: His is His office hour is 10:30am to 12pm on Mondays His office is Physics.
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #9
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Newtonian Relativity A reference frame in which Newton’s laws are valid is called an inertial frame Newtonian principle of relativity or Galilean invariance.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #7
Special Relativity Lecture 2 12/3/2018 Physics 222.
RELATIVITY III SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
The Galilean Transformation
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5
Special Relativity Chapter 1-Class4.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #8
Presentation transcript:

Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity Addition The Twin Paradox Space-time Diagram The Doppler Effect

Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 2 Announcements Bring your homework #1 after the class

Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 3 Reminder: Special Project #2 1.Derive the three Lorentz velocity transformation equations, starting from Lorentz coordinate transformation equations. (10 points) 2.Derive the three reverse Lorentz velocity transformation equations, starting from Lorentz coordinate transformation equations. (10 points) 3.Prove that the space-time invariant quantity s 2 =x 2 -(ct) 2 is indeed invariant, i.e. s 2 =s’ 2, in Lorentz Transformation. (5 points) 4.You must derive each one separately starting from the Lorentz spatial coordinate transformation equations to obtain any credit. –Just simply switching the signs and primes will NOT be sufficient! –Must take the simplest form of the equations, using  and . 5.You MUST have your own, independent answers to the above three questions even if you worked together with others. All those who share the answers will get 0 credit if copied. Due for the submission is this Monday, Feb. 16!

The Complete Lorentz Transformations Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Addition of Velocities How do we add velocities in a relativistic case? Taking differentials of the Lorentz transformation, relative velocities may be calculated: Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

So that… defining velocities as: vx vx = dx / dt, vy vy = dy / dt, v’x v’x = dx’ / dt’, etc. it can be shown that: With similar relations for vy vy and vz:vz: Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

The Lorentz Velocity Transformations In addition to the previous relations, the Lorentz velocity transformations for v ’ x, v’y v’y, and v’z v’z can be obtained by switching primed and unprimed and changing v to –v.–v. Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Velocity Addition Summary Galilean Velocity addition where and From inverse Lorentz transform and So Thus What would be the measured speed of light in S frame? –Since we get Observer in S frame measures c too! Strange but true! PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 8 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015

Velocity Addition Example Yu Darvish is riding his bike at 0.8c relative to observer. He throws a ball at 0.7c in the direction of his motion. What speed does the observer see? What if he threw it just a bit harder? Doesn’t help—asymptotically approach c, can’t exceed (it’s not just a postulate it’s the law) Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

A test of Lorentz velocity addition:  0 decay How can one test experimentally the correctness of the Lorentz velocity transformation vs Galilean one? In 1964, T. Alvager and company performed a measurements of the arrival time of two photons resulting from the decay of a 0 0 in two detectors separated by 30m. Each photon has a speed of c. What are the speed predicted by Galilean and Lorentz x-mation? –v G =c c= c – How much time does the photon take to arrive at the detector? Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Twin Paradox The Set-up: Twins Mary and Frank at age 30 decide on two career paths: Mary (the M oving twin) decides to become an astronaut and to leave on a trip 8 light-years (ly) from the Earth at a great speed and to return; Frank (the F ixed twin) decides to stay on the Earth. The Problem: Upon Mary’s return, Frank reasons, that her clocks measuring her age must run slow. As such, she will return younger. However, Mary claims that it is Frank who is moving and consequently his clocks must run slow. The Paradox: Who is younger upon Mary’s return? Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Twin Paradox cont’d Let’s say, Mary is traveling at the speed of 0.8c Frank will measure Mary’s total travel time as –T=8ly/0.8c=10yrs Mary’s clock will run slower due to relativity: – Thus, Frank claims that Mary will be 42 years old while he is 50 years old Who is correct? Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 12

The Resolution 1) Frank’s clock is in an inertial system during the entire trip; however, Mary’s clock is not. As long as Mary is traveling at constant speed away from Frank, both of them can argue that the other twin is aging less rapidly. 2) When Mary slows down to turn around, she leaves her original inertial system and eventually returns in a completely different inertial system. 3) Mary’s claim is no longer valid, because she does not remain in the same inertial system. There is also no doubt as to who is in the inertial system. Frank feels no acceleration during Mary’s entire trip, but Mary does. 4) So Frank is correct! Mary is younger! Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Space-time When describing events in relativity, it is convenient to represent events on a space-time diagram. In this diagram one spatial coordinate x specifies the position, and instead of time t, ct is used as the other coordinate so that both coordinates will have the same dimensions of length. Space-time diagrams were first used by H. Minkowski in 1908 and are often called Minkowski diagrams. Paths in Minkowski space-time are called worldlines. Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

The Space-time Diagram Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

Particular Worldlines Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu How does the worldline for a spaceship running at the velocity v(<c) look? How does the worldline for light signal look?

How about the time measured by two stationary clocks? Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

How about the time measured by moving clocks? Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu

The Light Cone Monday, Feb. 9, PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu