1 VISSIM Protocol ITE Oregon Traffic Simulation Roundtable May 31, 2012 Chi Mai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
Advertisements

1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Chapter 9. Performance Management Enterprise wide endeavor Research and ascertain all performance problems – not just DBMS Five factors influence DB performance.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
HCM 2010 WORKSHOP PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA DAN SMITH, P.E. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
Breaking the Static Barrier: Building Regional Support for Implementation of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Long-Range Planning Processes TRB Planning Applications.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Simulating I-710 Corridor Presented in the Western ITE Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, California.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Planning. SDLC Planning Analysis Design Implementation.
PAT Validation Working Group Process and Analytical Validation Working Group Arthur H. Kibbe, Ph.D. Chair June 13, 2002.
Proposal Writing for Competitive Grant Systems
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
1 Building and Maintaining Information Systems. 2 Opening Case: Yahoo! Store Allows small businesses to create their own online store – No programming.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Typical Software Documents with an emphasis on writing proposals.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Roundabout Capacity Analysis Framework Presented By: Dave Stanek & Joel Rabinovitz Fehr & Peers Presented By: Dave Stanek & Joel Rabinovitz Fehr & Peers.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Multiple Award Contracts Training Presented by Jennifer Salts State of Utah - Division of Purchasing 1.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process The Requirements Discipline in More Detail  Focus shifts from defining to realizing objectives.
Update: Grocery Refrigeration Provisional Standard Protocol for Site Specific Savings RTF Meeting June 28,
Systems Analysis and Design
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
2011 RTF Projects RTF Input on SOW Outlines: - Deemed Measure Reviews - Measure Life Guidelines -Measure Cost Guidelines Regional Technical Forum April.
Systems Life Cycle A2 Module Heathcote Ch.38.
Project Level Traffic Forecasting Summary of Practices from other States TNMUG March 6, 2008.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
Topics Covered Phase 1: Preliminary investigation Phase 1: Preliminary investigation Phase 2: Feasibility Study Phase 2: Feasibility Study Phase 3: System.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Implementation: Results from the Using Your Regional ITS Architecture Peer Exchange Network Workshop Mac Lister FHWA Resource Center ITS America Annual.
C r3a2 Issues Discussed in Conference Call - Dec 7 Reviewed list of open issues Evaluation Criteria Status Report from the Plenary updated.
BSBPMG404A Apply Quality Management Techniques Apply Quality Management Techniques Project Quality Processes C ertificate IV in Project Management
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
1 He Says vs. She Says Model Validation and Calibration Kevin Chang HNTB Corporation
3rd Stage Review: Lead Reviewers Experience Outline: –Objectives –Overview of technical findings –Lessons Learned/Confirmed –Value of 3 rd Stage –Lead.
Traffic Monitoring Guide (TMG) - What’s New? 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 2C Tuesday October 23, :45 pm – 4:00 pm By: David L. Jones.
Corridor Management Planning in California Jeff X. Ban CCIT, UC-Berkeley Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)
Washington State Work Zone Rule  Work Zone Rule Implementation  New Work Zone Policy Cathy Nicholas, FHWA - WA Division Office Frank Newboles, WSDOT.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
INFO 638Lecture #91 Software Project Management Conclude Adaptive Project Framework INFO 638 Glenn Booker.
The New 2010 Highway Capacity Manual An Overview.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Traffic Simulation L3b – Steps in designing a model Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
Development of Traffic Simulation Models Course Instructors: Mark Hallenbeck, Director, UW TRAC Tony Woody, P.E., CH2M HILL Offered By: UW TRANSPEED xxxxx,
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
The Role of Simulation in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual ITE Western District Annual Meeting June 28, 2010 Loren Bloomberg/CH2M HILL Santa Ana, CA
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Sustainability Performance Metrics
Preparing for a Stack Test
Chapter 11 Project Control.
Gender Training Workshop Name of Institution Place Date
Legislative Update: SB 2224 and SB 322 October 1, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

1 VISSIM Protocol ITE Oregon Traffic Simulation Roundtable May 31, 2012 Chi Mai

2 Presentation Overview  Background of VISSIM Use at ODOT  Process for Protocol Development  Chapter by Chapter of Protocol  Resources for VISSIM Model Development  Questions and Feedback

3 Background June 2005 – ODOT purchased VISUM and VISSIM package license through Metro June ODOT Updated VISSIM Protocol – Expanded to Include Arterials and for Statewide Use October ODOT Developed VISSIM Protocol for Freeways First Project Submittal Using VISSIM Since Adoption of Updated VISSIM Protocol - Sketch level analysis for I-5 Rose Quarter Project - Corridors Bottleneck Operations Study Use of VISSIM Increased - CRC - Airport Way Interchange - Sunrise - OR43 Streetcar - Milwaukie Light-Rail - Operational Corridors - Beltline Hwy Ramp Meter Study

4 Development Process in Updated Protocol  Review lessons learned

5 Lessons Learned from First Protocol  More detail on the process of developing VISSIM projects  Is VISSIM the right tool?  Project scoping details  Check-in points  Wanted to develop something that was consistent with FHWA guidelines  ODOT could benefit from protocols specific to arterials and for statewide use

6 Development Process in Updated Protocol  Review lessons learned  Interview other government agencies

7 Lessons Learned about VISSIM  Don’t work in parallel  Review process should include as many check-in points as possible  Software is always evolving and consultants are learning VISSIM along with agencies  VISSIM has vast capabilities, however, budget and schedule are often the contraint

8 Development Process in Updated Protocol  Review lessons learned  Interview other agencies  Researched for similar documents

9 Development Process in Updated Protocol  Review lessons learned  Interview other agencies  Researched for similar documents  Researched FHWA’s guidelines

10 Objective of Protocol  Use VISSIM at the right time for the right projects  Clear understanding of the project between agency and consultant from the beginning of the project  Minimizing a project from evolving throughout the development  Minimize back and forth

11 Development Process in Updated Protocol  Review lessons learned  Interview other agencies  Researched for similar documents  Researched FHWA’s guidelines  One-day brainstorming session

12 VISSIM Project Development One-day brainstorming session led to concept of VISSIM project development process

13 Putting Together the Updated Protocol  Developed outline – 10 chapters  Chapter by chapter review  Full draft review  Final submittal of protocol  All-day training on VISSIM and use of protocol

14 Note  VISSIM protocol is not aimed at being a training document  Intended to be a Guidance document to help ODOT develop successful VISSIM projects

15 Ch 1 - Project Understanding  Stimulates thoughts and understanding on project between ODOT and consultants up-front  Gives ODOT the means to help determine the appropriate analysis tools for projects  Smooths process for both ODOT and consultant  The result of this chapter is the Project Problem Statement

16 Ch 2 – Project Scoping The result of this chapter is the development of the Project Methods and Assumptions document which outlines:  Project Boundary/Study Period  Analysis Tools Being Used  Scheduling/Staffing Plan  Data Collection Plan  Calibration Targets  Measures of Effectiveness

17 Ch 3 - Data Collection  What data is needed and how it should be collected?  Data check-in points were added based on previous experience of lack of providing it soon enough  Provides an idea of essential data and project specific additional recommended data

18 Project Specific Data Collection  Streetcar Project (arterial) –  Detailed Transit Data  Detailed Bike and Pedestrian Data  Signal Timing Data  Freeway Model –  Spot Speed Data  Ramp Meter Rates  Bottleneck Locations

19 Ch 4 - Model Development  Develop standards for overall model development  Allow for modeler the ability to deviate from the guidelines (need to document deviations)  More detailed standards for ramp meters  More detailed standards for roundabouts  Standards for vehicle fleet setup (AASHTO standard vehicles)  Provide a better understanding of conflict points vs. priority rules

20 Model Development CHECK-IN POINTS! Identify problems before too far into the project:  Geometry  Volumes  Control Coding  Data Collection Points

21 Ch 5 - Error Correction  Checklist to help modeler  Review animation  Error files

22 Ch 6 - Calibration  Essential calibration and project specific calibration parameters to use  Calibration targets outlined in the beginning of the project and those targets are fixed!  Minimum number of simulation runs formula  Deliverables:  Base calibrated model  Calibrated Methodology and Results Report

23 Ch 7 - Additional Base Year Scenarios  Additional base year model with different time period can be developed at this time  Ensure that work is not done in parallel

24 Ch 8 - Alternatives Specifies the following order of work delivery:  Future No-Build traffic volumes  Future No-Build model with corresponding documentation  Future Build scenarios traffic volumes  Future Build models with corresponding documentation

25 VISSIM Project Development

26 Ch 9 - Reporting  Guidance of what both ODOT and consultant are expected to do with model output data  Post processing details and examples  Guidelines to help both consultant and ODOT where needed:  95th Percentile Queue  V/C Ratio – not typical output from VISSIM  Emission  Delay and HCM compliance  Sample Report Format

27 Ch 10 - Reviewing  How do we minimize the back and forth?  ODOT wanted a check-list  Helps consultant know what will be reviewed and how it will be reviewed  Helps ODOT know what to look for  Helps both have an understanding of level of effort and time frame that will be needed

28 VISSIM Protocol  ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual Addendum C  Consistent with FHWA’s Traffic Analysis Toolbox Manuals  Provides ODOT expectations, guidelines, and requirements when considering use of VISSIM as an analysis tool  Shall be followed on all VISSIM analysis for ODOT studies and projects

29 Resources for VISSIM Model Development  Metro DTA Model  Traffic Simulation Roundtable  INRIX Data

30 INRIX Data  Another source of data for VISSIM calibration  ODOT purchased Data  Can be shared with other public agencies  Available to consultants for work on ODOT projects  Data is very rich inside Metro area  ODOT looking into purchasing more data and the Analytics Suite

31 Questions and Feedback?