The Healthy Start National Evaluation Presentation to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality March 2004 Abt Associates Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Pre and Interconception Education and Counseling: Strategies from Florida Presented by: Betsy Wood, BSN, MPH Infant, Maternal & Reproductive Health Unit.
Advertisements

Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
FY07 Population-based Bidders Conference Fouad Berrahou, Ph.D Shirley Broussard DSHS Title V Maternal & Child Health April 6, 2006.
One Science = Early Childhood Pathway for Healthy Child Development Sentinel Outcomes ALL CHILDREN ARE BORN HEALTHY measured by: rate of infant mortality.
Benchmark: Improved Maternal and Newborn Health Construct: Prenatal care Parental use of alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs Preconception care Inter-birth.
LeddyView Graph # 1 OUTLINE Background - RIte Care Rhode Island’s Title XXI Plans RIte Care Benefit Package Experience Impact on Health Care Access, Utilization,
Reducing Infant Mortality in Maryland S. Lee Woods, M.D., Ph.D. Medical Director, Center for Maternal and Child Health Maryland Department of Health &
CHFS ANNUAL MEETING April 14, 2014 Baby Basics John Ladd, MNO Cuyahoga County Office of Early Childhood Invest in Children.
An Evaluation Model to promote linkages between community-based public health practice and academia.
Home Visiting Overview April 8, Help Me Grow A program for Ohio’s expectant parents, newborns, infants and toddlers.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Healthy Start in the District of Columbia Karen P. Watts, RNC, FAHM, PMP Chief, Perinatal and Infant Health Bureau DC Department of Health Community Health.
Juanita Graham MSN RN Health Services Chief Nurse MS State Dept of Health.
Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Community (ICC LC) Using Quality Improvement for Better Preconception Care Preconception Care Summit June 14,
Welcome. Perinatal Continuum of Care Tulsa County 2007 From Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa’s Community Profile 2007.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Interconception Education and Counseling: Strategies from Florida Presented by: Betsy Wood, BSN, MPH Infant, Maternal & Reproductive Health Unit Florida.
Outline of Presentation
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Using FIMR and PPOR to Identify Strategies for Infant Survival in Baltimore Meena Abraham, M.P.H. Baltimore City Perinatal Systems Review MedChi, The Maryland.
The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality November 14, 2012 Marilyn J. Keefe, MPH, MPP Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs U.S.
Using Outreach & Enabling Services to Support the Goals of a Patient-Centered Medical Home Oscar C. Gomez, CEO Health Outreach Partners Health Resources.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Essential Service # 7:. Why learn about the 10 Essential Services?  Improve quality and performance.  Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal And Child Health Bureau Healthy Start What’s Happening Maribeth Badura, M.S.N. Dept. of Health and.
OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INTERIM TRAINING Marlene Mason MCPP Healthcare Consulting, Inc. October 28, 2010.
Maternal and Child Health in Ohio: 2010 and Beyond Cuyahoga County CFHS Consortium 2009 Fall Meeting Jo Bouchard, MPH, Chief Bureau of Child and Family.
Best Practices Outreach Management Case Management Expenses Management Common Mistakes.
Perinatal and Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement National Learning Network Estimated Number Awards: One (1) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement Estimated.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Prevention of Preterm Births: The Role of Family Planning
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Assessment of 2003 ADRC Grantee Progress (Year 1 Planning Process) 2004 GSA Meetings November 22, 2004.
Collaboration and data in a County Initiative : Cuyahoga County – Invest in Children Claudia Coulton & Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Center on Urban Poverty & Community.
Framework and Recommendations for a National Strategy to Reduce Infant Mortality July 9, 2012.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
Affordable Care Act Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Health Resources and Services Administration Administration for Children.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
Healthy Families America Overview. Healthy Families America Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America Evidence-based home visiting model 400 Affiliated.
CDC’s Preemie Act Activities Wanda Barfield, MD, MPH, FAAP Director, Division of Reproductive Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and.
MICHIGAN'S INFANT MORTALITY REDUCTION PLAN Family Impact Seminar December 10, 2013 Melanie Brim Senior Deputy Director Public Health Administration Michigan.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
TITLE V OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH INFANT MORTALITY EFFORTS Michele H. Lawler, M.S., R.D. Department of Health and Human Services.
Welcome Home Baby Report to the First Steps Commission July 31, 2014.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting April 1, 2005.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Lessons from the CDC/RTC HIV Integration Project Marianne Zotti, DrPH, MS, FAAN Team Leader Services Management, Research & Translation Team NCCDPHP/DRH/ASB.
Incorporating Preconception Health into MCH Services
Grant Application Process Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Prepared by: Program Inventory / Assessment: Summary of Findings Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium Tools.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal And Child Health Bureau Healthy Start What’s Happening Maribeth Badura, M.S.N. Dept. of Health and.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Resource Review for Teaching Resource Review for Teaching Victoria M. Rizzo, LCSW-R, PhD Jessica Seidman, LMSW Columbia University School of Social Work.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
FAQ Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.
Approaches to Linking Process and Outcome Data in a Cross-Site Evaluation Laura Elwyn, Ph.D. Kristin Stainbrook, Ph.D. American Evaluation Association.
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
AFIX Standards: a new programmatic tool
Presentation transcript:

The Healthy Start National Evaluation Presentation to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality March 2004 Abt Associates Inc.

1 Background and Update on Evaluation Activities Overall Evaluation Approach Review of Phase 1 evaluation design Next steps

2 Evaluation Overview The evaluation is a four-year effort:  Phase 1 is focused on the full universe of grantees  Phase 2 is a more in-depth evaluation of a subset of grantees The evaluation is of the national program not of individual grantee performance The initial Phase 1 evaluation focuses on implementation of the program linked to results Key stakeholder inputs are critical to the evaluation effort

3 Background and Current Status Two-year contract awarded September 29, 2002 to Abt Associates, Inc. and its subcontractor Mathematica Policy Resources, Inc. to conduct an implementation evaluation of all 96 grantees Contract is in its second year with completion of the following:  Evaluation design based on key stakeholder inputs  Data collection package for OMB clearance Currently waiting for OMB clearance and receipt of grantee materials to begin data collection, analysis and completion of Phase 1 evaluation

4 Update: July 2003 to present Completed of survey development Conducted grantee workshop at September meeting Submitted annual report and executive summary Prepared for data collection activities and drafted analysis plan

5 A Participatory Approach To the Evaluation Obtained input to evaluation design and data collection instruments  Healthy Start Program  Grantees: National Meetings, ListServ, Pilot testing  TEPEHS  SACIM

6 A Participatory Approach To the Evaluation Inputs helped:  Clarify emphasis of the Phase 1 evaluation  Refine key evaluation questions  Develop and expand conceptual model/framework for understanding the Healthy Start Program  Develop content for and refine data collection tools

7 The Key Evaluation Questions We will answer three main questions during Phase 1:  What are the features of Healthy Start programs?  What results have Healthy Start programs achieved?  What is the link between program features and program results? Phase 2 will address a fourth question:  What types of HS programs (or program features) are associated with improved perinatal outcomes?

8 Understanding the Program The logic model helps us understand how the program is expected to affect results and outcomes Two additional diagrams support more detailed examination of implementation and results Together, these models provide a conceptual framework to help us:  Identify key features of the program and the types of results to be achieved  Develop appropriate data collection tools

9 Healthy Start Logic Model LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Healthy Start Population Changes Birth outcomes Maternal health Inter-pregnancy/ inter-delivery interval & birth spacing Child health during the first two years of life Healthy Start Population Changes Birth outcomes Maternal health Inter-pregnancy/ inter-delivery interval & birth spacing Child health during the first two years of life CONTEXT Target Population Demographic/ Socioeconomic Women’s health and reproductive history Health behavior Target Population Demographic/ Socioeconomic Women’s health and reproductive history Health behavior Community Characteristics Health care system State/local policies Community Characteristics Health care system State/local policies National/States Economic conditions Policy issues Investments in maternal and child health National/States Economic conditions Policy issues Investments in maternal and child health INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES Service Results Utilization Referrals Service intensity Behavior changes Medical home Service Results Utilization Referrals Service intensity Behavior changes Medical home Health Systems Changes Coordination/ collaboration Increased capacity New services Cultural competence Consumer/ community involvement Community values Health Systems Changes Coordination/ collaboration Increased capacity New services Cultural competence Consumer/ community involvement Community values Reduced disparities in access to and utilization of healthcare Improved consumer voice Improved local healthcare system HEALTHY START PROGRAM Grant Applications Workplan Needs assessment Plan Priorities Performance measures Grant Applications Workplan Needs assessment Plan Priorities Performance measures Core Services Direct outreach & client recruitment Case management Health education services Screening & referral for maternal depression Interconceptional continuity of care through 2 years post delivery Core Services Direct outreach & client recruitment Case management Health education services Screening & referral for maternal depression Interconceptional continuity of care through 2 years post delivery Systems Building Use community consortia to mobilize key stakeholders Develop local health action plan Collaborate & coordinate with Title V services Sustainability plan Systems Building Use community consortia to mobilize key stakeholders Develop local health action plan Collaborate & coordinate with Title V services Sustainability plan Program Implementation Reduced disparities in health status in the target community Program Infrastructure Staffing Contract arrangements Organization Program Infrastructure Staffing Contract arrangements Organization

10 Hypothesized Link Between Healthy Start Services and Results Outreach  High-risk pregnant women  High-risk interconceptional women  High-risk infants  Other women of reproductive age (e.g., adolescents, preconceptional)  Fathers/.male partners Outreach  High-risk pregnant women  High-risk interconceptional women  High-risk infants  Other women of reproductive age (e.g., adolescents, preconceptional)  Fathers/.male partners Risk Assessment Healthy Start Case Management  Regular  Intensive Healthy Start Case Management  Regular  Intensive Services for Pregnant and Postpartum Clients  HIV Counseling, testing, and treatment  STD counseling, testing and treatment  Bacterial vaginosis testing and treatment  Perinatal depression screening and treatment  Smoking cessation/reduction  Family planning and counseling  Nutrition counseling and WIC  Breastfeeding education and support  Substance abuse treatment  Violence prevention Services for Infants/Toddlers  Home visits  Well child visits  Immunizations  Early intervention  Supplies/equipment (diapers, formula, car seats) Services for Pregnant and Postpartum Clients  HIV Counseling, testing, and treatment  STD counseling, testing and treatment  Bacterial vaginosis testing and treatment  Perinatal depression screening and treatment  Smoking cessation/reduction  Family planning and counseling  Nutrition counseling and WIC  Breastfeeding education and support  Substance abuse treatment  Violence prevention Services for Infants/Toddlers  Home visits  Well child visits  Immunizations  Early intervention  Supplies/equipment (diapers, formula, car seats) Information and Referral Coordination of Care  Medical  Social Coordination of Care  Medical  Social Enabling Services  Transportation  Childcare  Eligibility assistance  Translation/ Interpretation Enabling Services  Transportation  Childcare  Eligibility assistance  Translation/ Interpretation Health Education  Informal guidance  Support groups  Formal classes Health Education  Informal guidance  Support groups  Formal classes Are services available? Are services culturally competent? Is there tracking and follow-up of referrals? Are services available? Are services culturally competent? Is there tracking and follow-up of referrals? Reduce Disparities in Pregnancy Outcomes  Preterm labor  IUGR  Low Birth Weight  Congenital malformations Reduce Disparities in Infant Outcomes  SIDS  Injuries  Infections Reduce Disparities in Women’s Outcomes  Infections (HIV, STD)  Perinatal depression  Smoking  Short inter- pregnancy intervals Reduce Disparities in Pregnancy Outcomes  Preterm labor  IUGR  Low Birth Weight  Congenital malformations Reduce Disparities in Infant Outcomes  SIDS  Injuries  Infections Reduce Disparities in Women’s Outcomes  Infections (HIV, STD)  Perinatal depression  Smoking  Short inter- pregnancy intervals Reduce Disparities in Maternal and Infant Mortality

11 Local Action Plan Expand Existing Services Create new services Develop service/provider networks Coordinate existing services and resources Influence policy Ongoing needs assessment Develop sustainability plan Establish coordination mechanisms and communication between systems-level planning and service-level implementation Expand Existing Services Create new services Develop service/provider networks Coordinate existing services and resources Influence policy Ongoing needs assessment Develop sustainability plan Establish coordination mechanisms and communication between systems-level planning and service-level implementation Needs/Assets Assessment Priority Setting Needs/Assets Assessment Priority Setting Consortium Work with Title V Community Participation Process Healthy Start System Mechanisms Systems Activities Systems Outcomes Hypothesized Link Between Healthy Start Systems Activities and Results Increased service capacity Increased participant satisfaction Increased cultural, financial, and structural access to care Increased number of women, children and families with medical home Enhanced community participation in systems change Increased integration of prenatal, primary care, and mental health services Increased identification of perinatal depression Policy change Sustained improvement in access to care and service delivery systems Increased service capacity Increased participant satisfaction Increased cultural, financial, and structural access to care Increased number of women, children and families with medical home Enhanced community participation in systems change Increased integration of prenatal, primary care, and mental health services Increased identification of perinatal depression Policy change Sustained improvement in access to care and service delivery systems Larger System Changes: Changes with Direct Impact on Participants

12 Evaluation Design: Data Collection Strategy Data for Phase 1 emphasizes primary data collected by survey supplemented by grantee reports and grantee CY 2003 performance measurement data Use of data contained in grantee program reporting requirements will be limited by its consistency and quality

13 Mail Survey: Development and Piloting Intensive development process Pilot and cognitive testing process  Grantees have the necessary information  Survey long but doable  Electronic format will increase ease of responding Revisions required to better coordinate with new grant guidance requests

14 Scope of the Mail Survey Staffing and organizational structure  Types of staff and staffing issues such as training, cultural competence, turnover, service sites Healthy Start Services components  Outreach/recruitment, intake/enrollment, retention, risk assessment/ service planning, case management, enabling services, health education, home visiting, smoking cessation/reduction, perinatal depression, interconceptional care, services to infants and toddlers, male involvement services  Questions on organizational strategies, staffing, and barriers

15 Scope of the Mail Survey (cont.) Systems components:  Consortium, local health systems action plan, coordination with Title V and other organizations and other specific activities  Questions on how grantees address the need for systems changes, community voice (inputs), results achieved, and barriers Reflections on program and results

16 Using Grantee Reports Structure and content of grantee reports revised to improve consistency across grantees Some data elements will be abstracted from grantee reports to reduce reporting burden on grantees Data from grantee applications may provide more detailed descriptions of Healthy Start activities Data anticipated in April

17 Using Performance Measurement Data Our data collection strategy is designed to complement (not duplicate) the information being collected through the performance measures We will work with MCHB to assess the feasibility of including performance measurement data in the Phase 1 evaluation Our Phase 1 report will include measures of program features and results, where data permit

18 Using Performance Measurement Data Potential measures:  Percent of women and children with a medical home  Percent of pregnant clients who had a prenatal visit during first trimester  Incorporation of cultural competence elements  Facilitation of provider screening for risk factors  Assessment of system of care for women’s health services  Number of people served (pregnant women, children, other)  Adequacy of prenatal care  Low birthweight births  Number screened/counseled/referred for further assessment or treatment by risk factor

19 Analysis Plan: Three Components Component 1: Descriptive Analysis of Program Features  Will produce a national profile of Healthy Start program features  Will describe the Healthy Start program features including the range and variation across programs and the “national program”  Component level analysis will show range and variation of approaches

20 Analysis Plan: Three Components continued Component 2: Descriptive Analysis of Results Achieved by Healthy Start Programs  Describe the results of Healthy Start programs during the current grant cycle, based on data collected through the survey and performance measures  Primary reliance will be on data from the mail survey to provide consistent quantitative data by which to describe the results achieved by the national program  Performance measures will be used selectively to support evidence on results

21 Analysis Plan: Three Components continued Component 3: Linking Program Features with Program Results  Can we identify whether there are certain features or approaches that are associated with particular (desired) results?  Descriptive and multivariate analyses will be used to determine how results vary in relation to the way programs are structured  The analysis will control for certain basic characteristics  The specific analytic approach will be developed based on findings from Components 1 and 2

22 Next Steps Implementation of data collection efforts  Fielding survey  Receipt and abstracting of grantee guidance information  Receipt and review of performance measurement data Data Analysis Draft and Final Reports Phase 2 planning