DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Advertisements

Hydrologic Analysis Dr. Bedient CEVE 101 Fall 2013.
Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
Infiltration and unsaturated flow Learning objective Be able to calculate infiltration, infiltration capacity and runoff rates using the methods described.
1 A physically based distributed model at the REW scale and application to Oklahoma region Murugesu Sivapalan Fuqiang Tian Hongyi Li Department of Geography.
Assessing the impact of a soil surface crust on simulated overland flow at the field scale. N. Chahinian (1, 2), M. Voltz (2), R. Moussa (2), G. Trotoux.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
Estimating Catchment Runoff Storm Surface depression storage Infiltration Initial abstraction Direct runoff or Effective rainfall Losses.
Runoff and Streamflow P Q
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
A Process-Based Transfer Function Approach to Model Tile Drain Hydrographs Mazdak Arabi, Jennifer Schmidt and Rao S. Govindaraju World Water & Environmental.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Soil physics Magnus Persson. Surface tension   2·R·cos  R 2·r P1P1 P2P2 z Due to surface tension water can be held at negative pressure in capillary.
Infiltration Rainwater that soaks into the ground and may reach the groundwater table.
The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.
WMS Infiltration and Evapotranspiration Considerations.
Hydrology Laboratory Research Modeling System (HL-RMS) Introduction: Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
The Concept of Runoff Elements As a Basis of Scale-Free Approach To Runoff Formation Modelling the experience of “Hydrograph” model development and implementation.
LL-III physics-based distributed hydrologic model in Blue River Basin and Baron Fork Basin Li Lan (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower.
Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology
Figure (p. 235) (a) Cross-section through an unsaturated porous medium; (b) Control volume for development of the continuity equation in an unsaturated.
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
Subbasin Loss Methods HEC-HMS.
Onion creek catchment modeling using PIHM By, Harish Sangireddy PhD Candidate The University of Texas at Austin.
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
1 The Role of the Antecedent Soil Moisture Condition on the Distributed Hydrologic Modelling of the Toce Alpine Basin Floods Nicola Montaldo, Giovanni.
September 16, 2008 R. Edward Beighley Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering San Diego State University SWOT Hydrology Workshop The Ohio State.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
ATM 301 Lecture #7 (sections ) Soil Water Movements – Darcy’s Law and Richards Equation.
Watershed Modeling Approaches Distributed: CASC-2D (CSU, U Conn, WMS) overland flow: 2-D diffusion wave with explicit FD channel flow: 1-D diffusion wave.
Introduction to the TOPMODEL
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
Water Resources Assessment Main Resources – Surface water – Groundwater – Unconventional Tools – Flood routing/delineation models – Runoff models – GIS.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
Hydro Europe 2016 Team L Influence of the various model parameters (Hec HMS + Mike SHE) 1.
Team  Spatially distributed deterministic models  Many hydrological phenomena vary spatially and temporally in accordance with the conservation.
Module 4: Loss Models Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI AUG 2015 Module 4 1.
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
Darcy’s Law and Richards Equation
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Digital model for estimation of flash floods using GIS
Modified Rational Method for Texas Watersheds
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
Water Balance in MIKE-SWMM
A Geographic Information System Tool for Hydrologic Model Setup
Hydrologic fundamentals
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling
Applied Hydrology Infiltration
Aquifer Anisotropy and general flow equations
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling
Applied Hydrology Infiltration
Hydrology CIVL341.
Infiltration.
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Presentation transcript:

DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL RUNOFF e-mail : todini@geomin.unibo.it MODELS APPLIED TO THE DARGLE Prof. Eng. Ezio TODINI e-mail : todini@geomin.unibo.it

DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING Rainfall Runoff Models Black Box M. Semi Distributed M. Distributed M. Advantages of Distributed Models Physical meaning of model parameters Distributed representation of phenomena Limited calibration requirements Possibility of internal analysis

Model 1: AFFDEF Main model characteristics: Mass Balance in each cell Main model characteristics: Modified CN for estimating infiltration Radiation method for evapotranspiration Muskingum-Cunge for ovrland and channel flow

Main model characteristics Vertical lumping of hydraulic conductivity Model 2: TOPKAPI Main model characteristics Vertical lumping of hydraulic conductivity Dunne infiltration Soil horizontal flow, overland and channel flows represented using a kinematic equation Horizontal lumping of kinematic equations Model for the single cell

TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell SOIL COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation ODE

TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell SURFACE COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation … ODE

TOPKAPI Distributed approach The model for the single cell CHANNEL COMPONENT mass conservation moment conservation … ODE

TOPKAPI Distributed approach Parameters

Model 3: MIKE SHE Main model characteristics: 1D Richards equations for unsaturated zone 3D Boussinesq equation for greoundwater Parabolic approximation for overland flow

Case study The Dargle Republic of Eireland County of Wicklow

Elevation from 20 m to 713 m a.s.l. Sandy and sandy loam for about Case study - Surface Area circa 122 km2 Elevation from 20 m to 713 m a.s.l. Sandy and sandy loam for about 1.5 m

Saturation mechanism Dunne Horton The “unrealistic” profile used in MIKE SHE to meet the observations

Results: AFFDEF Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 6.97 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.59 Explained Variance= 0.61 Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = 0.74 Willmott= 0.93 Efficiency Coefficients

Uniform value for curve number: 20 Risults: AFFDEF 5 [Km2 ] Areal threshold Average computer time = 5 min Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 [ms-1] Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 6.97 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.59 Explained Variance= 0.61 Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = 0.74 Willmott= 0.93 Efficiency Coefficients Infiltration Res. Const 4320000[s] Infiltration constant 0.7 Infiltration Capacity 0.1 Uniform value for curve number: 20

Results: TOPKAPI Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 4.01 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.77 Explained Variance= 0.77 Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = 0.90 Willmott= 0.95 Efficiency Coefficients

Results: TOPKAPI Average comp. time = 5 min Permeability [m3s-1] θS θR α L [m] Soil Type 9.1E-04 0.453 0.041 2.5 0.9 Sandy Loam 0.7 3.1E-05 1.5 0.463 0.020 1.0 Loam 4.1E-05 Average comp. time = 5 min Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 4.01 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.77 Explained Variance= 0.77 Coefficient of correlation =0.91 Volume Control = 0.90 Willmott= 0.95 Efficiency Coefficients

Results: MIKE SHE Efficiency Coefficients Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 8.32 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.52 Explained Variance= 0.54 Coefficient of correlation =0.85 Volume Control = 0.80 Willmott= 0.90 Efficiency Coefficients

Results: MIKE SHE Average computer time = 2.5 h Variance of obs. = 17.85 Variance of errors= 8.32 Nash Sutcliffe= 0.52 Explained Variance= 0.54 Coefficient of correlation =0.85 Volume Control = 0.80 Willmott= 0.90 Efficiency Coefficients Thickness of soil layer -1.3 [m] Horizontal hydraulic conductivity 5*10-4 [m s-1] Vertical hydraulic conductivity 1*10-5 [m s-1] Storativity coefficient 0.2 [m-1]

Distributed soil moisture Saturation percentage

TOPKAPI CALIBRATION TOOL

Example of link ECMWF -TOPKAPI on the Po Basin The basin closed at Ponte Spessa (Surface area 36,900 km2 ) Ponte Spessa

The Soil Types The Land Uses The DEM The Land Uses

Reproduction of the 1994 event in the Po river

ECMWF: deterministic run

ECMWF: deterministic run

ECMWF: deterministic run

ECMWF: deterministic run

ECMWF: deterministic run