Writing DRB Recommendations Ralph Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
DISTRICT FIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION UPDATE TRAINING Submission of Working Schedule Specification SP A.
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
Managing in a Labor/Management Contract Environment: Responding to Grievances Lisa L. Swem February 22, 2013 Training Agency Association of Michigan Fleet.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTATION In Search of Improved Performance.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Dissertation Writing.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada CANADA’S ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING 20 FACTS PREPARERS of FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHOULD KNOW.
Page 1 Non-Assurance Services Caroline Gardner IESBA December 2013 New York, USA.
Documenting Disciplinary Issues
Anatomy Laboratory Write up Emulate standard Scientific Paper (few exceptions)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Summary-Response Essay
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Dr. Ralph Ellis, P.E., Ph.D. The Role of the Dispute Review Boards and State Arbitration.
Guidelines to Publishing in IO Journals: A US perspective Lois Tetrick, Editor Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon clicking, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
Disciplinary Policy INCA Community Services. Purpose O Every employee has the duty and the responsibility to be aware of and abide by existing rules and.
Business Memo purpose of writer needs of reader Memos solve problems
Essay Writing What makes a good essay?. Essay Writing What is a good essay? Planning Essay structure Editing and proofreading Referencing and avoiding.
Research Report Chapter 15. Research Report – APA Format Title Page Running head – BRIEF TITLE, positioned in upper left corner of no more than 50 characters.
Dr. Ralph Ellis Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Dispute Review Board Value Contributions Ralph Ellis, P.E., Ph.D.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
Writing Letters of Recommendation Writing Letters of Recommendation Based on Harvard University’s GSAS Guide for Teaching Fellows on Writing Letters of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Allen Hughes State Materials Office
Report Writing.
EE LECTURE 4 REPORT STRUCTURE AND COMPONENTS Electrical Engineering Dept King Saud University.
Communication 2 Report Writing.
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND VENDOR BRIEFING SESSION RAF/ 2013 /00009 Date: 27 May 2013 Time: 11:00.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
REPORT WRITING WHAT IS A REPORT?  A report is a very formal document that is written for a variety of purposes in the sciences, social sciences, engineering.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
GEORGIA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION WRITING TEST September 25, 2013.
HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations Unit One Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations, Unit One Seminar Seminar.
Contractor / Engineer Conference 2010 Dispute Resolution Process Dispute Resolution Process.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Monitoring and 638 Contract Close-out. Contract Monitoring and Close-out After Award ▫ Meet with Tribe to discuss the Agreement  Include Monitoring Plan.
Writing a Research Proposal 1.Label Notes: Research Proposal 2.Copy Notes In Your Notebooks 3.Come to class prepared to discuss and ask questions.
Why do I Have Miners’ Rights? 4 The Act gives miners and their representatives many rights because Congress wanted to encourage them to take an active,
Writing Proposals Nayda G. Santiago Capstone CpE Jan 26, 2009.
Unit 9 Seminar Business Organizations. Things to do this unit: UNIT 9 – Read Chapter 13 and 14 – Respond to the Discussion Board – Attend the Weekly Seminar.
Internal Assessment IB History.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
CON 2001 CVE 4070 Construction Methods/Engineering Changes & Extra Work Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
10 Informal Reports.
Module 1: Writing Your Functional Competency Assessment East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
Effectively Managing Parental Concerns & Complaints
Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
CVE 4070 Construction Engineering Changes & Extra Work Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Heritage Trust Fund Grant Orientation Session. HTF Staff and Contact Information Katrina Ringler Grants Manager ext. 215
Revising Your Paper Paul Lewis With thanks to Mark Weal.
CHANGE ORDER/CLAIMS MANAGEMENT MODULE 9. Change Order Management.
The Port of New Orleans - As-Needed Consultant Selection Process for Professional Services June 9, 2016.
REPORT WRITING.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Transmitted by the expert
How to write a thesis proposal
Making Local Government a Participatory Sport
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
Presentation transcript:

Writing DRB Recommendations Ralph Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.

Topics  Objective  Recommendation Formation  Template for the Recommendation  Project Background/Context  Positions of the parties  Findings  Recommendation  Improving Your Writing

Objective of a Recommendation  Provides guidance to the parties with regard to who is to prevail in a dispute (who is right, who is wrong)  Documents the recommendation Anything else? “Explains Why”

Common Problems with Recommendations  Reasoning supporting the recommendation is not adequately explained  Recommendation is poorly organized  Positions of the parties are not fairly presented  Specific facts and contract provisions are not cited  Poorly written  Recommendation is not clear or is not aligned with what has been requested

Recommendation Formation  Deliberations must also include identification of key facts and contract provisions  These “findings” must be noted by the DRB in development of a recommendation  When tentatively considering a recommendation, ask yourself how are you going to tie this recommendation to the facts and contract terms  If you are having difficulty, maybe you need to reconsider

Keep Track of the Facts and Contract Provisions Fact 1 Evaporation counter measures were not in place during concrete placement Source: Statements by concrete foreman and inspector at hearing. Contract Provision 1: “when the forecasted or actual wind speed exceeds 10 mph, evaporation counter measures are required.” Source: 2007 Standard Specification for Roads and Bridges, Section Curing Concrete, Subsection General

DRB Members Often Agree on the Recommendation and Disagree on the Why  Chairman must be the referee  Relevant facts and contract provisions to  Adding more weight to selected items can be a problem

As Chairman how do you resolve differences between the other DRB members? I want to emphasize X. It is the critical point. I want to emphasize Y. It is the critical point.

Recommendation Organization  Introduction / Project Description  Contractor’s Position  Owner’s Position  Findings  Facts  Contract provisions  Analysis/Recommendation

Introduction / Project Description  Project personnel are not your only readers  Others need a brief orientation to establish the context  What would I need to know to be oriented? (in a paragraph or two?)  General description of the type of project and scope  Location  Description of the dispute

Positions of the parties  Full position papers can be hundreds of pages in length. What do you include?  Key points supporting their position  The Goal is to fairly represent their stated position You want each party to believe that the DRB fully understood their position. Acceptance of the recommendation depends on it.

What criteria should be used to decide what position points (facts and specs) are included?

Positions of the Parties (Dos and Don’ts)  Don’t cherry pick. Be careful about selecting some items in the position and omitting other items.  It is often better to copy and paste key language. (Ask for file copies of position papers)  Narrative formats can be used but a point by point format may provide more clarity  Include referenced contract language  Provide appropriate citations for specific contract references and facts (footnotes work well)

A Sample Introduction to the Position Section  “The following summary of the Contractor’s position is based upon written materials submitted to the Board and upon the hearing presentation. The complete written position is available in the Contractor’s position paper and rebuttal.”

Sample Position Section Format FDOT Position The following summary of the FDOT’s position is based upon written materials submitted to the Board and upon the hearing presentation. The complete written position is available in the FDOT’s position paper. Key Points Compliance with applicable laws, ordinances and regulations is required by contract Specification section requires that the contractor “become familiar with and comply with all Federal, State, County and city laws, by-laws, ordinances, and regulations that control the action or operation of those engaged or employed in the work or that affect materials used”. [1] [1] Compliance with noise regulations is required by contract Specification Subarticle requires that the contractor “comply with all applicable regulations governing noise abatement”. [2] [2] [1] [1] See FDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction 2004, Section [2] [2] See FDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction 2004, Section 8-4.1

Findings  Include relevant facts and contract provisions as determined by the DRB in its deliberations  Point by point organization provides clarity  Include text of contract provisions  Provide citations for both facts and contract provisions

Sample Findings Section Format HHC employed a specialty engineer to record and report on noise levels at Pond 23 East. Their consultant monitored noise levels on June 23, 2006 (after HCC had resumed work) and reported that noise levels were in compliance with the St. Lucie County ordinance. HCC represents that the work operations during the noise monitoring were representative of what occurred prior to the suspension on May 25 (backup alarms and tailgate slams). However, there is no known record of noise levels prior to the May 25 suspension. There appears to be no way to determine if HCC was in violation of the noise ordinance prior to the May 25 work suspension. [1] [1] [1] See Letter from PSI to HCC dated Sep. 5, 2006

Sample Findings Section Format The Engineer is given authority to temporarily suspend the Contractor’s work by specification section which reads as follows: [2] [2] “8-6.1 Authority to Suspend Contractor’s Operations: The Engineer has the authority to suspend the Contractor’s operations, wholly or in part. The Engineer will order such suspension in writing, giving in detail the reasons for the suspension. Contract Time will be charged during all suspensions of Contractor’s operations. The Department may grant an extension of Contract time in accordance with when determined appropriate in the Department’s sole judgment. No additional compensation nor a time extension will be paid or granted to the Contractor when the operations are suspended for the following reasons: a. The Contractor fails to comply with the Contract Documents. b. The Contractor fails to carry out orders given by the Engineer. c. The Contractor causes conditions considered unfavorable for continuing the Work.” (2)See FDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction 2004, Section 8-6.1

Analysis  Provide an explanation of the reasoning used by the DRB in analyzing the facts and contract provisions  Which contract provisions apply to this issue? How?  Which facts apply to this issue? How?  Given the facts and contract provisions, what is the resolution of this issue?  A narrative discussion works well for this section

Recommendation  What did they ask for?  Make sure the recommendation addresses the request  Entitled to compensation?  Entitled to our interpretation of how the work is to be done?  Qualifying or clarifying the recommendation?

How do you get better at writing?  Use a proven organizational template  Use a simple reference for correct style  READ Reading a variety of Recommendations will significantly improve your writing. ADM/DRB/DRBDecisions.shtm

A Final Thought Making a recommendation is always stressful. One party is going to be unhappy. Almost always they will get over it and you will be forgiven. However, if they think you did not listen and you did not understand their position, they will not forgive you. Each party when reading the recommendation should believe that the DRB clearly understood their position.

Questions or Comments ? Ralph Ellis, P.E., Ph.D.