16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,

Advertisements

Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)

Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.

Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.

The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.

NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.

The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.

Presenters: Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Tracy Schneider, Solano College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest.

ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

Cross Discipline Deans State Called Meeting February 25, 2013.

Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.

Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.

Fall Convocation Week September finish approval of GEP departments start submitting courses for approval into Goal Areas October GEC starts review.

1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.

August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.

Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)

Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices

ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:

Updating Curriculum to Support Learning Davidson County Community College May

Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.

ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.

A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.

Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.

The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.

Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.

Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.

New Program Development Presented by: Lyla A Eddington, Ed.D. April 17, 2008.

Program Review Training 2015 Petr Lensky and Amanda Corcoran.

The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.

Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

General Education: Developing Outcomes and Assessing Them Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda, Facilitator Joe Safdie, San Diego Mesa College Maggie.

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.

AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.

University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.

QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.

Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.

Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.

Cosumnes River College Vision, Mission and Values Review.

HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.

1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.

Becoming one with the SLO The Zen Of Our Course and Program SLOs.

Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.

AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.

Academic Program Review

Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards

Program Review Training

Program Review and Planning

Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here

Curriculum and Accreditation

Curriculum and Accreditation

Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module

Presented To: SLO Symposium

ACCJC Annual Conference April 6, 2017 Los Angeles Harbor College

New ALO Training February 22, 2018.

Accreditation and curriculum

Rebecca Eikey, ASCCC Area C Representative

ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.

Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college

Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan

Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College

ACCJC Annual Conference April 6, 2017 Los Angeles Harbor College

ACCJC Annual Conference April 6, 2017 Los Angeles Harbor College

CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION

Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.

Presentation transcript:

16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module

SLOs: What do the Standards say? II.A.Instructional Programs 1.All instructional programs, regardless of location or means of delivery, including distance education and correspondence education, are offered in fields of study consistent with the institution’s mission, are appropriate to higher education, and culminate in student attainment of identified student learning outcomes, and achievement of degrees, certificates, employment, or transfer to other higher education programs. (ER 9 and ER 11)

Courses: What do the Standards say? II.A.3. The institution identifies and regularly assesses learning outcomes for courses, programs, certificates and degrees using established institutional procedures. The institution has officially approved and current course outlines that include student learning outcomes. In every class section students receive a course syllabus that includes learning outcomes from the institution’s officially approved course outline.

Programs: What do the Standards say? II.A.11. The institution includes in all of its programs, student learning outcomes, appropriate to the program level, in:  communication competency,  information competency,  quantitative competency,  analytic inquiry skills,  ethical reasoning,  the ability to engage diverse perspectives,  and other program-specific learning outcomes.

Programs: What do the Standards say? 12.The institution requires of all of its degree programs a component of general education based on a carefully considered philosophy for both associate and baccalaureate degrees that is clearly stated in its catalog. The institution, relying on faculty expertise, determines the appropriateness of each course for inclusion in the general education curriculum, based upon student learning outcomes and competencies appropriate to the degree level. The learning outcomes include a student’s preparation for and acceptance of responsible participation in civil society, skills for lifelong learning and application of learning, and a broad comprehension of the development of knowledge, practice, and interpretive approaches in the arts and humanities, the sciences, mathematics, and social sciences. (ER 12)

How have we addressed the requirements? From the 2015 ACCJC Annual Report: #QuestionAnswer 24.a.Total number of college courses b.Number of college courses with ongoing assessment of learning outcomes 551 Auto-calculated field: percentage of total a.Total number of college programs (all certificates and degrees, and other programs as defined by the college) b.Number of college programs with ongoing assessment of learning outcomes 26 Auto-calculated field: percentage of total39.4

Where is the college now?