Purposeful Questioning 6-8 September 24, 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Focus on Instructional Support
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Julie Fredericks Teachers Development Group.  Definition and Purpose  What is a mathematical justification and what purposes does mathematical justification.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Developed by ERLC/ARPDC as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation.
Implementing the Mathematics Nevada Academic Content Standards Talking about mathematical terminology, symbols, and definitions Liz Carter and Shayla Taylor.
Common Core Circles Part II Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.
Common Core Circles - Monitoring 1. Common Core Circles A Joint Venture of CMC-S and CAMTE.
Strategies to Promote Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom
Math /Algebra Talks: Mental Math Strategies
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Professional Learning Series Number Sense and Numeration, Grades 4 to 6 (with reference to Volumes 1, 5, and 6) Understanding.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Using Math Talk To Promote Student Understanding and Problem-Solving Kim Oliver-Second Grade Melissa Hawley-Kindergarten
Identifying Mathematics Levels of Cognitive Rigor (DOK) Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development - Mathematics February 19, 2015 Module.
Discourse and Mathematics: Get Connected! Rosann Hollinger and Bernard Rahming Milwaukee Public Schools April 27, 2012 NCTM Annual Meeting Philadelphia.
CCRS Quarterly Meeting # 3 Promoting Discourse in the Mathematics Classroom Welcome participants to 3rd Quarterly Meeting for school year.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Orchestrating Productive Discussions of Cognitively Challenging Tasks Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Managing Effective Student Discourse
Elizabeth Jean Bingham Central Elementary
Classroom Discussions in Math: A Teachers Guide for using talk moves to support the Common Core and more, Third Edition Adapted Original Presentation by.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
The Interpersonal Mode
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 13, 2009 Learning to.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
M ULTIPLE R ESPONSE S TRATEGIES By Euranie Patin Campus Instructional Coach Martin Weiss Elementary School An Approach To Student Engagement.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 2: Modelling Exemplary Teaching – Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
Leveraging Student Representations and Discourse to Advance Learning through Progressions LEUSD Middle and High School September 23, 2015.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
Purposeful Questioning K-5 September 25, 2015 Vickie Inge The Virginia Council of Mathematics Specialist Conference.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University. Video courtesy Pittsburgh Public Schools and the University of Pittsburgh Institute.
This module was developed by Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute for Learning; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Amy.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Victoria Bill, University of.
This module was developed by Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute for Learning; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Amy.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith and Victoria Bill at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Debra Campbell and the Building a New Playground Task Geometry Principles to.
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute for Learning.
This module was developed by Melissa Boston at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Hamilton County School District and the Institute for Learning.
This session is based on the module entitled, “The Case of Shalunda Shackelford and the Bike and Truck Task”, developed by Melissa Boston at Duquesne University.
This module was developed by Lynn Raith, Mathematics Curriculum Specialist K-12. Video courtesy of NYC District 2 and the Institute for Learning. These.
Session 3 Implementing Tasks: Maintaining Fidelity Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks Reflecting on PracticePark City Mathematics Institute1.
PCMI 3 aspect – For your mathematics – For your teaching – For your community Reflecting on Practice Park City Mathematics Institute1.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
Facilitating Math Talks for All Students Candace Standley, Culpeper County Schools Carol Walsh, Middlesex County Public Schools March 21, 2016 Southwest.
Teaching for Understanding: Discourse and Purposeful Questioning
Curriculum Leadership Council High School Model Lesson Functions and Everyday Situations June 20, 2013.
Number Talks: A Powerful Math Instructional Practice.
USOE Professional Learning Series
Review of TTLP Insert comments for another assigned group within their Google doc (be certain to include your name) Read the comments made on your TTLP.
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Discourse Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Purposeful Questioning 6-8 September 24, 2015 The Virginia Council of Mathematics Specialist Conference NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Purposeful Questioning 6-8 September 24, 2015 Vickie Inge vickieinge@gmail.com http://www.nctm.org/Conferences-and-Professional-Development/Principles-to-Actions-Toolkit/The-Case-of-Elizabeth-Brovey-and-the-Calling-Plans-2-Task/

Overview of the Session Examining the types of questions and the patterns of questioning teachers use in the classroom. Watch video clips of an 8th grade pre-algebra class working on the Calling Plans Task. Relate teacher and student actions in the video to the effective teacher and student actions as well as the types of questions for purposeful questioning. Consider how to support teachers in using purposeful questioning. Session Outline Overview of the Session – 2 minutes Question Sort-- 15 minutes Overview of Types of Questions and Patterns of Questions Matrix– 10 minutes Solve and discuss the Donuts Task making connections to the VASOL – 10 minutes Watch and discuss Donut Task Video Clip #1 – 15 minutes (NCTM Website http://www.nctm.org/Conferences-and-Professional-Development/Principles-to-Actions-Toolkit/The-Case-of-Amanda-Smith-and-the-Donuts-Task/) Watch the video Make initial observations of teacher and student actions Discuss as a whole group Watch and Video Clip #2 – 15 minutes Discuss observations of teacher and student actions Discuss next steps in supporting teachers in applying the ideas to teachers’ own classroom – 10 minutes TOTAL TIME – 75 minutes

Effective NCTM, Principles to Actions, p. 10 Teaching and Learning is one of the essential elements for a successful mathematics program as ( p. 5) Transition: NCTM identified a framework that reflects the learning principals and the last 20 years of accumulated knowledge about mathematics teaching.   NCTM, Principles to Actions, p. 10

Question Sort Open the envelop on your table and work as table groups to sort the questions into exactly 4 non-overlapping groups or sets. Analyze the type of engagement and thinking each set brings out in the class room and develop a word or phrase that could be used to categorize the type of questions in each set. Ask groups to give the 4 labels they come up with

Making Sense of Mathematics An excellent mathematics program requires effective teaching that engages students in meaningful learning through individual and collaborative experiences that promote their ability to make sense of mathematical ideas and reason mathematically. Teachers’ questions are crucial in helping students make connections and learn important mathematics concepts. Teachers need to know how students typically think about particular concepts, how to determine what a particular student or group of students thinks about those ideas, and how to help students deepen their understanding. Weiss & Pasley, 2004 Facilitation Suggestion Summarize the Teaching and Learning Principle, noting the strong emphasis on promoting students’ ability to make sense of mathematical ideas and to reason mathematically. Ask them to keep this Principle in mind throughout the session and in particular, as they watch the video clips from the kindergarten classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author. (p. 7)

Work with a partner to explore the information contained in he table. In the 2nd Column you will see the identifying name for each type of question that the authors of Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All use. Column 3 provides a description or purpose of each type of question. Column 4 provides examples of specific questions representing each type. Column 1 identifies the two patterns of questioning observed in most classrooms and the set up of the table suggests the type of question that typically is used in each pattern. Work with a partner to explore the information contained in he table. Overview of the Relationship Between Question Types and Patterns of Questioning Table, HO page 3 Note that different researchers use various names for the categories, how every the purpose of the categories is very similar across researchers.

Principles to Actions Professional Learning Toolkit Website with Resources http://www.nctm.org/ptatoolkit 8th grade prealgebra class in Pittsburg

Mathematics Learning Goals Ms. Bovery’s Mathematics Learning Goals Students will understand that: the point of intersection is a solution to each equation (Companies A, B, and C); the rate of change (cost per minute) determines the steepness of the line; if the y-intercept (monthly base rate) is lowered then the rate of change (cost per minute) must increase in order for the new equation to intersect the other two at the same point.

The Calling Plans Task Long-distance company A charges a base rate of $5.00 per month plus 4 cents for each minute that you are on the phone. Long- distance company B charges a base rate of only $2.00 per month but charges you 10 cents for every minute used. Part 1: How much time per month would you have to talk on the phone before subscribing to company A would save you money? Part 2: Create a phone plane, Company C, that costs the same as Companies A and B at 50 minutes, but has a lower monthly fee than either Company A or B. The video clips featured in this session focuses on students who are trying to create phone plans for Company C (part 2). It is suggested that you engage teachers in solving the task prior to analyzing the video. This will take 45-60 minutes. The lesson guide (9. Calling Plans-LESSON GUIDE-MS-Brovey) contains suggestions for conducting the lesson and sample solutions that may be helpful to you. In addition, using the learning goals on slide 5 to guide your discussion of the task will help participants understand what the teacher featured in the video was trying to accomplish. If time is limited you may want to tell teachers that the cost of plans A and B can be determined by use for the equations shown below and ask teachers to explain what each equation means in the context of the problem. Then tell them that the phone plans both cost $7.00 for 50 minutes and ask them how they could verify this. Cost A= .04m + $5.00 Cost B = .10m + $2.00 You could then provide four solutions that students came up with for Company C (shown below) and ask them: a) if the equations fulfill the specified conditions; b) how they could arrive that the equations; c) if there are any other equations that fit the criteria (without rounding). Cost C1 = .11m + $1.50 Cost C2 = .12m + $1.00 Cost C3 = .13m + $ .50 Cost C4 = .14m

Pose Purposeful Questions Effective Questions should: Reveal students’ current understandings; Encourage students to explain, elaborate, or clarify their thinking; and Make the mathematics more visible and accessible for student examination and discussion.   Facilitation Suggestions Summarize the key features of this Mathematics Teaching Practice.

Pose Purposeful Questions Teacher and Student Actions (HO page 2) What are teachers doing? What are students doing? Advancing student understanding by asking questions that build on, but do not take over or funnel, student thinking. Making certain to ask questions that go beyond gathering information to probing thinking and requiring explanation and justification. Asking intentional questions that make the mathematics more visible and accessible for student examination and discussion. Allowing sufficient wait time so that more students can formulate and offer responses. Expecting to be asked to explain, clarify, and elaborate on their thinking. Thinking carefully about how to present their responses to questions clearly, without rushing to respond quickly. Reflecting on and justifying their reasoning, not simply providing answers. Listening to, commenting on, and questioning the contributions of their classmates. Handout: 5-TeacherStudentActions-Questions-ES-Smith.pdf Facilitation Suggestions Ask each participant to identify a shoulder partner. One person will study the “teacher actions” and the other person will study the “student actions.” They should use the handout to highlight or mark key ideas and to make note of important actions. The partners should then turn and summarize some of the key ideas from their respective list for each other. As a whole group, discuss: Based on the indicators or actions in the list, what does posing purposeful questions really entail? What will you see teachings doing? What will you see students doing?

The Context of the Video Segment The Calling Plans Task The Context of the Video Segment School: Pittsburgh Classical Academy, Pittsburgh, PA Principal: Valerie Merlo Teacher: Mrs. Elizabeth Brovey, Math Coach Class: Pre-Algebra 8th Grade Class Curriculum: Connected Mathematics Project 2 Size: 27 students At the time the video was filmed, Elizabeth Brovey was a coach at Classical Academy in the Pittsburgh Public School District. The students are mainstream eighth grade Pre-Algebra students. The lesson occurred in April. Facilitation Suggestions Summarize the context of the video. To establish a norm for the viewing and discussion of the video, remind teachers that Mrs. Brovey was willing to share her classroom instruction so that we could use the video to analyze and discuss the teaching of mathematics. It is important to be respectful of her work. We need to remember that we are only seeing a “snapshot” of her work.

The Calling Plans Task – Part 2 The Context of Video Clip 1 Prior to the lesson: Students solved the Calling Plans Task – Part 1. The tables, graphs and equations they produced in response to that task were posted in the classroom. Video Clip 1 begins immediately after Mrs. Brovey explained that students would be working on the Calling Plans Task – Part 2 and read the problem to students. Students first worked individually and subsequently worked in small groups.

Lens for Watching Video Clip 1 As you watch the first video clip, pay attention to the teacher and student indicators associated with Pose Purposeful Questioning . Think About’s: What types of questions is the teacher using? What can you say about the pattern of questions? What do you notice about the student actions? Lens for Watching the Video Clip 1 - Time 1 As you watch the video, make note of what the teacher does to support student learning and engagement as they work on the task. In particular, identify any of the Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices that you notice Mrs. Brovey using. Be prepared to give examples and to cite line numbers from the transcript to support your claims. Here are some of the things that teachers might notice: Many of the questions pressed students to explain what they did (lines 2, 4, 6, 25, 28, 31, 77) and probed for meaning (lines 8, 13, 16, 21, 50, 54, 57, 59). The teacher first tried to understand what the student was doing from the students’ point of view. These types of questions could be referred to as ASSESSING QUESTIONS - since the purpose is to determine what the student knows and understands about what they have done. The questions are closely tied to the what the students has produced. Other questions serve to press students to move beyond or challenge their current thinking. For example, in lines 37-39 the teacher asks “I am going to ask you to see if there is another plan that you could have” challenging the student’ statement that “1 is practically the only thing you could use.” Later in lines 81-84 she challenges another group to explain where the 50¢ comes in, how the three questions are related, and to find a fourth equation. In this way she is pressing them to look for a ways to explain the pattern that they noticed. These types of questions could be referred to as ADVANCING QUESTIONS - since the purpose is to more students beyond where they currently are and to explore why things work mathematically. In general the teacher seems to begin her interactions with a group by posing assessing questions. When these questions give her a good sense of where the students are she asks an advancing question. It is important to note that she stays with a group in order to hear their answers to the assessing questions but leaves a group to explore the advancing question on their own. In so doing she is sending an important message to students that sees them as capable of making progress without her closely monitoring their work.

Video Clip 2 focuses on the discussion between teacher and students regarding the patterns they notice. Following individual and small group work, Mrs. Brovey pulls the class together for a whole group discussion. Several different equations that satisfy the conditions of the problem are offered by students. Jake, a student in the class then proposed a theory that every time the rate increases by 1 cent the base rate decreases by 50 cents. Mrs. Brovey records the four possible phone plans for Company C (shown below) on the board and ask the class what patterns they see. C = .14m C = .13m + $ .50 C = .12m + $1.00 C = .11m + $1.50

Lens for Watching Video Clip 2 As you watch the second video this time, pay attention to the questions the teacher asks. Specifically: To what extent do the questions encourage students to explain, elaborate, or clarify their thinking? To what extent do the questions make mathematics more visible and accessible for student examination and discussion? How are the questions similar to or different from the questions asked in video clip 1? Many of the questions pressed students to explain what they did (lines 2, 4, 6, 25, 28, 31, 77) and probed for meaning (lines 8, 13, 16, 21, 50, 54, 57, 59). The teacher first tried to understand what the student was doing from the students’ point of view. These types of questions could be referred to as ASSESSING QUESTIONS - since the purpose is to determine what the student knows and understands about what they have done. The questions are closely tied to the what the students has produced. Other questions serve to press students to move beyond or challenge their current thinking. For example, in lines 37-39 the teacher asks “I am going to ask you to see if there is another plan that you could have” challenging the student’ statement that “1 is practically the only thing you could use.” Later in lines 81-84 she challenges another group to explain where the 50¢ comes in, how the three questions are related, and to find a fourth equation. In this way she is pressing them to look for a ways to explain the pattern that they noticed. These types of questions could be referred to as ADVANCING QUESTIONS - since the purpose is to more students beyond where they currently are and to explore why things work mathematically. In general the teacher seems to begin her interactions with a group by posing assessing questions. When these questions give her a good sense of where the students are she asks an advancing question. It is important to note that she stays with a group in order to hear their answers to the assessing questions but leaves a group to explore the advancing question on their own. In so doing she is sending an important message to students that sees them as capable of making progress without her closely monitoring their work. What are teachers doing? Advancing student understanding by asking questions that build on, but do not take over or funnel, student thinking. Making certain to ask questions that go beyond gathering information to probing thinking and requiring explanation and justification. Asking intentional questions that make the mathematics more visible and accessible for student examination and discussion. Allowing sufficient wait time so that more students can formulate and offer responses. What are students doing? Expecting to be asked to explain, clarify, and elaborate on their thinking. Thinking carefully about how to present their responses to questions clearly, without rushing to respond quickly. Reflecting on and justifying their reasoning, not simply providing answers. Listening to, commenting on, and questioning the contributions of their classmates.

Managing Effective Student Discourse Why is high level classroom discourse so difficult to facilitate? What knowledge and skills are needed to facilitate productive discourse? Why is it important? (i.e. Why do we care?) Students are reluctant to engage/ classroom environment not comfortable for students to take risks Coverage of material - Not enough time for students to respond via discussion Beliefs about what it means to teach Question whether discussion promotes learning Lack of skill in posing questions for discussion – or lack of awareness of the questions you actually ask Teachers afraid of losing control of the class (of the thinking) Vocabulary/ meaning often challenging to students. Teachers afraid they won’t understand students’ ideas Teachers have preconceived notions of “the answer” and are not open to other possible responses Establish a classroom environment supportive of risk taking Deep content knowledge Listening and patience Good questioning skills How to use a wrong answer in pedagogically productive ways Keep the mathematical goal of the lesson in mind

Questioning Techniques Funneling Questions How many sides does that shape have? Is this angle larger? What is the product? Focusing Questions What have you figured out? Why do you think that? Does that always work? If yes, why? If not, why not? When not? Is there another way? How are these two methods different? How are they similar? Explain the two types of questions: funneling and focusing. Funneling questions are good “quick assessments” for the teacher. Focusing questions are good for revealing misconceptions, developing reasoning skills, practicing the language of argument/conjecture/discourse. Focusing questions should be in the context of problems solving situations.

Questioning: Funneling or Focusing Funneling occurs when a teacher asks a series of questions to guide students through a procedure or to a desired result. Teacher engages in cognitive activity Student merely answering questions – often without seeing connections

Questioning: Funneling or Focusing Focusing requires the teacher to listen to student responses and guide them based on what students are thinking rather than how the teacher would solve the problem. Allows teacher to learn about student thinking Requires students to articulate their thinking Promotes making connections

“Our goal is not to increase the amount of talk in our classrooms, but to increase the amount of high quality talk in our classrooms—the mathematical productive talk.” –Classroom Discussions: Using Math Talk to Help Students Learn, 2009

Planning for Mathematical Discussion Productive Talk Formats What do We Talk About Whole-Class Discussion Small-Group Discussion Partner Talk What Do We Talk About? 1. Mathematical Concepts 2. Computational Procedures 3. Solution Methods and Problem- Solving Strategies 4. Mathematical Reasoning 5. Mathematical Terminology, Symbols, and Definitions 6. Forms of Representation Chapin S., O’Connor, C., & Canavan Anderson, N. (2003). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

A survey of multiple studies on questioning support the following: Plan relevant questions directly related to the concept or skill being taught. Phrase questions clearly to communicate what the teacher expects of the intent and quality of students’ responses. Do not direct the question to anyone until after it is asked so that all students pay attention. Allow adequate wait time to provide students time to think before responding. Encourage and design for wide student participation.

How can we support teachers in purposeful questioning. (HO 7) Bridging to Practice How can we support teachers in purposeful questioning. (HO 7)

Bridging to Practice Analyzing the Challenging Situation Some Ideas for Trouble Shooting Challenges My students will not talk The same few kids do all the talking 3. Should I call on students who _______ 4. My students will talk, but they will not listen 5. What to do if students provide a response I do not understand 6. I have students at different levels 7. What to do when students are wrong 8. The discussion is not going anywhere--or at least not where I planned 9. Answers or responses are superficial 10. What if the first speaker gives the right answer 11. What to do for English Language Learners

Change is Not Easy or Comfortable This is “Grand Avenue” The point of the cartoon is for teachers to recognize it’ll be easy to go back to old habits because we are used to them. We all need support to adopt and maintain new habits and ways of doing things.

Support—Support--Support Come on team we can do this together for the good of the students! OR This is “Grand Avenue”

Resources Chapin S., O’Connor, C., & Canavan Anderson, N. (2003). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions. Huinker, D., & Freckmann, J. L. (2004). Focusing conversations to promote teacher thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(7) 352-357. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (n.d.) Principles to Actions Professional Learning Toolkit. Retrieved September 2015. From http://www.nctm.org/ptatoolkit/. Reinhart, S. D. (2000). Never say anything a kid can say. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(8) 478–483. Author. (Date published if available; n.d.--no date-- if not). Title of article. Title of web site . Retrieved date. From URL.

Resources Sullivan, P., & Lilburn, P. (2002). Good questions for math teaching: Why ask them and what to ask. Grades K-6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions. Schuster, L., & Anderson, N. C. (2005). Good Questions for math teaching: Why ask them and what to ask. Grades 5-8. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions. Small, M. (2012). Good Questions – Great Ways to Differentiate Mathematics Instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Smith, M.S., Hughes, E.K., & Engle, R.A., & Stein, M.K. (2009). Orchestrating discussions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14 (9), 549-556.