Reading of Electronic Documents: The Usability of Linear, Fisheye, and Overview+Detail Interface by Kasper Hornbæk, Erik Frøkjær Presented by Luhui Hu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile learning with a mobile game Design and motivational effects.
Advertisements

What is Science Lesson 6. What is Science? (Lesson 6) Objectives: Explore and Explain.
Web Search Results Visualization: Evaluation of Two Semantic Search Engines Kalliopi Kontiza, Antonis Bikakis,
Applying Analytical Writing Patterns to Essay #2.
July 2006 Give graduate students what they want! WHAT THEY REALLY, REALLY WANT Dominic Hakim Silvio Killam Memorial Library Dalhousie University.
The Scientific Method: Scientific Questions
USABILITY AND EVALUATION Motivations and Methods.
Information Understanding Benjamin B. Bederson. University of Maryland, Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory What is the Problem?  How to perceive and.
Evaluation Adam Bodnar CPSC 533C Monday, April 5, 2004.
Copyright: Bruno Buchberger “Reading” Working with the Literature Bruno Buchberger Part of the Block Course „Working Techniques“ in the Frame of.
Stanford hci group / cs376 Adaptive Interfaces Nathan Sakunkoo.
Design of metadata surrogates in search result interfaces of learning object repositories: Linear versus clustered metadata design Panos Balatsoukas Anne.
Evaluating a Fisheye View of Source Code Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen & Kasper Hornbæk Department of Computing University of Copenhagen Copenhagen East, Denmark.
2D or 3D ? Presented by Xu Liu, Ming Luo. Is 3D always better than 2D? NO!
Workshop 6: PDF Accessibility Tools Copyright © 2007 NetCentric Technologies July 2007 Summer Accessibility Institute.
Ch 3 Usability page 1CS 368 Usability Models the authors compare three usability models and introduce their own “the extent to which a product can be used.
Overview of the MS Program Jan Prins. The Computer Science MS Objective – prepare students for advanced technical careers in computing or a related field.
2-D: Focus+Context cs5984: Information Visualization Chris North.
QUPER Paper Outline Yuri Sprockel. Update Unfortunate CCV date pick Cost view elaboration New QUPER PDD almost finished.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Communication with users in the Czech Statistical Office Author:
Evaluation: Controlled Experiments Chris North cs3724: HCI.
The Problem Solving Method Newcomb, Warmbrod, & McCracken (Brian Parr)
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation What Motivates Me 8 th Grade Advisory Activity.
IST Conference Paper Prototyping a Dynamic Software Interface: A Case Study Using APT Andrew Barrett Jamison Judd.
etools.massey.ac.nz Tools to help lecturers mark assignments John Milne Eva Heinrich.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
What is the Value of Audience to Technical Communicators? A Survey of Audience Research Author: Rob Houser Summary of article by: Jeny Carrasco September.
Seungwon Yang, Haeyong Chung, Chris North, and Edward A. Fox Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA 1ETD 2010, June 16-18, Austin, TX.
22C:082:001 Human-Computer Interaction. Fall Copyright © 2013 Juan Pablo Hourcade. 1 Group Project Phase Three.
+ The Division or Classification Essay Catherine Wishart Senior Adjunct Instructor.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
Writing a Thesis for a Literary Analysis Grade 11 English.
 Today is Day 52, 12/3 2 sheets of paper  Turn your study guide answers for chapters 1-2 in the basket without socializing.  Make a KWL Chart about.
Introduction Many students receiving special education services find reading difficult and frustrating, and as a result they do not read for pleasure and.
21/11/20151Gianluca Demartini Ranking Clusters for Web Search Gianluca Demartini Paul–Alexandru Chirita Ingo Brunkhorst Wolfgang Nejdl L3S Info Lunch Hannover,
JEOPARDY POWERPOINT TEMPLATES. Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category 5 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 FINAL JEOPARDY FINAL JEOPARDY.
APW DBQ CYDI? YYC!. WHY? The College Board uses the Document Based Question to assess your ability to analyze primary documents, evaluate them and use.
MODES OF DEVELOPMENT: CLASSIFICATION ESSAY Lit and Comp 2.
Universitas Gunadarma Human-Computer Interaction Parno, SKom., MMSI Teknik Informatika, UG, 2008 staffsite.gunadarma.ac.id/parno.
1D & 2D Spaces for Representing Data Mao Lin Huang.
12/19/14 Do Now: -Take out your Anna Howard Shaw SOAPStone and your cell phone. Homework: - Annotate Steve Jobs’ Commencement Speech (Focus on Logos, Ethos,
Introduction Today Overview of office schedule. Term 2 Overview No more computer theory Using MS Office in detail –Word processing –Excel Spreadsheets.
Learning benefits of structural example- based adaptive tutoring systems 指導教授 : 陳 明 溥 研 究 生 : 許 良 村 Davidovic, A., Warren, J., & Trichina, E. (2003). Learning.
Factors influencing the usability of icons in the LCD touch screens Hsinfu Huang, Wang-Chin Tsai, Hsin-His Lai Department of Industrial Design, National.
Six Patterns of Organization. 1.Main Idea and Supporting Details The main idea of a paragraph or a longer piece of writing is its most important point.
EXPLORATION, ENCOUNTER, EXCHANGE IN HISTORY Name ______________.
Human Learning Shaikh Albuainain.. Learning Theory how the learners take the information and understand it and keep it while learning the theory process.
Category Category Category Category Category
2. ABSTRACTS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Engleski jezik u akademskoj komunikaciji.
“Reading” Working with the Literature
Information Visualization: Navigation
cs5984: Information Visualization Chris North
Information Visualization 2: Overview and Navigation
MGT 716 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
Writing a Technical Report
Design Project Article Title Results and Discussion
cs5984: Information Visualization Chris North
Group 4 - Library Usability Study
Information Visualization 2: Overview and Navigation
Number Patterns Grade 6 Patterning Unit.
cs5984: Information Visualization Chris North
#1 #2 #3 Solve: 21 ÷ Solve: Solve: 3 (7 + 4) 12 ÷ 3 – 2 + 1
We categorize messages both by the author’s purposes and by the initial response we expect from the reader. In an informative or positive message, you.
Information Understanding
IMPORTANCE OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Grade 6 Patterning and Algebra Unit
The Effect of a Teacher’s Active Role in Accelerated Reader with Elementary Students by Sarah Lenko Spring 2005.
Introduction 8th Grade Science
FRAMEWORKS AND REUSE What is “Framework”?
cs5984: Information Visualization Chris North
Presentation transcript:

Reading of Electronic Documents: The Usability of Linear, Fisheye, and Overview+Detail Interface by Kasper Hornbæk, Erik Frøkjær Presented by Luhui Hu on Apr 19, 2001

Motivation -why analyzes reading of electronic documents Electronic documents are increasingly being used Reading plays a central role in information access and use

Information visualization techniques -- used in reading of electronic documents Linear Interfaces –Notepad –Office Word Fisheye Interfaces –Document Lens –Flip Zooming Overview+detail Interfaces –Seesoft –Thumbar –PDF Acrobat Reader –Office Powerpoint

Examples -- Linear, Fisheye & Overview+Detail Interfaces Linear Fisheye Overview+Detail

Experiment Design --Comparing the usability of three interfaces for reading scientific documents Three kinds of interfaces –Linear, fisheye & overview+detail Subjects –20 CS graduate students Tasks –Essay (reading-to-learn-to-do) –Question-answer (reading-to-do) Six IEEE journal papers –2 tasks, 3 interfaces Usability Measures –Effectiveness –Satisfaction –Efficiency –Reading patterns

Usability(1)-Effectiveness Overview+Detail (O+D) gains the highest grade in each category (especial in essay tasks) Fisheye lies in the middle Notes: –4 points totally –O+D: Overview+Detail –Q-A: Question-answering –AG: Author’s Grading –SG: Subjects’ Grading

Usability(2)-Satisfaction Satisfaction Questions –How was the system to use? –How do you perceived the tasks just solved? –Were your answers to the tasks? –How much did you learn from reading the papers? –Were the papers just read? –Was information in the two papers just read? 95% prefers O+D 5% prefers Linear 0% prefers Fisheye

Usability(3)-Efficiency 1-Linear, 2-Fisheye, 3-Overview+Detail Essay tasks: –Fisheye is significantly the fastest (16% faster) –Linear & O+D are similar with each other Question-Answering Tasks –Linear is the fastest –Using O+D took 20% longer than using linear

Usability(4)-Reading Patterns 1-Linear, 2-Fisheye, 3-Overview+detail Fisheye needs more frequency to study Fisheye needs more time to have initial orientation Fisheye needs less time to review & read through

Conclusion Overview+detail: –best supports reading electronic documents –be strongly preferred by subjects (readers) –needs more time for answering questions Fisheye: –faster reading (time-critical) –less understanding Linear: –Inferior to the other two 1-Linear, 2-Fisheye, 3-Overview+Detail

Thank you