Reflections on Unit Costing Work Focusing on a cost-benefit analysis of two services within a Sure Start programme (Chris Brain)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEASURING COST- EFFECTIVENESS AT A LOCAL LEVEL Pamela Meadows National Evaluation of Sure Start Team.
Advertisements

22 April 2002Health Services Research Unit Feedback From Parents : Using an Action Research Approach to Evaluate a Local Sure Start Programme Tameron Chappell.
Locuming Made Simple Dr Manjit Purewal WHY LOCUMING?
Extended Services Reaching the full core offer Nicky Tothill Burnham-on-Crouch Primary.
Leaders and Managers Network Meeting 6 th March am.
Sarah Rock Oct Health Visiting in Shropshire Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust North Shropshire South Shropshire Shrewsbury and Atcham North.
Session Objectives: For Mentors to know:
Working in partnership with parents/carers
EECERA Prague Improving Language and Literacy Opportunities in an Early Years Setting Annette J. Kearns, IPPA Ireland
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
Monitoring and evaluation of carers’ services and projects Dr Andrea Wigfield - Associate Professor of Social Policy Centre for International Research.
Implementing a settings approach to health promotion: Working together to promote outcome focused programmes in Childhood Obesity Experiences from the.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Integrated ‘Children’s Centres’ in England
One Glasgow 0 to 8 Early Intervention Early Intervention – Towards Prevention.
EECERA Prague 2007 Making visible ’Parent, Baby and Toddler Groups’ within the Irish Context: Assessing needs to influence policy Mary Quirke IPPA
Work hard, play hard – Developing assessment practices to support children’s key competences in the infant classes of primary school. Hello everyone.
Speech & Language Therapy Services in Mainstream School Parent session – Rosendale school Marie-Therese Worthington, SLT.
Family Learning Tracey James from King Richard School in Portsmouth talks to the National Literacy Trust about how her school has involved parents in learning.
1 Routes into Training and Employment. 2 Introduction Promoting the employability of parents is one of the four core Sure Start service targets for the.
Good Practice in the UK Preschools, nurseries, children's centres, family centres, childminders.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Healthy Schools Phase Five Hygiene Miss Davies: Healthy Schools Co-ordinator.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Care and Support Policy Guidance for Deafblind Children and Adults, Debbie James & Annette Bodsworth, Deafblind Enablement (DBE)
How can local initiatives help workless people find and keep paid work? Pamela Meadows Synergy Research and Consulting Ltd and National Institute of Economic.
Unpacking the ‘Parenting in Wales: Guidance on engagement and support’ 10 September 2014 Workshop 3 Gail Bennett, Flintshire Parenting Strategy Coordinator.
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
A little B.I.T. goes a long way B.I.T. PROGRAMME Bullying Intervention Training.
National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland May 8th 2006
Bridlington Children’s Centres Development Plan East Riding Children’s Centres Bridlington “working in partnership”
 Visits take place in family’s home, at their convenience. (to the greatest extent possible).  Allows for opportunity to see the family interact in.
1 Quality of Play: Progress and Challenges. 2 Introduction Key Sure Start objective: Improving the ability to learn Core Sure Start service: Support for.
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
Lets talk about How to get started Badisa input: Z Volschenk.
Social Care and Inclusion Talk about charging. Thank you for taking time to talk to us about charging for community social services The Council has to.
Presentation to Education Portfolio Committee, 29 May 2001 White Paper Early Childhood Development.
KEY CHANGE WORKSHOP FAMILY ENGAGEMENT TO SUPPORT EARLY LEARNING Early Years Collaborative: Learning Session 4.
Co-East & EQUAL Margaret Davies & Doug Reed. Why are we here?
Shobnall Primary School Forest School Information for Families Everything you need to know about Forest Schools What is Forest School? Forest Schools have.
HSE Regulation 5 WELCOMING THE CHILD WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS INTO A CHILDCARE SETTING. Breda Mc Carthy, Early Years Manager, Health Service Executive - West.
Qualifications Update: Childcare and Development Qualifications Update: Childcare and Development.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
Evaluation Workshop Self evaluation – some workable ideas and approaches.
Solihull Approach multi-agency approach to developing universal parenting support.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Self Directed Support Personalisation for Providers.
Making it work, making it fun. Successful working in primary schools Deena Day – curriculum adviser, consultants’ manager, HMS.
North West Youth Employment Convention Wednesday, 23 November 2011 Nick Page.
1 Making the most of evaluation a provider perspective on the outcomes of Brighter Futures Andrew Anderson, The Benevolent Society.
Jakeman Nursery School is committed to inclusion; We believe that all children are entitled to have their individual needs appropriately supported in order.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
Keeping on Track 5 th February 2014 NBP16 PEG PAIR PURPOSEFUL ASPIRATIONAL INDEPENDENT RESILIENT.
GCSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT. Summary of Assessment Unit 1 Written Paper 1½ hours (40% final mark, one tier only) Unit 2 Controlled Assessment – Child Study.
Early Years Review Update. Aim of Today  Provide an update on the Early Years Review  Provide information on our proposals for a refreshed Early Years.
Y1 SBT Workshop EYFS Input Please ensure you have registered your name before you take a seat.
Psychological Service Using a Relational Approach (Video Interaction Guidance: ViG and Video Enhanced Reflective Practice: VERP) to Improve Attunement,
Westminster Special Schools Training and Outreach: Who Are We? Sue Latham Advisory Teacher Autism Laura McClelland: Advisory Teacher Autism Ziekelle Noakhes.
Partnership with Parents/ carers.. EYFS and Parents Working with parents as partners in children’s early learning and development is central to the EYFS.
Evaluation Nicola Bowtell. Some myths about evaluation 2Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer always involves extensive questionnaires means.
CAMP GABIKA Andrew Thomson, Chelsea Community Education & Recreation Amount Requested: $8,100 Intervention also funding in:  Year 1: $0  Year 2: $13,000.
Assessment Information Evening 05/10/15. Purpose of this evening To share the new primary curriculum with parents and how we at Little Hill are implementing.
Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.
Preventonomics: A Better Start – how will it pay?
Preventonomics: A Better Start – how will it pay?
nEW child care subsidy: GUIDANCE FOR FAMILIES
Newsletter Family Learning UNIFORM Drop off and collection
Early help: councillor training
Unit 5: Working with Parents and Others in Early Years
Presentation transcript:

Reflections on Unit Costing Work Focusing on a cost-benefit analysis of two services within a Sure Start programme (Chris Brain)

Aims of this session To outline what was done for this cost-benefit analysis of the two services To look at issues involved, and decisions made This will be a quick run through! NOTE: this analysis was started in 2002, without reference to NESS guidelines NOTE: permission from the Programme has been obtained

Aims of the Analysis The Sure Start Unit were talking about the importance of cost-benefit analysis This programme wanted to find out how they were doing They wanted to ‘practice’ They wanted something manageable Started in 2002

Methods Finance Manager worked out all the necessary costs Practitioners noted numbers of children and adults, as well as their own hours Case studies were carried out using observations and interviews

What is cost benefit analysis? Analysis of costs, analysis of benefits Accountability Mainstreaming Monitoring for Sure Start Unit Internal purposes - learning from evaluation

What are costs? Outlay costs are payments out Imputables are what would cost something but are donated free of charge Some costs are mixed in with other budgets So costs are outlay; a proportion of other budgets; imputable costs

What are benefits? Number of children attending Number of adults attending Improved language ability Quality measures like happier family Quality measures like happier child Future measures such as what intervention would cost at a later stage if needed

Choice of settings – 1) Language Scheme Language team input Discrete, half-hour sessions with clear purpose One-to-one provision, with parent present 4 settings (3 primary school, 1 shop) and home visits

Choice of settings – 2) Drop in Drop-in facility Supports some adult provision such as ESOL, Keep Fit, Asian Women’s Group 2.5 to 4 hourly sessions A central facility and will be central in new Children and Family Centre

Some definitions of terms (1) ‘Outlay’ costs are those paid out ‘Imputables’ refer to what is donated by other agencies E.g. building rent – given free by schools but ‘costed’ at £28 per session in the analysis E.g. volunteers – give time free but ‘costed’ at £4.20 per hour in the analysis

Some definitions of terms (2) ‘True’ costs are what the service would cost without the Partnership (imputable costs added) ‘Actual’ costs take outlay costs into account but allow donated services to be free ‘Future’ costs are what the service will cost (e.g. Language scheme will have more volunteers)

Data gathered Four months chosen – Oct 02, Jan 03, Apr 03, July 03 – as representative Numbers of children and adults recorded Number of minutes provided recorded Costs calculated (including imputables of every sort)

Language Scheme ‘true’ costs Cost per month plus imputables: £2, Time scheduled per mth in hrs: Actual Children per mth:34 Adults per month:34 Cost per hour:£71.96 Child per hour:1.12 Cost per hour per child per hr:£64.25

Language Scheme ‘actual’ costs Cost per month (no imputables): £1, Time scheduled per mth in hrs: hrs Actual Children per mth: 34 Adults per month: 34 Cost per hour: £53.80 Child per hour: 1.12 Cost per hour per child per hr: £48.08

Language Scheme – some conclusions Clinic rates v Partnership rates (£82.70 v £64.25) ‘True’ v ‘actual’ rates (64.25 v £48.04) If take up rate higher (currently 55.7%) If adults are said to benefit too A question of averages (all 13 home visits, 16 out of 22 at shop)

Data gathered – Drop in Staff costs£18,906 Premises£6,492 Communication£195 Equipment£1,419 Sundries£781 TOTAL(annual)£27,793 Of staff costs £4,107 are imputable costs

Drop in - costs Cost per month (no imputables): £2, Time per month in hours: hrs Children per month:114 Cost per hour:£43.19 Child per hour:2.13 Cost per hour per child per hr:£20.28

Drop in – some conclusions Staff hours v child hours ( v means 2.58 staff for each hour) Number of children per session (8 for 4 hours is costed at 2 per hour) Adults benefit too but not counted Partnership holistic approach (picking up on issues, working with families = benefits)

Case study evidence Parents appreciate services Attendance at Language Scheme more likely than at ‘clinic’ setting Language progress at Scheme clear Drop in encourages: (in child) confidence, social skills, (in adult) sharing and support

Overall conclusions (1) Language Scheme costs more than Drop in (around three times as much) Take up rates are low for both (but better than national ‘clinic’ rates re: Scheme) Benefits can appear later so hard to judge Partnership holistic working is important Figures use ‘true’ costs not ‘actual’ costs (mainstreaming?)

Overall conclusions (2) By giving a cost to everything, there has been a lot of honesty so a ‘worse case’ scenario - not really accounting for Partnership working Benefits of early intervention are very hard to quantify Case study evidence is clear – services are appreciated

References (1) Karoly, L. A., Greenwood, P. W., Everingham, S. S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M. R., Rydell, P., Sanders, M., & Cheisa, James “Investing In Our Children: What We Know And Don’t Know About The Costs And Benefits Of Early Childhood Interventions” RAND

References (2) Meadowes, P., 2001 “Guidance for Sure Start Local Evaluators On The Estimation of Cost Effectiveness” National Institute of Economic and Social Research Moran, R., Myers, R., & Zymelman, M “The uses of cost analysis in Early Child Care and Development (ECCD) programs” Inter- American Development Bank

References (3) Holtermann, S., 2001“Children’s Centres: exploring the costs of delivery of a national scheme” Daycare Trust Facing the Future Policy Papers Holtermann, S., 2002 “Children’s Centres: exploring the costs of delivery of a national scheme” supplementary note Jan 2002

References (additional) Universal childcare provision in the UK – towards a cost-benefit analysis. Discussion paper by PricewaterhouseCoopers. August NOTE: this was a paper published after we had done the analysis and report, so not used.

Contact details Chris Brain Centre for Research in Early Childhood, St. Thomas Centre, Bell Barn Road, Attwood Green, Birmingham. B15 2AF