Science and Pseudoscience Feb 2014

Today we hope to… Understand the difference between science and pseudoscience Look at some examples of pseudoscience and analyze their shortcomings

What is meant by science? What is meant by pseudoscience? How is it different from science? With your partner, discuss the following…

What are some examples of pseudoscience? With a partner, see if you can come up with some examples of pseudoscience. Be prepared to provide evidence as to why you believe it is pseudoscience.

Some possible examples of pseudoscience Ufology Astrology Phrenology –study of bumps on head Creation science Paranormal investigations

Can something which is believed to be science turn out to be pseudoscience? Consider these beliefs which were formally widespread among the population Alchemy –the belief that we could transmute a common material into something of great value- ie lead into gold A belief in witches A belief that the earth was the centre of the universe A belief that the earth is only a few thousand years old

Can some ideas which started on the fringe of science turn out to be true? Yes! Consider the following: Existence of meteorites Theory of continental drift But were these ideas pseudoscience or simply way out ideas in science? –if the idea is based on evidence and the scientific method, then it should be considered science even if it is widely rejected

We need to be careful about pseudoscience passing itself off as science One idea which comes up in discussions about the origin of life is the Theory of Intelligent design –this is an idea which rejects the Theory of Evolution and natural selection From the website “The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.”

The belief in Intelligent Design comes from certain Political and Religious Groups Certain right wing Christian groups favour the teaching of Creationism in schools along with or in place of Evolution Most people object to the teaching of Creationism in Science so these same groups have resorted to funding “research” into Intelligent Design Intelligent design is really just another form of Creationism

The belief in Intelligent Design is an old one going back to Aristotle Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century used the argument to try and prove the existence of God: wherever complex design exists, there must have been a designer nature is complex therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer

Intelligent Design seeks to prove the existence of an “Intelligent designer” This “theory” seeks to prove the existence of an Intelligent designer So, if it followed the scientific method, then what should the hypothesis be?

Is Intelligent design science? Is intelligent design a scientific theory? Here is an answer from the website Yes. The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI). Design theorists hypothesize that if a natural object was designed, it will contain high levels of CSI. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information. One easily testable form of CSI is irreducible complexity, which can be discovered by experimentally reverse- engineering biological structures to see if they require all of their parts to function. When ID researchers find irreducible complexity in biology, they conclude that such structures were designed.

Let’s analyze the preceding paragraph from the perspective of the Scientific Method “Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI)” How can you begin with the assumption that Intelligent agents exist when this is in fact what you are trying to prove (if it actually did follow the scientific method). This is a prime example of having a foregone conclusion and then looking for evidence to support it.

Can anyone see a problem with the method described in the previous slide? “Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information.” What tests? How do we define complex? What is specified information?

Can anyone see a problem with the method described in the previous slide? This is a prime example of having a foregone conclusion and then looking for evidence to support it. When your conclusion is that an all powerful creator made something, then anything can support your premise. But this is NOT evidence and not science. The argument that because something is complex, it must have been intelligently designed is incorrect. Natural selection has shown how complex organisms and complex forms can form over time. For example see the Wikipedia entry for “evolution of the eye” There is simply no evidence that an intelligent designer created anything –but there is loads of evidence to support natural selection

Does this mean that a God does not exist? NO, the existence or non-existence of God is not considered here What it does show is that all evidence that has been found points to the process of natural selection and evolution as the means of producing complex life forms on Earth

This cartoon nicely sums up the difference between a Science and a Pseudoscience

Creationism and Intelligent Design Watch this short video which summarizes these two ideas and why they are not science

The Media is full of Examples of Pseudoscience There are probably more examples of pseudoscience in the field of health sciences than any other field Why? Because we care about our health and we are willing to spend lots of money to take care of ourselves

Consider the following Pseudoscience called Homeopathy “Homeopathy is a system of medicine which involves treating the individual with highly diluted substances, given mainly in tablet form, with the aim of triggering the body’s natural system of healing. Based on their specific symptoms, a homeopath will match the most appropriate medicine to each patient” “Homeopathy is based on the principle that you can treat ‘like with like’, that is, a substance which causes symptoms when taken in large doses, can be used in small amounts to treat those same symptoms” ” From the Society of Homeopaths website:

Does Homeopathy Work? Watch the following video: “Homeopathy, Quackery and Fraud”