+ Assistive Technology Assessment Made Easy Content by Dr. Penny R. Reed Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Advertisements

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA 1.
Purpose of Instruction
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Campus Improvement Plans
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Omaha Public Schools Behavior Consultation Team Program Supporting Children with Challenging Behaviors Kylee Starmer – Behavior Consultant Omaha Public.
Implementing Assistive Technology in School and Beyond 1.
CTE Teachers and Special Populations Rick Peterson, Ph.D., LMFT, CFLE Lakshmi Mahadevan, Ph.D. Reviewed May 2008.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
1 Assistive Technology? What Does It Have to Do with Me? Joy Zabala,, M.Ed., ATP Assistive Technology and Leadership Lake Jackson, Texas
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Assistive Technology Getting There Another Way. “The Power of A.T. to improve and enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities is virtually.
Assistive Technology Collaborations AT and Transition: Trends, Barriers and Initiatives Gayl Bowser, Coordinator Oregon Technology Access.
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
The Team Approach for Considering Assistive Technology Melanie Tervo, UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center/MARESA Sara Menzel, UCP.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Assessment Callie Cothern and Heather Vaughn. A Change in the view of assistive technology assessment: From a one shot, separate event to an ongoing,
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Joy Zabala, AT & LEADERSHIP Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed.D, ATP SETTing the Stage for Technology-Supported Achievement.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
From SETT to TEST: Evaluating Assistive Technology Presenter: Nadiya Destiny
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Section 2 Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
+ ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (AT) ROUND ROBIN PART 2: AT ASSESSMENT Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Assistive Technology (AT) in the IEP and Transitioning with AT Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Have You Considered AT Lately? Answers to your questions about Assistive Technology as members of the IEP team Michigan's Integrated Technology Supports.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Ten Things Families Need to Know About Assistive Technology… and more Jeff Diedrich Michigan Integrated Technology Supports Joy Zabala CAST and the National.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.
Students with IEPs and the One-to-One Aide
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Assistive Technology Implementation
AT ASSESSMENT 7 elements to include Teresa Pinder MLS/AT, OTL/R, ATP
Presentation transcript:

+ Assistive Technology Assessment Made Easy Content by Dr. Penny R. Reed Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech

+ Oklahoma ABLE Tech Improving access to assistive technology for individuals with disabilities Borrow AT & Try with Students

+ AT Team Activities Handout 1. Attend a Regional Workshop 2. Nov 3 Webinar 3:30 p.m. 3. Dec 3 Webinar 3:30 Team Activities: Oct 26 QIAT Self-Assessment Jan 30 AT Consideration & Assessment Form March 30 QIAT Self-Assessment, Re-Assess  Bonus points: Additional Student AT Consideration & Assessment Form Instructions and reminders will be sent in advance.

+ State Department of Education AT Technical Assistance Guide Accommodations Guide Self-Assessment Directory and Training Resources Professional Development Modules OK EdPlan Training & Resources

+ AT Overview

+ AT Device AT is a device or piece of equipment that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of children with disabilities.

+ AT EXAMPLES

+ AT Service AT is also a service that directly assists children with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an AT device.

+ AT Devices and Services are Provided For those students the IEP team determines need AT May also be referred to as auxiliary or supplementary aids and services and provided in 504 plans

+ Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology (QIAT)

+ What is the QIAT? Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Leads best practice in AT service delivery 8 Quality Indicators Join the QIAT list qiat.org

+ 8 Quality Indicators 1.Consideration of AT Needs 2.Assessment of AT Needs 3.AT in the IEP 4.AT Implementation 5.Evaluation of Effectiveness of AT 6.AT in Transition 7.Administrative Support for AT 8.AT Professional Development

+ 1. Consideration of AT Needs Sub-indicators Consider AT devices and services for all students with disabilities. 2.When considering AT devices and services, every IEP team consistently uses a collaborative decision-making process. 3.IEP team members have the collective knowledge and skills needed to make informed AT decisions and seek assistance when needed. 4.Decisions regarding the need for AT devices and services are based on the student's IEP goals and objectives, access to curricular and extracurricular activities, and progress in the general education curriculum.

+ 1. Consideration of AT Needs Sub-indicators The IEP team gathers and analyzes data about the student, customary environments, educational goals, and tasks when considering a student's need for AT devices and services. 6.When AT is needed, the IEP team explores a range of AT devices, services, and other supports that address identified needs. 7.The AT consideration process and results are documented in the IEP and include a rationale for the decision and supporting evidence.

+ 2. Assessment of AT Needs Sub-indicators Procedures for all aspects of AT assessment are clearly defined and consistently applied. 2.AT assessments are conducted by a team with the collective knowledge and skills needed to determine possible AT solutions 3.All AT assessments include a functional assessment in the student’s customary environments. 4.AT assessments, including needed trials, are completed within reasonable timelines.

+ 2. Assessment of AT Needs – Sub-indicators Recommendations from AT assessments are based on data about the student, environments and tasks. 6.The assessment provides the IEP team with clearly documented recommendations that guide decisions about the selection, acquisition, and use of AT devices and services. 7.AT needs are reassessed any time changes in the student, the environments and/or the tasks result in the student’s needs not being met with current devices and/or services.

+ 3. Including AT in the IEP – Sub-indicators The education agency has guidelines for documenting AT needs in the IEP and requires their consistent application. 2.All services that the IEP team determines are needed to support the selection, acquisition, and use of AT devices are designated in the IEP. 3.The IEP illustrates that AT is a tool to support achievement of goals and progress in the general curriculum.

+ 3. Including AT in the IEP – Sub-indicators IEP content regarding AT use is written in language that describes how AT contributes to achievement of measurable and observable outcomes. 5.AT is included in the IEP in a manner that provides a clear and complete description of the devices and services to be provided and used to address student needs and achieve expected results.

+ 4. AT Implementation – Sub-indicators AT implementation proceeds according to a collaboratively developed plan. 2.AT is integrated into the curriculum and daily activities of the student across environments. 3.Persons supporting the student across all environments in which the AT is expected to be used share responsibility for implementation of the plan. 4.Persons supporting the student provide opportunities for the student to use a variety of strategies–including AT – and to learn which strategies are most effective for particular circumstances and tasks.

+ 4. AT Implementation – Sub-indicators Learning opportunities for the student, family and staff is an integral part of implementation. 6.AT implementation is initially based on assessment data and is adjusted based on performance data. 7.AT implementation includes management and maintenance of equipment and materials.

+ Group Work QIAT Indicators 1-4

+ 5. Evaluation of Effectiveness Sub-indicators Team members share clearly defined responsibilities to ensure that data are collected, evaluated, and interpreted by capable and credible team members. 2.Data are collected on specific student achievement that has been identified by the team and is related to one or more goals. 3.Evaluation of effectiveness includes the quantitative and qualitative measurement of changes in the student’s performance and achievement. 4.Effectiveness is evaluated across environments including during naturally occurring opportunities as well as structured activities.

+ 5. Evaluation of Effectiveness Sub-indicators Data are collected to provide teams with a means for analyzing student achievement and identifying supports and barriers that influence AT use to determine what changes, if any, are needed. 6.Changes are made in the student’s AT services and educational program when evaluation data indicate that such changes are needed to improve student achievement. 7.Evaluation of effectiveness is a dynamic, responsive, ongoing process that is reviewed periodically.

+ 6. AT Transition – Sub-indicators Transition plans address the AT needs of the student, including roles and training needs of team members, subsequent steps in AT use, and follow-up after transition takes place. 2.Transition planning empowers the student using AT to participate in the transition planning at a level appropriate to age and ability. 3.Advocacy related to AT use is recognized as critical and planned for by the teams involved in transition.

+ 6. AT Transition – Sub-indicators AT requirements in the receiving environment are identified during the transition planning process. 5.Transition planning for students using AT proceeds according to an individualized timeline. 6.Transition plans address specific equipment, training and funding issues such as transfer or acquisition of AT, manuals and support documents.

+ 7. Administrative Support – Sub-indicators The education agency has written procedural guidelines that ensure equitable access to AT devices and services for students with disabilities. 2.The education agency broadly disseminates clearly defined procedures for accessing and providing AT services and supports the implementation of those guidelines. 3.The education agency includes appropriate AT responsibilities in written descriptions of job requirements for each position in which activities impact AT services.

+ 7. Administrative Support – Sub-indicators The education agency employs personnel with the competencies needed to support quality AT services within their primary areas of responsibility at all levels of the organization. 5.The education agency includes AT in the technology planning and budgeting process. 6.The education agency provides access to ongoing learning opportunities about AT for staff, family, and students. 7.The education agency uses a systematic process to evaluate all components of the agency-wide AT program.

+ 8. Professional Development Sub-indicators Comprehensive AT professional development and training support the understanding that AT devices and services enable students to accomplish IEP goals and objectives and make progress in the general curriculum. 2.The education agency has an AT professional development and training plan that identifies the audiences, the purposes, the activities, the expected results, evaluation measures and funding for AT professional development and training. 3.The comprehensive AT professional development and training content addresses all aspects of the selection, acquisition and use of AT.

+ 8. Professional Development Sub-indicators AT professional development and training address and are aligned with other local, state and national professional development initiatives. 5.AT professional development and training include ongoing learning opportunities that utilize local, regional, and/or national resources. 6.Professional development and training in AT follow research-based models for adult learning that include multiple formats and are delivered at multiple skill levels. 7.The effectiveness of AT professional development and training is evaluated by measuring changes in practice that result in improved student performance.

+ Group Work QIAT Indicators 5-8

+ AT and the Law

+ 3 MAIN LAWS Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504)

+ LUNCH

+ Round Robin

+ AT Consideration

+ Truths About AT Consideration Is required by law for all students on IEPs Can take place during an IEP meeting – may take under minutes Uses information the team already knows Looks at the student’s ability to achieve academically with assistance and without

+ No AT is Needed When the Student… is reaching educational goals without it. has access to the curriculum without it. is communicating effectively without it.

+ AT Is Needed When… it is currently being used and is aiding the student in reaching educational goals. it allows the student to remain in the least restrictive environment. the absence of it requires the student to be removed to a more restrictive environment. it is not currently being used but the IEP team decides it is needed.

+ AT Assessment

+ AT Assessment Now in Your District Who does it? What are your procedures? What guides your procedures?

+ Truths About AT Assessment Can be completed by the IEP team One team member must have knowledge about AT (or consultation with a specialist may be necessary) Is completed over days, weeks, or even months Involves obtaining new information Takes multiple interactions Goal: To find an AT match

+ Assessment vs Evaluation Evaluation: Activities conducted to determine a child’s eligibility for special education Assessment: Activities conducted to determine a child’s specific needs.

+ Steps of an AT Assessment A.Referral and Preliminary Decisions B.Primary Decisions C.Trial Use D.Final Decisions/Implementation and Ongoing Use

+ A. Make a Referral: When More Info is Needed

+ When Do I Refer a Student for Assessment? When considering AT needs during the IEP meeting: Student is not using AT, but IEP team decides it is needed Student is not using AT, and the team does not have enough info Student is using AT but has new/changed needs that may require additional AT When a student is being removed from the regular education classroom for any part of their instruction – Will the use of AT allow them to stay in the regular education classroom? When a student has difficulty accessing educational materials like textbooks, worksheets, workbooks, novels, etc.

+ A. Preliminary Decisions

+ B. Primary Decisions Student Environments Tasks Tools joyzabala.com

+ Gathering Information - Student Current abilities Needs Expectations Future plans Use the least complex intervention that will lower the barrier to achievement.

+ Gathering Information - Student – Current Abilities Physical Sensory Communication Cognitive Academic Performance Vocational Performance Environmental Control Social Competence Recreation/Leisure

+ WATI Student Information Guide

+ Activity 1 Think of a student you have worked with or currently work with who may need an AT Assessment Complete two sections of the WATI Student Information Guide – the first one and one other of your choice

+ Activity 1 – Resources Needed/Available WATI Assessment Forms Doc GPAT Protocols PAR Information at donjohnston.com/par/ Communication Matrix at communicationmatrix.org AIM Navigator at aim.cast.org Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills at

+ Environments - Where is the student throughout the day?

+ Information Gathering – Environment What are the other students doing? Equipment materials available? AT currently used by student? Modifications typically made? Primary people interacting with student? How is instruction/direction delivered?

+ Information Gathering – Environment, Continued Student’s position/location in room? Where are things students needs to see? Lighting/Sound? Transitions? – Concerns? Adaptations/modifications used to facilitate participation?

+ Environmental Observation Summary

+ Activity 2 Use the WATI Environmental Observation Summary form to discuss the student’s environments and tasks. WATI Environmental Observation Summary form WATI Assessment Forms Doc Classroom Observation Guide Gathering Information about Environments and Tasks Resources Needed/Available

+ Information Gathering - Tasks What does the student need to be able to do both now and in the future? NOT goals but things you do to reach the goals Is student an active participant?

+ Tasks – Examples Produce legible written material Produce audible speech Take turns Transition to new activities

+ Oklahoma Parents Center Update

+ Information Gathering - Tools Tools can include devices and services What are the features needed? What tools have those features? Does the student already have any tools? Will more than one tool be needed?

+ SETT Scaffold for Tools Selection - Descriptors

+ Activity 3 Based on S-E-T data, fill in the descriptors of the types of support your student needs across the top of the SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection WATI Assessment Forms Doc – SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection AT Checklist Maryland mATch up tool – marylandlearninglinks.org ABLE Tech Staff Gathering Information about Tools Resources Needed

+ SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection – Specific Tools

+ Activity 4 Fill in the rest of the SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection with specific tools WATI Assessment Forms Doc – SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection ABLE Tech Staff Gathering Information about Tools Resources Needed/Available

+ C. Trial Use Identify times, places, and duration of the trial Select a functional, frequently occurring activity from identified tasks Specify when and how the student will use the device(s) in the activity Specify cues and supports Specify any training needed

+ C. Before the Trials – Additional Duties Detail current achievement on this activity and expected change during the trial Develop criteria that will indicate success or lack thereof Decide what information will be collected to indicate level of change Assign responsibilities appropriately

+ Trial Use Plan – Resources Available WATI Assessment Forms Doc WATI AT Trial Use Guide WATI AT Trial Use Summary Guide effective trials in the environments in which the AT will be used

+ AT Trial Use Guide

+ D. Final Decisions/ Implementation & Ongoing Use 1. Follow the implementation plan completely 2. Take time to talk 3. Monitor the student’s progress 4. Adjust the plan as needed

+ A Twist on SETT: Creating an Implementation Plan Ways each member of the staff and other supporters will support the students’ AT use Actions that will be taken in the environment to support the student’s AT use Tasks that adults need to do Help for people in the environment to understand the tools

+ AT Decision-Making Guide

+ Activity 5 As a team fill in one AT Decision-Making Guide form using information about the student you chose. Earlier you completed:  Problem Identification  Solution Generation Proceed with:  Solution Selection – Discuss/Select ideas from your Tool list.  Implementation Plan – AT Trials/Services needed, date, length, person responsible

+ Planning for Long-term Use Use the same decision-making process for making final decisions: AT Tool(s) – What and why? AT Services – What? Why? and for whom? include: Set up Training – Content and for whom Maintenance and Repair Supervision Follow-up Other needs or considerations

+ ReSETT Over time things change with the S tudent, E nvironment, and T asks which may lead to changes in T ools May be new people involved New questions/ideas may have come up New technology may be available Re SETT ing is NOT starting over

+ Funding Resources

+ AT Funding Manual Medicaid Ability Connection Donna Nigh Foundation Private Insurance AIM Center (for select vision items) Liberty Braille (for select vision items) Department of Rehabilitation Services (DRS)

+ Contact ABLE Tech Director Program Manager CCC-SLP AT Teacher/TVI Equipment Specialist Loan Coordinator Toll Free