Draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft-ietf-pim-port-06. port-06 update Changes made in response to second wglc comments and following discussion Many minor editorial issues fixed Changed.
Advertisements

EAP Channel Bindings Charles Clancy Katrin Hoeper IETF 76 Hiroshima, Japan November 08-13, 2009.
1 Chapter 22 Network layer Delivery, Forwarding and Routing.
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
Session Announcement Protocol Colin Perkins University College London.
Nov 11, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 IP Routing: OSPF Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
RTSP NAT Traversal Update Magnus Westlund (Ericsson) Thomas Zeng (PVNS, an Alcatel company) IETF-60 MMUSIC WG draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-03.txt.
1 RSVP Resource Reservation Protocol By Ajay Kashyap.
1IETF-59 MANET WG Ad Hoc IP Address Autoconfiguration Jaehoon Jeong ETRI 3 rd February 2004 draft-jeong-adhoc-ip-addr-autoconf-01.txt.
Chapter 3 Review of Protocols And Packet Formats
Ch 23 1 Based on Data Communications and Networking, 4th Edition. by Behrouz A. Forouzan, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Ameera Almasoud.
IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format IETF 84 Vancouver 1.
Request History – Solution Mary Barnes SIP WG Meeting IETF-57 draft-ietf-sip-history-info-00.txt.
PPSP Tracker Protocol draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol PPSP WG IETF 82 Taipei Rui Cruz (presenter) Mário Nunes, Yingjie Gu, Jinwei Xia, David Bryan, João.
WG RAQMON Internet-Drafts RMON MIB WG Meeting Washington, Nov. 11, 2004.
All rights reserved © 1999, Alcatel, Paris. page n° 1 SIP for Xcast SIP for the establishment of xcast-based multiparty.
1 Accounting, Authentication and Authorization Issues in “Well Managed” IP Multicasting Services November 9, 2005 Tsunemasa Hayashi
Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech.
1 Section 10.9 Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol ISAKMP.
INRIA Rhône-Alpes - Planète research group Reed-Solomon FEC I-D LDPC-* FEC I-D TESLA I-D Simple-auth I-D IETF 70 th – Vancouver meeting, November 2007.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 8: IP Multicasting (Ch. 17) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). History Diskless workstations –needed to know configuration parameters like IP address, netmask, gateway address.
1 IPFIX Protocol Specifications IPFIX IETF-59 March 3, 2004 Benoit Claise Mark Fullmer Reinaldo Penno Paul Calato Stewart Bryant Ganesh Sadasivan.
Authentication Mechanism for Port Control Protocol (PCP) draft-wasserman-pcp-authentication-01.txt Margaret Wasserman Sam Hartman Painless Security Dacheng.
Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01.
QUALCOMM Incorporated 1 Protocol Options for BSN- BSMCS Controller Interface Jun Wang, Kirti Gupta 05/16/2005 Notice: Contributors grant a free, irrevocable.
Device Reset Characterization draft-ietf-bmwg-reset-02 Rajiv Asati Carlos Pignataro Fernando Calabria Cesar Olvera Presented by Andrew.
Advanced Roaming & Mobility Scenarios in IPv6 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant & Director Project Botticelli Ltd in.
6lowpan ND Optimization draft Update Samita Chakrabarti Erik Nordmark IETF 69, 2007 draft-chakrabarti-6lowpan-ipv6-nd-03.txt.
Magnus Westerlund 1 The RTSP Core specification draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-06.txt Magnus Westerlund Aravind Narasimhan Rob Lanphier Anup Rao Henning.
1 Multicast Routing Blackhole Avoidance draft-asati-pim-multicast-routing-blackhole-avoid-00 Rajiv Asati Mike McBride IETF 72, Dublin.
NATFW NSLP Status draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-12.txt M. Stiemerling, H. Tschofenig, C. Aoun, and E. Davies NSIS Working Group,
A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery (draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-11) SIPPING – IETF 68 Mar 19, 2007 Sumanth.
GMPLS Recovery Signaling Issues draft-rhodes-rsvp-recovery-signaling-01 Nic Neate Data Connection Ltd (DCL)
Issues In Multicast Transition For presentation to the Multrans BOF Tom Taylor Cathy Zhou.
IPSec is a suite of protocols defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to provide security services at the network layer. standard protocol.
Extension of the MLD proxy functionality to support multiple upstream interfaces 1 Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos.
54 th IETFMMUSIC WG1 54 th IETF – Yokohama 18 July 2002.
6DEPLOY. IPv6 Deployment and Support
Network Layer 3 Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data Link Physical OSI Model.
Page 1 IETF Speermint Working Group Speermint draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-04 IETF 71 - Wednesday March 12, 2008 Jean-François Mulé -
1 IETF-70 draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth MPLS Benchmarking Methodology draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth-03 IETF 70 Aamer Akhter / Rajiv Asati /
IPFIX Requirements: Document Changes and New Issues Raised Jürgen Quittek, NEC Benoit Claise, Cisco Tanja Zseby, Sebstian Zander, FhG FOKUS.
Page 1 IETF DRINKS Working Group Data Model and Protocol Requirements for DRINKS IETF 72 - Thursday July Tom Creighton -
1-D Interleaved Parity FEC draft-begen-fecframe-interleaved-fec-scheme-00 IETF 72 – July 2008 Ali C. Begen
Multicasting EECS June Multicast One-to-many, many-to-many communications Applications: – Teleconferencing – Database – Distributed computing.
PMIPv6 multicast handover optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos.
Draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-02.txt Link Management Protocol (LMP) LMP draft updates…  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-07.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-01.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-00.txt.
IETF 79, Beijing China FECFrame WG Meeting Thurs, November 10, , Jade 1.
PANA Issues and Resolutions
GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
Kumiko Ono End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-04 draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-03 Kumiko Ono.
Next Generation: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) RFC 2460
Huajin Jeng, Jeffrey Haas, Yakov Rekhter, Jeffrey Zhang
IETF#67 – 5-10 November 2006 FECFRAME requirements (draft-ietf-fecframe-req-01) Mark Watson.
NAT State Synchronization using SCSP draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-01
In-Band Authentication Extension for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) draft-bhatia-zhang-pim-auth-extension-00 Manav Bhatia
Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Peter Psenak Martin Pilka
NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-04
draft-ipdvb-sec-01.txt ULE Security Requirements
GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol draft-ietf-anima-grasp-08
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
BPSec: AD Review Comments and Responses
draft-ietf-bier-ipv6-requirements-01
Editors: Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen
Georgios Karagiannis, Tom Taylor, Kwok Chan, Michael Menth
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Presentation transcript:

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 2 Agenda Motivation Solution Changes since the last version Next step

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 3 Motivation Per FEC Framework, the FEC encoder and FEC decoder must have the common FEC Framework Configuration Information (FFCI) 1.Identification of Source Flow(s) 2.Identification of the repair flow(s) 3.Identification of FEC Scheme 4.Length of Source FEC payload ID 5.FEC Scheme Specific Information (FSSI)

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 4 Solution Dynamic signaling of the FEC Framework Configuration Information between FEC encoder (or sender) and decoders (or receivers). Two signaling methods (in section 4)- 1.Session Announcement Protocol for Multicasting 2.Individual application protocol for Unicasting; No dedicated protocol. FEC_Sender | | FEC_Receiver2 | | FEC_Sender1-----IP/MPLS network | FEC_Receiver11 | FEC_Receiver12 | FEC_Receiver13

Solution More details in additional slides.. draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 5

6 Changes since the last version Reviewed in detail during WGLC –Thanks to Ali Begen (16 comments) and Vincent Roca* (24 comments). They helped to improve the document greatly. Fixed Terminology, and few Editorial stuff.. Updated –Destination multicast IP address for IPv4 admin scope –hold timer to be 5x announcement interval Added the request for an RSTP option-tag for 'FEC protection required’ (section 4.2.2) Removed DSM-CC reference * Acknowledgement section needs to be updated

Changes since the last version One last outstanding Q Should the “time-interval” (section 4.1.1) be a user defined value or derived from a complex formula or both? Current prescription: –User defined value: MUST (deterministic value) –Complex formula: MAY (non-deterministic value) draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 7

8 Next Steps WGLC already ended, so proceed towards IESG review. More WG feedback is welcome

Additional Slides Taken from -00 slides presented at IETF 72 draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 9

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 10 Solution Details The solution can be utilized by any FEC scheme and/or any Content Delivery Protocol (CDP). Hence, it is independent of the –FEC scheme, –Content Delivery Protocol –Encoding format of the configuration information (for multicast).

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 11 Solution Detail Encoding Format Each instance of the FEC Framework must use a single encoding format to describe all of the configuration information (FFCI) associated with that instance. Whatever encoding format is selected for a particular FEC framework instance, it must be signaled to the receiver. –Enables correct parsing by the recipient.

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 12 Solution Detail Multicasting of Config Information Session Announcement Protocol (SAP) [RFC2974] is used to signal the FEC Framework Configuration Information (FFCI). –FEC sender acts as the SAP announcer –FEC receiver acts as the SAP listener SAP messages are sent UDP over IP to a well known UDP port (9875) and at least one well known multicast group IP address. –IPv4= (admin scope) or (global scope) –IPv6= FF0?:0:0:0:0:0:2:7FFE –IP TTL and DSCP values of SAP messages may be set by the sender. FEC sender doesn’t need to maintain any state per receiver.

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 13 Multicasting of Config Information Sender Procedure FEC sender periodically signals the FFCI for each FEC Framework instance ‘available’ at the sender –FFCI is placed in the SAP payload of Announcement message * See note | V=1 |A|R|T|E|C| auth len | msg id hash | | | : originating source (32 or 128 bits) : : : | optional authentication data | :.... : *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | optional payload type | | |0| | | | | : payload : | | The periodic interval* is sec (range) with default=60sec. Session can be deleted by SAP delete message or the purge-time expiry. Updated Purge time = 3 x announcement interval.

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 14 Multicasting of Config Information Receiver Procedure FEC receiver obtains the FFCI for each FEC Framework Instance from the payload of the received SAP announcements. –Creates an entry in the local SAP database, –Passes the FFCI to the ‘FEC Framework’ module. When a matching announcement is received the next time, the FEC receiver should reset the timer of the corresponding entry, to avoid it being purged. The purge time = 3 x announcement interval.

draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt 15 Solution Detail Unicasting of Config Information No dedicated protocol proposed for unicasting. The proposal is to enable the individual application protocol such as SIP, RTSP etc. to convey the desire to use FEC and exchange FFCI. –The offer/answer signaling, described in [RFC3264], is commonly utilized by many application protocols. Either FEC sender or FEC receiver conveys the desire to use FEC, and once agreed, they can exchange the FFCI. The draft includes text to describe SIP, RTSP etc. –Anything else?